US mimics Japan’s fertility crisis — and you can blame virginal men - Foids and Moids need to bump uglies otherwise boomers will run out of SSI

Experts warn that the United States may be following Japan’s worrying population decline after the Asian nation-state released new shocking data.

Japan’s National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, known as the IPSS, recently revealed that a third of women who are now 18 may never have children. The island country recorded a population of 126.15 million in 2020, and that number is projected to fall to 87 million by 2070, IPSS said.

“With the rising cost of living, I don’t think people feel they can afford to or comfortably say they want to have children,” 23-year-old Anna Tanaka told Reuters.

The birthrate has been declining for more than four decades as the desire for marriage and parenting has faded and financial worries have grown, the outlet reported.

Miho Iwasawa, the IPSS’s director of population dynamics research, blamed the population decline on the fact that people were marrying later in life and having fewer children — or none at all.

More families opting to have fewer children may be creating a cycle of smaller families.
Parents who have fewer children are able to spend more on each child, increasing the average cost of raising a child, which deters more people from having children, Takuya Hoshino, senior economist at Dai-ichi Life Research Institute, explained to Reuters.

As Japan looks to incentivize population growth amid worrying economic decline, experts warn that the US is experiencing a similar cultural shift that’s leading to a continued population decline.

Data from the US Census Bureau showedthat the population grew just 0.4 percent in 2022, an increase from 2021 but a much lower amount than every other year of the past few hundred years.

The number of births in the US has continued to decline for decades as nearly half of American women under 45 are currently childless. The number of biological fathers in the same age range also dipped.

Some attribute this to the fact that Americans are choosing to marry later or not at all.

The median age for getting married for the first time has increased over the past 50 years, from 23 years old in 1970 to about 30 in 2021 for men, and from 21 in 1970 to 28 in 2021 for women, the University of Virginia’s National Marriage Project found.

On top of that, a record number of 40-year-olds in the US have never been married, and most of them are living alone.

And a staggering 21% of millennials and 7% of Gen Z are not planning to get married, with the majority saying they simply aren’t interested in marriage, according to a study conducted by the Thriving Center of Psychology.

This marks a new peak in a decadeslong trend.

Advancements in egg-freezing and fertility treatments have allowed women to delay child-bearing and to remain single — but the quieting of their ticking biological clock has also allowed them to build fulfilling lives and conclude that they don’t want children.

A Match.com survey found a 19% dip in singles under 40 who said it was important to have a partner who wanted to have kids compared to 2017. The decreased interest in having children was “most pronounced among women, with only 56% now saying it is important to find a partner who wants children,” according to the research.
Younger generations have become particularly disinterested in childrearing, with 37% of non-parents younger than 40 revealing that it is not too likely or not at all likely that they will have children some day, according to the Pew Research Center.

Of those planning to remain childless, the majority (60%) said they simply don’t want to become parents.

Those who do want children are choosing to do it later and have smaller families, another study from the Pew Research Center reported. In 2021, the average mother had her first kid when she was 27.3 years old — up from 25.6 years old in 2011. Those who did give birth had an average of two children in 2020, which is much smaller than compared to the average of over three in the late 1970s, the study noted.

Other experts have also attributed the declining birth rate to women earning higher degrees and income, obtaining greater and longer career paths, changing family values, financial concerns, improved access to contraception, relationship instability and climate concerns — and the list could go on.

“The challenge is that no single cause can be identified for the declining birthrate,” the IPSS director said.
 
But I thought having less children is a good thing because the environment wouldn't be endangered? Haven't people been told to stop breeding and get in line for sterilisation for ~50-60 years? That unless the world implements one child policies The Climate Apocalypse will wipe us all out? That kids are a nuisance and useless clumps of cells that ruin your life and all the resources spent on them could be spent on taking in and taking care of immigrants?
If male virgins are causing the USA's and the world's fertility rate to drop further, does that make incels the good guys?
Can't have successful eugenics program if the common man knows about it.
 
I'm not the least bit interested in debating with middle aged fat women with personality disorders and trying to decipher their incoherent shrieking and repetitive insults.

