Milo Yiannopoulos / Milo Wagner / Milo Hanrahan / @nero - Gets banned from everywhere, Stole charity money and general supervillan antics, Probably a Fed

  • Thread starter Thread starter JU 199
  • Start date Start date
He's an Ann Coulter esque professional shitposter with half the name recognition, as soon as Trump loses the election by a massive landslide Milo will once more be irrelevant.

Also the charity thing may end up with him behind bars so theres that.
 
Did he ever go through with that pride march in Switzerland?
It was in Sweden. He didn't actually organise it, he was supposed to be going to the second Pride Järva, but he wussed out. His "security advisors" said it was too dangerous for Milo. It went ahead anyway, and nothing happened.
Pride-J%C3%A4rva1.jpg
The guy who organised it - Jan Sjunnesson - claims to be bisexual, but it was a pretty transparent effort on his part to use a Pride parade as a harder-to-criticise reason for having an anti-Muslim protest. They want to invite Milo again next year, though.
Funny he mentioned those "reorientation camps". Two of the founders of "reorientation therapy" ended up leaving the movement -- and wound up with each other. HA!
I'm fairly sure Milo doesn't want to actually stop being gay. He just says crap like that to pander to his alt-right fans. Notice how he swings between "I'm a good Catholic and I can't help this awful compulsion I have, I wish I could fix it" and "hahaha I love big black cocks, yaaaas president daddy". He's probably still working out whether "self hating homosexual" or "amusingly faggy alt-right homosexual" is the more profitable venture.
Not super related but his poetry is super bad.
B7XXJ6YCMAAyZHk.jpg

resize

B7Xfs96CMAElVr_.jpg

B7Xg68YCAAEuacS.jpg
It's like he skimmed T.S. Elliot's The Wasteland and just went "I can do that!".
 
Milo, he's the kind of rabid dog you're happy with is on your side instead of your opponents.

He's good to start fires, he's not capable to burn someone down.
 
I remember when Gamergate just blew up I suddenly started to see Milo and Breitbart everywhere. It sure looked legit and totally not opportunistic to me.

Same. I believe Milo's the type who'll glom onto any cause so long as it gives him a chance to espouse some of his beliefs or opinions without any sort of recourse or punishment. He's been shown to be very anti-political correctness, anti-feminism/ a misogynist, so on and so forth.

Gamergate, regardless of where you may have stood on the matter, did have people -very vocal people- who espoused similar opinions/beliefs and basically took over the whole deal and seriously undermined -and later drove out- the efforts of people who genuinely wanted change in gaming journalism. And since this was looking to become the next big cultural "war" (for lack of a better term), it totally makes sense that someone like Milo -and by extension, Breitbart- would jump on it solely to fuel his ego and grow his cult of personality, and allow him to spew his opinions without punishment and have a mob of people to back him up when he gets called out on it. Even if he made remarks disparaging gamers a year or two before all of this. Give it a year or two, I'm sure he'll be back to insulting gamers once the well dries up and he can't feed his ego anymore.

And honestly, at this point, I see him as no different than Brianna Wu in some respects: all noise, an obnoxious echo chamber surrounding them, and nothing to show for their crowdfunding efforts (his "scholarship" fund vs. Brianna's "game").
 
a pre-gamergate, pre-flamboyant gay but 'my grandmother dressed me today' Milo:


He's not that great of a debater when he's presented with people that aren't easily triggered, deer in the headlights feminists. Might be the reason why the Ben Shapiro thing never happened.
 
a pre-gamergate, pre-flamboyant gay but 'my grandmother dressed me today' Milo:


He's not that great of a debater when he's presented with people that aren't easily triggered, deer in the headlights feminists. Might be the reason why the Ben Shapiro thing never happened.
exactly. he's good as a trigger, but watch his videos and it's all pretty empty
 
a pre-gamergate, pre-flamboyant gay but 'my grandmother dressed me today' Milo:


He's not that great of a debater when he's presented with people that aren't easily triggered, deer in the headlights feminists. Might be the reason why the Ben Shapiro thing never happened.

Oh the clothes... fucking hilarious.

He really isn't even a half-decent debater. When has Milo ever publicly taken on a truly bright, intelligent opponent? He has found his audience and it sure ain't very smart. Plus, talking lots in the US to that audience with a posh English accent covers up many weaknesses.

Seems like he has a soft spot for man boy love and Jewish traditional circumcision.

Yeah he did that borderline pro-pedo interview with Joe Rogan. I could not decide if he really believed that or was shock-jocking yet again. But I lean towards his being a genuine pedo-apologist.
 
Last edited:
Yeah he did that borderline pro-pedo interview with Joe Rogan. I could not decide if he really believed that or was shock-jocking yet again. But I lean towards his being a genuine pedo-apologist.
That interview was weird. I don't mind his "I sucked a priests cock when I was a kid/lost my virginity in a tranny gangbang" shit because I just put it down to edgelording, but in the same interview he mentioned being at a Hollywood party and there being very young boys but he didn't want to say who's party it was because that'd be 'indiscreet'. The same guy who had no problem outing Nyberg's pedo past or giving the full name of the Rolling Stone fake-rape girl suddenly has concerns about privacy or something?
 
That interview was weird. I don't mind his "I sucked a priests cock when I was a kid/lost my virginity in a tranny gangbang" shit because I just put it down to edgelording, but in the same interview he mentioned being at a Hollywood party and there being very young boys but he didn't want to say who's party it was because that'd be 'indiscreet'. The same guy who had no problem outing Nyberg's pedo past or giving the full name of the Rolling Stone fake-rape girl suddenly has concerns about privacy or something?

Milo does what suits him. He is singularly without principles. It suited him to out Nyberg.

Not a lot of upside for Milo in naming names in the pedo abuse he witnessed at a Hollywood party. Very creepy though especially as it came in the same interview where he insisted he was a 14 year old sexual predator..... and not the priest who was abusing him.
 
Back