Race superiority is fucking dumb

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Pitbulls aren't scary, that's what rocks are for. If you're so scared of running into a scary black dude, carry a gun.

The matter isn't whether pitbulls are scary or not, it's if they have a propensity for killing people or not, and they do.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I owe niggers nothing. Not an acknowledgement, not anything. We fought a war and lost half a million soldiers to remove your ape peoples shackles. I owe you nothing, you filthy nigger

Who the fuck are you talking to? Who is "your" and "you"?

Oh, you mean me, whose great-grandfather was wounded at Gettysburg? Fuck off, you pretender.

100% my people have been in this country longer than yours, you mutt.

I said multicultural and millennia spanning, you stupid nigger. I said we inherited it from many cultures and made good decisions with it, building on the past. Niggers didn't even have the wheel.

Weak.

 

[Shidoen]

MUTT FIGHT MUTT FIGHT MUTT FIGHT

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Who the fuck are you talking to? Who is "your" and "you"?

I quoted your post didn't I nigger? Obviously you

Oh, you mean me, whose great-grandfather was wounded at Gettysburg? Fuck off, you pretender.

Giving massa a blowjob

100% my people have been in this country longer than yours, you mutt.


Weak.

Hahahahahaha niggers have nothing. They're so stupid.

You're welcome for giving you literacy, nigger. You're welcome for bringing you to civilization, nigger. Just remember to be grateful. Your people barely understands the wheel, let alone the big canoe that brought your black complaining nigger ass across the Atlantic.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I quoted your post didn't I nigger? Obviously you

Giving massa a blowjob

Hahahahahaha niggers have nothing. They're so stupid.

You're welcome for giving you literacy, nigger. You're welcome for bringing you to civilization, nigger. Just remember to be grateful. Your people barely understands the wheel, let alone the big canoe that brought your black complaining nigger ass across the Atlantic.

Tf is wrong with your brain? "My people" created this country, before it was even organized as a nation and fought to create that nation. I am whiter than all your great-grandmas. You, I suspect of being a mutt who doesn't even know who or where you came from. Fucking barnacle.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Tf is wrong with your brain? "My people" created this country, before it was even organized as a nation and fought to create that nation. I am whiter than all your great-grandmas. You, I suspect of being a mutt who doesn't even know who or where you came from. Fucking barnacle.

You built America in the same way all the other draught animals did. Your people were just beasts of burden. That's all they are now.

Again, you're welcome for literacy, nigger. You niggers certainly weren't going to discover it on your own.

 

[N Space]

@Friend of Dorothy Parker For some reason I can't neither reply nor quote your post, I suppose you blocked me or something but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it's my newfag ass not understanding the forum UI.

I see you got to page 13 of the 78 summary pages. The stat I assume you're referencing is for illicit drug use rates in those 12 and older.

Yes indeed, when people talk about 'drugs' they almost universally refer to illicit drugs, this apparently flew over your head when writing your reply.

To actually provide the info you alluded to, for illicit drug use in the last year*, Black people had a higher RATE**than white people by 1.2%. And Native American/Alaskan and multiracial folks' rates exceeded both.

This is a weak attempt at arguing semantics. Yes, consumption rate and amount of consumption aren't the same thing, the difference is irrelevant and you are just splitting hairs.

70.3% of white people 12 and older used alcohol in the last year, compared to 55.8% of Black people 12 and older (women lower in all populations).

As I alluded to earlier, alcohol isn't an illicit drug and isn't classified as a 'drug' in casual parlance so its inclusion here is irrelevant. Given that alcohol is regularly used without ill effect or addiction, only the alcohol use disorder statistic is relevant.

For meth, white people had a rate 3.33x higher than Black people (0.7% vs 0.2%). And Black women specifically tied for the lowest gender/race/ethnic group reported (0.1%).
White people outstripped Black people in rx misuse (4.2% vs 3.6%), both outdone by multiracial, Native American/Alaskan, Native Hawaiiam/Pacific Islander, and Hispanic/Latino populations.
White people out-used fent over every other group.

Fair points but of course those are drugs in particular, I talked about ALL drugs as a whole.

More white people than Black people had an alcohol use disorder. Men more than women. Overall, white people tied with Hispanic/Latinos in 3rd after native american/Alaskan and multiracial populations. 5th was native hawaiian/Pacific islanders, and 6th were Black people.

Why didn't you mention the percentages this time? Is it because the disparity isn't as large as you wanted to suggest? They are 5.8% for whites and 4.8% for blacks.

Despite the above about alcohol use disorders, the rates for seeking treatment among those who needed it were higher for Black people than white people.

How is this statistic relevant especially since alcohol isn't a 'drug'?

