Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 26.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.6%

  • Total voters
    355
He's perpetuating the theory that you need a written notice from the entity that owns the property in order for it to be trespassing. It's too bad, I like his on-screen persona, perhaps Nick is his Dick?
It's actually true for it to be criminal trespassing in Texas and many other states to require notice in the form of a sign OR a verbal or written warning.

(a)​

A person commits an offense if the person enters or remains on or in property of another, including residential land, agricultural land, a recreational vehicle park, a building, a general residential operation operating as a residential treatment center, or an aircraft or other vehicle, without effective consent and the person:

(1)​

had notice that the entry was forbidden; or

(2)​

received notice to depart but failed to do so.

And it defines "notice."

(2)​

“Notice” means:

(A)​

oral or written communication by the owner or someone with apparent authority to act for the owner;

(C)​

a sign or signs posted on the property or at the entrance to the building, reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders, indicating that entry is forbidden;

There are other forms of notice like purple paint on private property adjoining a wilderness, or obvious agricultural activity, in general, kinds of land that are clearly private property.

That doesn't mean what the guy did is legal. It's easily any number of disorderly conduct offenses, vandalism, etc. And it doesn't mean Eric July wasn't correct that someone startled by extreme and unusual behavior at night on their own property wouldn't in Texas likely have at least a good self-defense argument if they just ventilated the cunt. It wouldn't be a good idea because juries are unpredictable but Texas is probably a place where Riley would get zero sympathy.
 
Screenshot 2023-10-03 002215.jpg


$2 well spent
 
Eric is right. AnCaps operate on the NAP (non-aggression principle). Free speech doesn't include slander and threats. By the NAP, slander and threats of violence should be met with something equal.

So yeah, no freeze peach in AnCapistan. If you call me a jerk, I can just nuke(tm) your commune.
Good luck with the Cosean bargaining for the externalities of the nuclear weapon usage on adjacent properties, especially if you didn't take out nuke insurance.
 
Eric is right. AnCaps operate on the NAP (non-aggression principle). Free speech doesn't include slander and threats. By the NAP, slander and threats of violence should be met with something equal.
To extend this, "free speech" would mean there's "unfree speech", who gets to decide? Anarchy means lack of a government or any authoritative figure.

Here's an even more autistic take from Mises.

(Not that I agree or disagree.)
It's honestly not hard to figure out. Balldo's brain is so pickled by alcohol and pornography.

Good luck with the Cosean bargaining for the externalities of the nuclear weapon usage on adjacent properties, especially if you didn't take out nuke insurance.
It's a joke.
 
Technically incorrect as I don’t think Branca actually practices. He’s a consultant on use of force, he doesn’t really argue as an attorney. He gives expert testimony or advises a lawyer in self-defense law.
Fucking Christ! Don't any of these lawtube people actually practice law?

On an unrelated note. Just realized its October. I gotta get my Halloween costume on. I love this time of year!
 
Last edited:
>gets called a fake lawyer on friday
He didn't even get called a fake lawyer. He got called a non-practicing lawyer. Which he is. He doesn't fucking practice. It's just an objective fact.
Technically incorrect as I don’t think Branca actually practices. He’s a consultant on use of force, he doesn’t really argue as an attorney. He gives expert testimony or advises a lawyer in self-defense law.
Acting as a consultative lawyer is also the practice of law. He is obligated to practice competently. Nick doesn't practice at all.

Something like 10% at most of the practice of law is appearing in court. Shit like writing wills or contracts is also the practice of law. That is, you can in many jurisdictions be arrested for unlicensed practice of law if you do them for others, for pay or not.

Giving legal advice as in-house counsel is also the practice of law, even if you aren't the one ever appearing in court.
 
Last edited:
Nick got branca on stream to explain why it's actually a good thing being a non practicing lawyer and nick is cope agreeing with him despite malding over it the last 3 days.

Nick is laughing and saying "it doesn't bother me" but you can HEAR it from his tone and see it from his demeanor that his core is still shaking.
 
Fucking Christ! Don't any of these lawtube people actually practice law?
They are all coping and seething
images (1).jpeg

Nick got branca on stream to explain why it's actually a good thing being a non practicing lawyer and nick is cope agreeing with him despite malding over it the last 3 days.
It's fucking hilarious watching old washed up men past their prime act like some hot shots when they are non practicing losers
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's an even more autistic take from Mises.
https://mises.org/wire/no-one-has-right-good-reputation
I agree in general with Mises on this (to a limited extent). You don't have the right to a good reputation itself. Suppose you're a complete asshole. I think you do have the right to a reputation unsullied by false accusations, although you surrender this to some extent by entering the public sphere.

So I suppose a complete asshole, like Nick Rekieta, has the right to a reputation as a complete asshole.
 
Is emotional support lawyer code for practicing competent both or either practicing or competent lawyer?

Edit: I'm really not sure how to phrase the original post, Balldo is neither practicing nor was he ever competent based on his track record. Damn It Nick, We Lost Again.
 
In honor of Nick's ghetto escapades:

A place to spend my hot tub streams, time to unwind
Kiwis creating so pressure in this life of mine, I mald all the time
I once contemplated channel suicide and would of tried
But when my butt cheeks held that bottle of wine, all I could see was my Rumble contract going by
No one knows my struggle, they only see Drex brewing up grooming trouble
Not knowing it's hard to pay Randazza when the Superchatters don’t love you
Elb keeps clipping me inside the misery of cuckoldry
No man alive has ever defamed so many with blatant lies
Praying hard for “Bull Filled Dayz,” promise to hold on
Me and my Hedo boys ain't have a choice but to roll on
We finally found a spot to kick it
Where we can drop molly and no one bickers over Vito’s pedo shit
A spot where we can coom in peace, and even though we G's
We still visualize places, that have St. Chris’ cross in peace
And in my mind's eye I see this place, the players go up in my ass
I got a spot for em all, where they can fit their Ball-dos, at 'Degenerate Mansion'
 
Back