Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

The thing about step one is fixing any addiction requires the person to want to change. This is universal in any recovery method and it's a big hurdle to clear. I think he would have bigger problems with how easy it is for AA to turn into a groupthink hugbox. Think Locals chat but no external observers/commenters to challenge him. The biggest concern would be the "13th step" i.e. hooking up with a fellow addict. I can very easily see even worse degeneracy filling the void left behind if he sobers up.

Honestly, most people I know who went to AA* typically just made a few friends and carried on by going cold turkey forever. I had a friend of a friend who got worried when he saw me making an Irish Stew for a St. Patrick’s Day dinner and I used a can of stout and that was mildly annoying, but I can understand the fear.

*basically everyone I know who went to AA went willingly after a relative confided in them that they had a problem or more than one family member called them out. I don’t think Nick has anyone like that. Nick is basically isolated from everyone.
I honestly think both Nick and Kayla isolated themselves from everyone they could.

 

[ReverendVerse]

Apparently, someone in Nick's Locals chat confirmed that the brunch that Nick was going to do today did not happen.

Sounds about right.

 

[Captain Manning]

On of the few things I'm actual grateful to Nick for is introducing me to lawyers who aren't hypocritical faggots like he eventually transformed into, like Sean, Branca, Gosney, Nate, Jew Nierman, etc.

Sean seems okay. I'm not a fan of Branca.

I get definite grifter vibes off Branca. From what I understand, he predominately markets a self defense legal education product towards the LEO community. Which I think might cloud his judgement in a lot of cases, and lead to a similar situation to Rekieta where he's not as smart as he portrays. For example, he was dead wrong on George Floyd and Atatiana Jefferson cases.

Branca seems like the type of guy that would shamelessly defend a police officer mag dumping a baby by claiming the baby "aggressively crawled" towards the officer. He seems like the type of guy where, if you followed his advice, you'd be staring down the barrel of a capital murder conviction.

Also, people have stated here he's got a weird problem with women, and is pussy whipped by his wife.

Sean, OTOH, seems cool. I think a lot of that has to do with the fact law is his day job, and Youtube is secondary. Hopefully he keeps it that way, because otherwise he could end up just like Nick with an overinflated ego. The fact that he's willing to state Rekieta's appeal chances are slim to none is a good sign. It means he's not going to to be dishonest just for the sake of e-friends or Youtube politics. Issuing a retraction to Monty shows integrity as well.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

I once heard a legit alcoholic say, “I envy people who can drink safely. If I could drink normally, I’d do it every day.” She wasn’t trying to be clever.

Fuckin' same bro, some people just need to stay away from it.

 

[arc minsk]

I actually kinda want to see the contract renewed in nick's favor tbh. Because currently whenever the switch happens, his rumble live view count more than doubles. It's actually very in line with the multiplier theory if a good portion of his youtube viewers has to switch to rumble and rumble multiplies it when they do. Without the multiplier, it's looking like the real live numbers pre switch was 1200 yt, 300-500 rumble, and then when the yt switch happens it becomes 1500ish rumble (6000 on multiplier).

Now, as for why I want to see it renewed...I'm thinking nick would end up streaming to at 300-500 rumble live viewers (2000ish with the multiplier) and that's it. Since he doesn't start on youtube, people just don't visit his channel (is my hope). Nick would just see an immediate drop from 6000 that he's thinking he should be getting to just 2000 and under. He'll just start coping.

OTOH, if he doesn't renew, he'll just dual stream on yt and rumble and rumble numbers will strangely never go past 2000ish again and there'll be some sort of cope too. Which way do you think is better? I'm giving very rough numbers that I remembered off the top of my head but it really is weird when the switch happens the numbers don't translate (if 1200 was watching on yt and it ended, it should be less than 1200 switching to rumble but it's much bigger than 1200..by multitudes)

Destiny actually explained the view counts (i think by accident) when he was fishing for platform deals a few months ago and he was streaming to a ton of other places. He asked the CEO of Rumble about the weird view numbers and why they looked suspicious and Destiny said that the CEO said that there is a one hour holdover for a live viewer on the count; so if you watch a Rumble livestream for 15 seconds, it holds your view count number for ONE HOUR. every other platform also does this but it's for much shorter times, IIRC Destiny said a Youtube holdover number was for like 2 minutes or something way lower. This is a (probably legal-ish way compared to the other accusations) of making numbers look more large than what they are. You just constantly have these click views being held in purgatory even though the person isn't really watching anymore and hasn't been for 59 minutes and 55 seconds.

 

[Null]

I'll cosign the holdover number as being true. I do not see abnormally high numbers on my streams on Rumble, but I have noticed they continue to stay high through superchats. This is not going to reflect reality. My streams continually climb in viewership until superchats and then they halve, and during the outro song they dip to about 1/5th of peak as people tune out. On Rumble, my peak number is my superchat+outro segment number. I would not agree that the numbers are simply artificial though.

