- Joined
- Mar 6, 2022
This people need to be bullied constantly until they leave the internet
Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts
- Thread starter CrunkLord420
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
And you agree with all of us who think the only code of conduct for a software project should be "don't be an asshole".
Sadly, trannies really do try and stick their CoCks in all sorts of places they don't belong. Any software issue or discord message or anything that involves "As an X" should be immediately deleted and the person banned. No, you being trans, female, male, black, white, purple, etc has nothing to do with the software, just STFU.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
I'm glad he took the covid vaccine.
Hall of Cost Payer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2022
I know where you're coming from and I agree.
CoCks are all about "contributions being open to everyone". That's why they're important for corporations, they want as many customers as possible and they want every customer to be able to participate. Whatever. But when a snowflake like a tranny wants to join a project because it's cool and they see a person, who in a different context said "Trans women aren't real women", they of course can't participate there, "because they're threatened for their life". So trannies and faggots like Drew use this clause to inject themselves and start a discussion, enforcing a tranny friendly environment. Or at least smothering people who just want to be themselves.
Summary, if you and a group of people who know each other work on a project: Fuck CoCs. If you want to formalize your project and make it independent of you or your friends. You adopt one of these.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
As a white man, my pale skin proves I don't get enough sunlight, and spend more time programming than others, affirming my belief that I'm better at it than they.
Short Circuit
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2021
Drew DeVault' thread incoming I'm certain of it. Don't forget that one time he sucked girldick good on his blog.
Remember: Forget the politics and focus on the software? It’s simply not possible. Free software is politics.
Remember: Forget the politics and focus on the software? It’s simply not possible. Free software is politics.
Hall of Cost Payer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2022
Dude has so many problems. He publicly quit social media multiple times because he always engages in deranged behavior.
Remember when the default Go package manager was retarded? Sure, the golang behavior was insane, but instead of doing what any rational human would do, rate limiting these requests, he made like 2 passive aggressive blog posts, until he made this announcement. I think the Go team resolved the issue on their side after that. But typical Drew behavior, making a public fight instead of resolving it privately.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Free Software is politics, the old-timey politics that sees irrelevant political infiltration for what it is. I hate comparing the movement to communism, but the old communists understood the same thing, and focussed on communism above all else. Anything else was a bourgeois distraction.
Oh! So it's not add a CoC, but suck a CoCk. Good to know.
Fucking FOSS man, I swear.
Fucking FOSS man, I swear.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2016
That's the whole point - it's not relevant. Nothing about it is relevant. The only thing that matters is if a contributor's code is good or not. The whole thing is a farce being perpetrated by the Grand Wizards of the Gender Cult in order to cement social control and elevate their status. It's the new, socially acceptable autism fixation that all of these deranged men have.
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2020
Wayland is a replacement for the old aging X11/Xorg window management. The old way used to rely on how the application was drawn on the screen and Wayland is a replacement which requires the application to manage itself.
When the switch to Wayland happened a lot of applications would have issues running.
Hope that explains a bit better. Someone else can do a better job.
That Drewvault guy sounds like a massive faggot. If Hyprland uses any of his libraries they should just fork and maintain them and block that crazy faggot.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
The only rule should be write code that fucking works or fuck the hell off you useless troon piece of shit.
I'm not sure how driving off half their customers to appease 0.1% of the population achieves that.
No enterprise is going to adopt shit that can be sabotaged by a single deranged troon at any moment. That's why they'll keep going for Microsoft.
Which is why I think these troon incursions are deliberately promoted by corporations like Microsoft to keep their competition down.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
Yes. Corey "Coraline" Ehmke, who's largely responsible for the whole CoC mess, is known to absolutely hate the idea of meritocracy.
You missed the joke. "Burgers?"
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2021
He wrote the "Post-Meritocracy Manifesto":
I assume he was one of the feminist crowd calling for the removal of the "United Meritocracy of GitHub" rug based on tortured logic about white male privilege.
