Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Shagedan]

I'm so fucking back @Useful_Mistake and all other mods are trannies who can suck my profile picture so can @Norbert the Tiger for doubting my power.

I was the prophet of our times. Eat it.

Our wife propositioned muh fish eyed drexel but he's too much of a bro TM to do that to balldoman. She prefers niggeroni just like our boy fatty rick I wonder if they also fart in her vagina?

Our very own Still-Life is back from gay baby jail. Welcome back, chum.

 

[Captain Manning]

He's a fucking idiot. He's seething and coping. He's completely incapable of facing the fact he fucked up. He was drunk, and he fucked up, because he was a drunk idiot.

The sick thing to me is that he's doing it in a way meant to prey on the ignorant. The ignorant will assume he must be right because he has a J.D.. It's like he's saying "Guys! I have to win against Monty! If I don't, all of you will be at risk for being sued if you call somebody a weirdo or retard on the Internet. Don't you see?!?"

No Nick, we don't. Because what you're trying to claim happened isn't what actually happened, and it's long been established that the vile thing you said isn't protected under the 1A. The risk is only there if you are a complete mouth breathing idiot with absolutely no filter. Even Kiwi Farms wouldn't tolerate somebody doing what you did. You could be banned from here for that. And Farmers are somewhat renowned for being assholes who post on a site that's otherwise extremely permissive when it comes to speech. That should tell you something.

But then again, I feel confident we're a bit more intelligent then what's left of his audience. Especially from what I've seen from his Locals. The same Locals that harbors people like Still-Life.

I really wish another lawyer would do a video pushing back against his narrative. Dunford kinda did, but his video has several issues and not a lot of people like him. Kurt seems like he's on the cusp, but can't seem to pull the trigger. Sean, understandably, doesn't want to get involved any more than he absolutely has to because Monty might try and draw him in. It's just disconcerting see people hoodwinked by his blatant disregard for the truth, but I guess it can't be helped.

 

[RotPockets]

If Montys lawyer is able to convince the court that Nick's statements constitute defamation per se damages are presumed. We went over this in ass bleeding detail while Nick covered the Vic lawsuit. Monty can be argued to tick the boxes on example 1 and 3 of the listed examples of defamation per se. Its considered a crime or immoral act and its a form of sexual misconduct. Just need to cross the hurdle of getting the court to agree.

What that said, I'm wracking my brain how anybody could falsely accuse somebody of child molestation and NOT be a malicious asshole. Actual malice is also defined as "reckless disregard for the truth," which seems to fit Nick's comments to a T.

I’m back from the future with the closing arguments of Nick’s trial, but he was so drunk in the courtroom that I got a buzz off his breath and posted this in the past.

1. Did you make the claim that Montagraph is a pedophile?
2. Do you actually believe he is a pedophile?
3. If so, do you have any proof that he is a pedophile?

If the answer to all 3 of those questions isn’t ‘yes’ he’s fucked.

 

[Dr Naomi Hunter]

What kind of lawyer can nick hire at this stage? A case that is already on appeals and is on a ridiculous argument about jurisdiction?

Russell Greer is probably available

 

[John Andrews Stan]

"I prefer to be me and not lie or misrepresent who I am, often to my detriment." - Nick Rekieta

Lmfao.

Also Nick Rekieta:



I’m not Christian but for the sake of not inciting a religious thread I’ll just say that this is the same guy who acts like anyone who recalls him laying it on thick with the Christian act was just imagining things. Again, IANAC but I still hope Nick doesn’t teach Sunday school anymore.

Related, I suspect this has been seen before but sharing in case it hasn’t:



(I did not search for Nick Rekieta nudes. This comes up in a basic search for Nick and Kayla’s names. I’d love to be a fly on the wall at the parent/teacher conferences if these two ever dared to let their children get near any mandated reporters.)

 

[Strix454]

Legal bro's, I need your opinions.

If Monty wins, does that make any difference legally to anyone else that Rekieta has dropped a bucket of shit on, if they were inspired by a Monty victory to sue him for defamation?

Rekieta appears to be saying he has to fight this case to the bitter end, else some of his A-Logs might come gunning for him.

The circumstances of this case make the verdict meaningless in terms of any future cases. Defamation cases on the internet are usually incredibly difficult to prove and to win on. If Monty wins here, it will only be because Nick made a series of bad decisions that he could have easily avoided.

