Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
It's always reassuring when you read bullshit like this and realize that half of these people are either lazy teenage stoners or have the mentality of one (dude what do you mean I have to obey traffic signals and not play starfield while driving) and thus will never accomplish anything, and if they do it will be because of dark money from klaus schwab and bill gates and not their little movement.

Thankfully it looks like fuckCars is starting to reach the end of it's sigmoid curve of growth.

View attachment 5325651



Does the mythical "stroad" these urbanists obsess over even exist? The only time I ever encounter something like it is outside of those big strip malls where one of the corners has a hill with an olive garden or red lobster on it. But that's a strip mall, it doesn't have residential housing in it (like the s in "stroad" implies), it's outside of the city, and the same types businesses can be found inside of the city proper, so what exactly is the problem? That you can't cross the street with nothing on the other side of it?
That graph basically proves what I've already known: That most of the new traffic came from normies that were frustrated about their higher gas prices and were trying to find other solutions. The Ukraine War began in February of 2022 which drove the gas prices up, and their rise in popularity basically colleralates to that perfectly, with the real takeoff happening two months later in April of 2022. I can't imagine it's going to grow much more than that. The API protest likely did some serious damage to their growth, I distinctly recall they were one of the last to lift their protest that weren't just replaced by Spez's cronies outright. Not to mention the "slash tires to dab on da carbrains" crowd is getting really, really brazen, as is wont to happen when the far-left terminally online trannies put down stakes in your community. People will tolerate a lot of things, but no one outside of a deep blue full-brainworm city is going to sit there and smile while someone talks about destroying their property.
 
LMAO:
1694223086459.png
Source (Archive)

Also, an interesting old article:
This private information is unavailable to guests due to policies enforced by third-parties.
Source (Archive)
English Translation (Archive)

Ban the child killers!
 
Last edited:
getting off their bike and walking it for any reason.
A lot of those types can't do that, or at least can't do it easily. The pedals on serious roadbikes aren't pedals, they're basically the same type of locking hook you see on skis and bike shoes have little metal clips on the bottom to interface with them, it allows you to always have your shoe on the optimal place on the pedal for power while also allowing you to pull up on the pedal as well as push down so you aren't wasting movement while pedaling, it also makes the shoes very uncomfortable to walk in. And yes, people elect to make their bikes and shoes way less versatile like this and then ride them on public roads where they are less equipped to handle changing conditions. And yes, this is everyone else's fault.


I'm going to add a link to this article about how modern bicycles actually aren't environmentally friendly due to the rare materials and shipping needing to manufacture them too.

Bicycle-Pedal-Lock-Road-Bike-Bicycle-Self-Locking-Pad-Buckle-Pedal-Plywood-Group-Riding-Equipm...jpg
 
Last edited:
A lot of those types can't do that, or at least can't do it easily. The pedals on serious roadbikes aren't pedals, they're basically the same type of locking hook you see on skis and bike shoes have little metal clips on the bottom to interface with them, it allows you to always have your shoe on the optimal place on the pedal for power while also allowing you to pull up on the pedal as well as push down so you aren't wasting movement while pedaling, it also makes the shoes very uncomfortable to walk in. And yes, people elect to make their bikes and shoes way less versatile like this and then ride them on public roads where they are less equipped to handle changing conditions. And yes, this is everyone else's fault.


I'm going to add a link to this article about how modern bicycles actually aren't environmentally friendly due to the rare materials and shipping needing to manufacture them too.

View attachment 5328935

The MTB version of clips are a lot easier to slide in and out, also a lot easier to walk in as well. They are a happy compromise for riding in populated areas.
 
To be completely fair, I think you'll be hard pressed to find any bicycle commuters using clip-in pedals. They're more reserved for hobbyist stuff like mountain biking and competitive road riding, and even then most MTBers stick to platforms because the benefits of clips aren't as pronounced compared to the risks when riding in uneven terrain. Maybe some gravel bikers might run them but no way your average commuter is going to rock those.
 