 

[Mordecai "3 Finger" Brown]

Branca seems like the type of guy that would shamelessly defend a police officer mag dumping a baby by claiming the baby "aggressively crawled" towards the officer. He seems like the type of guy where, if you followed his advice, you'd be staring down the barrel of a capital murder conviction.

Branca definitely has a dichotomy between analyzing videos and cases where the self-defense defendant is a cop vs a civilian.

I agree he gives cops ridiculous amounts of benefit of doubt.

I find his civilian analyses much more narrow in scope though.

- He's a big proponent of retreating in all scenarios even when not legally obligated to do so.
- He repeatedly advises not to rely on self-defense tenets of law even when in the theoretical legal right because your liberty in the end will be determined by a braindead civilian jury
- He acknowledges that there's a faction of the right-leaning/gun enthusiast community that likes the idea of killing people relying on legal loopholes a little too gleefully
- He's a proponent that any personal threat to life and limb is something fluid in a self-defense situation that changes second-to-second and must be present at the very moment of use of force. He was very critical of the stabbing of the jogger by the Puerto Rican bodega clerk, the young Asian vape clerk stabbing the thief along with the boyfriend blasting the ex-husband on the porch in Texas with the shotgun over a custody dispute.

At least from the civilian side, Branca really emphasizes that a potential self-defense plea is something that needs a perfect set of facts and not just what we would like it to be.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

I think the biggest Red Flag Rekieta showed during all of this was gushing about American Beauty because of how Kevin Spacey’s character portrays a gay man’s idea of a straight suburban man’s midlife crisis by making a gay man’s fantasy of fucking a teenager into a straight man’s fantasy.

 

[AnOminous]

And all that is normal, WITHOUT counting thr personal history Nick has with this judge. A man telling a woman off in an elevator (assuming it happened as Nick claimed) would be something very uncomfortable because of the enclosed space.

And I've pointed before it was just being a pissy little bitch. It was incompetent not to have brought the point out in trial where it could have been a point of appeal. It was highly improper to make a statement essentially saying she was punishing the defendant because she dared to have a lawyer.

Which I think might cloud his judgement in a lot of cases, and lead to a similar situation to Rekieta where he's not as smart as he portrays. For example, he was dead wrong on George Floyd and Atatiana Jefferson cases.

I don't know about the other, but his problem with Floyd wasn't the law. It was with failing to take account of the fact you had a corrupt prosecution that got away with murder and a terrorized jury in a court surrounded by a violent mob of thugs. The result was a travesty whether or not you think (as I do) that Derek Chauvin was guilty of something, if not murder as such.

I think the biggest Red Flag Rekieta showed during all of this was gushing about American Beauty because of how Kevin Spacey’s character portrays a gay man’s idea of a straight suburban man’s midlife crisis by making a gay man’s fantasy of fucking a teenager into a straight man’s fantasy.

That may be how Nick approaches it. But seriously, are you joking? This very site is full of seething incel morons openly lusting after teenage females. Every thread that remotely touches on the subject has at least one of these perverts halal themselves.

I would not agree that the numbers are simply artificial though.

I think they're accurate to their methodology of counting them rather than outright fake, but I also think their methodology is fucky and semi-rigged. I can't swear to that or as to how it is, though. It just seems off.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I think the biggest Red Flag Rekieta showed during all of this was gushing about American Beauty because of how Kevin Spacey’s character portrays a gay man’s idea of a straight suburban man’s midlife crisis by making a gay man’s fantasy of fucking a teenager into a straight man’s fantasy.

The earliest memtion of this fascination that I could find was Drexels first show appearance.

I haven't gotten much further in reviewing his back catalogur

 

[arc minsk]

The earliest memtion of this fascination that I could find was Drexels first show appearance.

I haven't gotten much further in reviewing his back catalogur

people forget that rekieta's first adult life arc was as a bohemian storyteller. he went to college for creative writing.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

That may be how Nick approaches it. But seriously, are you joking? This very site is full of seething incel morons openly lusting after teenage females. Every thread that remotely touches on the subject has at least one of these perverts halal themselves.

Here's how I explain it. Write this down, it's complicated.
Stories can be good and well made, but they can also be about bad people.

 

[trash cat]

The thing about step one is fixing any addiction requires the person to want to change. This is universal in any recovery method and it's a big hurdle to clear. I think he would have bigger problems with how easy it is for AA to turn into a groupthink hugbox.

100% agreed. Nick if you're reading this look into SMART recovery. It's a type of CBT so you probably have tons of experience with it.

Sean seems okay. I'm not a fan of Branca.