However, this was in 2014, before GitHub shot themselves in the face by actually hiring Corey as a community manager. GitHub did one sane thing and fired the insane troon a year later.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
Raven Rainbow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2021
It's not only about the software for CoC-pushers. They don't dip in, drop a fix, and dip out. Those kind of people tend to socialize entirely through the computer, and what they are trying to do is create rules for the social space around the software where they can know and be known. If you compare activity in any random CoC-encumbered project's Discord (it is always Discord) you will see social/shitposting type comments vastly outnumber discussions about the project itself.
- Joined
- May 3, 2023
If project leaders don’t gatekeep effectively enough, retards LARPing as litigators will assume that role instead. Let that be a warning to all those who say one should never gatekeep.
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
Looks like someone is having some fun by submitting an absolutely mental CoC for trolling purposes, the dev behind a wayland tiling DE shockingly is too autistic to catch on that its a troll.
>I will be sticking to Rust window managers in the future.
perfect
## Goal
Our goal is to provide a space where it is safe for everyone to contribute to,
and get support for, open-source software in a respectful and cooperative
manner.
We value all contributions and want to make this organization and its
surrounding community a place for everyone.
As members, contributors, and everyone else who may participate in the
development, we strive to keep the entire experience civil.
## Standards
Our community standards exist in order to make sure everyone feels comfortable
contributing to the project(s) together.
1. **Anti-Discrimination:** Uphold a zero-tolerance stance against discrimination. Do not engage in any form of harassment, discrimination, or mistreatment based on protected traits, including but not limited to sex, religion, race, appearance, gender, identity, nationality, sexuality, disability, socioeconomic status, immigration status, age, or political affiliation.
2. **Intersectional Equity:** Embrace intersectionality by acknowledging the intersections of identity and experience. Recognize that individuals may face multiple forms of discrimination simultaneously, such as those related to race, gender, sexuality, disability, and socioeconomic background. Be mindful of the unique challenges they encounter.
3. **Cultural Sensitivity:** Show profound respect for diverse cultural backgrounds and experiences. Avoid cultural appropriation, stereotypes, or insensitive comments. Foster an environment that celebrates cultural diversity and promotes cross-cultural understanding.
4. **Gender-Inclusive Language:** Utilize gender-inclusive language and respect individuals' preferred pronouns. This practice reflects the principles of queer theory, which challenge normative views of identity and sexuality while promoting inclusivity and recognition of the full spectrum of gender identities.
5. **Amplify Marginalized Voices:** Actively seek to amplify the voices of marginalized and underrepresented contributors. Acknowledge the historic and systemic silencing of these voices and work to counteract it. Support initiatives that promote diversity and inclusion within our community.
6. **Deconstructive Discourse:** Embrace deconstructive dialogue that dismantles oppressive structures through critical analysis. Challenge conventional language norms and foster discussions that question the inherent biases within language itself. Engage in thoughtful and introspective conversations that deconstruct power imbalances.
7. **Narrative Disruption:** Encourage narrative disruption, which questions dominant narratives and perspectives. Promote alternative narratives that challenge established power structures. Engage in critical examinations of history, discourse, and representation to create space for diverse voices and counter hegemonic narratives.
8. **Heteroglossic Engagement:** Embrace heteroglossic engagement, acknowledging the multiplicity of voices and perspectives within our community. This notion, inspired by Mikhail Bakhtin's heteroglossia, values the rich tapestry of experiences and viewpoints. Encourage dialogues that respect and celebrate the plurality of voices within our community, fostering a dynamic and inclusive environment.
9. **Accessibility and Accommodation:** Commit to making our community accessible to all individuals, including those with disabilities. Ensure that digital content and communication platforms are accessible, and be open to accommodating specific needs to ensure everyone can fully participate.
10. **Economic Justice:** Acknowledge the importance of economic justice in our community. Recognize and address economic disparities that may exist, and strive to create opportunities for all members, regardless of socioeconomic status, to engage and benefit from our community.
