Matt Walsh / The Matt Walsh Show

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

What does he think about sixteen year olds?

That they should not be sexually mutilated. Do you concur with him?

 

[LolRaccoon]

Matt Walsh is genuinely one of the most annoying people on the right. He's one of those people that talk about the culture war but doesn't provide any alternatives to it because he believes anything that you do for fun is childish. Also, if he had any integrity, he wouldn't be hiding "What is a Woman" behind a paywall because otherwise it's just preaching to the choir.

 

[BetterFuckChuck]

he's essentially a white trash hipster

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Matt Walsh is genuinely one of the most annoying people on the right. He's one of those people that talk about the culture war but doesn't provide any alternatives to it because he believes anything that you do for fun is childish. Also, if he had any integrity, he wouldn't be hiding "What is a Woman" behind a paywall because otherwise it's just preaching to the choir.

You're probably referring to his comments on video games, he just said it's childish to play them constantly and take them seriously, basically. Same with sports.

What is a Woman was made free to watch on Twitter, but in the end they're a business and not a charity anyway. For some reason only the right is held to the standard of fighting the culture war, but for free on the side while they do a regular full-time job somehow. Just slip speeches, documentaries, podcasts, etc in between your 9-5, I guess. I always found that a particularly petty and unrealistic criticism

 

[WelperHelper99]

That they should not be sexually mutilated. Do you concur with him?

Bro, you should not have to retract a statement about 16 yo being "if it bleeds it breeds" type shit.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Bro, you should not have to retract a statement about 16 yo being "if it bleeds it breeds" type shit.

What specifically did he say? Whenever I ask for a quote his critics fall apart.

 

[AveryTec]

That they should not be sexually mutilated. Do you concur with him?

Well for MTFs it should be 18 minumum with rare exceptions (6 years of gender therapy and dysphoria diagnosis if over 16) with FTMs it should be 25 minimum with those same other rare exceptions. Male puberty is in fact a very unforgiving for feminity and androgyne, sexually dimorphic, if you deny that then you are retarded as that's why so little MTFs pass their bodies are just comically sexually dimorphic to point of tramua. I have a thing for occasionally making morbid stories about this as someone with an onset of fantasies at 6 and dysphoria at 12 who started at 18. Regardless they are fetishists yeah yeah yeah. FTMs are attention whores, yeah what are you gonna do. I genuinely think trannies are retards but actual dysphoria is actual pain far worse than just simple BDD even if autogynephillic or androphillic by nature.

This leads into the ultimate point I need to make too. The argument others make is that you are choked by pain and watch your body brutally decay and your body is typically early onset in dysphoria at 6 or so. There is no legal means to escape. It's a strong argument for MTFs with a timer on their passing with an "in pain, all for nothing" argument and FTMs for the weaker reason that MTFs also have that they do have to see their bodies evolve and hate the everyloving shit out of it.

Being brutally harsh to this argument is understandable from a side that doesn't understand, or more importantly doesn't care for any transitioning and thinks all of it is immoral advocating for therapy. Most of this is supported by a backbone of emotionally harsh dogma and being quite good at setting a tone. The left is always really bad with optics and also can't seem to articulate and a sound and detailed argument without their own emotions and once again, the reasons do show. MTFs are really perverts and FTMs really are attention whores. This is why it accumulated so much support in the polls and once again I agree with it but the decay and dissociation was always there in my heart and there was irreversible harm. I am 6'1 have a strong jaw and whatnot and am not going to pass and only have the hopes of maybe being an androgyne soon as an 18 year old. There is no form of transmaxxing you deep down do disgust women, lesbians, bi and straight. Men are limited in scope too but not as harshly thankfully. There would be no gain in female culture from my male socialization, I have high standards and my personality is far less in tune with other women I imagine. I only started at 18 to not repress more and feel like a predator in case I couldn't take it anymore and insanely socially transition and would rather not like to start later in that case.

The reason this matters ultimately is not to protect kids from mutaliation but many others have more emotional reasons to the contradict transgenderism in general ("as an ideology entirely"). Walsh specifically is very emotionally/evangelically/culturally motivated and doesn't even seem to get the extremities of insanity dysphoria does cause, he doesn't seem to have empathy with this cause. He really does have no arguments that account for these painful extremities of puberty because he lacks empathy cause it is hard to articulate and be empathetic and understand what this exactly is, what this exactly means etc. This is how most people view it too, it's too hard to understand but it feels forceful and extreme. I have my own reasons for it that are mostly the same as Destiny's reasons or so even as a conservative but no one is empathetic enough and that's my ultimate thoughts on his views on transitioning and whatnot. I agree with about 60% of his trans takes and like 70% of everything else.

He advocates at best for HRT to be for those over 25 which is where I start to notice he is too ignorant to in fact even care about blending in and passing but simultaneously wants those people that to be the only ones to transition socially and is either actively ignorant or intentionally mischievous in understanding the extreme sexual dimorphisms of men and women, mostly the latter which is also more importantly the goal of many evangelicals. Once again the ultimate reason he does these.

