US mimics Japan’s fertility crisis — and you can blame virginal men - Foids and Moids need to bump uglies otherwise boomers will run out of SSI

Experts warn that the United States may be following Japan’s worrying population decline after the Asian nation-state released new shocking data.

Japan’s National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, known as the IPSS, recently revealed that a third of women who are now 18 may never have children. The island country recorded a population of 126.15 million in 2020, and that number is projected to fall to 87 million by 2070, IPSS said.

“With the rising cost of living, I don’t think people feel they can afford to or comfortably say they want to have children,” 23-year-old Anna Tanaka told Reuters.

The birthrate has been declining for more than four decades as the desire for marriage and parenting has faded and financial worries have grown, the outlet reported.

Miho Iwasawa, the IPSS’s director of population dynamics research, blamed the population decline on the fact that people were marrying later in life and having fewer children — or none at all.

More families opting to have fewer children may be creating a cycle of smaller families.
Parents who have fewer children are able to spend more on each child, increasing the average cost of raising a child, which deters more people from having children, Takuya Hoshino, senior economist at Dai-ichi Life Research Institute, explained to Reuters.

As Japan looks to incentivize population growth amid worrying economic decline, experts warn that the US is experiencing a similar cultural shift that’s leading to a continued population decline.

Data from the US Census Bureau showedthat the population grew just 0.4 percent in 2022, an increase from 2021 but a much lower amount than every other year of the past few hundred years.

The number of births in the US has continued to decline for decades as nearly half of American women under 45 are currently childless. The number of biological fathers in the same age range also dipped.

Some attribute this to the fact that Americans are choosing to marry later or not at all.

The median age for getting married for the first time has increased over the past 50 years, from 23 years old in 1970 to about 30 in 2021 for men, and from 21 in 1970 to 28 in 2021 for women, the University of Virginia’s National Marriage Project found.

On top of that, a record number of 40-year-olds in the US have never been married, and most of them are living alone.

And a staggering 21% of millennials and 7% of Gen Z are not planning to get married, with the majority saying they simply aren’t interested in marriage, according to a study conducted by the Thriving Center of Psychology.

This marks a new peak in a decadeslong trend.

Advancements in egg-freezing and fertility treatments have allowed women to delay child-bearing and to remain single — but the quieting of their ticking biological clock has also allowed them to build fulfilling lives and conclude that they don’t want children.

A Match.com survey found a 19% dip in singles under 40 who said it was important to have a partner who wanted to have kids compared to 2017. The decreased interest in having children was “most pronounced among women, with only 56% now saying it is important to find a partner who wants children,” according to the research.
Younger generations have become particularly disinterested in childrearing, with 37% of non-parents younger than 40 revealing that it is not too likely or not at all likely that they will have children some day, according to the Pew Research Center.

Of those planning to remain childless, the majority (60%) said they simply don’t want to become parents.

Those who do want children are choosing to do it later and have smaller families, another study from the Pew Research Center reported. In 2021, the average mother had her first kid when she was 27.3 years old — up from 25.6 years old in 2011. Those who did give birth had an average of two children in 2020, which is much smaller than compared to the average of over three in the late 1970s, the study noted.

Other experts have also attributed the declining birth rate to women earning higher degrees and income, obtaining greater and longer career paths, changing family values, financial concerns, improved access to contraception, relationship instability and climate concerns — and the list could go on.

“The challenge is that no single cause can be identified for the declining birthrate,” the IPSS director said.
 
Hey everybody!

