Thoughts on conservatives who say "Nobody cares about gay people, it's the trans stuff we're against"?

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
I've never been a fan of homosexuality. I'd always found their movement obnoxious and instinctively "off" and "weaselly". Then I found Web 1.0 gay sites from before they used to obscure the quiet parts of their goal and my view of them only grew dimmer.
There's always been a strange hypocracy surrounding it. I remember my parents refusing me adult movies and video games but then turning around and wanting to take me to a gay fetish parade to "educate" me. We've got an entire field of medical science that exists solely because they refuse to wear a fucking rubber.
At this point, I am fully willing for laws to be passed against it. That's harsh and obviously won't stomp it out but that's not really the point. It sets a precedent. It sends a message.
"I don't actually care what you do but if you step out of line and make a problem of it we will see that you are punished and made an example of"
Now obviously this used to be the norm and there were problems with it being fairly enforced but I like the idea behind it.
Is this an overreaction? Well, I don't like having to set up a morality police but we really must have a solution to the homosexual question.
My untested un-thought-out "fairer" solution is thus: If we are to live in a society where homosexuality isn't criminal, we absolutely MUST educate everyone (put it in the school curriculum) about all the sex crimes their leading figures have either endorsed or commited. We must REFUSE to hold any double standards for them and stop coddling them for fucking sake.
 
I know that some of you are big fags, but the whole gay lifestyle thing is concerning because we don't know how it really affects adopted children (and no one wants to take responsibility and research it) and because most countries forbid any research into gay genes. If there is a gay gene, wouldn't it benefit all humankind if we remove it from the future generations?
 
Counterpoint: Scott weimer and the laws he’s got / getting through: decriminalising knowing transmission of HIV, allowing the state to take your kids if you don’t troon them out/ putting the concept of a willing minor into law in the context of decriminalisation of sodomy of children. All laws driven by his lifestyle.
This stuff is a slippery slope. What benefits the individual isn’t always good for society. All sexual degeneracy needs to be frowned on. Does that suck for anyone same sex attracted who is monogamous? Yes it does.
Most societies have taboos, and we are just removing them without asking why they are there in the first place. Never take a fence down unless you know why it was put up.
The reason they say it is because if you’re against gays in any way you can be done for hate speech or shut down on that basis before anyone hears the argument. It’s the verbal equivalence of lambs blood on the lintel
The autistic guys here will never have sex with you.
 
It's because they are morally bankrupt. L, G, B, and T are one. Sexual deviancy is one, unitary body of perversion. Polymorphous Perversity is the undergirding characteristic of all L, G, B, and T swine. The faggots try to feel superior to the trannies, but they all serve Satan.

It would be ethical and caring to impose the death penalty for homosexuality. Any faggot who is capable of rationality would, if the threat of death loomed, cease to participate in those activities. How can a man trade his life, his precious life, for anus? Any faggots whose reason had not been entirely corrupted by depravity would cease their activities upon the imposition of capital punishment. Those who persisted in the face of such punishment would, accordingly, deserve the punishment.

If a faggot chooses to commit faggotry within a regime in which aforesaid faggotry ends in death, it's simply a case of 41%ing. At that point it's not even the government killing the faggot; it's the faggot killing himself. No real loss.
 
It would be ethical and caring to impose the death penalty for homosexuality. Any faggot who is capable of rationality would, if the threat of death loomed, cease to participate in those activities. How can a man trade his life, his precious life, for anus? Any faggots whose reason had not been entirely corrupted by depravity would cease their activities upon the imposition of capital punishment. Those who persisted in the face of such punishment would, accordingly, deserve the punishment.

If a faggot chooses to commit faggotry within a regime in which aforesaid faggotry ends in death, it's simply a case of 41%ing. At that point it's not even the government killing the faggot; it's the faggot killing himself. No real loss.
Gay Gom Jabbar :)
 
I agree with them, so do most sane people.
It's not the LGB that is responsible for the weird shit that is destroying the West right now.
It's the TQ+ that attached itself to the gay acceptance movement back in the 2000's and the uber tolerant dummies fell for it..
Get rid of the TQ+ completely and things will get back to normal.
 
Do not call yourself a conservative. What a limp-wristed term to describe yourself, seriously who convinced you to pronounce yourself so impotently?. And what the fuck did you even conserve? Everything's changed over the past couple decades.
The way I've seen faggots blatantly and maliciously twist our language with stuff like "gender-affirming care (mutilation=/=care)" and "homo-phobia (fear=/=dislike)" leads me to believe that those who took to calling themselves "conservatives" fell for the same trick a long time ago.

"Conserving" is bait. Enact the change you want to see. Never compromise.
 
It's pretty much the meme of "conservatives never conserving anything" and "conservatives are democrats from a decade ago". The ones most in fault are the ones that changed their opinion for political reasons. But there are a lot of fault at conservatives who buys into the idea that "gay culture" is an acceptable thing in any possible way, as it is incredibly toxic tor everyone around.

