It's called due process and the presumption of innocence. And it seems to have worked better than "trust me bro".If you want to move [acceptable use policy] enforcement to the realm of government oversight, it’s more than likely going to result in a much more heavy-handed approach than is necessary
Adherence to the concept of due process and the presumption of innocence. If the author thinks it's not perfect, then to quote their own article back at them:Allowing Kiwi Farms to flourish would not have protected anyone anywhere in the world from the malice of authoritarians who seek to abuse power at every turn. [...]
What would Kiwi Farms’ victims have been sacrificed for?
how could anyone mistake our world for an ideal one?
Last edited: