Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Pomniman]

Reading between the lines, I've always assumed that this meant she only did anal and oral with the previous boyfriend.

Or he's just retroactively coping about simping for the town bike. I don't think there was even a real "change" so much as them not bothering to keep up appearances anymore after they felt like they'd "made" it.

"No one can complain about how much of a whore you are if it makes you money." - an allegedly Christian man

 

[AnOminous]

This is a regurgitated Dick Masterson take. Dick is whispering his life ruining "advice" into Rekieta's ears, just as he did with Mint Salad, Ethan Ralph, that crazy kiwi, Aesterios, and now Rekieta.

Grima Daxtongue.

 

[Telemeter]

Grima Daxtongue.

We can do the ripper knocking on doors meme, for people that have listened to Dax's advice.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Nick is absolutely delusional if he thinks deliberately seeking out porn isn’t damaging him as well as his wife and marriage (and, thus, his children). Not a surprising delusion, since we live in a culture that tells us sex between humans is no more meaningful than sex between monkeys, but a delusion all the same.

Nick seems to hold tight to the “Porn enhances my relationship” narrative — despite also telling us how his porn use upset his wife — because he has to. Otherwise he’d be compelled to make amends and change his behavior, and we can’t have that! After all, Nick prides himself on his oppositional defiance (seen in adults as a disordered, narcissistic MO).

Spoiler

Immoral behavior isn’t an imaginary construct. Fantasizing about immoral behavior isn’t a victimless crime. It’s incompatible with the health (spiritual, physical, emotional) of the whole human organism. It also makes it extremely difficult to experience intimacy in relationships. Porn removes the connection between husband and wife and places it with third parties. Whether your spouse knows about it or not and whether they feel betrayed or not, objectively speaking porn is an intimacy breaker. That is true even when both spouses are enthusiastic participants in this intimacy-damaging behavior.

It’s possible Nick felt guilt about his porn use at some point and it actually drove him to use porn even more. Because the guilt cycle usually leads to repeating the behavior that caused it.

Guilt —> Pain —> Indulgence (to cover the pain) —> Further guilt about the indulgence

Spoiler

Conscious focus on damaging thoughts is different from damaging thoughts that pop up and intrude on us every so often. We’re not accountable for those “pop-ups” that knock on the door of our conscious thought on occasion. If we answer the door and invite them in, that is a choice and we are culpable for it.

The idea that only physical, tangible actions are behavior, or are the only behaviors that “count,” is easily dismissed. Thought is also behavior. Speech is also behavior. Both can do tremendous harm if a person doesn’t work to counteract his or her base animal urges.

But the impulse to have a thought (“thinking of”) isn’t the same as deciding to invite that thought in (“thinking about” — sitting back, sipping a drink and focusing on that fantasy). Those who refuse to distinguish between the two are bound to cause a considerable amount of pain to themselves and those they love.

TL;DR Rekieta probably shouldn’t be taking moral guidance from Dax Herrera on anything, but especially not on sex, marriage or hairstyles.

 

[Bepis]

I shouldn’t be shocked anymore, but yet I am. There is nothing so horrible to a child than being exposed to their parents’ sexual escapades. Even more skin-crawling would be finding out one or both engaged in any form of prostitution. Only an abused/molested child wouldn’t flinch at being exposed to, ahem, familial sex. This is utter coom-brained madness. No kid wants to be reminded of their parents doing it, their existence is sheer proof enough.

This is the cherry on top of Nick’s previous sundae of his kids finding out he bonks their mom and wants them to explicitly know about it (”GOOD!”).

All that Randazza, Mustang, Balldo, and tattoo cash SHOULD be going to therapy funds for the children.

It's horrifying enough to most kids when it's just their parents having normal married couple sex. The stuff he's talking about now like doing Onlyfans genuinely has potential for causing a kid to rope nowadays. It doesn't matter how much money you have if everyone you know has compromising videos of your mother.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

It's horrifying enough to most kids when it's just their parents having normal married couple sex.

