@Suenonym said:
"Also, this is an interesting thing to really talk about, Vichan, and I assume all websites running it, is under the supervision of a person who oversees Soyjak party. I wonder if that is an issue or not, and if this changes the current scope of involvement."
You seem to be implying, and confused, that whoever develops Vichan, the software has control over the many imageboards running Vichan, the software. Kiwifarms certainly isn't in a "ring" with the company that develops XenForo just because Kiwifarms is on XenForo forum software.
It makes even less sense for open source software like vichan. There is no "The Vichan" organization, most imageboards are running modified copies of it. The version these guys picked up had been abandonware for years, it might be the closest to a central version, but it's effectively just another version since using it is voluntary.
TLDR Any imageboard running vichan doesn't have to have anything to do with the people who decide to develop vichan.
"Also, this is an interesting thing to really talk about, Vichan, and I assume all websites running it, is under the supervision of a person who oversees Soyjak party. I wonder if that is an issue or not, and if this changes the current scope of involvement."
You seem to be implying, and confused, that whoever develops Vichan, the software has control over the many imageboards running Vichan, the software. Kiwifarms certainly isn't in a "ring" with the company that develops XenForo just because Kiwifarms is on XenForo forum software.
It makes even less sense for open source software like vichan. There is no "The Vichan" organization, most imageboards are running modified copies of it. The version these guys picked up had been abandonware for years, it might be the closest to a central version, but it's effectively just another version since using it is voluntary.
TLDR Any imageboard running vichan doesn't have to have anything to do with the people who decide to develop vichan.
Last edited: