JFG / Jean-Francois Gariepy / jfgariepyneuro / The French Pervert / The Public Space - Warski's Abusive Ex-BF, Racist Streamer, Failed Academic, Potato Masher, Kristi Winter's BFF, Kero Defender

What happened to Momma JF?

  • Alive and enjoying life as a free spud.

    Votes: 149 6.9%
  • Murdered while hitchhiking.

    Votes: 162 7.5%
  • Lost in the woods.

    Votes: 196 9.0%
  • The potato was sliced and served... french fried.

    Votes: 1,667 76.7%

  • Total voters
    2,174
good point earlier that winter is coming soon and the chances of finding a body go way down, police will 100% double down before the end of the month.

also i think it’s funny in the lauren interview JF says he’s the “least emotional person in the world” and high IQ yet still manages to be manipulated with friendliness and deliberately worded questions. i think a full on investigation and interviews was much more than he bargained for.

if you can’t recognize interviewers/cops playing friendly and letting you gather the rope to hang yourself, you’ve got no chance in the interrogation room or in court, especially if you decide to go pro se like he brilliantly did for a custody dispute and still LOST

i want a lawyer goodbye
inaccurate, lawyers are for low IQ people according to JF
 
good point earlier that winter is coming soon and the chances of finding a body go way down, police will 100% double down before the end of the month.

also i think it’s funny in the lauren interview JF says he’s the “least emotional person in the world” and high IQ yet still manages to be manipulated with friendliness and deliberately worded questions. i think a full on investigation and interviews was much more than he bargained for.

if you can’t recognize interviewers/cops playing friendly and letting you gather the rope to hang yourself, you’ve got no chance in the interrogation room or in court, especially if you decide to go pro se like he brilliantly did for a custody dispute and still LOST


inaccurate, lawyers are for low IQ people according to JF
I don't know if you've seen the AIU video, but he made the point, and I think it's all that matters, that JF's thesis is "no body, no crime." That's JF's entire position here. He's thrown out a ton of gorilla dust, and it all makes him look terrible. My guess is that, in his mind, if Mama JF can't be located, he can't be successfully prosecuted.
 
I don't know if you've seen the AIU video, but he made the point, and I think it's all that matters, that JF's thesis is "no body, no crime." That's JF's entire position here. He's thrown out a ton of gorilla dust, and it all makes him look terrible. My guess is that, in his mind, if Mama JF can't be located, he can't be successfully prosecuted.
This may have been true forty years ago but there have been many “no body” murder convictions in recent decades. I’m mostly familiar with American convictions but it’s easy to turn up recent ones in Canada:



The lack of a body might make prosecution more difficult but thankfully JF’s media tour is making the crown’s case a whole lot easier, even without Elora’s corpse.

JF acts like an ugly, ignored teen girl who’s just been informed she’s been elected home coming queen in all his recent interviews.
 
This may have been true forty years ago but there have been many “no body” murder convictions in recent decades. I’m mostly familiar with American convictions but it’s easy to turn up recent ones in Canada:
found the some info on that kind of thing, hes in Canada right? i have found 3 seperate things just like this for different places in Canada this is just the first

Definitions

1 In this Act:
"court" means the Supreme Court;
"interested person" means
(a)any person who is or would be affected by an order made under this Act,
(b)the next of kin of the person in respect of whom an order is made or for whom an order is applied, and
(c)a person who holds property of the person in respect of whom an order is made or for whom an order is applied.

Repealed​

2 [Repealed 2009-13-256.]

Presumption of death​

3 (1)If, on the application of an interested person under the Supreme Court Civil Rules, the court is satisfied that
(a)a person has been absent and not heard of or from by the applicant, or to the knowledge of the applicant by any other person, since a day named,
(b)the applicant has no reason to believe that the person is living, and
(c)reasonable grounds exist for supposing that the person is dead,
the court may make an order declaring that the person is presumed to be dead for all purposes, or for those purposes only as are specified in the order.
(2)An order made under subsection (1) must state the date on which the person is presumed to have died.
(3)Any interested person may, with leave of the court, apply to the court for an order to vary, amend, confirm or revoke an order made under subsection (1).
(4)An order, or a certified copy of an order, declaring that a person is presumed to be dead for all purposes or for the purposes specified in the order, is proof of death in all matters requiring proof of death for those purposes.
(5)The registrar of the court must forward to the registrar general under the Vital Statistics Act an order made under subsection (1) or (3) within 30 days of the entry of the order.

