Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Apparently some Onion Farmers think that s/he's a gay man lusting for Null's vocally deep fried and panko encrusted boi pussy.

I like getting into conspiracies, but even that seems a bit much for me. I'm not ruling it out though.
What I’ve seen on OF was actually some people saying that she’s this chick called Elaine Miller, who apparently has been stalking Null/generally acting batshit insane. That’s actually why I’m surprised he’s so nonchalant about that user, since from the screen caps I saw with him interacting with Elaine he took a hardline “stop fucking talking to me” stance.

That’s all going of what OF says of all places though, and I know they’re a herd of retards.
 
The problem people have nowadays is that there aren’t the same places to meet others unless you’re promiscuous or terminally online . You’ve got online dating, which looks horrendous. You’ve got hookup apps which look worse. You have to be extroverted to put yourself out there like that. A shy ish girl or guy who just wants to meet someone halfway normal - where do they find someone?
This is spot on. It's very hard to meet people IRL these days. I think at some point we may have to go back to matchmaking.

Incidentally I am employed by Yentas Я Us, fee schedule available upon request.
 
Incidentally I am employed by Yentas Я Us, fee schedule available upon request.
I genuinely believe things would be much better with a few small social tweaks. Mums allowed to be mums and not dump babies in daycare, the eradication of social media and yes, Make Interfering Yentas (or your cuktural equivalent, we all have them) Great Again. She knows Hilda’s sister’s hairdresser’s daughter and she’s perfect for you, they are coming round for tea Wednesday why don’t you be there to do the garden and I’ll engineer a meeting.
If tinder et al fill you with horror and you’re past college age, where are you supposed to meet people? Can’t even flirt at work any more.
We need match making - doesn’t have to be forced, just people bringing people together. It also has a pre-vetting built in. If it’s people you know or you know their families, you’ll likely be able to avoid at least some unpleasant surprises
 
The problem people have nowadays is that there aren’t the same places to meet others unless you’re promiscuous or terminally online . You’ve got online dating, which looks horrendous. You’ve got hookup apps which look worse. You have to be extroverted to put yourself out there like that. A shy ish girl or guy who just wants to meet someone halfway normal - where do they find someone?
Me! I'm right here.
 
Mums allowed to be mums and not dump babies in daycare
This is the single thing that pisses me off about feminists, especially Third (Tard) Wave feminists. Absolutely no support and visible disdain for those of us who choose to stay home and raise children. I get the distinct feeling they are threatened by women who choose to do so (eg, calling them brainwashed fundie Republicans) but some of us want to be mothers and raise our children to be the best that they can be.
 
If you constantly tell them that they are problematic, toxic and not needed some will eventually resent you.
That's not "women" who do that. It's socialists. And yes, most people who aren't socialists utterly despise socialists (indeed, most socialists despise each other), but that's because socialists are arrogant, condescending, obnoxious, manipulative, patronizing, malicious, spiteful, petty, avaricious, psychotic, vicious, hateful, violent, ignorant, hypocritical jerks. It's as if they very consciously and deliberately use all their creativity and intelligence to be the absolutely worst people they could possibly be.

Some people confuse modern feminists with a women's group, but today's feminism is no longer about women, no more than racist gangs like "Black Lives Matter" or the "Black Panthers" are about Negroid people or the Irish Republican Army is about the Irish or the Palestinian Liberation Organization is about so-called "Palestinians." These factions are all about socialism, in particular about the obnoxious socialist tradition of identifying with certain social, ethnic, biological and gender groupings and then claim to speak for and own every single member in that set. Thus my claim that socialists are the most extreme and shameless racists and sexists in the world today.

... s/he's a gay man lusting for Null's vocally deep fried and panko encrusted boi pussy.
My understanding was that the appropriate clinical term is "mangina."
 
That's not "women" who do that. It's socialists. And yes, most people who aren't socialists utterly despise socialists
I would disagree with that assessment. At least the "I need no man" and the accusations of privilege is mainstream opinion among women in my generation. I have witnessed it both online and with relatives and friends. Men are able to take a lot of shit but if the mainstream tells them constantly they are also super privileged there is no better way to breed resentment. Gaslighting, if it doesn't work will produce the opposite result.