You don’t have to be religious to recognize that human children are hard-coded to be repulsed by knowledge of their parents’ sexual experiences. All forms of incest, acted upon and otherwise, are anathema to the procreational drive. Only a literal degenerate would argue otherwise.

This guy is really testing my general reluctance to write people off as irredeemable wastes of human life.

ETA:
I don’t suggest listening to this if you’re eating. It might make you sick to your stomach.

Nick is claiming that the whole lawsuit is about Monty being upset he was called “a weirdo.” He also does that thing he loves where he feigns confusion (“Uh, okay…I guess...”)



Nick is such a dishonest faggot. He will never acknowledge that the lawsuit arose from him saying that Monty “always loves to suck baby dicks.” He pretends Monty is suing Nick for calling him “a weirdo.” He pretends he didn’t say “I dare you to sue me,” taunting Monty and begging him to go legal. He calls the lawsuit “frivolous” while any person with a functioning brain can grasp that Nick actively pursued the drama, letting his mouth write checks his ass can’t cash.

Nick “Gurlogic” Rekieta is a lost cause. He dindu nuffin and reality will never enter into his reasoning.

 

[Ghostse]

Reading between the lines, I've always assumed that this meant she only did anal and oral with the previous boyfriend.

It was probably the same for Nick.

 

[PermaLurker69]

(Video of Nick justifying his degeneracy)

Nick surely knows that most onlyfans hoes don't make any money, right? So at that point, you may as well be a stripper or a dating escort since the behaviour is the same and the money makes it moral correct right? Can't say that because he knows its wrong and what kind of seedy life that is.

Doing webcam shit is the same shit, the only difference is that there is a screen in the way. Won't stop creepy ppl from trying to find their home tho as opposed to follow them home.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick seems to hold tight to the “Porn enhances my relationship” narrative — despite also telling us how his porn use upset his wife — because he has to. Otherwise he’d be compelled to make amends and change his behavior, and we can’t have that! After all, Nick prides himself on his oppositional defiance (seen in adults as a disordered, narcissistic MO).

And as pointed out previously, ODD is solely a diagnosis for children.

Adults who act like this have less salubrious names. They are called sociopaths, or even psychopaths.

Nick is claiming that the whole lawsuit is about Monty being upset he was called “a weirdo.” He also does that thing he loves where he feigns confusion (“Uh, okay…I guess...”)

What is wrong with his pickled brain to the point he thinks this convinces everyone? We all know Monty is suing because this idiot drunk faggot said he literally sucked the dicks of little boys.

There is nothing more insufferable about this fucking faggot than when he pretends he has no idea why anyone is coming at him when literally everyone knows exactly why people are coming at him.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

He was trying to get her no time in prison AT ALL. He should have also said that in the actual courtroom to preserve the issue for appeal, not in a fucking elevator.

That requires having a set of big boy balls

And as pointed out previously, ODD is solely a diagnosis for children.

Adults who act like this have less salubrious names. They are called sociopaths, or even psychopaths.

We call them dumbfuck assholes if ODD is never cured upon reaching majority

 

[tehpope]

tf when you can't just payoff your school bullies with moms OnlyFans earnings
Nick has gone full on retard mode.

Made me think of this Shane Gillis sketch.

No you fucking coomer. Kids will be bullied because one of both of their parents are whore(s) on the internet. Kids will find anything to bully others about.

 

[AnOminous]

No you fucking coomer. Kids will be bullied because one of both of their parents are whore(s) on the internet. Kids will find anything to bully others about.

"How to gaslight your kids into thinking them being bullied because you're a giant fucking whore deviant piece of shit is their fault and not yours."

 

[Strix454]

Nick surely knows that most onlyfans hoes don't make any money, right?

Sometimes I really wonder if he does know any of the reality of it. He seems to have those whole coom brain perception of sex work and the sex industry which he is really attached to. To him, its just this wonderland of easy money and a great life. He talked once about how he dreamed of interviewing porn stars (woman) and how interesting it would be. It all sounded so 15 year old and so dumb.

