Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

[Matt Damon]

Death to all gender war promoters

You may not be interested in gender war, but gender war is interested in YOU.

 

[SuperShibuyaFighter]

Do they not understand that insults lose a lot of their sting when the other person is clearly emotional and acting irrationally?

"Yep, tiny baby dick. Lame in the sack. Probably secret gay. That really cuts deep - anything else?"

That really explains this from yesterday in the pick me thread


The faggotry of publicly announcing a block/ignore aside, I found it hilarious she said this as if I'd be devastated some stupid femcel put me on ignore.

She definitely had people IRL (probably backstabbing female friends) block and mute her and it traumatized her lol

 

[KittyGremlin]

M8, I haven't even been using the "women's area" since I promised Lidl Drip not to shit up her thread. That's where the story ends for me.

I know who else uses womens areas

 

[Lurker]

Josh, that's just ridiculous. Disagreeing with a woman is not a "fetish" for being crass "specifically to make them uncomfortable".

If the standard is "no disagreeing with women in the man-hate thread", then so be it. But let's make it explicit so we're all on the same page, rather than characterizing anyone who dares to do it as a sex pest.

>be male and go into area designated for women
>"not a sex pest"

learn when you're not wanted.

 

[Omen_Sulk]

Josh, that's just ridiculous. Disagreeing with a woman is not a "fetish" for being crass "specifically to make them uncomfortable".

If the standard is "no disagreeing with women in the man-hate thread", then so be it. But let's make it explicit so we're all on the same page, rather than characterizing anyone who dares to do it as a sex pest.

They are from LCF, getting uncomfortable around Men is what they do.

 

[Matt Damon]

We have the whole damn world. Think of the wamen.

And remember, if they disagree with us anywhere in the rest of the world, they're intentionally invading our space to make us uncomfortable.

It's a creepy sex fetish.

 

[Kalsarikännit]

And remember, if they disagree with us anywhere in the rest of the world, they're intentionally invading our space to make us uncomfortable.

It's a creepy sex fetish.

 

[Kermit Jizz]

I haven't lodged a single report or PM. So apparently this explosiveness is all happening behind the scenes as Matt Damon theorized. Many of us have no idea whats going on. We are largely clueless. That's why we sit in here theorizing. Props for your work though.

I'm in this boat. I've been fairly inactive the past few weeks, and now there's this special thread where it looks like people are getting banned for thing they said in other threads, dear feeder is fucking pissed, and as someone mostly out of the loop it's just a confusing clusterfuck to look at.

Here's the rundown: if you post there to act like a faggot and cry, I will delete your posts and boardban you from the BP so you stop.

>area for women
>go into women's area to make women uncomfortable
>get banned from women's area
>cry about it

This is what's confusing me, I'm seeing mixed messages. On one hand I fully understand and can respect not going into a thread and shitting it up, that's a standard rule for the forum. I've seen some of those retards doing that today, and they should rightfully be thread banned.

On the other hand (unless I missed some of his posts) @Matt Damon appeared to be completely respectful and non disruptive over there. So is the rule just flat out no male posters in that thread?

The whole thing is just a muddy mess from my perspective, and I imagine for anyone else not following the drama as well.

 

[The Heartthrob]

>be male and go into area designated for women
>"not a sex pest"

learn when you're not wanted.

It's so creepy, ew.

 

[Unremarkable Anus Lover]

Shoutouts to @Lidl Drip for creating the Man-Hate thread knowing fully well it was gonna cause a shitstorm. Well played, dude.

 

[Matt Damon]

On the other hand (unless I missed some of his posts) @Matt Damon appeared to be completely respectful and non disruptive over there. So is this rule just flat out no male posters in that thread?

The implied standard is whether Josh gets reports. If you say something one of them doesn't agree with, no matter how cordially or fairly, you'll be banned.

I get it now. I'm a little autistic, so I didn't pick up on the subtle nuance, but now I'm up to speed.

 

[decline]

The whole thing is just a muddy mess from my perspective, and I imagine for anyone else not following the drama as well.

It is a muddy mess even for us that follow the drama, try to anyway.

Imo all could be solved by simply fusing all the hate threats into one, undoing all the senseless bannus and tell the involved to liberally make use of the ignore feature or get lost. Unless the posts are against the law obviously.

 

[Omen_Sulk]

On the other hand (unless I missed some of his posts) @Matt Damon appeared to be completely respectful and non disruptive over there. So is this rule just flat out no male posters in that thread?

My understanding is, Salon is the designated Feminist space on the site. Making Women uncomfortable. Shitting up the thread, or even disagreeing is subject to a ban from Salon. If you are going to post there it's to be content only as a guy. Do not touch or look directly at the Women.

If you catch one outside of Salon however, you are free to blast her in the face when she makes some dumb comment.

 

[decline]

The implied standard is whether Josh gets reports. If you say something one of them doesn't agree with, no matter how cordially or fairly, you'll be banned.

They abused the rating system and when that didn't have the desired effect they started abusing the report feature.

 

[Diamond Homonculus]

You see you aren't alowed to give ratings in that thread cause its rape but they are allowed to rate this thread because...???

 

[Kalsarikännit]

View attachment 5336539
You see you aren't alowed to give ratings in that thread cause its rape but they are allowed to rate this thread because...???

board bans disable your ability to rate, not thread bans

 

[Matt Damon]

You see you aren't alowed to give ratings in that thread cause its rape but they are allowed to rate this thread because...???

Stop making women uncomfortable, pervert!

 

[Null]

So is the rule just flat out no male posters in that thread?

There is a 0% chance that he was trying to just make friendly conversation, give me a fucking break. He's been bitching about the thread for weeks at this point and I'm not going to give him the benefit of a doubt because he doesn't deserve it.

And at this point with the number of people anally devastated over the thread, yeah, your best bet is to just avoid it.

 

[The Heartthrob]

View attachment 5336539
You see you aren't alowed to give ratings in that thread cause its rape but they are allowed to rate this thread because...???

Because none of them are banned from off-topic. They're just thread banned. The idea that anyone banned from the man-hate thread will destroy deathfats or stinkditch is autistic.

 

[Diamond Homonculus]

board bans disable your ability to rate, not thread bans

Oh phew thats so much more reasonable that people are being given board wide bans for making innocent posts in one thread. I was worried there for a minute.