11. **Environmental Responsibility:** Promote environmental responsibility by considering the environmental impact of our activities. Encourage sustainable practices and engage in discussions about the intersection of environmental justice and our work.
12. **Digital Privacy:** Respect the digital privacy and security of all community members. Avoid sharing personal information without consent, and be vigilant about protecting sensitive data within our digital spaces.
13. **Ethical Collaboration:** Prioritize ethical collaboration within our community. Promote transparency, honesty, and integrity in all interactions. Encourage open communication and constructive feedback to build trust and maintain ethical standards.
14. **Educational Empowerment:** Recognize the power of education as a tool for empowerment. Encourage and support educational initiatives within our community, fostering an environment where members can learn, grow, and share knowledge freely.
15. **Restorative Justice:** Embrace restorative justice principles to address conflicts and disputes within the community. Strive for resolutions that prioritize healing, understanding, and reconciliation, rather than punitive measures.
16. **Scientific Rigor:** Maintain scientific rigor and intellectual honesty in discussions related to research or technical topics. Encourage evidence-based reasoning, critical thinking, and the responsible use of data.
17. **Anti-Colonial Practices:** Be conscious of and challenge colonial legacies, especially within the context of knowledge production and resource allocation. Promote anti-colonial practices that respect indigenous knowledge, land, and rights.
18. **Solidarity and Allyship:** Promote solidarity and allyship with marginalized and oppressed communities both within and outside our community. Actively engage in supporting social justice movements and initiatives that align with our values.
19. **Decolonized Resource Allocation:** Ensure that resources and opportunities within the community are allocated in a manner that addresses historical imbalances and supports marginalized individuals and initiatives.
20. **Conflict Resolution Skills:** Develop and encourage conflict resolution skills within the community. Equip members with tools for addressing disagreements constructively and fostering a culture of understanding and cooperation.
21. **Historical Context:** Recognize and acknowledge the historical context in which our community operates. Understand the broader societal, cultural, and political factors that shape our work and interactions.
22. **Community Accountability:** Foster a culture of community accountability, where individuals and the community as a whole are responsible for upholding these standards. Encourage open dialogue about accountability and improvement.
23. **Continuous Learning:** Commit to ongoing learning and self-reflection. Embrace the idea that knowledge and understanding evolve, and be open to revisiting and revising our standards in light of new insights and perspectives.
24. **Holistic Well-being:** Prioritize the holistic well-being of community members. Recognize that well-being encompasses mental, emotional, physical, and social dimensions, and support initiatives that promote health and balance.
Examples of breaking each rule respectively include:
1. **Anti-Discrimination:** A message that harasses or mocks someone based on their religion, making derogatory comments about their beliefs or practices.
2. **Intersectional Equity:** A message that dismisses or belittles the experiences of an individual who identifies as both a racial minority and part of the LGBTQ+ community, implying that their experiences are not valid.
3. **Cultural Sensitivity:** A message that makes fun of or perpetuates stereotypes about a specific cultural group, such as using caricatures or offensive jokes.
4. **Gender-Inclusive Language:** A message that intentionally misgenders someone or refuses to use their preferred pronouns, despite being aware of their identity.
5. **Amplify Marginalized Voices:** A message that consistently ignores or talks over contributions from members of historically marginalized groups, suppressing their voices within the community.
6. **Deconstructive Discourse:** A message that dismisses critical analysis and constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks or derogatory language instead.
7. **Narrative Disruption:** A message that insists on maintaining a dominant narrative without considering alternative perspectives or acknowledging the impact of that narrative on marginalized groups.
8. **Heteroglossic Engagement:** A message that tries to silence or discredit voices within the community that hold different viewpoints or experiences, rather than engaging in respectful dialogue.
9. **Accessibility and Accommodation:** A message that refuses to make accommodations for individuals with disabilities, such as not providing text alternatives for images or dismissing requests for accessibility features.
