This happened his entire stream, another clip of him just running a red light and almost cycling into people crossing the street. This guy is truly retarded and should be protected against himself.
You mean a guy that spend most - all of his days on a computer watching YouTube , playing video games and talking to strangers has no concept of social norms?
So the Sidemen (group of Britbong YouTubers featuring KSI) had a charity football (soccer) stream with a lot of famous YouTubers and streamers such as Jidion, iShowSpeed, and of course, xQc. xQc was not very good.
xQc receives lowest rating in football.
Announcers take shots at xQc.
KSI throws, then Speed throws, then xQc throws.
xQc, 30 minutes in, catches his first ball.
xQc… mimics the kicker (???)
But it was all for a good cause, like I said before it was a charity, and they ended up raising over 3 million dollars. I have to say, good on xQc for once.
So, I did some lurking on one of the nitter instances and this was one of the things that popped up after looking up a Twitch streamer:
You didn’t read that wrong: Rolling Stone of all legacy magazines was getting in on the e-influencer craze and think they are the “most influential”. Granted, it doesn’t have some of the other ones that we talk on this thread, but the thought remains that RS is trying too hard to not think that they are not out of touch with what their magazine used to be known for.
Also, I thought Theo Von was a comedian, not an influencer. Who is this “list” supposed to be made for? It’s bad enough that they’re trying to ignore the fact that ”Dylan Mulvaney” legitimately bankrupted a beer company.
I also noticed that commenters were not too forgiving with the fact that this magazine is a literal shell of itself:
There were more comments like this, but the rest mocked RS for turning into a political rag that works for the same establishment that they used to mock when they had journalistic integrity. When they’re not too busy making embarrassing anti-Donald Trump articles and outright lying about other celebrities who happen to be for Trump or just against cancel culture overall, they now have to resort to making these “influencers” and “creators” have the image as if they speak for the rest of the world at large.
You didn’t read that wrong: Rolling Stone of all legacy magazines was getting in on the e-influencer craze and think they are the “most influential”. Granted, it doesn’t have some of the other ones that we talk on this thread, but the thought remains that RS is trying too hard to not think that they are not out of touch with what they’re magazine used to be known for.
Also, I thought Theo Von was a comedian, not an influencer. Who is this “list” supposed to be made for? It’s bad enough that they’re trying to ignore the fact that ”Dylan Mulvaney” legitimately bankrupted a beer company.
I also noticed that commenters were not too forgiving with the fact that this magazine is a literal shell of itself:
There were more comments like this, but the rest mocked RS for turning into a political rag that works for the same establishment that they used to mock when they had journalistic integrity. When they’re not too busy making embarrassing anti-Donald Trump articles and outright lying about other celebrities who happen to be for Trump or just against cancel culture overall, they now have to resort to making these “influencers” and “creators” have the image as if they speak for the rest of the world at large.
They lied about North Korea hacking their shit to astroturf that movie when it was just a disgruntled employee and some shit I.T. and the Obama Administration at the time was happy to go along and help push more globalist control of the internet.
Also could just be a random dude named Kim Jong Un. That would be funny.