Gays are disgusting and the only time they should show affection is in a closed space. And don't get me started on the insanity of letting them raise a child.
 
anybody who is disgusted by troons but thinks gays are based is being extremely short-sighted. like many in the thread have already stated, the two are intrinsically linked. I say this as somebody with multiple gay relatives whom I have a good relationship with, I'm not a judgmental person IRL and I won't throw somebody out of my life because I disagree with their lifestyle choices unless it's harmful to me. however, if there are any neurotypical gay people, I haven't met them. in my experience, homosexuality always comes with a laundry list of other neurotic personality features and/or traumatic formative events. even if you do know one or more "normal" gay people, you can't deny that the gay subculture itself has fomented and unleashed all sorts of perversions on polite society, and that, when concentrated in numbers, the things that manifest as just regular parts of gay culture are shocking to anybody who either doesn't have their head firmly planted in the sand or isn't completely jaded to it. if you don't believe me, find the hottest gay bar in your town, or any place where gay culture is concentrated most powerfully, and go as undercover as you can. they'll probably clock you easily because the mask-off gay vibe is extremely distinct from anything you're putting out if you're not a sexual deviant, and you'll feel it immediately if you just sit among them and watch. these are not your people. the shit they do amongst their own is a lot fucking different from how the average homosexual comports themselves in the daylight.

"LGBTQIA2S+" should be seen as a correlated progression of increasingly degenerate sexual delusions.

And what individuals do DOES affect everyone else.

this. I try to explain this to people so often but everyone is unconsciously stapled to the "I don't care what other people do in their bedrooms" ideology partially out of a defensive fear that if they open that door then they're inviting that kind of judgment on themselves even if they're completely vanilla. and I understand that fear to be sure. but it is rhetorically dishonest. this is one of the demonstrative lines of reasoning I use:

say we accept transgenderism as completely valid based on the idea that we're not qualified to judge others' lived experiences, and we take their claims at face value. that means
1. gender identity is something that exists outside of biology and happens independent of biological sexual development;
2. the mismatch of physical and psychological gender - dysphoria - is a horrible, involuntary suffering that can be cured by transitioning;
3. since psychological gender is inborn, the awakening of an individual to their true identity is something that can occur at any age.
therefore:
1. everyone should should be monitoring themselves for signs of their psychological gender manifesting;
2. in the case that somebody's psychological gender manifests as different from their biological gender, swift action must be taken to spare them the profound pain of dysphoria;
3. even though the tools we have to enable transition are crude, the unfortunate side effects are worth it so that trans people can experience the relief of living in the right body, which is taken for granted by cisgender people.
finally:
1. since psychological gender exists before biological gender completely manifests, and biological sexual development can be altered, it is ideal for psychological gender to manifest before puberty so that corrective action can be taken as soon as possible;
2. in order to promote the early manifestation of psychological gender, children should be gently introduced to various situations that encourage gender expression;
3. although various behavioral markers can be attributed to gender identity, all gender ultimately expresses itself sexually;
4. therefore, it is acceptable and even prudent to introduce children to sexual situations.
arbitrarily accepting transgenderism is valid promotes child sex abuse. QED.

most people just handwave out about halfway through with some half-assed dismissal like "I don't agree with that" like the fact that they don't endorse where the logic leads means it's somebody else's problem. but just look at these headlines:
Lexington Public Schools teaches elementary students lessons about gender identity; provides training to teachers about toddlers who show racism
School board votes to fire teacher who read book on gender identity to Georgia fifth-graders
Utah elementary students asked about gender pronouns in 'About Me' survey
No Constitutional Right to Opt out of Sexual-Minority-Themed Curriculum Elements at Public Elementary School

there is a visible, demonstrable link between enabling degeneracy and increasing social peril. it's not secret. we are currently in the "if it is happening, it's good" part of the propaganda cycle. I found these articles just by searching for "elementary gender" on Google News. they're all on the first page of results. the fact that it's not your problem today does not mean it will remain so forever. the dildo of consequences may already be in the mail, and you won't know until it's already on your doorstep.
 
To be honest, this going to be a shit whole disaster. But this a consequence of ignorance. Look, this going to make homophobic when the trans activists ruining everthing about comun sense. For me i'm neutral of this but the think is depressing me is brainwash minors to do that. I try to be most realistic on these situation.

Even the normal gays and other normal trans people are shamed how the comunity got screw up with "maps".
 
I don't hate them, I tolerate fags. However gay culture is incredibly cringe. I don't think it's "cute" or "based" when they talk about how much cock they get or how those heckin heterosexuals have basic bitch tastes. Call me naive, but I generally just dislike their incredibly degenerate behavior, although I imagine not all of them are like that. In any case the degeneracy should definitely be shamed and ridiculed, as publicly and loudly as possible, instead of celebrating it just to look tolerant.
 
Back