To be completely fair, I think you'll be hard pressed to find any bicycle commuters using clip-in pedals. They're more reserved for hobbyist stuff like mountain biking and competitive road riding, and even then most MTBers stick to platforms because the benefits of clips aren't as pronounced compared to the risks when riding in uneven terrain. Maybe some gravel bikers might run them but no way your average commuter is going to rock those.
The MTB version of clips are a lot easier to slide in and out, also a lot easier to walk in as well. They are a happy compromise for riding in populated areas.
Both good points, I was overthinking things.
 
It must be Strong Towns or another of his ilk. A road is essentially any path used for transportation, but generally for vehicles. Streets are a subset of roads that have buildings on one or both sides. Stroad by any genuine definition is literally meaningless as all streets are fucking roads.

It is Strong Towns, the same genius who can't define suburbs between "lower density development" or "literally another adjacent town".

Basically the definition is "has driveways/street entrances" and "also fast". But how many does "have streets and driveways" and "fast" need to be?

Most urban "stroads" have posted signs of 35 mph, which is pretty normal for major throughfares, and most "stroads" anyway are just outgrowths of old highways, where commercial development clustered around the main street, which dates back to the 1920s. And how many driveways? When I go out of town, on the highways (which aren't grade separated) there are numerous outlets to county roads and tiny, ramshackle rural houses.

The fact that he can make up nonsense terms and expect to people to use them seriously is amazing to me. It's like trying to write about "NPCs" and then use that to trying to unironically argue a point.
 
Chris has many dysfunctions, inability to drive is (un)fortunately not one of them. He is a sheltered manchild with a weak grasp on reality, not a mush-brained vegetable that needs to be chauffeured everywhere.
It takes a lot to be incapable of driving. You can be missing your legs and still rig up hand controls to drive. That's the bar.
 
The stroad complaint is a real issue, a collector road with speeds above about 40mph that has many driveways per block, and people exiting and entering.

It was a really common design in the California expansion, where they made fuckwide roads with malls dumping right into them.

But of course they go autistic and nuts over it instead of just fixing it.
 
The stroad complaint is a real issue, a collector road with speeds above about 40mph that has many driveways per block, and people exiting and entering.

It was a really common design in the California expansion, where they made fuckwide roads with malls dumping right into them.

But of course they go autistic and nuts over it instead of just fixing it.
I don't even think it's the biggest issue in the world. Sure, it can be annoying going from 40 to getting into a parking lot, but that's what actually knowing how to drive and driving school is for. It's like playing a video game with a different controller than you're used to; don't be autistic, git gud scrub
 
Yeah it’s an issue for city planners not internet autists. Reducing the driveways to side streets and then controlling access on those streets reduces collisions and congestion, so the city should do that when expanding and redeveloping.

Which is all the more amusing because the super wide photos they always show are almost always collector roads correctly designed.
 
Yeah it’s an issue for city planners not internet autists. Reducing the driveways to side streets and then controlling access on those streets reduces collisions and congestion, so the city should do that when expanding and redeveloping.

Which is all the more amusing because the super wide photos they always show are almost always collector roads correctly designed.
At the end of the day, if you're a driver, you're responsible for dealing with the streets. Should the city planners have done better? Sure. But bitching non stop makes you look weak and like a pussy.
 
I’m a construction autist, when I see the big machines roll into town I always gotta go check out what they’re doing. There’s a reason that construction works are called improvements.

I guarantee the fuckcars idiots are always forefront in the NIMBY howling against and changes or improvements that aren’t the heckin’ train (and I bet they oppose those nearby too because fuck you I got mine).
 
The stroad complaint is a real issue, a collector road with speeds above about 40mph that has many driveways per block, and people exiting and entering.

It was a really common design in the California expansion, where they made fuckwide roads with malls dumping right into them.

But of course they go autistic and nuts over it instead of just fixing it.
That's the tragic thing about them, I find myself agreeing with the problems they bring up, but vehemently disagreeing with the conclusions they draw. They are correct when they say train travel in this country is in a sorry state, they are correct when they say cities need better public transit infrastructure, they are correct when they say government regulations force auto manufacturers to make trucks into gigantic land zeppelins. It's just that their solution more often than not is to chimp out and fling shit at the average car driver. But not the people that actually caused these issues of course.
 
Back