For substance use disorders overall, white people had a higher rate than Black people. Both Black men and Black women had lower rates than their white counterparts.

Again, when people talk about 'drugs' they mean 'illicit drugs'. Black people still have a higher (3.4%) illicit substance abuse disorder than white people (2.9%), moreover, treatment for such disorders is more prevalent for white people (23.5%) than black people (18.6%) though I don't think that last one is terribly important.

Christ. What was it you said? "cope, seethe and die"? Oh, yeah, that was it.

Despite your best efforts to the contrary, what I said was factually correct, niggers do in fact have a higher rate of illicit drug consumption than white people.

 

[Skeletonized Cow]

Stan already got doxed. She's literally just a middle of the road christian woman IIRC. Hardly a damming personal expose lol.

I somehow don't think I'm the first person to point this out, but seeing that her initials are MP, Miss Piggy is what she will be known as henceforth:
View attachment 5329971View attachment 5329973

Best argument against white supremacy right here is the fact that @Stan is white. Clearly no superior race could have produced such a specimen.


Jokes aside, I'm not really huge on racialism as a rule of thumb. Having been on the receiving end of "you belong to X demographic, ergo you're bad" a few too many times in my life, it feels quite hypocritical to turn around and slap it on other people. That being said, I'm not going to be a bleeding heart retard and start weeping every time the media screams "racism!" either. 99% of supposed racist incidents in this country could as easily be explained without racialism, and the continued insistence on doing so by the media reflects how TPTB are literally governing us in the same manner that colonial administrations in Africa were set up. Divide and conquer is being set up, a deliberate stoking of racialist thought to ensure that the people remain divided and cannot form a united front to oust the parasites on the top.

As to their being differences between the races, well, I honestly think we lack too much information to make a serious, informed decision. Too much propaganda and warped research exists around the topic of race these days, and when coupled with the confounding troubles (culture, economic status, etc.), I'd say it's impossible to fully determine what factors could actually and definitively be said to be down to race, if any.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

@Friend of Dorothy Parker For some reason I can't neither reply nor quote your post, I suppose you blocked me or something but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume it's my newfag ass not understanding the forum UI.

You're not blocked. If you highlighted a portion and still couldn't reply, that's a site or other issue, not down to me.

You built America in the same way all the other draught animals did. Your people were just beasts of burden. That's all they are now.

Again, you're welcome for literacy, nigger. You niggers certainly weren't going to discover it on your own.

In the supposed hierarchy, I am at the apex. What did your people - and specifically you - do to build this country?

This is a weak attempt at arguing semantics. Yes, consumption rate and amount of consumption aren't the same thing, the difference is irrelevant and you are just splitting hairs.

Not semantics. I am not making an argument, merely relating statistics. You did not.

As I alluded to earlier, alcohol isn't an illicit drug and isn't classified as a 'drug' in casual parlance so its inclusion here is irrelevant. Given that alcohol is regularly used without ill effect or addiction, only the alcohol use disorder statistic is relevant.

It was in the source you provided. And I provided the reported disorder stats above.

Fair points but of course those are drugs in particular, I talked about ALL drugs as a whole.

Yes, but you picked one stat of a score+, which is either sloppy or disingenuous.

Why didn't you mention the percentages this time? Is it because the disparity isn't as large as you wanted to suggest? They are 5.8% for whites and 4.8% for blacks.

I stopped repeating stat numbers after the first one or two because they're in evidence in the report. And I got bored of doing the homework you should have done when posting. I did assess each one, and if you review, you'll see where I noted other narrow margins, etc. But it was on you, as the profferer, to have provided the details. You didn't, and instead cherry-picked (and didn't even give numbers or relative siting among groups, even for the one stat you referred to). Please don't suggest I'm being disingenuous when you provided absolute ZERO as far as numbers.

when people talk about 'drugs' they mean 'illicit drugs'.

Not sure where you've been for the last 15+ years, but abuse of rx drugs is a massive issue in America.

How is this statistic relevant especially since alcohol isn't a 'drug'?

Again, just another stat, but it goes to effort to drop addictions. If you're unfamiliar with the effects of alcohol addiction and the costs of it, I encourage you to investigate.

Despite your best efforts to the contrary, what I said was factually correct, niggers do in fact have a higher rate of illicit drug consumption than white people.

By a 1.2% differential (and btw, if you do the numbers (extrapolate to population), that translates into a lot more white people contributing to a societal ill than Black people).

And your original comment was about "drugs," not "illicit drugs". So, no, you did not say what you think you said. Sorry!

All I did was open the fucking document you offered up as proof of...something. All the info was right there. I won't speculate on why you didn't look a few pages further or why it's important for you to grab onto one (the first) of 30 statistics in there. That's for you to (hopefully) consider. But the facts are the facts, and the facts are that your initial dunk was anything but.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

In the supposed hierarchy, I am at the apex. What did your people - and specifically you - do to build this country?