No I don't give a fuck that Null considers them to be extremely based and the backbone of the site for whatever reason.
Never forget that as recently as 10 years ago, these feminists were cheering at your every misfortune and retweeting #KillAllMen. The only reason they're here is because trannies stole their special victim card with the progressive stack, a concept these very feminists helped to popularize. If TTD actually did occur, these self-same women that hang out on the Farms to gossip about their favorite girlcow would be trying to get the Farms cancelled literally the very next day. Being woke on the tranny question should be seen as the bare minimum, not a basis for us to hoist these roasties on our shoulders and parade them about and call them based for the most remedial observations.
 
You don't get to blame everyone smart enough to not fuck the fatties, neon haired chud crowd, and whores. Between them and women who wanna be baby mamas with 5 guys for the spousal support its not like there's a lot of good women to choose from. What makes it worse is that all women seem to have a friend or two who are chuds, fatties, or whores that will interject themselves into others relationships for the sake of drama.

Its a manufactured mess that gets more ridiculous every year.
 
The future is Mormon
Damn right. But even that's not easy anymore. I tell you what, nothing is more depressing sitting in the Singles Ward hearing a woman talk about having multiple exes, meanwhile you've been grinding the last few years to get a steady job to start a family, and not just crash and burn like your buddy you always sit by that gets dates but gets fucked over. I'm tired bros.
 
Me either, I was talking about some of the retarded and repulsive ways men express their sexuality towards women with whom they’d like to be in a relationship.

Yours is the gender that sets up attraction signs and scapegoats women for the erosion of family values. This is also the gender that nags me for my number at public events while I am wearing my wedding band. If you ain’t gonna live like a tradchad then don’t expect to be treated like one.
If we're going to equate all men with CWC making attraction signs then "yours is the gender" that talks mentally ill people into fucking their elderly mothers while fungus grows on their feet.

Obviously this is inflammatory and unproductive so it really seems like you are arguing in bad faith. Maybe your profile saying you're a jew isn't ironic?
 
Last edited:
Never forget that as recently as 10 years ago, these feminists were cheering at your every misfortune and retweeting #KillAllMen. The only reason they're here is because trannies stole their special victim card with the progressive stack, a concept these very feminists helped to popularize. If TTD actually did occur, these self-same women that hang out on the Farms to gossip about their favorite girlcow would be trying to get the Farms cancelled literally the very next day. Being woke on the tranny question should be seen as the bare minimum, not a basis for us to hoist these roasties on our shoulders and parade them about and call them based for the most remedial observations.
Got a metric shit ton of angery stickers for saying the same in another thread.

Radfems are not your friends, they hate trannies more for being men than for being trans, else they would hate pooners too for being traitors to womanhood or something, but no the pooners are "victims of the patriarchy" somehow, as if a patriarchal society would allow that, did they forget corrective rape its still used as a cure for lesbians and the like in some countries?

These are the same shits who support circumcision but are against female circumcision calling it "genital mutilation" in the same way that a loitering munition becomes a suicide drone if it has a russian flag sticker on it.

What they want is a line in the sand, that being trannies, but they are okay with all the other bullshit and insanity that's going on, their problem with trannies is that they are men getting a platinum victim card while they are now stuck with the social equivalent of a scratched up discover card.
The future is Muslim, more likely
Yeah I also got even more stickers for telling some sperg that he's retarded for thinking muslims are based and allies for hating on trannies when they also hate his kuffar ass.

Reminder that over 60% of all muslims living in the western world approved of isis' actions in syria and their methods.

There were nearly two million christians living in iraq, after isis its less than 200k.

"Based" my ass.
sitting in the Singles Ward hearing a woman talk about having multiple exes
So much for fundies I guess, so what's the limit for you guys now? like, if some white chick with 2 black babies shows up at the church saying she's a born-again virgin do you release the dogs? or let her in?

Be honest.
 
But I thought having less children is a good thing because the environment wouldn't be endangered? Haven't people been told to stop breeding and get in line for sterilisation for ~50-60 years? That unless the world implements one child policies The Climate Apocalypse will wipe us all out? That kids are a nuisance and useless clumps of cells that ruin your life and all the resources spent on them could be spent on taking in and taking care of immigrants?
If male virgins are causing the USA's and the world's fertility rate to drop further, does that make incels the good guys?
What happened is that the retarded HNIC finally realized that the agendas they've been pushing and narratives they've been wanting The West™ to wholesale accept such as the one you pointed out here, have a serious flaw.

