anybody who is disgusted by troons but thinks gays are based is being extremely short-sighted. like many in the thread have already stated, the two are intrinsically linked. I say this as somebody with multiple gay relatives whom I have a good relationship with, I'm not a judgmental person IRL and I won't throw somebody out of my life because I disagree with their lifestyle choices unless it's harmful to me. however, if there are any neurotypical gay people, I haven't met them. in my experience, homosexuality always comes with a laundry list of other neurotic personality features and/or traumatic formative events. even if you do know one or more "normal" gay people, you can't deny that the gay subculture itself has fomented and unleashed all sorts of perversions on polite society, and that, when concentrated in numbers, the things that manifest as just regular parts of gay culture are shocking to anybody who either doesn't have their head firmly planted in the sand or isn't completely jaded to it. if you don't believe me, find the hottest gay bar in your town, or any place where gay culture is concentrated most powerfully, and go as undercover as you can. they'll probably clock you easily because the mask-off gay vibe is extremely distinct from anything you're putting out if you're not a sexual deviant, and you'll feel it immediately if you just sit among them and watch. these are not your people. the shit they do amongst their own is a lot fucking different from how the average homosexual comports themselves in the daylight.
"LGBTQIA2S+" should be seen as a correlated progression of increasingly degenerate sexual delusions.
And what individuals do DOES affect everyone else.
this. I try to explain this to people so often but everyone is unconsciously stapled to the "I don't care what other people do in their bedrooms" ideology partially out of a defensive fear that if they open that door then they're inviting that kind of judgment on themselves even if they're completely vanilla. and I understand that fear to be sure. but it is rhetorically dishonest. this is one of the demonstrative lines of reasoning I use:
say we accept transgenderism as completely valid based on the idea that we're not qualified to judge others' lived experiences, and we take their claims at face value. that means
1. gender identity is something that exists outside of biology and happens independent of biological sexual development;
2. the mismatch of physical and psychological gender - dysphoria - is a horrible, involuntary suffering that can be cured by transitioning;
3. since psychological gender is inborn, the awakening of an individual to their true identity is something that can occur at any age.
therefore:
1. everyone should should be monitoring themselves for signs of their psychological gender manifesting;
2. in the case that somebody's psychological gender manifests as different from their biological gender, swift action must be taken to spare them the profound pain of dysphoria;
3. even though the tools we have to enable transition are crude, the unfortunate side effects are worth it so that trans people can experience the relief of living in the right body, which is taken for granted by cisgender people.
finally:
1. since psychological gender exists before biological gender completely manifests, and biological sexual development can be altered, it is ideal for psychological gender to manifest before puberty so that corrective action can be taken as soon as possible;
2. in order to promote the early manifestation of psychological gender, children should be gently introduced to various situations that encourage gender expression;
3. although various behavioral markers can be attributed to gender identity, all gender ultimately expresses itself sexually;
4. therefore, it is acceptable and even prudent to introduce children to sexual situations.
arbitrarily accepting transgenderism is valid promotes child sex abuse. QED.
most people just handwave out about halfway through with some half-assed dismissal like "I don't agree with that" like the fact that they don't endorse where the logic leads means it's somebody else's problem. but just look at these headlines:
Lexington Public Schools teaches elementary students lessons about gender identity; provides training to teachers about toddlers who show racism
School board votes to fire teacher who read book on gender identity to Georgia fifth-graders
Utah elementary students asked about gender pronouns in 'About Me' survey
No Constitutional Right to Opt out of Sexual-Minority-Themed Curriculum Elements at Public Elementary School
there is a visible, demonstrable link between enabling degeneracy and increasing social peril. it's not secret. we are currently in the "if it is happening, it's good" part of the propaganda cycle. I found these articles just by searching for "elementary gender" on Google News. they're all on the first page of results. the fact that it's not your problem today does not mean it will remain so forever. the dildo of consequences may already be in the mail, and you won't know until it's already on your doorstep.