Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 53 15.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 133 38.6%

  • Total voters
    345
okay come on. Nick just said "BAD FAITH. HE DOESN'T LIKE YOU. CAN'T YOU SEE WHY HE WOULD BELIEVE THIS IN GOOD FAITH?"

what a nigger. his argument makes no sense. YOU JUST SAID IT WAS IN BAD FAITH. LITERALLY. WHY ARE YOU NOW SAYING THEY LEGITIMATELY BELIEVE IT? Like, yeah Nick, I guess if someone irrationally hates me for no reason, and is willing to believe anything about me without any reason or evidence, then I guess they're justified in ruining my business!
 
Both are not really doing a good job. But did he really chatge a charity 3 dollars more than the original price?
Nick is muddling things, but I felt what Eric was trying to say was fairly clear. A book costs $17 but buyers were incentivized to buy multiple books at a lower cost per book. So figuring all the people who bought multiple books, the average cost was lower. This was apparently well-documented and public knowledge previously. Also, I think the issue is the value donated to the charity in books and the only people who paid were the buyers, not the charity. I have no context on any of this lol and I'm not a lolyer like the Nose
 
The word Eric actually means to use is "impartial".

What's interesting is that Nick isn't catching on to this and is going full lawyer brained.

It's obvious Nick wasn't impartial when he initially mischaracterized the whole drama Vito and Dick have initiated with Eric.

Dick was obviously trying to screw around with someone's business no different than what Dong Gone has tried to do with the forums. It's not a difficult concept to grasp when Dick told Eric on that stream that it wasn't a fraud and then went on Twitter to claim Eric is involved in fraud.

And somehow, Nick doesn't understand this.
Nick fully understands that, He doesn't believe it anymore than he meant something else with his on the wall comment. Like Duncan though Eric is too smooth brained to make a coherent argument and is giving Nick a free layup.
 
Nick is coming off so fake, it’s unreal. His voice keeps cracking, his face keeps bugging out. We need to make a gif of all the stupid faces Nick keeps pulling over this. Nick is used to talking with other liars & gaslighters, he isn’t comprehending the straightforward way Eric is speaking to him on this stream. Balldo is floundering. Now Nick is appealing to authority, an hour plus deep in the stream, “everybody knows blah blah blah,” with stupid points about the $17 book. It’s looking like a humiliating defeat for Ole Balldo man.
 
bad.png

"I'M ON THE BOARD OF SEVERAL CHARITY ORGANIZATIONS!"

Since when? Shouldn't this be public. Is he trying to fucking big time him on fucking charity?
Not sure. This claim was news to me.
 
I'm pretty sure trying to fuck with someone's business (outside of legal channels) is the definition of tortuous interference. It's understandable why Eric would believe this is a reasonable thing to do, but Nick defending this in any context while calling Eric a retard for reiterating public number is quite wet-brained. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong
 
of course if someone is gassing dogs, there's evidence that there's a reason for the business to be ruined. Versus...no evidence, no reason.

honestly I don't like Eric July very much, but he's taking this extremely well. Nick is being unbelievably condescending and rude and acting like a total cunt. I would be way more pissed off.
 
- Nick repeated that he wants porn star Adriana Chechik (the one who broke her back) on his show.
This is way worse than you frame it.



He wants to have someone on who is on "the fringes of free speech" cause he's such a believer of it. It just so happens to be an ex-porn star. Boy if only there was SOMEONE he knows who is constantly dealing with his free speech being stifled.
 
honestly I don't like Eric July very much, but he's taking this extremely well. Nick is being unbelievably condescending and rude and acting like a total cunt. I would be way more pissed off.
This is my first time watching Eric live, but if I was face-to-face with someone doing this much eye-rolling and condescension I would have thrown proverbial hands long ago. And I'm not even black.
 
Back