Duty of personal representative​

4 If an order has been made declaring that a person is presumed to be dead for all purposes or for the purpose of distributing his or her estate, and the personal representative of the person presumed to be dead subsequently believes or there are reasonable grounds for the personal representative to believe that the person is not in fact dead, the personal representative must not deal after that with the estate or the remaining estate unless the presumption of death is confirmed by a further order made under section 3.

Status of property if deceased later found alive​

5 (1)If a person who is presumed to be dead is, in fact, alive, any of his or her property that has been distributed in reliance on an order made under section 3, and not in contravention of section 4, is deemed to be a final distribution and to be the property of the person to whom it has been distributed as against the person presumed to be dead.
(2)Subject to subsection (1), if a person who is presumed to be dead is found by the court to be alive, the court may, on the application of any interested person, by order, give directions the court considers appropriate respecting the property of the person found to be alive and its preservation and return.

Status of property if deceased in fact dead​

6 If a person who is presumed to be dead is, in fact, dead, any of his or her property that has been distributed in reliance on an order made under section 3 is deemed to be a final distribution and to be the property of the person to whom it has been distributed as against any person who would otherwise be entitled if the order made under section 3 had not been made.

Appeals​

7 Any interested person may appeal an order made under this Act to the Court of Appeal.
edit: search terms were "death in absentia canada"
 
Last edited:
JF's rules for Mama JF coming back were that she had to get tested for STDs and couldn't be pregnant. Makes me think that the last time Mrs. Potatotard took off for a couple of weeks, she may have came back with the clap and a bun in the oven.
Is it possible that none of the kids were his? Could something have happened to MJF because she cuckolded him? Then, he just passed the kids off to someone else? Even entirely legally so he thinks it's not going to be scrutinized? Perhaps he thinks he can just say that they were HER kids and not his and they are with rightful guardians?
 
Truly Rural said:
Ahem a fameelee man, all ah ever wanted was to provaeed for Mama JF and our fameelee projekt. Damn algae , I can barely pay my Internet, it is a miracle. Idk, renovating house costs a decent amount of money, so he either had decent money when she "left" or went full retard and CCed it.
Thats a good point, a really good point actually. Replacing a decent amount of drywall can get expensive very quickly, is time consuming as hell and requires you to actually have some idea what you were doing. I the relevant questions are:

1. Who specifically did the drywalling itself. JF himself? Did he hire someone? Have someone helping him? If not why not?

2. How much drywall was actually replaced? In what part or parts of the house? It was supposedly done in what 3 days? So i'm thinking it couldn't have been too much. The last time I had some drywalling replaced due to some water damage it took about that long to do a room and part of an adjoining hallway. So are we talking about replacing it in just one area? If so, why there specifically and nowhere else?

3. How much did he spend doing it? If he spent a fair bit and only did a small area there had to be a specific reason for it. and if this is the case why did he 'sterilize' the whole house instead of that area? If there wasn't a specific reason for this like a burst pipe or whatever then why spend a significant amount to do it and why so quickly? Why didn't he do this the first time she left or with previous women leaving?

4. Was anything else replaced or removed? I mean like carpeting, flooring, furniture and things of that nature. If so, why?

