Homosexuality is evil.

[Whatevermancer]

This is what comes from allowing socialism to exist.

No, we should actually bring back socialism cause a lot of socialist countries outlawed homosexuality.

 

[SlaanyChaser]

Seethe and cope while I fuck my husband lmao

 

[Dr Cruel]

No, we should actually bring back socialism cause a lot of socialist countries outlawed homosexuality.

Why go half-way. Impose sharia and be done with it. I mean, except for bacha bazi (of course).

 

[Whatevermancer]

Why go half-way. Impose sharia and be done with it. I mean, except for bacha bazi (of course).

☝Inshallah!☝

 

[Lemmingwiser]

View attachment 5379834

You have to give it to the faggots. Creating a meme out of "if you are against faggots you must be one" is a brilliant move as it comes to optics. It combines two of the most powerful of debating techniques: Calling someone a hypocrite and calling someone a faggot. And it manages to do so in defense of faggotry. Brilliant mnemonics.

As for homosexuality, any healthy society would sufficiently repress homosexuality to the level where faggots are having the same amount of new partners as heterosexuals. Any that doesn't is just riddled with diseases. And yes, it takes quite a bit repression to bring them down from 500-1000 lifetime sexual partners to 10-15.

 

[Stan]

to 10-15 lifetime sexual partners.

SLUT

 

[XM-05 Thanatos]

Very autistic thread. Every homosexual i've met, man or woman, has had a lot of "dark triad traits". I dont think the act of homosexuality is evil, but people who do it are always the most weird messed up people, they don't even have to be pedophiles, they can just be spiteful, deviant, assholes (lol). They should be treated the same as anyone with a severe mental disorder, a human, but y'know there's something wrong with them, even if its just a little bit of weirdness.

 

[gang weeder]

Where are you getting this from? Nobody in their right (sound of) mind would support those for obvious reasons.

This guy is using the "well as long as they consent it's fine" cope. You are right that nobody supports allowing those things and this guy almost certainly doesn't either, even though consent isn't an issue in any of these cases. The point is to expose that the whole "well as long as everyone consents" garbage as a cope. The core of the issue is just that he doesn't think fagging is wrong. On things he actually believes are wrong he is fine with disallowing them consent be damned, just like everyone else is.

Citation please. Where is racism "outlawed"? If you're talking about platforms with CoC, that's clearly written within their guidelines upon using the products. For DEI initiatives, in practice, that just creates more racism. Both arguments and positions are invalid.

Uhh.... the Civil Rights Act? You may have heard of it.

 

[Absurdist Laughter]

I can concede that Christians think of us evil; whatever. Don't attempt to shove federal law down people's throats based on a shrinking minority religion as if it is the only one in the world. Whaaa whaa, the gays are gross and akin to plague rats.
My response to those who think gays as nothing but evil is this:

But add, "cucks" to the end of it.

 

[Norbert the Tiger]

All that being said though, how do you know that this applies gays in general though? Like, these could just be handpicked examples. There maybe like 50 more who he interviewed yet didn't manage to dig up any dirt on. That being said, all these do confirm my suspicion that childhood sexual abuse could roll people that way.

As I wrote before, right now we have no way of knowing with things like blind studies and that kind of thing because the institutions are ideologically corrupted. With those limitations, the theory makes sense based on anecdotal evidence. Right-winger DEVON STACK has commented on this innumerable times that every faggot he knew would soon start divulging Milo like experiences in early adolescence or before, IN A WORK ENVIRONMENT. It also makes sense in terms of what we know about mapping during childhood and very early adolescence.
In regards to drag queen story hour, rainbow teachers going after the kids, this is something I really worry about. Also, I will repost graphs showing how once homosexuality became promoted and no longer stigmatized, rates of self reporting rainbow people exploded in millenials and zoomers.

Most of those are women, because as I stated, feamel sexuality (in terms of sexual orientation) is much more malleable. Once porn became mainstream, a lot of young women became bi, and so on.

But through top-down state enforcement and indoctrination, the vast majority of normies have been trained to believe that saying nigger is the greatest most cardinal sin, and they will never do it even if they know they are in a situation where they could get away with it. So again it's just beyond absurd to suggest that effective state sanctions against particular behaviors are impossible or somehow can't exist.

This is such an excellent comment and it is unfortunate it has not been discussed more than it is. This is particularly relevant by way of SCOTUS decisions that are based on shaky legal reasoning. When ROE was decided, it was very unpopular. But, once SCOTUS declared abortion to somehow be a constitutional right, a lot of lemmings just concluded, oh well, yeah, it is a constitutional, inalienable right. And they did so without reading or understanding ROE, a decision so poorly reasoned the lefty hero RBG had grave concerns about. Same thing happend with Obergefell. Before that decision, most Americans were adamantly opposed to gay marriage. So much so an intiative in California failed by a pretty wide marriage. Scotus intervenes, conjures up some phantom right for gays to marriage, and boom, majority now support, so much so I am not sure it will be possible for quite a long time to put that genie back in the bottle. Ditto with miscegenation before Loving v Virginia. Even Brown v Board of Education was wildly unpopular in its day, but it was not long until that exercise of power convinced the lemmings and normies to fall in line.

Do you support legalizing pedophilia, necrophilia, bestality, or viewing of child pornography?

Imperfect analogies because of the "what willing adults do is none of my busines hurr durr. A better analogy is adult on adult incest, polyamory, or polygamy. Why, if a society rightly bans polyamory, should it tolerate polygamy?

Again, obviously proven false by the tiniest most cursory glance at how much state action has moved the needle on attitudes about race, gender, etc. People respond to power and their behavior can clearly be shaped accordingly. Not with 100% perfection, in the sense that making murder illegal doesn't prevent any murders from ever happening at all, but it sure does lower the amount of them.

Precisely. See examples of unpopular, and often poorly reasoned Scotus decisions that create a large consensus, even if people do not understand those decisions or have even read them.

But the fact remains that, clearly, there is a set of people and institutions who have power, and they do enforce it at the barrel of a gun.

As Heinlein so correctly articulated, violence is the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived.

 

[gang weeder]

Precisely. See examples of unpopular, and often poorly reasoned Scotus decisions that create a large consensus, even if people do not understand those decisions or have even read them.

It's ironic as the guy I'm responding to is defending the situation created by this effect, by denying that it exists. "No government action can never possibly matter or be effective on social or cultural norms!"

Imperfect analogies because of the "what willing adults do is none of my busines hurr durr. A better analogy is adult on adult incest, polyamory, or polygamy. Why, if a society rightly bans polyamory, should it tolerate polygamy?

Those are good examples as well. Although they fit better in that it's two consenting adults, by the same token, they are also easier for dishonest faggots to yeschad at. If you bring up adult incest or polygamy in these contexts a lot of people like @Deogracias will just lie through their teeth and say "well yea sure hurr hurr what's wrong with those they're fine lololol." Even though they don't believe that they will say it to save face in the anonymous Internet retard debate.

The reason I went to more disgusting and horrific things is that, even here in the anonymous Internet retard arena, most people still won't be able to make that dishonest yeschad and pretend that they are okay with things like necrophilia. Even though, going based on muh heckin' consent as the only value, sexing what is logically an inanimate object should be totally fine.

 

[Dr Cruel]

You have to give it to the faggots. Creating a meme out of "if you are against faggots you must be one" is a brilliant move as it comes to optics. It combines two of the most powerful of debating techniques: Calling someone a hypocrite and calling someone a faggot. And it manages to do so in defense of faggotry. Brilliant mnemonics.

Gotta agree. This always bothered me. Wouldn't it be more accurate to consider violent and irrational hatred of turd miners to be a kind of homopathy? Likewise labeling someone who is beating a troon to death with a crowbar as a "transphobe" seems inherently and outrageously dishonest, especially as it normally is the dying troon writhing and screaming in fear. This is even more of a problem given fact that troons, like blacks, are most usually assaulted or killed by another member of their own "community." Not to mention having the very anti-gay Left fascists of Marxism-Leninism appointing themselves as the only legitimate spokesmen of the kink or off-color "communities."

Note again that it isn't the poofs who are playing semantic games with the language and doing everything they can to make people fight with and hate each other. Divide and Conquer has been a favorite tactic of the Left fascists for over a hundred years. Part of it is to remove shame for acts that are destructive to society, and to organize people willing to engage in such behavior, like looting. That they're now trying to normalize and promote pedophilia (the new term "MAP" is part of that new project) only means they are running out of ways to split the evil Western petit bourgeoisie up into infuriated battling factions. Socialism in action.

 

[Dr Cruel]

It's ironic as the guy I'm responding to is defending the situation created by this effect, by denying that it exists. "No government action can never possibly matter or be effective on social or cultural norms!"

Social and cultural norms can be manipulated and changed on the basis of bat-shit crazy ideas that diverge markedly from reality. The coercive apparatus necessary to enforce such ideas usually takes the form of a government, but doesn't have to - as Goths, Huns, Vikings, Mongols and Left fascists have historically demonstrated, it can simply be a gang of greedy murderous thugs. The long term problem is always the same - an accumulation of bad outcomes directly related to these bat-shit crazy ideas invariably results in increasing public resistance. Sooner or later the coercion needed to maintain control becomes prohibitively expensive and difficult, or the coercive surrogate force simply decides to take charge directly, imposes their own ideas, and the process begins anew.

 

[gang weeder]

Social and cultural norms can be manipulated and changed on the basis of bat-shit crazy ideas that diverge markedly from reality. The coercive apparatus necessary to enforce such ideas usually takes the form of a government, but doesn't have to - as Goths, Huns, Vikings, Mongols and Left fascists have historically demonstrated, it can simply be a gang of greedy murderous thugs. The long term problem is always the same - an accumulation of bad outcomes directly related to these bat-shit crazy ideas invariably results in increasing public resistance. Sooner or later the coercion needed to maintain control becomes prohibitively expensive and difficult, or the coercive surrogate force simply decides to take charge directly, imposes their own ideas, and the process begins anew.

Well yeah "government" really just means whatever or whoever holds the monopoly on violence. It's nice to sit here and imagine that eventually enough people will get fed up with having evil shoved down their throats to do something about it, but I don't see much reason to believe that will happen. More likely we are in a collapse of the Roman Empire scenario--things just keep slowly getting shittier and more dysfunctional until our once first-world nations eventually revert back to resembling Africa, or at best, South America..

 

[SwanSwanson]

This is what comes from allowing socialism to exist.

Homosexuality or being against it?

 

[Dr Cruel]

Homosexuality or being against it?

Both. Especially when the advocacy is the most irrational, malicious and destructive. Socialism in action.

 

[SwanSwanson]

Both. Especially when the advocacy is the most irrational, malicious and destructive. Socialism in action.

But I'm a socialist

 

[Dr Cruel]

But I'm a socialist

So are National Socialists.

 

[74164978231]

I can concede that Christians think of us evil; whatever. Don't attempt to shove federal law down people's throats based on a shrinking minority religion as if it is the only one in the world. Whaaa whaa, the gays are gross and akin to plague rats.
My response to those who think gays as nothing but evil is this:

But add, "cucks" to the end of it.

Most people here probably wouldnt look down on gays if gays didnt think rolling sex parties on parade floats down the middle of cities was something to be celebrated.

Dont be surprised when you act like an animal people think of you as one.

 

[Absurdist Laughter]

Most people here probably wouldnt look down on gays if gays didnt think rolling sex parties on parade floats down the middle of cities was something to be celebrated.

Dont be surprised when you act like an animal people think of you as one.

Doesn't change the fact that I don't see an antifa black block protest like but from the right. Y'all just bark but have no teeth because, "I have shit to lose." "I got a family to maintain." yet if gays and homosexuality poses enough of a threat that the participants should die these excuses shouldn't matter. Let's see more Charlottesville, January 6 should have actually been an insurrection with the way the government has acted in the fall out of the walking tour. Glory of hindsight I suppose.

All I'm getting at is talk is cheap. It took four years to even get the tickle of impeachment of Joe Biden, two years for Donald Trump and two house impeachments in a single term. I mean what happened? Cuckservatives better get their shit together if they really want to live forever as a political party otherwise, these "animals" will continue their parades that offend you so. Y'all got no one to blame but yourself (as a political ideology) and the establishment. Everything else is just scapegoating.