10. **Economic Justice:** A message that belittles or marginalizes members who come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, implying that their contributions or perspectives are less valuable.
11. **Environmental Responsibility:** A message that ignores environmental concerns or makes jokes about environmental issues, undermining the importance of sustainability.
12. **Digital Privacy:** A message that shares another member's personal information without their consent, violating their privacy.
13. **Ethical Collaboration:** A message that engages in dishonest or manipulative behavior, such as spreading false information or attempting to deceive other community members.
14. **Educational Empowerment:** A message that ridicules or belittles someone for asking questions or seeking to learn, creating a hostile learning environment.
15. **Restorative Justice:** A message that insists on punitive measures and retaliation in response to a community dispute, rather than seeking understanding and reconciliation.
16. **Scientific Rigor:** A message that promotes pseudoscience or conspiracy theories without providing credible evidence, undermining the community's commitment to evidence-based reasoning.
17. **Anti-Colonial Practices:** A message that dismisses the importance of acknowledging and addressing the impact of colonialism on knowledge production and resource distribution.
18. **Solidarity and Allyship:** A message that fails to show support or allyship with a marginalized community facing discrimination or injustice, choosing to remain silent or indifferent.
19. **Decolonized Resource Allocation:** A message that opposes efforts to allocate resources equitably or challenges initiatives aimed at rectifying historical resource imbalances.
20. **Conflict Resolution Skills:** A message that escalates conflicts by resorting to personal attacks, insults, or aggressive language instead of seeking constructive solutions.
21. **Historical Context:** A message that dismisses the relevance of historical context in discussions about social issues, denying the importance of understanding how historical factors shape present-day challenges.
22. **Community Accountability:** A message that deflects responsibility or accountability for one's actions within the community, refusing to engage in discussions about improving behavior.
23. **Continuous Learning:** A message that resists revisiting or updating community standards in light of new insights or perspectives, insisting on maintaining outdated practices.
24. **Holistic Well-being:** A message that mocks or belittles someone's mental health struggles or personal well-being, creating a hostile and unsupportive environment.
## Enforcement
Enforcement of this CoC is done by the members of the hyprwm organization.
We, as the organization, will strive our best to keep this community civil and
following the standards outlined above.
### Reporting incidents
If you believe an incident of breaking our standards has occurred, but nobody has
taken appropriate action, you can privately contact the people responsible for dealing
with such incidents in multiple ways:
***E-Mail***
- `vaxry[at]vaxry.net`
- `mihai[at]fufexan.net`
***Discord***
- `@vaxry`
- `@fufexan`
***Matrix***
- `@vaxry:matrix.vaxry.net`
- `@fufexan:matrix.org`
We, as members, guarantee your privacy and will not share those reports with anyone.
## Enforcement Strategy
Depending on the severity of the infraction, any action from the list below may be applied.
Please keep in mind cases are reviewed on a per-case basis and members are the ultimate
deciding factor in the type of punishment.
If the matter would benefit from an outside opinion, a member might reach for more opinions
from people unrelated to the organization, however, the final decision regarding the action
to be taken is still up to the member.
For example, if the matter at hand regards a representative of a marginalized group or minority,
the member might ask for a first-hand opinion from another representative of such group.
### Correction/Edit
If your message is found to be misleading or poorly worded, a member might
edit your message.
### Warning/Deletion
If your message is found inappropriate, a member might give you a public or private warning,
and/or delete your message.
### Mute
If your message is disruptive, or you have been repeatedly violating the standards,
a member might mute (or temporarily ban) you.
### Ban
If your message is hateful, very disruptive, or other, less serious infractions are repeated
ignoring previous punishments, a member might ban you permanently.
## Scope
This CoC shall apply to all projects ran under the `hyprwm` organization and all _official_ communities
outside of GitHub.
However, it is worth noting that official communities outside of GitHub might have their own,
additional sets of rules.