All things considered they're questions that deserve an answer. The cops will be just as eager to hear the reason as well

Tard Whisperer said:
completely agree with your thoughts. perhaps a schizo theory but I have also been wondering, if he’s a computer programmer is it possible to make it seem like she’s contacting him if he put her phone on a random car and let it drive until it died, like some sort of program that would send texts?
Theoretically perhaps. But should the RCMP recover her phone they'll do a forensic analysis to check for just that kind of thing. It would pretty much sink him the moment any trace of such an application was discovered. There would be no way of explaining it that didn't point directly to him and it would scream that he did something to her. Most programmers would have enough sense not to go that route

Tard Whisperer said:
I am very curious whether he handed over his phone records to the police. because I’ve thought about this theory too but for the police it would be very easy to tell where he was on the 19th. it’s hard to believe that he could leave the phone at home and drive 2 hours to get her in Mockton without it, personally I’d rely on my phone to find someone that far from home. he mentioned that he has his own electric trail far from hers on that day but did he actually prove it? he said he didn’t let the police in his house, would Mr. Internet actually willingly hand over any sort of electronic records?

Idk how Canada courts work but I am not sure if they’d even be able to subpoena those from him if he doesn’t give them up willingly.
Its a missing persons case and he is a suspect in her disappearance. They can get the phone records easily. It was likely one of the first things they did

Tard Whisperer said:
PEI being surrounded by water and the amount of time that has passed makes me think either she appears alive, or they never have a body and he is never arrested and his home not even searched because police really have no evidence of a crime. if there was a murder, tho, I think she never left the island at all.
They have plenty of circumstantial evidence. Not the least of which includes his guilty as fuck behavior and statements. People have been convicted on far less than the shit he's already been saying and doing. They don't need a body they just need reasonable justification to believe she's dead and they can go after her for her murder. That aside they can go after her for negligence that led to her disappearance and probable death as well and if they feel like making an example of him they can hit him with various obstruction charges for changing his story and talking nonsense and contradictory statements. To put it simply, if they want him they'll get him on something

Truly Rural said:
Too fucked up to take care of herself, leave her in the woods to survive.
So.... now he's blatantly obviously calling her a crackwhore and saying shes so fucked up he can save her long enough to get some babies out of her before she disappears again. He's not even trying to hide it

Take note RCMP: this is not how an innocent person talks. This is how someone talks when they don't give a shit that the mother of their children has disappeared without a trace and sees them as literal worthless breeding machines. This is also how abusers talk and people who legitimately hate women. Talking like this he may as well paint a bullseye on his ass

Ash Gassem said:
JF talks about how he doesn't/didn't know if/when she might return, and how his door is always open to that possibility. The problem is, the "deep cleaning" operation he did immediately after she "left." He took 3 days off his stream to "sterilize" his place, and rearrange everything to his liking. Those are not the actions of a man who's unsure whether his wife is returning. Those are the actions of a man who knows his wife is gone for good, and, what's more, is glad for it. It's clear from his actions that he operated under the presumption that there was no chance she would return. How would he know that, given the alleged prior incident of her leaving? Because he took actions to ensure that her removal from the household would be permanent.
Indeed. His statements and actions are, yet again, contradictory. Like you said he put all the time, money and effort into pretty much immediately doing that cleanup job and by his own previous statement did it because she wasn't coming back. Now he is suddenly unsure about whether she will and says he's open to it. That doesn't fit with his previous justification for his answers or the cleanup job itself. He knew she wasn't coming back or he wouldn't have done it. Why do it at all if he didn't know? I mean the previous 'disappearance' when she was very much in contact with others she was only gone for a couple weeks before she showed back up. How could he be so certain she wouldn't have done the same thing this time? He didn't even wait to start doing it, he started the cleanup almost immediately. Why?

At an absolute bare minimum he knows more than he is saying. Considering he seems perfectly willing to incriminate himself and talk about shit he shouldn't be during the investigation I think its safe to say any deliberate withholding of information should be treated as highly suspicious. Whatever he is hiding he is hiding for a reason

MirnaMinkoff said:
JF specifically mentioned it on the Dick show and went to pain to mention how it was stupid to think “not taking your phone” to the crime scene was enough, but that one needed to set up their own phone to be clicked and moved at a separate location during the crime to create a digital alibi.
Well that certainly is an interesting statement. He's talking like he's unaware there are plenty of forensic tools that would turn said phone inside out looking for just those kinds of custom programs in case anyone got any ideas like that. He wouldn't be the first person to get busted trying to pull that. I can just imagine the looks the cops working this investigation are giving each other every time they see him talk like that