You can't have neo-fuedalism if there aren't enough people to make it work. I've tried to explain in depth elsewhere just how much of an achille's heel this is but the TL;DR is that if you had this same problem in say, a medieval village of ~2,000 people, the local fuedal lord would be screaming at his advisors to fucking fix it immediately with whatever amounts they'd have to drag out of the treasury. In a society as complex and populous as the U.S. let alone the west in its entirety, we're going to see some serious shit as a result of this in the next few years revolving around having a severe lack of people to begin with let alone compounded by the competency crisis, meaning that of those left there will be a shrinking number of which who are even suitable for any job more complex than toilet scrubbing.

That also ties into:
Never forget that as recently as 10 years ago, these feminists were cheering at your every misfortune and retweeting #KillAllMen. The only reason they're here is because trannies stole their special victim card with the progressive stack, a concept these very feminists helped to popularize. If TTD actually did occur, these self-same women that hang out on the Farms to gossip about their favorite girlcow would be trying to get the Farms cancelled literally the very next day. Being woke on the tranny question should be seen as the bare minimum, not a basis for us to hoist these roasties on our shoulders and parade them about and call them based for the most remedial observations.
That's not the only reason. Some of these types, the more intelligent among them anyway, have probably done some necessary reading on the subject of the collapse of civilizations or at least did some digging/thinking on issues like this after they had their "waking up" moment from the tranny nonsense.

No stronk wahmen feminist would ever admit it, probably under any circumstances, but you need a functioning society with a driven, motivated male populace for progressivism of any kind to be even remotely workable. Trannyism isn't new, and when you start seeing trannies become "a thing" in a society, well, I hate to inform you but they might as well be harbingers of the fucking apocalypse as they're a phenomenon known to happen right before things go to shit in a civilization. Relative to feminists doing a limited hangout is the fact that, nobody wants to hear about your thoughts on gender roles when everything's falling apart so badly that its affecting the ability of the commons to live, work, and trade in a fluid, and relatively comfortable way.

Now, I'll never call myself a smart person, but paying attention to this shit, doing a bit of reading/thinking/listening to shit on the topic and generally just putting 2+2 together over a long enough time being interested in this issue, I'd say don't panic as a birthrate issue isn't going to bring the walls crumbling down overnight. Japan's gotten away with it for a while now albeit they have a completely different demography and culture than the U.S., but over the course of about 20-40 years assuming everything right now stays exactly the same you're going to see this country slowly turn into African levels of third-worldery as there's less teachers for every kid, less doctors for every patient, less electricians for every square mile, less plumbers for every home, etc and those that are left will be continually degrading in competency and work output to the point that rolling blackouts, boil water advisories, and other assorted fun facets of failed state life will become normal.

All of this of course also affects every other aspect of society from policing, to agriculture, to tax collection, to the organization of the goods at your local WalMart. Which means that as bad as it may seem it's also the most likely suspect for a natural reason for the WEF types to see their plans fail outright, you can't institute a dystopic global order or whatever if you literally can't find a nigger to crack heads for you that is capable of reading the correct address who isn't over fifty.
 
Last edited:
The future is Muslim, more likely
They are starting to have their own fertility issues and a bunch of medical ones, just like the Mormons, Protestants, Catholics, especially the Jews (lmao even), Hindus and Buddhists and every other religious group since they all have adherents that buy into modernity too deeply. More than likely, the future is going to be the first world turning into the third world and the less functional third world countries becoming giant warzones. That much I can say with certainty. We are probably going to see the return of unironic feudalism to hold shit together and actual barbarians in the same vein as Ancient Iranian steppeniggers.
 
Last edited:
Trannyism isn't new, and when you start seeing trannies become "a thing" in a society, well, I hate to inform you but they might as well be harbingers of the fucking apocalypse as they're a phenomenon known to happen right before things go to shit in a civilization. Relative to feminists doing a limited hangout is the fact that, nobody wants to hear about your thoughts on gender roles when everything's falling apart so badly that its affecting the ability of the commons to live, work, and trade in a fluid, and relatively comfortable way.