(Many positons he argues for are for abolishing it entirely, and he waffles around that forever and I honestly don't understand which one he is.)

Basically that's my disagreements with his trans take but yeah yeah he's a fucking pedo too lol that's really what I meant. He argues 16 year olds are most fertile and that is technically right but he had a reason to bring it up and obvious implications behind his words

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Well for MTFs it should be 18 minumum with rare exceptions (6 years of gender therapy and dysphoria diagnosis if over 16)

Minors cannot even consent to sex, let alone grooming, drugging, and bodily mutilation.

with FTMs it should be 25 minimum with those same other rare exceptions. Male puberty is in fact a very unforgiving, sexually dimorphic, experience, if you deny that then you are retarded as that's why so little MTFs pass their bodies are just comically sexually dimorphic to point of tramua.

"Groom them young so their mutilation is more successful" lol no. Puberty isn't unforgiving, reality is. Males are males, females are females.

If your normal, healthy body gives you trauma then you need a straitjacket, not mutilation.

Regardless they are fetishists yeah yeah yeah. FTMs are attention whores, yeah what are you gonna do. I genuinely think trannies are retards but actual dysphoria is actual pain worse than just simple BDD even if autogynephillic or androphillic by nature.

It sucks to feel incongruent with your body, I feel sorry for anyone genuinely going through that, but the solution is real gender affirmation, not sex changes.

 

[Skylavijas]

So Matt Walsh will make an appearance in a DailyWire+ exclusive comedy film "Lady Ballers", set to premiere on December 1st

https://youtu.be/Py2MzGtmaJ0?feature=shared

Get your torrents ready boys, Kino incoming

 

[Skylavijas]

If your normal, healthy body gives you trauma then you need a straitjacket, not mutilation.

Late to the thread here (only came because of the new movie announcement), but what kind of cure is that? Just lock people up and wait until they die of old age or stroke, while tax payer money is used to house and feed them while they contribute nothing to society at all? It doesn't alleviate the material strain on the society like execution would and it doesn't offer a sane environment where the psychology could be properly analyzed and treatments be done. It would also allow them to still work and bring productivity to society (even if among trans people it tends to be very niche like programming). Stray jacket is the worst of both worlds.

 

[TATE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODE!!]

So Matt Walsh will make an appearance in a DailyWire+ exclusive comedy film "Lady Ballers", set to premiere on December 1st

https://youtu.be/Py2MzGtmaJ0?feature=shared

View attachment 5527887

Get your torrents ready boys, Kino incoming

Glad he's finally found peace with himself and embraced being a woman.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Late to the thread here (only came because of the new movie announcement), but what kind of cure is that? Just lock people up and wait until they die of old age or stroke, while tax payer money is used to house and feed them while they contribute nothing to society at all?

It was obvious hyperbole to express the depths of their mental illness. I then suggested an actual solution, "real gender affirmation". What that entails should be obvious, but suffice to say it's the opposite of what they really do.

I will say, a straitjacket approach is better than letting these activists run around grooming, some of them truly deserve to be locked up, mostly the people pushing this stuff so hard.

 

[Skylavijas]

It was obvious hyperbole to express the depths of their mental illness.

Ah, pardon my unprofessionalism then.

I then suggested an actual solution, "real gender affirmation". What that entails should be obvious, but suffice to say it's the opposite of what they really do.

I sorta agree, although I'm not fully aware of what "real gender affirmation" would entail in the finer print. The closest thing my mind can contrast to is the treatment of pedophiles in certain medical institutions (or what little of them exists). The best they have on offer is Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and if that doesn't work... drugs or outright chemical castration. So there is treatment in the same sense as there is treatment for HIV, it's lifelong treatment that doesn't offer a permanent cure. Hypothetically, even under circumstances of chemical castration it doesn't eliminate romantic attraction so it can still lead to unsettling encounters (although of course it's SUBSTANTIALLY easier to manage for the pedo in question).

Going off of that, I cannot help but think that "real gender affirmation" wouldn't be that much different from regular "gender affirmation", in a sense that both of them would involve lifelong repetition of "you are X gender, you are X". Can toning down on sexual content everywhere prevent people from developing it? Maybe? Although there are people with body integrity identity disorder (BIID), who feel inexplicable need to chop off their limbs or other body parts because it causes them persistent discomfort. If that extends to genitalia then it doesn't need to be sexual, it can be just something a person is born with.

Unless there's standardized genetic modification of the fetus that would ensure a person isn't born with physical or mental ailements, wouldn't need to deal with the trauma of feeling born in the wrong body, we'll probably be stuck with it being a political hot button issue.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

I cannot help but think that "real gender affirmation" wouldn't be that much different from regular "gender affirmation", in a sense that both of them would involve lifelong repetition of "you are X gender, you are X".

If you want to boil it down to that, sure. The main difference being "regular" so-called "gender affirmation" is grooming young people into a lie that goes against reality itself. Real gender affirmation would be "you're a girl/guy, cope", but obviously more in-depth.

There's no miracle pill for confused people, but a lot of these trannies are normal and just groomed into it, so that needs to stop.

