JFG / Jean-Francois Gariepy / jfgariepyneuro / The French Pervert / The Public Space - Warski's Abusive Ex-BF, Racist Streamer, Failed Academic, Potato Masher, Kristi Winter's BFF, Kero Defender

What happened to Momma JF?

  • Alive and enjoying life as a free spud.

    Votes: 149 6.9%
  • Murdered while hitchhiking.

    Votes: 162 7.5%
  • Lost in the woods.

    Votes: 196 9.0%
  • The potato was sliced and served... french fried.

    Votes: 1,667 76.7%

  • Total voters
    2,174
If JFG was a smart man he would shut up, remove the posts, and lawyer up. Making no public statements unless his lawyer tells him to.

If he was less smart than that, he would say he used the wrong words in talking about this, is fully working with the police but will refrain from talking more publicly about the issues until more information comes to light which sharing will help the investigation.

But JFG is a total retard, who keeps digging this hole deeper than the one he likely buried Mama JF in.
 
I guessing he’s the opposite of a tard wrangler
So he's a....Tard Strangler??
F7pddWAXAAApuH_.jpeg
 
@AltisticRight you've tried to shill the "Dead Sekturr (tm)" meme so hard lately that you've made the simulation render out these kind of news.

Does this mean the sektur is alive again, or is it just dying in a more literal mode of understanding? :thinking:

edit:
>ralph is a junkie wreck streaming from a hovel in mexico
>jim is dying from cancer
>sargon tried to go into IRL politics which backfired in spectacular fashion and made him a complete laughing stock
>milo the aids infested faggot was last seen trying to suck up to schizo kanye west
>rekeita is now a degenerate cuck with a swinger wife, does nude bathtub streams, and is losing lawsuits to lolcows
>warski got into the boxing ring and got totally humiliated in a first round knockout by a fat filipino
nvm ,.. that kinda sums it up the best
 
So he's a....Tard Strangler??
View attachment 5387948
If he gets away with murder that's revolutionary alright.
On a side note, here's a bit of entertainment with JF going from "Karen is the greatest MRA in history of humanity" to "Fuck you Karen" in span of 10 minutes, because of her opinions regarding his Texas case.
 
Can the police legally lie to suspects in Canada?
Lol, Canada is where a type of sting called a ‘Mr Big’ operation originated, in which police create a crime boss character and dupe the suspect into joining a fake criminal organization made up entirely of cops, until the suspect trusts them enough to divulge whatever information they’re looking for. So yeah, not only can the Canadian police lie to you, they can make your whole life a lie if they feel like it.

I enjoy the Casefile podcast and they’ve done some great eps on this type of sting, I’ll try to edit my post with the exact cases cause I thought they were pretty interesting.
 
Who's going to be the first in the sektur to get an interview with the first potato's parents? At least they were able to steal their daughter back before....
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
normal people care about the parents of their children if only for the sake of their kids.
I think it's worth mentioning that according to the posters from facebook who know her she was pregnant with the last kid in 2022 so one of the two kids is a literal baby.
1696539589225.png
 
Last edited:
You start lawyering up and acting defensive in such a scenario - well that's suspicious as fuck.
You're oversimplifying it a bit by saying that, though, and even if he is entirely innocent and she really is just out at a long lunch there's perfectly legitimate reasons to lawyer up. I don't know Canada's version of pleading the 5th but if it's at all close, doing it cannot be used against you in court EVER, and even the slightest implication by a prosecutor that it is even suspicious is grounds for a mistrial.
Saying "I have seen innocent people wrongly prosecuted before, I will not speak to the police without my attorney present" is a completely legitimate statement in every circumstance. You aren't acting defensive, you're exercising your leafstitutional rights to a defense.

If he has exonerating evidence that proves, conclusively, that he could not have done it, that's great, and it should absolutely be taken to the police. But it should not be him making that call, it should be his lawyer.
 
I think it's worth mentioning that according to the posters from facebook who know her she was pregnant with the last kid in 2022 so one of the two kids is a literal baby.
I think they've been together for what, like 5 years tops? So none of their kids should be of school age.
As for her intellectual capabilities I remember JF talking about her being very capable at math. It of course can be viewed as framing her for not being a retard to cover his bases. Like, there's notion for different types of intelligence IQ, EQ, JQ etc so that her problem is merely a speech impediment. Einstein also wasn't known for his speeches, you know. Would be very useful, if we had people from their chat that she also used. They could assess better.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
You're oversimplifying it a bit by saying that, though, and even if he is entirely innocent and she really is just out at a long lunch there's perfectly legitimate reasons to lawyer up. I don't know Canada's version of pleading the 5th but if it's at all close, doing it cannot be used against you in court EVER, and even the slightest implication by a prosecutor that it is even suspicious is grounds for a mistrial.
Saying "I have seen innocent people wrongly prosecuted before, I will not speak to the police without my attorney present" is a completely legitimate statement in every circumstance. You aren't acting defensive, you're exercising your leafstitutional rights to a defense.

If he has exonerating evidence that proves, conclusively, that he could not have done it, that's great, and it should absolutely be taken to the police. But it should not be him making that call, it should be his lawyer.
I don't disagree with you on any of this - but part of the issue here is at what point you have a right to legal advise. In Canada, I am pretty sure this would only come into play upon being arrested.

If your wife has disappeared, and the police want to ask you a few questions about her whereabouts to try and find her, are you going to refuse to say anything without a lawyer present? If you want to find her, offering up the last bits of information you have to help them do this is completely logical.

What if you don't have the means to hire your own attorney in those situations, do you refuse to engage with authorities as they look for your loved one until you are arrested and you have a right to representation? This isn't about giving up your rights, it's countering this idea that you should never talk to the police - even when your interests dovetail with what they are doing. In the case of a missing loved one - it's finding them!
 
I bet he lured her into his car by saying they were going camping or on a long drive or something, then tricked her into getting out of the car while in the middle of nowhere ("Get out and check if a tire is flat"), speeding off without her afterwards. My guess is she said something about not needing JF, and JF's control freak brain concocted this whole plan to prove how much she did need him, not caring that she'd likely die, only caring that he'd get his message across.
 
Back