Our goal is to provide a space where it is safe for everyone to contribute to,
and get support for, open-source software in a respectful and cooperative
manner.
We value all contributions and want to make this organization and its
surrounding community a place for everyone.
As members, contributors, and everyone else who may participate in the
development, we strive to keep the entire experience civil.
## Standards
Our community standards exist in order to make sure everyone feels comfortable
contributing to the project(s) together.
1. **Anti-Discrimination:** Uphold a zero-tolerance stance against discrimination. Do not engage in any form of harassment, discrimination, or mistreatment based on protected traits, including but not limited to sex, religion, race, appearance, gender, identity, nationality, sexuality, disability, socioeconomic status, immigration status, age, or political affiliation.
2. **Intersectional Equity:** Embrace intersectionality by acknowledging the intersections of identity and experience. Recognize that individuals may face multiple forms of discrimination simultaneously, such as those related to race, gender, sexuality, disability, and socioeconomic background. Be mindful of the unique challenges they encounter.
3. **Cultural Sensitivity:** Show profound respect for diverse cultural backgrounds and experiences. Avoid cultural appropriation, stereotypes, or insensitive comments. Foster an environment that celebrates cultural diversity and promotes cross-cultural understanding.
4. **Gender-Inclusive Language:** Utilize gender-inclusive language and respect individuals' preferred pronouns. This practice reflects the principles of queer theory, which challenge normative views of identity and sexuality while promoting inclusivity and recognition of the full spectrum of gender identities.
5. **Amplify Marginalized Voices:** Actively seek to amplify the voices of marginalized and underrepresented contributors. Acknowledge the historic and systemic silencing of these voices and work to counteract it. Support initiatives that promote diversity and inclusion within our community.
6. **Deconstructive Discourse:** Embrace deconstructive dialogue that dismantles oppressive structures through critical analysis. Challenge conventional language norms and foster discussions that question the inherent biases within language itself. Engage in thoughtful and introspective conversations that deconstruct power imbalances.
7. **Narrative Disruption:** Encourage narrative disruption, which questions dominant narratives and perspectives. Promote alternative narratives that challenge established power structures. Engage in critical examinations of history, discourse, and representation to create space for diverse voices and counter hegemonic narratives.
8. **Heteroglossic Engagement:** Embrace heteroglossic engagement, acknowledging the multiplicity of voices and perspectives within our community. This notion, inspired by Mikhail Bakhtin's heteroglossia, values the rich tapestry of experiences and viewpoints. Encourage dialogues that respect and celebrate the plurality of voices within our community, fostering a dynamic and inclusive environment.
9. **Accessibility and Accommodation:** Commit to making our community accessible to all individuals, including those with disabilities. Ensure that digital content and communication platforms are accessible, and be open to accommodating specific needs to ensure everyone can fully participate.
10. **Economic Justice:** Acknowledge the importance of economic justice in our community. Recognize and address economic disparities that may exist, and strive to create opportunities for all members, regardless of socioeconomic status, to engage and benefit from our community.
11. **Environmental Responsibility:** Promote environmental responsibility by considering the environmental impact of our activities. Encourage sustainable practices and engage in discussions about the intersection of environmental justice and our work.
12. **Digital Privacy:** Respect the digital privacy and security of all community members. Avoid sharing personal information without consent, and be vigilant about protecting sensitive data within our digital spaces.
13. **Ethical Collaboration:** Prioritize ethical collaboration within our community. Promote transparency, honesty, and integrity in all interactions. Encourage open communication and constructive feedback to build trust and maintain ethical standards.
14. **Educational Empowerment:** Recognize the power of education as a tool for empowerment. Encourage and support educational initiatives within our community, fostering an environment where members can learn, grow, and share knowledge freely.
15. **Restorative Justice:** Embrace restorative justice principles to address conflicts and disputes within the community. Strive for resolutions that prioritize healing, understanding, and reconciliation, rather than punitive measures.