Look, it's STAN, real name Marge, with yet another one of her stupid diatribes that are only tangentially (at best) related to the subject at hand. Let's see how it goes this time!
“Male sexuality is treated as creepy and inappropriate” = why can’t I tell random women at the Home Depot that they should “take a look at this plumbing” or say “I’ve got some special wood for you out in the back”, or even “call me a hammer because I am going to pound you flat”.
The subject in this thread concerns crippling birth rates. Your off the shelf misandrist comments, that are not much much than a less than amusing, rather inaccurate description of how many males approach women really has very little to do with this subject. Except in a way that it does. As per usual your comments are not the least bit interesting, OR ORIGINAL. They do however seem to typify a certain sociological phenomenon among a certain subset of white women, that in part does explain lower birth rates. As another poster pointed out, it is the increasing alienation between the sexes that is a crucial part of the problem. Third and fourth wave feminism, a hyper sexualized, pornographic culture are some of the underlying culprits.
I waited til 32 to get pregnant and I had no trouble with it at all.
There she goes power-levelling again. I will say that women waiting that long for their first new born is a big reason why birth rates are so low. This of course is the first born, which does not leave a lot of runway for a third baby before complications start at 40.
You sound like it you feel you’re in this disrespected class of marginal men. Maybe you need to go see a therapist.
There goes Marge again, with her go to rebuttal personalizing anybody who gives her any sort of pushback. Surprised she did not go with the "your dick is small" or "mangled" bit. It does however fit with the meme I produced elsewhere where one of the three off the shelf insults is that a guy does not get enough attention from women.
Mind you this absolute drivel is not coming from some mean girl in high school or sorority girl in college, but a frumpy thirty something who is a wife and mother, yet still under the delusion she is somehow a close facsimile of Regina George.
Yours is the gender that sets up attraction signs and scapegoats women for the erosion of family values. This is also the gender that nags me for my number at public events while I am wearing my wedding band. If you ain’t gonna live like a tradchad then don’t expect to be treated like one.
There she goes again with more misandry, and MORE power-levelling. Someone else chided her conflating personal anecdotes with broader trends. Really though, this is absolutely irrelevant to the subject at hand. To me it seems like a desperate way to counter insults about her appearance to say "nuh uh guys, I go to functions and random men to try to pick me up even though I have a wedding band on my finger." I am surprised she did not end with something like "But I told them no, and each time the entire bar claps in applause."
I was talking about some of the retarded and repulsive ways men express their sexuality towards women with whom they’d like to be in a relationship.
Right, because this is not about a civilization's deficiencies in birth rates, it is about your misandry, Marge.
The average age of first time mothers in Massachusetts is 28, so it isn’t just a personal anecdote. This notion that women promptly lose their fertility at 35 (or that they “hit the wall” at 30) is stupid and needs to die.
The AVERAGE birth rate, which means fifty percent are higher. That complications start at 40, on the whole that's not enough runaway for three children (or 2.5 on average). That number is going to include lots who only have one, or none at all.

One last thing, elsewhere you accused of the A and H contributors of routinely asserting that women hit the wall at 30 (not 45 or 5) and that they cannot have babies at 35. Far be it from me to speak for the community as a whole, but I personally have never read a single comment to that effect. Someone else rightly pointed out it is a continuum and perhaps these problems START at about those ages, but your characterization to me rings utterly untrue, and I am pretty sure it does to most others here as well.
If you want kids to fill your tax base, you'll have to unfuck the relationship between men and women. The broken relationship created by these same globalist fucks who pushed women to be just like men, so now very few men are good enough for those women, and the ones that are have no intention of settling down because they get so many women.
I gave this a gold medal. I do not have much to add but just felt it needed a little more emphasis, particularly in the context of Stan's absurd misandrist rants and power-levelling that no one asked to read about.
Truth is, there are more than enough human beings.
That's not the question. The question is if there are enough whites in the US and actual Europeans in Europe, Japanese in Japan, and there are not. Funny thing how the ruling class is doing everything it can to make us extinct and so that our memory is relegated to an exhibit in the fucking Smithsonian but is purposefully fanning the flames of the population explosion in Africa, India, and the Muslim World.
 
Last edited:
That's not the question. The question is if there are enough whites in the US and actual Europeans in Europe, Japanese in Japan, and there are not.
Why not?
What would happen if Japan's population went from the current 125 million to 100 million?
Would that mean there aren't enough Japanese people anymore somehow?
Please, explain.
Funny thing how the ruling class is doing everything it can to make us extinct and so that our memory is relegated to an exhibit in the fucking Smithsonian but is purposefully fanning the flames of the population explosion in Africa, India, and the Muslim World.
Just because the less civilized parts of the world are doing something stupid doesn't mean everyone should.
 