Hahhahaahhahahaa oh my sides. A nigger at the apex.

Look, if you don't want to be grateful to Whites for such things as literacy, the wheel, and not fucking castrating your worthless nigger ancestors like the Arabs did, and not fucking continuing the slave trade to today, then you can at least not hate us. It's not our fault that you spent thousands of years perfecting the mud hut, grass skirt, nudity, wooden spears and and not learning how to write, or how to leave Africa, or what the fucking wheel is. Its not my fault your monkey ass peoples did and discovered nothing, and you're all butthurt about it. Go kill some niggers if you're so mad about it.

It's impossible to know which race is the absolute best, but we know who the worst ones are: niggers (you!), pajeets, and ooga-boogas.

 

[Noble Redditor]

When this thread started I didn't understand how the conversation could lead to people being doxed. Now I see that it only took a dozen pages for people to start voluntarily posting their entire family lineage to prove that they aren't racist.

 

[Shidoen]

When this thread started I didn't understand how the conversation could lead to people being doxed. Now I see that it only took a dozen pages for people to start voluntarily posting their entire family lineage to prove that they aren't racist.

I love it

 

[Mewtwo_Rain]

Actually yes. The most violent organism on the planet is Man. We have started wars over fucking buckets. Those were white Europeans, that went ape over a tin water receptacle. Every race has a equal capacity for violence and as such, retarded violence

Potential is not the same as actually living up to that potential, and even how that violence is portrayed among groups is often different. Even perception of certain races towards other races. IE: Many Japanese manga artists have a positive perception of wars waged by white people in quite a few manga while certain races shriek "Colonialism"

Brother, no black man has ever touched my wallet at a Dennys bathroom. They eat the undercooked eggs and hashbrowns and leave. They piss like the rest of us.

My pets piss too, as do wild animals, and they bleed red as well. That doesn't make us the same even if we as humans are closer despite our differences in race/sex/ethnicity. Not all blacks are criminals but ratio wise they are more likely to be ratio wise.

Jokes aside, I'm not really huge on racialism as a rule of thumb. Having been on the receiving end of "you belong to X demographic, ergo you're bad" a few too many times in my life, it feels quite hypocritical to turn around and slap it on other people. That being said, I'm not going to be a bleeding heart retard and start weeping every time the media screams "racism!" either. 99% of supposed racist incidents in this country could as easily be explained without racialism, and the continued insistence on doing so by the media reflects how TPTB are literally governing us in the same manner that colonial administrations in Africa were set up. Divide and conquer is being set up, a deliberate stoking of racialist thought to ensure that the people remain divided and cannot form a united front to oust the parasites on the top.

I don't think that's the same as race realism or "racialism." Certain behaviors are attributed to certain races because it's very common. (Including to certain genetics, behaviors, moods, etc.) Doesn't apply one shoe fits all but more common than not. Too many think you have to be a full on white supremacist to believe in it and it is nonsense. Heavily mixed race people notice it often, many minorities notice it, it's fear that pervades the discussion and political gain (optics/benefits) that keeps people from letting loose the truth or perception of being harshly judged.

s to their being differences between the races, well, I honestly think we lack too much information to make a serious, informed decision. Too much propaganda and warped research exists around the topic of race these days, and when coupled with the confounding troubles (culture, economic status, etc.), I'd say it's impossible to fully determine what factors could actually and definitively be said to be down to race, if any.

It's very apparent many people know there are racial differences just as there are sexual differences, it's just most people due to fear of either A) Being called racist (Especially if you are white) and B) Political expedience/benefits of the lie keeps people from being honest. I know because I've had this discussion with many minorities (republican AND liberal) and many have admitted they just don't want "racist using that against their race if it turns out they have some inferiority as a race." Which makes me question those same people at least on the right wing side for being manipulators to their fellow republicans who do not share the same lineage.

We can ascertain those other mentions do cause a factor to some degree, but so does genetics and race and ethnicity. (Sex/Race/Ethnicity/biological background/mutations/etc.)

 

[Death of an Ego]

Well, this thread has been a fun read. Thanks, kiwis!

 

[Mothra1988]

Actually yes. The most violent organism on the planet is Man. We have started wars over fucking buckets. Those were white Europeans, that went ape over a tin water receptacle. Every race has a equal capacity for violence and as such, retarded violence

You're a Mormon, and according to your own religion, black people are supposed to be space demons without souls:

 

[DeadwastePrime]

agreed, however, you forget what website you're on and as such,

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

I think there was a country that tried that, but it didn’t work out so well. Rhymes with “mouth paprika.”