- Don't make factual statements about someone being something unless you have facts to back it up. Especially if you are accusing them of a crime.
- If there is a public controversy about someone, talk about the controversy rather than directly accusing them of something. "People talk on the internet about him being a pedo" rather than "He is a pedo doing acts with children"
- Don't talk about your own case on the internet. Don't talk about your motives for making the defamatory statement.
- Never dare someone to sue you like Nick did. Never make potentially defaming comments and then dare someone to sue you.
- Never assume someone doesn't have the resources to hire an attorney and sue you.

Nick did everything that you are not supposed to do in these situations and then got sued. If a person acts like a fool, they will suffer the consequences of acting like a fool.

What kind of lawyer can nick hire at this stage? A case that is already on appeals and is on a ridiculous argument about jurisdiction?

My advice would be to hire someone not flashy who understands defamation cases. Abandon the appeal because its stupid and it will not work. Put as much effort as necessary into winning the public figure argument.

If the judge starts pushing for a settlement, cooperate with that effort as much as possible. Make it look to the judge like you are reasonable and want this over. If an apology is necessary, agree to it. Stop bugging the judge with long motions and documents about how Monty is a bad person.

The case should be fought on two grounds. The question of actual malice by Nick in making the comments and on the amount of damages that should be awarded.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Calling it now: Even if Nick somehow pulls out a win after saying Monty “always loves sucking baby dicks,” it won’t be long before Nick gets himself into another spot of bother just like this.

Lolcows never learn. And Nick is a thoroughbred lolcow if ever one existed.

 

[arc minsk]

Lmfao.

Also Nick Rekieta:

View attachment 5365774
View attachment 5365773
View attachment 5365772
View attachment 5365775

I’m not Christian but for the sake of not inciting a religious thread I’ll just say that this is the same guy who acts like anyone who recalls him laying it on thick with the Christian act was just imagining things. Again, IANAC but I still hope Nick doesn’t teach Sunday school anymore.

Related, I suspect this has been seen before but sharing in case it hasn’t:

View attachment 5365786
View attachment 5365787
(I did not search for Nick Rekieta nudes. This comes up in a basic search for Nick and Kayla’s names. I’d love to be a fly on the wall at the parent/teacher conferences if these two ever dared to let their children get near any mandated reporters.)

there is internet level 'explain-away' where people (DSP types) can hold on to their acolytes and convince them that anyone with a whisper of bad faith are clearly detractors and haters and "IN THEIR MOM'S BASEMENT". along with some of the other greatest hits such as: hater, jealous, trolls, etc. surely you can easily grift-nosis on the normies of the real world with much more ease. imagine the rubes of rural minnesota.

"these people are stalkers! they just want me to suffer!" - nick saying to 14 people from a town that still thinks a rail company will turn them into a metropolitan like it's 1908

 

[Grotesque Bushes]

Rekieta appears to be saying he has to fight this case to the bitter end, else some of his A-Logs might come gunning for him.

You don't understand, I MUST absolutely wreck my family's financial future, otherwise Cumwarrior27 will type 'lmao rekieta more like retardkieta' on an offshore African touristry forum.

 

[Sock Cucker]

Our very own Still-Life is back from gay baby jail. Welcome back, chum.

I see what you did there.Lol.

 

[Potatoherder]

Super low night on rumble and is getting close to dipping under $100 on YT($138 ). The superchat spread is actually somewhat decent so some chat back and forth seemed to have happened. One of them indicates he is back to article reading.

moonman332

The author of this article is weird, either they want to control a certain narrative or they generally don't understand legal precedent at all.

------------------------
Total Rumbles: $ 75
Rumble Count: 17
Conversion Rate Raw: 0.24323937616254113
Peak Viewers: 6989
Peaked time: 2023-09-27 00:50:03.785391571 -0500 CDT m=+14292.563023543
------------------------
Chat Messages: 3194
Muted: 0
Deleted: 0
Unknown: 1
------------------------
StreamID: 212589775
Start: 2023-09-26 21:54:02.535014726 -0500 CDT m=+3731.312646626
End: 2023-09-27 02:38:14.342585606 -0500 CDT m=+20783.120217578
------------------------
StreamURL: https://rumble.com/v3l5xcv-trump-gu...mophobic-rant-insurrectionist-opinions-a.html
------------------------

 

[Associate Rick]

He could also take this whole thing full circle and go pro se.

Maybe he should just pull the pin on the grenade and go all out with the balldo defense.