Ash Gassem said:
Also, regarding the latest MATI, I fully agree with Jersh's take that this is going to be a huge international story. Frankly, I'm dumbfounded it isn't all over the media already. It has everything. It's nigh the perfect "true crime" story.
I agree, its likely to go international before too long. I suspect the reason it hasn't is because the RCMP is playing things close to their vest and trying to keep it low key for as long as they can, so he'll keep acting like he has been and talking as much as possible. Knowing there is a good chance when it goes international the large amount of attention and suspicion that'll be aimed at him will pressure him into shutting the fuck up and finally getting a lawyer. They want to avoid that as long as possible

Tard Whisperer said:
He actually did say as much on the Dick Show today. he said he left her in front of a gas station and did specifically check for cameras because he didn't want to be accused of murder. Lol.
Wait what? He actually said that? Yeah, he fucking killed her. Nobody who drops someone off anywhere would even think about that let alone be concerned about being accused of murder if there aren't any cameras around the drop off location unless they're actively planning to or at least considering killing someone. I know i've never given a shit whether there are any cameras around when I drop people off and I sure as shit don't go out of my way to ensure there are. This is the definition of what guilty people and only guilty people would do

Tard Whisperer said:
He would have weighed her down and dropped her in the water in my opinion, they lived on an island surrounded by water, which quickly decomposes bodies or feeds them to sea life and washes away evidence
While I don't disagree its a good way to dispose of a body, for him to do it that way he would pretty much have to have access to a boat. Dumping the body off a dock or too close to the shore would end up likely resulting in parts breaking off as she decomposed and floating back to the coast where somebody would find them, as thats what bodies tend to do unless you dump them far enough out. He doesn't have a boat. If he rented one or whatever there would be a record of it and getting a dead body onto a boat (or even to the shore or a dock if he was that stupid) is harder than it sounds and pretty hard to do without risking getting caught. Especially if its in pieces

Tard Whisperer said:
  • "technically it was a few meters away from the ocean, so she was still on land at the moment I dropped her, and I did so in front of cameras" I dropped her in front of cameras because you know in the modern world you are always in front of cameras and the few seconds you are not in front of cameras they will accuse you of murder.
For someone who at that moment supposedly had no reason to have the slightest reason to believe anyone would have a reason to think he killed anybody later on he sure did supposedly go out of his way to ensure nobody got it in their head he murdered her. Talk like that to a jury and you'll get your ass convicted pretty fast

Tard Whisperer said:
  • 59:00: he says he has been working on covering police investigations, murders, mass shootings etc for 10 years so he knows the language of investigations such as 'electronic trace'
Sounds like what an idiot would say when admitting they were studying how not to get caught for murder. Plus he 'studied this stuff for 10 years' but doesn't know he is automatically considered a suspect and that talking suspiciously is a bad idea? Uh huh. Nice studying there. How'd you get a PhD again?

Tard Whisperer said:
  • 1:02:00: "women drop their babies in a box. there are boxes put around the US for women to practically drop their newborn into it" as a reason why it isn't a cause for concern that Elora left her 2 children
Women that recently gave birth and can't support their child because they're runaways or addicts or whatever do this. Not mothers in relationships who have TWO kids they intended to have, and they don't do it so they can run off and live in the woods or whore themselves out to truckers. This is disingenuous idiocy of the highest order

Tard Whisperer said:
  • 1:03:00: "I have uncovered the killer's bounty" re: women being more attracted to him because they think he killed his wife "I used to be at insemination within the first year, and as I moved into eceleb territory I was at insemination at the first date, at this point i've reached insemination on the first sentence." Is that your goal? "I'm just a family guy who wanted a large family with a single woman but the world didn't want to give it to me and so i'm on a quest of vengeance, and so I spray and prey until I get my vengeance."
Thats narcissistic psychopath talk and makes it sound like he hates women and the world for not giving him what he feels he's entitled to and who sees women as property to serve his purposes. The last time I heard someone talk like this it was george trepal in reference to how he hated people who were not as intelligent as him. Gee, thats an interesting coincidence there