True, Apartheid did not work well in South Africa, but abandoning Apartheid has not worked well for South Africa either, with the country fast becoming a failed state like Zimbabwe.

Maybe the real mistake in both cases, was to think that a civilized country of civilized people, would work with millions of low-IQ Africans in it. The average IQ in SA is in the low seventies. How can you possibly fix that?

And there is a different kind of apartheid that has worked very well, the apartheid of the nation state. Meaning, England for the English, Norway for the Norwegians, Poland for the Poles. and Africa for Africans. Ethnostates, in other words. I don't see any reason why, say, the Swedes should put up with a majority of rapes in Sweden being commited by animalistic brown foreigners, who despise the native swedes and contribute nothing but violence and entitlement. Better to deport them all in 20-foot containers.

And as I said elsewhere, I wish black people all the best. But from distance. In their own countries. Its time for them to pack their backs.

 

[Stan]

Don’t think if you wrong me I’ll feel any guilt for the actions I would need to take.

You talk like a Bond villain. It’s a little bit silly.

England for the English,

Ok stop right there. Who are “the English”? Are they the Saxons that came from the continent? The Celtic people living their before? We’re the old Roman governors “English” or are they Roman? If you’re black and born in England, and your parents were too, where are you supposed to pack your bags and go back to?

Very few countries make viable ethnostates, and a country that can do this tends to be small. Japan for Japanese, Iceland for Icelanders, all well and good, but China isn’t racially homogenous, neither is Russia, and Europe has traded genes across nations so frequently in the last two generations that “France for the French” or “Germany for Germans” are just incoherent statements at best. Either everyone who’s a citizen would remain one, or nobody is a citizen. There are no pure-bloods, not even in Japan (those people emigrated from China, exporting Song-dynasty era culture and the Chinese system of writing.)

The statement is totally unworkable in the States. The US is a nation comprised almost entirely of immigrants of one vintage or another. If you tried to make them all leave, you’d be emptying out the US population. England, France, Germany, Italy; ditto. Are they mad the Turks came in and settled during the rebuilding effort? Yeah, but the Turks actually helped with rebuilding the nation.

Anyway, last time I was there, there were a vanishingly tiny number of black people in every country that wasn’t England or France, where blacks are slightly more common, but still less common than the 1:5 ratio we see in the US. So you’re trying to solve a problem that barely registers with an unworkable solution.

Add to that the fact that most violence is intraracial (whites vs whites, etc.) and I doubt that even if you could coherently sort people into their “proper” country, it would have a minimal impact on crime.

 

[Otis Mallebrok]

Ok stop right there. Who are “the English”? Are they the Saxons that came from the continent? The Celtic people living their before? We’re the old Roman governors “English” or are they Roman? If you’re black and born in England, and your parents were too, where are you supposed to pack your bags and go back to?

Yes to all of them. The English are the native people of England. Black people mostly came from somewhere else. Most of them have their own enthnicities, and people there know the difference. And I do not care where they would go. Not my circus, not my problem.

Very few countries make viable ethnostates, and a country that can do this tends to be small. Japan for Japanese, Iceland for Icelanders, all well and good, but China isn’t racially homogenous, neither is Russia, and Europe has traded genes across nations so frequently in the last two generations that “France for the French” or “Germany for Germans” are just incoherent statements at best. Either everyone who’s a citizen would remain one, or nobody is a citizen. There are no pure-bloods, not even in Japan (those people emigrated from China, exporting Song-dynasty era culture and the Chinese system of writing.)

Japan is not small. Its a viable ethnostate, because the rulers want it that way. Germany for the Germans and France for the French, are very coherent statements. There is such a thing as a native ethnic Germans, and a native ethnic Frenchmans, and a lot of the inhabitants of either country are neither, citizenship or not. If foreigners and foreigner born people were deported from Germany and France tomorrow, crime would absolutely plummet, school performance would skyrocket and a million social ills would be automatically solved, and cars and churches would no longer spontaneously combust every other fucking day.

And yes, it might not work for the US. Thats a problem for the Americans to deal with.

But still, allowing melanated people to walk freely around unteethered outside of the zoo, seems to lead directly to your wife or daughter being gang-raped or your son stabbed. I think it is an irrational policy. I consider it monkey appeasement.

 

[RollerGator]

The statement is totally unworkable in the States. The US is a nation comprised almost entirely of immigrants of one vintage or another. If you tried to make them all leave, you’d be emptying out the US population.

We will settle for kicking out just the niggers. You won't hear any complaints from the Hispanics, Asians, Indians, or Arabs either because they all hate niggers too. I wonder why all these different groups hate niggers equally as much as those white supremacists you're obsessed with.