- Joined
- Jun 4, 2018
Oh for God's sake... I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh for God's sake... I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
In the end, all we can do is UwU.Oh for God's sake... I don't know whether to laugh or cry.
And that's why "faggot" is the only rational way to answer thisTwitter: https://archive.ph/RY5Ef
Nitter: https://archive.li/ONzFY
Someone is tired of all of the random 'this character is queer' jokes. This person is not even being homophobic, but simply tired of the gay jokes.
View attachment 5377175
Naturally, the narcissism kicks in.
Frankly, I agree with Larry. All of these 'characters are gay because shut up' jokes were never funny.
If anything, the ones getting upset over this comment are the ones taking the jokes way, WAY too seriously. Someone disliking a joke is not a hateful act, even if the joke is about you.
...to the gay kaijuu jokes, to Larry, or to the narcissism?And that's why "faggot" is the only rational way to answer this
Lmao, it looks like he's actually celebrating the death of George Floyd.
Only thing missing was him pulling a Pelosi afterwards:Lmao, it looks like he's actually celebrating the death of George Floyd.
I can tell from this guy's back that he has a black niece or nephew named Jordyn that he sees only at major holidays but has decided to make it roughly half of his personality.
Yes,one of the original founders of Right Wing Cope was a curly haired mutt outed for listing over 16 year olds. Eventually even the furries called him out, and he stepped down. I think I, Hypocrite might have mentioned it.I always believed that Right Wing Cope was a poster on r/theDonald until it was shut down due to wrongthink on Reddit. Now, it’s turned into a poster that thinks that Twitter is r/politics on steroids, yet thinks he’s too smart to not know that he’s no different from a gimmick account on that same site.
All I’m saying is that this account is suspicious.
Ok, that's fucking hilarious.
Already deleted.
>Martin Luther King Jr.
Martin Luther King Jr. said:I'm absolutely convinced that a riot merely intensifies the fears of the white community while relieving the guilt. And I feel that we must always work with an effective, powerful weapon and method that brings about tangible results. But it is not enough for me to stand before you tonight and condemn riots. It would be morally irresponsible for me to do that without, at the same time, condemning the contingent, intolerable conditions that exist in our society. These conditions are the things that cause individuals to feel that they have no other alternative than to engage in violent rebellions to get attention. And I must say tonight that a riot is the language of the unheard. And what is it America has failed to hear? It has failed to hear that the plight of the negro poor has worsened over the last twelve or fifteen years. It has failed to hear that the promises of freedom and justice have not been met. And it has failed to hear that large segments of white society are more concerned about tranquility and the status quo than about justice and humanity.
We must reaffirm our commitment to nonviolence. I want to stress this. The futility of violence in the struggle for racial justice has been tragically etched in all the recent Negro riots. Yesterday, I tried to analyze the riots and deal with their causes. Today I want to give the other side. There is certainly something painfully sad about a riot. One sees screaming youngsters and angry adults fighting hopelessly and aimlessly against impossible odds. And deep down within them, you can see a desire for self-destruction, a kind of suicidal longing.
Nowhere have the riots won any concrete improvement such as have the organized protest demonstrations. When one tries to pin down advocates of violence as to what acts would be effective, the answers are blatantly illogical. Sometimes they talk of overthrowing racist state and local governments and they talk about guerrilla warfare. They fail to see that no internal revolution has ever succeeded in overthrowing a government by violence unless the government had already lost the allegiance and effective control of its armed forces. Anyone in his right mind knows that this will not happen in the United States. Furthermore, few, if any, violent revolutions have been successful unless the violent minority had the sympathy and support of the non-resisting majority.