Tard Whisperer said:
  • 1:09:00: talking about the other retarded girl who liked his rap and they talked and decided to get married because she didn't like her dad, the dad tried to convince him she was an ugly retard, but she was "an absolutely beautiful female, 10/10, your heart melts when you see her" he told her father to fuck himself because it was her constitutional right to suck his dick, so the dad got her to be considered mentally incapable to consent in Texas while she was out of state with him, when she was actually at college and is one of the most intelligent women he has ever met. then she was kidnapped by a bodyguard to bring her back to Texas against her will. he says usually these laws such as the one for Brittany Spears' conservatorship are used to prevent women from reproducing.
This is not helping his case any. Its only proving the point the court in texas made about him. Talking like this landed him a psych evaluation, restraining order, prohibition of having anything to do with his kid and a lost court case in texas. Clearly he's proving the psych eval and court right and showing that he has learned NOTHING from the experience.

Tard Whisperer said:
  • 1:17:00: Dick asks him how he should kill his wife. JF: "If I did it..." "I'm actually surprised that the clips haven't come out yet, but I have extended descriptions of how to kill someone while not being caught"
Totally a thing you want to say publicly when you're under investigation after someone disappears under suspicious circumstances. No bloody wonder the RCMP is content to let him keep talking to incriminate himself as much as humanly possible

Tard Whisperer said:
  • 1:18:00: discussing Brian Kohlberger, "this idiot turned off his cellphone after starting to drive to the house to murder" "Modern murder cannot be executed if you do not have a full electronic alibi." 100% true. "it's not enough to leave your cell phone at home. if you wanted to escape the police you would need a simulation of your hand clicking on the phone, or a macro recorder, so you have an electronic alibi." WTF....
Spoken like someone who thinks an awful lot about what they have to do to effectively carry out a murder. If I didn't know better I might wonder if he wants to get himself locked up so he can be some kind of martyr while blaming women for his situation

Tard Whisperer said:
  • 1:20;00: "The second principle of good murder is exactly expressed in Dexter. if there is no crime scene, it is so much harder, and so there needs to be a complete elimination of even the idea that a murder has happened." says that Dexter was doing it by wrapping everything in plastic and dropping it in the ocean. JF says the bodies cannot be found if you are to get away with murder. JF: "Plastic looks really good when you're at home depot but when you get home and unwrap it it gets in your running shoes, it's really impractical"
Thats really not a statement someone in his position should be making. Particularly after admitting to making a point of tearing out his drywall and sterilizing his house and such. Do you want the RCMP slapping you with a warrant to tear your house apart looking for evidence? Cause saying shit like this is how you get that

Tard Whisperer said:
  • Says the reason he is allowing himself some comedy is that he has a great alibi and he knows the police are great at what they do
People who aren't guilty don't brag about how great their alibi is and laugh about it. People who think they're getting one over on the cops do that

Tard Whisperer said:
  • 1:25:00: says that since MJF has been missing for months he has been through the worries and emotions that everyone else is having months ago. "There are grief periods, not the grief of knowing she's dead, but the grief of having control over your wife, the grief of yeah, you're going to have to keep living without knowing"
Uh huh. You had those same emotions and thats why you quickly made sure to call the police to report a missing pers..... oh, right

Tard Whisperer said:
  • He says he is so terrified of being framed for murder (especially someone getting his DNA and spreading it around a crime scene) that he even has a camera that films him when he sleeps
What crime scene would that be? That would imply someone deliberately targeted her to kill her, somehow get his DNA, spread it around said crime scene and frame him. Now why would anyone, even some crackpot serial killer, do something like that? No, really. To even consider such a plan the killer would have to know exactly who she is, that she left, when she left and where she was in order to get to her and do all of this. Unless it was some JF obsessed psycho who was stalking him constantly, nobody would have a reason or inclination to even consider doing this. To any other random killer, serial killer or whatever who might cross her path she'd be some random woman, they would have no reason to have a plan like this in mind if they targeted her and probably wouldn't even know who he was or her connection to him until this stuff went public. So where the fuck is he coming up with this nonsense? This sounds like him trying to pre-emptively come up with an excuse if her body is found and his DNA is found around it. No officer that wasn't me at all! Some crazy fan broke in while I was asleep, stole my DNA and went back to the crime scene to frame me!

