Furry PFP tranny: "My surgeon gave me larger breasts than I wanted even though I specifically told him my max desired size oh noooo whatever will I do with these massive ungainly titties <squish squish>"
Smells like that_happened.txt to me. For starters, wouldn't that be a breach of medical ethics? Even if it's a non-essential cosmetic procedure, I would still think you'd be brushing up against malpractice territory, if not squarely in it, if you blithely disregarded a patient's explicitly stated wishes about what they want to have done to them.
Kevin: "Odd that this guy thinks he's the one that draws the line."
Yes, Kevin, it's so strange that the surgeon who actually has to perform the procedure and is potentially at risk of a big fat malpractice suit if something were to go wrong while you're under the knife might want to set limits on what he's willing to do. Outrageous, really.
I would get mad, but the sheer entitlement on display here is so divorced from reality that all I can really feel is a combination of wow and

.
I guess when you live to consoom and consoom to live,
everything looks like a product to be forked over on demand as long as you pay for it, even body-altering surgical procedures performed under general anesthesia. There's probably a metaphor about American society in here somewhere, but I'm too lazy to flesh it out.
Without wanting to go too far off-topic, I'm rather curious what the legal dynamics are here. If tranny bolt-on surgery is covered by insurance in his state, then I suppose they have to provide it as long as the recipient jumps through all the hoops of getting clearance from their psychiatrist as suffering from true and honest gender dysphoria.
On the other hand, since it's ultimately still just a cosmetic procedure, there's no real objective standard for determining how big is big enough as long as the procedure is performed in a medically sound fashion, I would think? Like, when you remove a tumor we can see whether it's been completely excised with clean margins, but there's no way to objectively tell if a given bolt-on size will be enough to satisfy an AGP coomer's "dysphoria". So if a surgeon performs a successful augmentation with no egregious screw-ups, shouldn't he be able to argue that he's done his duty as a medical professional, even if it's not enough for the coomer tranny?
...I also wonder if Kevin wouldn't be shooting himself in the foot by openly stating "If I don't get the FF mommy milkers of my dreams, I'll just tell them I still have dysphoria!" in a public forum like that if he actually tried to press the issue down the line.