16. **Scientific Rigor:** Maintain scientific rigor and intellectual honesty in discussions related to research or technical topics. Encourage evidence-based reasoning, critical thinking, and the responsible use of data.
17. **Anti-Colonial Practices:** Be conscious of and challenge colonial legacies, especially within the context of knowledge production and resource allocation. Promote anti-colonial practices that respect indigenous knowledge, land, and rights.
18. **Solidarity and Allyship:** Promote solidarity and allyship with marginalized and oppressed communities both within and outside our community. Actively engage in supporting social justice movements and initiatives that align with our values.
19. **Decolonized Resource Allocation:** Ensure that resources and opportunities within the community are allocated in a manner that addresses historical imbalances and supports marginalized individuals and initiatives.
20. **Conflict Resolution Skills:** Develop and encourage conflict resolution skills within the community. Equip members with tools for addressing disagreements constructively and fostering a culture of understanding and cooperation.
21. **Historical Context:** Recognize and acknowledge the historical context in which our community operates. Understand the broader societal, cultural, and political factors that shape our work and interactions.
22. **Community Accountability:** Foster a culture of community accountability, where individuals and the community as a whole are responsible for upholding these standards. Encourage open dialogue about accountability and improvement.
23. **Continuous Learning:** Commit to ongoing learning and self-reflection. Embrace the idea that knowledge and understanding evolve, and be open to revisiting and revising our standards in light of new insights and perspectives.
24. **Holistic Well-being:** Prioritize the holistic well-being of community members. Recognize that well-being encompasses mental, emotional, physical, and social dimensions, and support initiatives that promote health and balance.
Examples of breaking each rule respectively include:
1. **Anti-Discrimination:** A message that harasses or mocks someone based on their religion, making derogatory comments about their beliefs or practices.
2. **Intersectional Equity:** A message that dismisses or belittles the experiences of an individual who identifies as both a racial minority and part of the LGBTQ+ community, implying that their experiences are not valid.
3. **Cultural Sensitivity:** A message that makes fun of or perpetuates stereotypes about a specific cultural group, such as using caricatures or offensive jokes.
4. **Gender-Inclusive Language:** A message that intentionally misgenders someone or refuses to use their preferred pronouns, despite being aware of their identity.
5. **Amplify Marginalized Voices:** A message that consistently ignores or talks over contributions from members of historically marginalized groups, suppressing their voices within the community.
6. **Deconstructive Discourse:** A message that dismisses critical analysis and constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks or derogatory language instead.
7. **Narrative Disruption:** A message that insists on maintaining a dominant narrative without considering alternative perspectives or acknowledging the impact of that narrative on marginalized groups.
8. **Heteroglossic Engagement:** A message that tries to silence or discredit voices within the community that hold different viewpoints or experiences, rather than engaging in respectful dialogue.
9. **Accessibility and Accommodation:** A message that refuses to make accommodations for individuals with disabilities, such as not providing text alternatives for images or dismissing requests for accessibility features.
10. **Economic Justice:** A message that belittles or marginalizes members who come from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, implying that their contributions or perspectives are less valuable.
11. **Environmental Responsibility:** A message that ignores environmental concerns or makes jokes about environmental issues, undermining the importance of sustainability.
12. **Digital Privacy:** A message that shares another member's personal information without their consent, violating their privacy.
13. **Ethical Collaboration:** A message that engages in dishonest or manipulative behavior, such as spreading false information or attempting to deceive other community members.
14. **Educational Empowerment:** A message that ridicules or belittles someone for asking questions or seeking to learn, creating a hostile learning environment.
15. **Restorative Justice:** A message that insists on punitive measures and retaliation in response to a community dispute, rather than seeking understanding and reconciliation.
16. **Scientific Rigor:** A message that promotes pseudoscience or conspiracy theories without providing credible evidence, undermining the community's commitment to evidence-based reasoning.