Tard Whisperer said:
  • he says he is being dehumanized for being a man, "we have our little edgy comments, we have our little facade, but please understand that everyone is a human being and we have all of the normal human emotions and sometimes we're just playing with you guys because you're so stupid"
Says the guy who has tried to dehumanize a missing woman and paint her as a whore who ran out on her kids to suck off truckers and live in the woods. The fact he's playing victim when all of this is his own doing is disgusting

Ash Gassem said:
I don't know if you've seen the AIU video, but he made the point, and I think it's all that matters, that JF's thesis is "no body, no crime." That's JF's entire position here. He's thrown out a ton of gorilla dust, and it all makes him look terrible. My guess is that, in his mind, if Mama JF can't be located, he can't be successfully prosecuted.
Considering tons of people have been convicted of murder without a body he hasn't been doing his years of research nearly as well as he thinks he has

I look forward to this turning into international news in the near future. I also look forward to how JF explains why she doesn't contact the police or him to let everyone know shes alive when it goes international. It should make for quite the explanation. Libertarian 007 SAS ninja privacy and being too busy jumping borders and living in the woods to have seen any of the news reports or heard about them from anyone. Right JF?
 
Either way, get this through your skull:
If your field's scientists can't reproduce more than half of the studies they base their field upon, that whole field and its "scientific" methods need to be rebuilt from the ground up. Publish or perish has destroyed fields. IQ was evaluated back when scientists could take two identical twins and observe their whole lives in "controlled" environments. You can not do ANYTHING like this anymore because muh human rights, so "scientists" can only GUESS what the results of a study would be by essentially FABRICATING data. Any questions?
Human rights are not insignificant. Others have brought up The Pit of Despair on here and it was bad enough with monkeys. Imagine if humans were put through that. We don't need to isolate identical twins to get meaningful data and this isn't a fit experiment for psychology anyway, it would be an Anthropology concern. Psychology is mostly concerned with pathology at it's most pure as a science. All of the sciences are suffering from a competence crisis, not just psychology. It is an illusion that there is less fraud in other fields. The foundations, however, are not only perfectly sufficient for learning a field, we haven't progressed as much beyond them as many believe. Your edgelord, misanthropic, self aggrandizing hatred of others' rights, believing your own will always be unquestioned, is as much a plague from the competency and reproducibility crises as hugboxes and committee/publication commissions.
 
Someone earlier in the thread posted a stream JF did on Brian Kolberger (Moscow ID killer) and critiquing his crime. JF specifically mentioned this show on the Dick show and went to pains to mention how it was stupid to think “not taking your phone” to the crime scene was enough, but that one needed to set up their own phone to be clicked and moved at a separate location during the crime to create a digital alibi.

I’m sure the RCMP are enjoying the JF media tour. Least surprising thing in the world to learn he was a fan of that shitty Dexter show too.
This needs to be sent to the RMCP because this could legitimately mess with an investigation if he did that.
 
What will you do when they find her body parts?
I predict two possibilities. 1)He tried to dissolve her in acid and fucked it up because of mid wit arrogance or 2)He tried to rely on her decomposition and fucked that up too, out of mid wit arrogance. I bet there's more evidence in his house because of the same issue, too.

Now we know why he hid "his" kids - their father is a bantu.
Or at least not his. I was effectively thinking the same thing and he figured it out at some point and lost his disordered mind.
 
Also, regarding the latest MATI, I fully agree with Jersh's take that this is going to be a huge international story. Frankly, I'm dumbfounded it isn't all over the media already. It has everything. It's nigh the perfect "true crime" story.
The perfect true crime story is the Julia Wallace murder.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Also, regarding the latest MATI, I fully agree with Jersh's take that this is going to be a huge international story. Frankly, I'm dumbfounded it isn't all over the media already. It has everything. It's nigh the perfect "true crime" story.
I don't think there's a hook quite yet and neither of the people involved are attractive, so they're probably waiting on a bit more content before diving in. I also personally feel that JF's comments are so retarded that it works like obfuscation, in that it would take way too long to build a cohesive narrative since we know very little about the actual events, and everything else said has at least one contradiction.
 