Progressives can't see this. In fact, whenever they envision an apocalypse (like in The Last of Us,) they imagine the survivors will exist in multi-ethnic Progressive enclaves with Basketball courts and coffee shops and pregnant women soldiers wielding Katanas on the front line of battles. Conservatives, they imagine, will be unenlightened and low IQ Christian cultists who will all accidentally shoot each other in the first week of the apocalypse. If WW3 ever does kick off, I guarantee that no one's going to care about anyone else's pronouns, and those that waste time caring about such things are going to find themselves becoming some wasteland warlord's hood ornament.
 
Cruel and unusual torture, AND more niggers?!

Honestly though, we could just add an option:

6. Ban abortion.

There, that's a million extra babies per year.
To keep a steady fertility rate the bitter truth seems to be to curtail forms of birth control. If you do anything at all on a legal level, the country has to be prepared in advance somewhat otherwise things go as well as Decree 770 did for Romania.
 
There, that's a million extra babies per year.
We dont need those babies, Europe and to a lesser extend the US are already overpopulated. The birth rates going back is a natural development and not really a big deal.
The problem is this import of infinity shitskin mudslime niggers due to this mainstream macroeconomic obsession with infinite growth.
 
We dont need those babies, Europe and to a lesser extend the US are already overpopulated. The birth rates going back is a natural development and not really a big deal.
The problem is this import of infinity shitskin mudslime niggers due to this mainstream macroeconomic obsession with infinite growth.
Even if we didn't they shouldn't be killed. Besides, overpopulation is a myth like global warming.

But yeah, the brown wave needs to be pushed back permanently.
 

What's the end game to mass illegal immigration? It has to be short term gain. Cause in the long the term, its gonna bite the DNC in the ass. But by that point, the folks in charge today will be in their graves. Or heads in jars if their fantasies come true.

I understand that it allows giant businesses to hire folks under the table for scraps and get rid of those complaining about a living wage.
Just to add to the things other people have pointed out;

Costs for everything are spiraling out of control. The US/West can't really do anything to lower energy prices in the short term, and the only longer term solutions involves huge amounts of capital up-front. The same is true for raw materials. So that leaves labor, and for this there actually is a way they can lower the cost of that right now - tons of immigration.
 
Don't mind me. Just dropping this off here. You don't even have to sign for it.
Aristotle/Politics/Spartan Women said:
The mention of avarice naturally suggests a criticism on the inequality of property. While some of the Spartan citizen have quite small properties, others have very large ones; hence the land has passed into the hands of a few. And this is due also to faulty laws; for, although the legislator rightly holds up to shame the sale or purchase of an inheritance, he allows anybody who likes to give or bequeath it. Yet both practices lead to the same result. And nearly two-fifths of the whole country are held by women; this is owing to the number of heiresses and to the large dowries which are customary. It would surely have been better to have given no dowries at all, or, if any, but small or moderate ones. As the law now stands, a man may bestow his heiress on any one whom he pleases, and, if he die intestate, the privilege of giving her away descends to his heir. Hence, although the country is able to maintain 1500 cavalry and 30,000 hoplites, the whole number of Spartan citizens fell below 1000. The result proves the faulty nature of their laws respecting property; for the city sank under a single defeat; the want of men was their ruin.
 
Aren't they pretty keen on the whole feminism thing? Africa isn't and without checking I bet they breed like rabbits. Hm...

Edit: I checked, Nigeria has the highest birthrate lol

The single most important variable influencing fertility in a society is the overall education level of women. It matters more than religion, left v right politics, per-capita GDP, or anything else. The more time women spend in school, the fewer children they have.

We dont need those babies, Europe and to a lesser extend the US are already overpopulated. The birth rates going back is a natural development and not really a big deal.
The problem is this import of infinity shitskin mudslime niggers due to this mainstream macroeconomic obsession with infinite growth.

Birth rates are extremely low everywhere, not just in areas of high population density. The birth rates are not "going back;" we are on the precipice of a demographic collapse as fundamentally parasitic socio-economic structures devour the host. Humanity won't go extinct, but what comes next won't just be "this, but with fewer people."
 
Last edited:
Back