 

[Harm]

Struggling to envision the scenario where his children are being dogpiled by peers with 4k video of their mom being sexually violated by strangers, but the money makes everything better. Does he envision sending them to private schools where other OnlyFans whores send their kids? Homeschool them? That sounds alienating for those kids who'd have built bonds with their peers before they find out the truth.

Does he expect it to be so "normalized" that they simply won't be bullied at all? Is the ribbing and bullying going to roll off their backs because the kids will think "fuck you, I've got money?" This makes no sense. It sounds like he's not empathizing with them at all.

 

[Bepis]

You don’t have to be religious to recognize that human children are hard-coded to be repulsed by knowledge of their parents’ sexual experiences. All forms of incest, acted upon and otherwise, are anathema to the procreational drive. Only a literal degenerate would argue otherwise.

You really just need to be online at all to see it. There are thousands of nearly identical stories of kids walking in on their parents and being absolutely horrified. And that's normal people sex, presumably. Not filmed for the internet, no balls entering orifices, no mom tied to a cross. Man's been watching too much stepmom porn or something.

 

[Bowl of Ramen]

I’ll powerlevel, but only if taking one for the team shakes Nick up a bit (LOL, LMAO even). Nick, behold:

Spoiler: EW

I, Bowl, and Mr. Bowl, were cleaning out the former family home not too long ago. My parents spent a great deal of time apart. They sent letters, which 99% were of lewd content, and on occasion, a photo was sprinkled in. Even at my age, THAT WAS GROSS. Mr. Bowl took it upon himself to trash them pronto, so I wouldn’t have to even touch them. Such is a normal reaction to parental intimacy. I wanted to nuke them from orbit.

Anything beyond the birds and the bees is inappropriate on every spiritual, biological, ethical, and moral level. Answering your kids’ questions about sex is a far cry from telling Balldo stories ‘round the family table.

No wonder Vito is snuggling up to Rekieta.

 

[Particle Bored]

tf when you can't just payoff your school bullies with moms OnlyFans earnings
Nick has gone full on retard mode.

Made me think of this Shane Gillis sketch.

[loosely paraphrasing] "When the kids are old enough, you tell them 'this is what Mommy does'..."

Exactly how big is this overlap supposed to be between "old enough to hear about parent's sexual e-whoring," and still referring to yourself in such exchanges as "Mommy?"

 

[Captain Manning]

Maybe he should switch up his look.

First one doesn't look half bad, TBH. It would be an improvement over the malding look.

Second one he looks like a penis. Which I suppose would be appropriate given all the Balldo jokes, but it honestly looks like shit.

Nick is such a dishonest faggot. He will never acknowledge that the lawsuit arose from him saying that Monty “always loves to suck baby dicks.” He pretends Monty is suing Nick for calling him “a weirdo.” He pretends he didn’t say “I dare you to sue me,” taunting Monty and begging him to go legal. He calls the lawsuit “frivolous” while any person with a functioning brain can grasp that Nick actively pursued the drama, letting his mouth write checks his ass can’t catch.

The sad thing is there's people that buy what he's saying because haven't actually put in 5 minutes of research.

Case in point:

I don't like predicting lawsuit outcomes anymore, but there's a decent chance there might be some seriously shell shocked people when this is all over.

 

[Tackleberry]

[loosely paraphrasing] "When the kids are old enough, you tell them 'this is what Mommy does'..."

Exactly how big is this overlap supposed to be between "old enough to hear about parent's sexual e-whoring," and still referring to yourself in such exchanges as "Mommy?"

There is literally no age where you are old enough to hear any specifics about your parents' sexual exploits, much less about their e-whoring.

 

[Potatoherder]

The most delusional bit is he thinks lady ours will get anywhere near millions of dollars. Tatted up midwestern 5s are a dime a dozen on these prostitution sites. These are the ones barely making over $10 a month.