Branca seems like the type of guy that would shamelessly defend a police officer mag dumping a baby by claiming the baby "aggressively crawled" towards the officer.

I'm think part of the deal with Branca is his LE clientele. It clouds his judgement. LE often think of themselves as the "good guys" but that's not always the case.

One thing I'll never understand about guys like Branca is his blind allegiance to the police - especially the feds - who are some of the most corrupt assholes in existence, and who's true purpose is to protect the ruling class and the multinationals.

I guess if it butters your bread it's easy.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

The earliest memtion of this fascination that I could find was Drexels first show appearance.

I haven't gotten much further in reviewing his back catalogur

Could you post the episode? It’s something that I noticed as time went on and it’s something only faggots like, otherwise it’s a forgettable movie where Kevin Spacey gets domed.

 

[AnOminous]

Stories can be good and well made, but they can also be about bad people.

American Beauty is pretty ambiguous (what is not ambiguous is that Kevin Spacey is a complete piece of shit). Lester is definitely some sort of malignant narcissist (who acts like a gay guy and may be an Alan Ball self-insert), but ultimately chooses not to fuck the teen.

 

[TheClappening]

Sean seems okay. I'm not a fan of Branca.

I get definite grifter vibes off Branca. From what I understand, he predominately markets a self defense legal education product towards the LEO community. Which I think might cloud his judgement in a lot of cases, and lead to a similar situation to Rekieta where he's not as smart as he portrays. For example, he was dead wrong on George Floyd and Atatiana Jefferson cases.

Branca seems like the type of guy that would shamelessly defend a police officer mag dumping a baby by claiming the baby "aggressively crawled" towards the officer. He seems like the type of guy where, if you followed his advice, you'd be staring down the barrel of a capital murder conviction.

Also, people have stated here he's got a weird problem with women, and is pussy whipped by his wife.

Branca's business model is mostly use-of-force law in relation to self defense. Far as I can tell he does exclusively consultation work now.

He does mention he does lectures for LEOs, but his primary target are normal Joes, far as I can tell.

He was wrong about Floyd and Jefferson for sure, but it's hard to call those normal cases when nignog politicking poisons the well.

We'll just agree to disagree.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

American Beauty is pretty ambiguous (what is not ambiguous is that Kevin Spacey is a complete piece of shit). Lester is definitely some sort of malignant narcissist (who acts like a gay guy and may be an Alan Ball self-insert), but ultimately chooses not to fuck the teen.

I thought it was a good movie and did a fine job of dissecting the whole upper-middle class suburbia facade thing that was going on at the time. It’s along the lines of God Bless America, American Beauty has the focal point be the main character’s discontent with how his life is going even though he followed the ‘American Dream’. Both films have mains that suck as people, but the points they touch on as we move through the story are relatable for many, but some negroids can’t seem to grasp that.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Could you post the episode? It’s something that I noticed as time went on and it’s something only faggots like, otherwise it’s a forgettable movie where Kevin Spacey gets domed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=me6zZ23zhe4

I have a full archive but it is very large. Bring up the transcript and CTRL-F search for keywords in what you are looking for.

 

[Captain Manning]

I find his civilian analyses much more narrow in scope though.

You might be right. I've mainly watched his LE analysis, and a lot of those are re-goddamn-diculous, IMO. He sounds like he'd make a great lawyer for the Fraternal Order of Police.

Still, my biggest complaint is he's got a product to sell, and that seems to be the main reason he's on TY. Which is a turn-off for me. Somebody like Sean seems to stream mainly for shits and giggles, and maybe some money on the side I suppose. Streamers who stream for fun tend to be more genuine and entertaining.

Rekieta has made it so that I don't watch to watch a grifter anymore.

I don't know about the other, but his problem with Floyd wasn't the law. It was with failing to take account of the fact you had a corrupt prosecution that got away with murder and a terrorized jury in a court surrounded by a violent mob of thugs. The result was a travesty whether or not you think (as I do) that Derek Chauvin was guilty of something, if not murder as such.

There's that but, as I recall, Branca's argument was that Chauvin was innocent. Which I do not agree with.

 

[TheOtherSideofMakeBelieve]

Did he say Chauvin was innocent and didn't do anything wrong? Or did he say that he was not guilty of flat-out murder? I do think Chauvin was guilty of things but murder isn't one of them. I don't think he was applying unreasonable force up until the point that Floyd became unresponsive. Once he was unresponsive and the other officer couldn't find a pulse but he kept him pinned down is where the issues start for me.

I think if the other officers had applied an appropriate amount of force to begin with rather than letting Floyd (literally) push them around then Chauvin wouldn't have needed to do what he did but it seemed like they were trying to treat him with kid gloves I guess because they were inexperienced