The second principle of good murder is exactly expressed in Dexter
HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHHHHAHAHA
ENJOY PRISON, RETARD CHILD!

this nigga gets more ridiculous and disgusting by the day, what an absolute fucking retard. He might as well be saying how suits is a tight, accurate legal thriller.
 
@Tard Whisperer "He actually did say as much on the Dick Show today. he said he left her in front of a gas station and did specifically check for cameras because he didn't want to be accused of murder. Lol."

Really? He has genuinely killed her lol. If you thought someone was a modern day "oh oh seven" you wouldn't be so certain they'd be found dead (after you drop them off) that you could end up a murder suspect and need to create an alibi for yourself in that way. It also suggests he knew he would be the last person to see her alive.

In addition to this he has mentioned "electronic traces", which again if he hasn't been told has placed him and his wife far from his own location, he ought to have no knowledge of. After all, his wife could easily have hitchhiked back to their home area for one thing. But he also should not have knowledge of whether or not she has been using phones and credit cards after the last known communication he had with her.

To mention electronic tracing without authorities bringing it up, also suggests, like carefully finding a location with surveillance cameras, that this is an important element of his alibi. He believes the CCTV footage (likely gone by now) and use of phones/credit cards far apart from his own, will absolve him of the crime.

The next part of the "alibi" is going to be a note he miraculously receives from her on his ProtonMail. She will have found a way to access the dark web and set up some Tormail (with a sub 70 IQ) and send him a note saying "haha yes I am fine guys living my wild life alone in the woods!" perhaps with a picture attachment of herself. Perhaps the picture will suspiciously NOT be a selfie (because of course JF will be the photographer). Let's hope he overlooked that.
 
This needs to be sent to the RMCP
I'm sure they're already watching everything he is doing and saying. There's no way he isn't under heavy surveillance right now.

ETA:

He just keeps digging. The arogant midwittery is on full display.
jury.png
[archive]
 
Last edited:
Being cold is not being tempered and being rationalistic and not being rational. They are either affectation issues or rhetorical habits. This laundry list of daddy-traits is loot-box personality for terminally online poor people.

Who know what he actually did at Duke. Who knows how he got in and kept his position. Even if he ran his own research projects and actually managed to defend a thesis by lab work and an oral (which is standard but not always the case) there are plenty of retards with strings of letters after their names and in association with academia. In fact, there are many concession degrees for people who don't actually pass their requirements for a higher degree they were originally working for. It's a fucked up system in a lot of cases.

I did a bit of digging and found his dissertation. He only graduated from the University of Montreal, not from Duke. He had some sort of travel funding to Duke university for 6 months during his thesis work, but he seems to have done the bulk of the research at Montreal. There is no way to know what he actually did in his research, because its not outlined properly in the "contributions" section of his thesis

His dissertation is an article dissertation, meaning it has three published works and a short literature review section. Bulk of his work was writing published articles in a research group, and its unknown what his specific contribution to those papers was. The only articles where he describes his contributions properly are the ones not included in the thesis. They are in french, and seem pretty grim when translated.
1696824600016.png



The reason he was able to get to Duke University was probably because he knew people there because of the 6 months he was there earlier and because he had funding from Quebec (The Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (FRQS)). 45,000 (presumably CA$) per year for the years 2012-13, 13-14, and 14-15. There was no reason for Duke to not take him, because they were not paying him.


He was funded by Canadian institute of health research during his doctoral work at Montreal. 3 years combined 105,000 (again presumably CA$) and 6,000 travel grant to Duke


Also I noticed that sometime in or before 2016 he was working for Carolina Partners in Mental Healthcare because of this study
He was let go before its publication in March of 2017
1696826231239.png
 

Attachments

Back