Nick: ...ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a balldo. A balldo is a rubber device that you put your balls into to fuck your wife. Now think about it; that does not make sense!

Schneider: Damn it! ... He's using the balldo defense!

Nick: Why would a man place his balls into a rubber device and then use that rubber device to fuck his wife while his little whiskey dick is flopping all over the place? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending myself because I called someone a child molester, and I'm talkin' about balldos! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If a man fucks his wife with a rubber device attached to his balls, you must acquit! The defense rests.

 

[Maude Snew]

Maybe he should just pull the pin on the grenade and go all out with the balldo defense.

Nick: ...ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a balldo. A balldo is a rubber device that you put your balls into to fuck your wife. Now think about it; that does not make sense!

Schneider: Damn it! ... He's using the balldo defense!

Nick: Why would a man place his balls into a rubber device and then use that rubber device to fuck his wife while his little whiskey dick is flopping all over the place? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending myself because I called someone a child molester, and I'm talkin' about balldos! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If a man fucks his wife with a rubber device attached to his balls, you must acquit! The defense rests.

Beat me to posting this because I decided to cook first.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Nashville show.

I have a 720p verison, but it is over 1 Gb. I have a horrible connection atp, so it will have to wait.

 

[northstar747]

He's engaged in full on denial with Hedonism II, despite the fact no reasonable person believes he didn't go (not even many of his fans). Supposedly, Kayla didn't want their vacation destination being known but he spilled the beans anyways.
He wanted the Mandy thirst clip scrubbed from the Internet.
He wanted his monologue about Kayla's body post-pregnancy scrubbed too.

Does any one know how those photos of hedo got out?

Why would anyone think that would be a good idea?

If nick and his wife wanted to be spicy just have a stream where she comes in and he humps her leg because he loves her etc

 

[Thugnificent]

If Rekieta is arguing that it's important for everybody to be able to falsely accuse people of child molestation whenever they feel like it, he can get fucked. That's not free speech. I don't think most people would support that argument.

Question, does the accusation have to be a specific one? So far I haven't heard Nick name a specific child so maybe that's his out in this case?

 

[Kopasea]

I have a 720p verison, but it is over 1 Gb. I have a horrible connection atp, so it will have to wait.

Nick sitting in the cuck chair while everyone else hangs out on stage is Peak Rekieta at this point

 

[Maraschino]

Question, does the accusation have to be a specific one? So far I haven't heard Nick name a specific child so maybe that's his out in this case?

I think it's the opposite. His lack of specificity would be the thing that makes it more obvious he defamed Monty, because if he had proof it happened, he could just cite the specific children Monty allegedly molested and get this shit over with.

"He sucked their dick!"
"Okay, who?"
"Someone's dick somewhere."

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Nick’s closing statement:

“Ladies and gentlemen of the court, groove with me..”

-pulls out a boombox

https://youtu.be/o2X8qvzceBA?si=AlZfAwv9REG2VfPF

 

[Owlbear]

Maybe he should just pull the pin on the grenade and go all out with the balldo defense.

Nick: ...ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a balldo. A balldo is a rubber device that you put your balls into to fuck your wife. Now think about it; that does not make sense!

Schneider: Damn it! ... He's using the balldo defense!

Nick: Why would a man place his balls into a rubber device and then use that rubber device to fuck his wife while his little whiskey dick is flopping all over the place? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending myself because I called someone a child molester, and I'm talkin' about balldos! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If a man fucks his wife with a rubber device attached to his balls, you must acquit! The defense rests.

I assume that speech goes more like this:

Nick (waving around a glass of whiskey): Ladies and gentlemen of the supposed jury or whatever, I have 5 superchats to get through, and then like 1 maybe 2 final things for you to consider.

[insert 7 superchats here, including an inane toast]

OK, now that that's over, have you heard of the balldo? It's this great device that stretches over your balls so you can use them to fuck your wife and you get a ballgasm. You see, it goes over your balls like this and there are rings to stretch it out and stuff.

Anyway there was a whole speech from South Park or some show like that I was going to quote, but I had to pick up my kids because my wife is getting a 23rd facelift, so I didn't have time to prepare it. So now I'm just going to read it.

[Proceed with half the speech]

Oh, I forgot something. You can't use it for DP. It just doesn't work for that because the geometry is wrong and shit. I wouldn't know if you really can, my dick hasn't worked for years.

[Read 10 more superchats and then get back to the rest of the speech]