17. **Anti-Colonial Practices:** A message that dismisses the importance of acknowledging and addressing the impact of colonialism on knowledge production and resource distribution.
18. **Solidarity and Allyship:** A message that fails to show support or allyship with a marginalized community facing discrimination or injustice, choosing to remain silent or indifferent.
19. **Decolonized Resource Allocation:** A message that opposes efforts to allocate resources equitably or challenges initiatives aimed at rectifying historical resource imbalances.
20. **Conflict Resolution Skills:** A message that escalates conflicts by resorting to personal attacks, insults, or aggressive language instead of seeking constructive solutions.
21. **Historical Context:** A message that dismisses the relevance of historical context in discussions about social issues, denying the importance of understanding how historical factors shape present-day challenges.
22. **Community Accountability:** A message that deflects responsibility or accountability for one's actions within the community, refusing to engage in discussions about improving behavior.
23. **Continuous Learning:** A message that resists revisiting or updating community standards in light of new insights or perspectives, insisting on maintaining outdated practices.
24. **Holistic Well-being:** A message that mocks or belittles someone's mental health struggles or personal well-being, creating a hostile and unsupportive environment.
## Enforcement
Enforcement of this CoC is done by the members of the hyprwm organization.
We, as the organization, will strive our best to keep this community civil and
following the standards outlined above.
### Reporting incidents
If you believe an incident of breaking our standards has occurred, but nobody has
taken appropriate action, you can privately contact the people responsible for dealing
with such incidents in multiple ways:
***E-Mail***
- `vaxry[at]vaxry.net`
- `mihai[at]fufexan.net`
***Discord***
- `@vaxry`
- `@fufexan`
***Matrix***
- `@vaxry:matrix.vaxry.net`
- `@fufexan:matrix.org`
We, as members, guarantee your privacy and will not share those reports with anyone.
## Enforcement Strategy
Depending on the severity of the infraction, any action from the list below may be applied.
Please keep in mind cases are reviewed on a per-case basis and members are the ultimate
deciding factor in the type of punishment.
If the matter would benefit from an outside opinion, a member might reach for more opinions
from people unrelated to the organization, however, the final decision regarding the action
to be taken is still up to the member.
For example, if the matter at hand regards a representative of a marginalized group or minority,
the member might ask for a first-hand opinion from another representative of such group.
### Correction/Edit
If your message is found to be misleading or poorly worded, a member might
edit your message.
### Warning/Deletion
If your message is found inappropriate, a member might give you a public or private warning,
and/or delete your message.
### Mute
If your message is disruptive, or you have been repeatedly violating the standards,
a member might mute (or temporarily ban) you.
### Ban
If your message is hateful, very disruptive, or other, less serious infractions are repeated
ignoring previous punishments, a member might ban you permanently.
## Scope
This CoC shall apply to all projects ran under the `hyprwm` organization and all _official_ communities
outside of GitHub.
However, it is worth noting that official communities outside of GitHub might have their own,
additional sets of rules.
>I will be sticking to Rust window managers in the future.
perfect
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2016
One of the really great things about the FOSS space before all of these parasites moved in is that nobody really gave a fuck about who anyone else was. It was possible for a whole bunch of people from a whole bunch of different backgrounds to work together on a common goal because none of that race/gender/sexuality/whatever shit mattered. Don't be a dickhead was the only real rule necessary and most everyone knew it. Be an adult, make good contributions, lead by example. That's a space everyone can participate in, except one group of people: deranged mongoloids.
One of the most perverse things about this whole inclusivity cult is that they end up dividing and destroying truly inclusive places so they can power grab in their island fiefdoms that are left over. It's so profoundly selfish just so they can feel good about themselves.
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
One final (hopefully) bit of Drew-ness:
He's not offended by the idea...
The edit is his previous note, "
", which he changed to " rights"
He's not offended by the idea...
The edit is his previous note, "
", which he changed to " rights"