Resentment is pure poison to a society and we should have probably dealt with the problem earlier but since men underperforming doesn't get addressed until it affects women as well nothing will change in time. And even if there was more awareness the solution I see proposed are at best useless and at worst actually making the underperformance issue worse because they fundamentally don't understand men.
 
What happened to the idea where thing you need to get the attention of the opposite sex, is to be a dependable, reasonable, strong non emotionally stunted human being. The women who go for men based solely on income

Socialism happened to it. In socialism, the purpose of any interpersonal relationship is personal material gain. If the other person gets anything out of it, you're being exploited. And yes, socialists are very much miserable materialist people who have negligible fulfillment and require material things and the demeaning of others in order to feel satisfied. It's why they invented the Pronoun Game.

Being a pillar for someone does not solely depend on income, yes being dependable can generate income and status as a consequence but the core still rests within a person and what they do for themselves and others, things that aren't necessarily financially motivated or involved.

That sounds so bourgeois. Talk like that is partly why Left fascists despise Jordan Peterson so much.

People need to love themselves more, and have to be confident but have the humility to admit that they can be wrong.

Oh good God. Pretty soon you're going to talk about lobsters and how I need to clean my room.
 
Mums allowed to be mums and not dump babies in daycare,
This is horseshit. Not every mother with kids in workday care (when not in school) is “dumping” their kids. And there is zero broad-based negative view of women who choose not to do so. There may be resentment in some quarters, but certainly not “you’re a handmaiden” sentiment by actual people (vs ITT, online, or among polemics).
but some of us want to be mothers and raise our children to be the best that they can be.
Fuck off. Plenty of women are absolutely dedicated to raising children - but also work. If you wonder why you supposedly don’t get the “support” you want from other women, maybe it’s because your starting point is that women who make different decisions than you are somehow substandard mothers.
 
Fuck off. Plenty of women are absolutely dedicated to raising children - but also work. If you wonder why you supposedly don’t get the “support” you want from other women, maybe it’s because your starting point is that women who make different decisions than you are somehow substandard mothers.
No, you fuck off you duplicitous bitch-I never, ever said people who made different choices are substandard mothers, that's you projecting what feminists do to women who stay home to raise their children. It's cunts like you who belatedly realized dumping your children onto a family member or day care was not the best thing for your children but instead of admitting and working to change it you decided to shit on women who have, in order to justify your shit decision.

See men, this is how this stronk wahmen bitch responds to my post--telling me to fuck off. That's the feminist sisterhood right there; make an argument against something I never posted so she can smugpost in the man hate thread about telling me off.
 
This is horseshit. Not every mother with kids in workday care (when not in school) is “dumping” their kids. And there is zero broad-based negative view of women who choose not to do so. There may be resentment in some quarters, but certainly not “you’re a handmaiden” sentiment by actual people (vs ITT, online, or among polemics).

Fuck off. Plenty of women are absolutely dedicated to raising children - but also work. If you wonder why you supposedly don’t get the “support” you want from other women, maybe it’s because your starting point is that women who make different decisions than you are somehow substandard mothers.
It's horrible that our political and economic situation forces women into a position where they have to warehouse their kids, but don't lie and pretend that on balance it's as good for children as being raised by their families. You know and everyone else knows it deep down.
 
This is horseshit. Not every mother with kids in workday care (when not in school) is “dumping” their kids. And there is zero broad-based negative view of women who choose not to do so. There may be resentment in some quarters, but certainly not “you’re a handmaiden” sentiment by actual people (vs ITT, online, or among polemics).
There is a huge negative view of sahms. Sahms are criticised, working mums are criticised. Mainly by other women.
I also work, few women where I live can even afford to stay home. my kids were lucky enough to have me at home for well over a year each as babies and have really nice nurseries, but still, it’s not as good as I feel being home with them would have been.
The US and countries where actual babies, weeks old, get put in daycare. I feel, honestly that that is wrong. It’s bad for the kids, at that age they need their mothers constantly. It’s bad that women have to work and have no choice about it.
I work, and I know, deep down, that it would have been better to have them at home with me. I feel bad about that. I didn’t have a lot of choice, and I dont judge other women for doing it , what I’m criticising is the SOCIETY that forces women to put tiny babies in daycare while they work to pay the rent. It’s wrong, and our society would be far better if we didn’t do it.
 
Back