I also find boomers to be more pleasant conversationalists, millennials and zoomies barely respond and have that blank fish eyed stare that comes from too much reddit/Instagram/Tik Tok and a daily SSRI cocktail. Too bad I'm not into grannies.
Boomers and Xers grew up in a very different time and have better communication because of a lack of care. Meanwhile, Millenials and especially Zoomers grow up in current culture where you are always walking on egg shells with people. There is sort of a look before running rule because even offline interactions can go south.

Coming out of college, many college interactions felt like a ticking time bomb where you had to watch yourself. There is the obvious trannies that can make problems, the SJW types that are just gearing up for a fight, and even teachers who wait to belittle their “racist” students.

With controversies over everything from actual politics to Harry Potter, no one has a personality as any would just set off triggers.
 
Last edited:
Coming out of college, many college interactions felt like a ticking time bomb where you had to watch yourself. There is the obvious trannies that can make things shit, the SJW types that are just gearing up for a fight, and even teachers who wait to belittle their “racist” students
This goes away when you leave that environment. College and cooperate America are emotional playgrounds for women, trannies and negros but their power decreases outside of those areas. I'm the last person to simp and defend women but my personal observation is that even women are tired and fed up with that society and just want a man to take them by the hand and lead them out.

If you're a man you have to do whatever you can to remove yourself from those environments. Make it your main mission in life. You have to see it like a dog kennel or something. They're fine for dogs, but you're not a dog so why are you sitting in a dog kennel??
 
This goes away when you leave that environment. College and cooperate America are emotional playgrounds for women, trannies and negros but their power decreases outside of those areas. I'm the last person to simp and defend women but my personal observation is that even women are tired and fed up with that society and just want a man to take them by the hand and lead them out.
I agree.

What I am saying is that many young are a part of or were bread up through this system. It explains why they are not great conversationalists. Modern America’s ladder sits them through hell for years till they can leave. You cannot place America’s youth in an unstable playground in their formative years and expect them to come out without a few issues. I doubt the dead stares are more from social media usage rather than outside cultures that validate the worse behaviors.
 
Jesus H Christ what a shitshow this thread became.
We're going to go extinct from low birthrates with this level of bitching back and forth.
I thought it was kind of tame; they always go the same way anyway, but we've been through it so many times, it's becoming difficult to add very much new. Unless some harridan pipes up to re-ignite conflict, I feel that the menz can't be arsed to even argue any more. We'll take our peace where we can find it, rather than engaging - fruitlessly - with argumentative wahmens. Reflective of the situation as a whole, I'd say.
 
But I thought having less children is a good thing because the environment wouldn't be endangered? Haven't people been told to stop breeding and get in line for sterilisation for ~50-60 years? That unless the world implements one child policies The Climate Apocalypse will wipe us all out? That kids are a nuisance and useless clumps of cells that ruin your life and all the resources spent on them could be spent on taking in and taking care of immigrants?
If male virgins are causing the USA's and the world's fertility rate to drop further, does that make incels the good guys?
 
so we know that deep down, they're actually really happy."
Sunken cost fallacy, they all invested into this scam and can't accept that they wasted about 20 years of the prime of their lives on this. So they keep at it thinking they can actually be a single mom at 50 with their frozen eggs.

The amount of middle age women who expended those eggs without any of the embryos attaching its higher than most people think, not a well known fact because that industry keeps that information hidden and radfems don't want to talk about it either since its bad for their propaganda efforts aka: coping.
 
IMG_6594.jpeg

Meme is still undefeated
 
Guys for the love all that is holy stop responding to @Stan shitposting in threads like this. I don't think she's a straight up troll but she might as well be. You could present the most logically sound argument with heckin' facts and statistics and she will unironically hone in on the one part where you said whore and say "well, that's not very nice! How would your mother feel if blahblahblah". I promise you that you aren't going to convince her, because she's exactly the kind of person that would immediately be exiled from polite society if the pendulum starts swinging back. What you are doing is tantamount to trying to convince a heroin addict that we need to tighten up the laws on opoids. It's never going to happen because it directly cuts against his interests of being zonked out on heroin 24/7. Just save yourself a little bit of aggravation, trust me.
 
Back