Unless there's standardized genetic modification of the fetus that would ensure a person isn't born with physical or mental ailements, wouldn't need to deal with the trauma of feeling born in the wrong body, we'll probably be stuck with it being a political hot button issue.

It shouldn't be a hot button issue to accept the truth. We are a sick society and need God.

 

[Sugriva]

I like Walsh, I think he's hilarious and his ability to make people seethe is unparalleled. I don't agree with him on everything though, and sometimes I really wish he wasn't such an insufferable grifter and simp for Israel.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

I like Walsh, I think he's hilarious and his ability to make people seethe is unparalleled. I don't agree with him on everything though, and sometimes I really wish he wasn't such an insufferable grifter and simp for Israel.

He's been pretty fair on the Israel thing. In fact, he was criticizing Nikki Haley for her actual Israel simpery, and I was surprised he didn't get chewed out by Shapiro like Candace Owens did for much the same.

 

[Skylavijas]

If you want to boil it down to that, sure. The main difference being "regular" so-called "gender affirmation" is grooming young people into a lie that goes against reality itself. Real gender affirmation would be "you're a girl/guy, cope", but obviously more in-depth.

There's no miracle pill for confused people, but a lot of these trannies are normal and just groomed into it, so that needs to stop.


It shouldn't be a hot button issue to accept the truth. We are a sick society and need God.

I used to believe that grooming people into LGBT was common, but after I started studying in a liberal institution in a liberal country (that's what desperation for western European wages and free education does to you (post-soviet country grindset)) I didn't notice any pressures for people to have a specific orientation or identity or it being discussed in lectures. Even went to an LGBT club once out of curiosity and it turned out to be some boring crafts club barely related to political LGBT action or discussion at all. It also feels like you could count trannies in a university on two or even one hand, even the Russians are a larger demographic in spite of the current political climate.

The closest thing I vaguely recall as people being genuinely groomed into LGBT was that there is (was?) a discord server run by 4chan users (not people I would consider liberal in any traditional sense) that were really thirsty for traps/femboys so they were gaslighting and manipulating children for pics. Pretty sure that place was squashed though.

I would've full heartedly agreed with you a year or two ago, but I'm not sure what to make of my recent experiences. Yeah, it's not really a debate worthy argument, I just didn't have an opportunity to talk to anybody about it since I know people on both political sides who would eat me alive for daring to not be an unquestioning drone.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

used to believe that grooming people into LGBT was common

So you used to be correct.

Even went to an LGBT club

You ever hear the expression, "so open-minded your brain falls out"? This is related to the above.

It also feels like you could count trannies in a university on two or even one hand

Despite growing in number they're obviously always going to be a minority, there's no amount of social engineering that can make troons a majority or even a large minority.

The closest thing I vaguely recall as people being genuinely groomed into LGBT was that there is (was?) a discord server run by 4chan users

You're not paying attention then. It's in school, even grade school. It's in media. It's in politics. You are incorrect.

I'm not sure what to make of my recent experiences.

Likely a combination of indoctrination and desensitization.

Yeah, it's not really a debate worthy argument, I just didn't have an opportunity to talk to anybody about it since I know people on both political sides who would eat me alive for daring to not be an unquestioning drone.

There's nothing wrong with questions, but I do think anybody who has to is retarded. Transgenderism is self-evidently a bad phenomenon and a dangerous social contagion, and there's objectively a lot of pro-LGBT propaganda regardless of your acknowledgement or perception of it.

 

[DDR Yoga]

I used to believe that grooming people into LGBT was common, but after I started studying in a liberal institution in a liberal country (that's what desperation for western European wages and free education does to you (post-soviet country grindset)) I didn't notice any pressures for people to have a specific orientation or identity or it being discussed in lectures. Even went to an LGBT club once out of curiosity and it turned out to be some boring crafts club barely related to political LGBT action or discussion at all. It also feels like you could count trannies in a university on two or even one hand, even the Russians are a larger demographic in spite of the current political climate.

The closest thing I vaguely recall as people being genuinely groomed into LGBT was that there is (was?) a discord server run by 4chan users (not people I would consider liberal in any traditional sense) that were really thirsty for traps/femboys so they were gaslighting and manipulating children for pics. Pretty sure that place was squashed though.

I would've full heartedly agreed with you a year or two ago, but I'm not sure what to make of my recent experiences. Yeah, it's not really a debate worthy argument, I just didn't have an opportunity to talk to anybody about it since I know people on both political sides who would eat me alive for daring to not be an unquestioning drone.

The grooming is the propaganda and the propaganda is everywhere - media, education, employment quotas, flags etc.

In terms of demographics you're right. It's not that common because most people are either disinterested or just don't like it. Lots of normies will pretend to be on board but privately they would never want their son to depenis himself.

 

[anustart76]

I like Walsh, I think he's hilarious and his ability to make people seethe is unparalleled. I don't agree with him on everything though, and sometimes I really wish he wasn't such an insufferable grifter and simp for Israel.

Matt Walsh is at his best when he's complaining about random everyday things like tipping.