JFG / Jean-Francois Gariepy / jfgariepyneuro / The French Pervert / The Public Space - Warski's Abusive Ex-BF, Racist Streamer, Failed Academic, Potato Masher, Kristi Winter's BFF, Kero Defender

What happened to Momma JF?

  • Alive and enjoying life as a free spud.

    Votes: 149 6.9%
  • Murdered while hitchhiking.

    Votes: 162 7.5%
  • Lost in the woods.

    Votes: 196 9.0%
  • The potato was sliced and served... french fried.

    Votes: 1,667 76.7%

  • Total voters
    2,174
Sorry, I don't have time to look it up right now, but he definitely claimed in the interview that it is common in French to refer to the living in the past tense, which French speakers in Null's chat immediately called out as false. He was saying this in English during the interview. so we don't need any translation, just a French speaker who knows whether or not this is a thing. He has referred to her in past tense probably a dozen times in the past week in various interviews and comments. While his accent is thick, his English is decent, and I doubt this was some "lost in translation" moment.
This is JF just assuming all the English listeners are retarded. Romance languages conjugate and use the past-tense in much the same way English does. It was such a stupid lie to cover up his use of past tense for his wife that it makes him look x2 as guilty. Claiming, as a native French speaker, his English tense usage was imperfect would have been a far more believable excuse, but even to cover his ass JF couldn’t say he was incorrect.
 
Lmao like he hired someone. "Hey, dude, I got this drywall I need replaced. It's like, got blood all over it and stuff. So how much does it cost to remove this blood-soaked drywall? And can you like, forget it's like all covered in blood and stuff?"
This raises another question: how did he dispose of the bloody drywall? I did some work at a landfill once and one of the things we were told to look out for was a guy getting there really early to throw away a blood-stained mattress.
 
This raises another question: how did he dispose of the bloody drywall? I did some work at a landfill once and one of the things we were told to look out for was a guy getting there really early to throw away a blood-stained mattress.
if i were in that situation i wouldnt go anywhere near official dumping sites lol, or any place where someone could see me with it.
my first approach would probably be to load it on a pickup truck, drive it on a bridge over a river or lake at night, and dump it into the water when nobody's looking.
 
Sorry, I don't have time to look it up right now, but he definitely claimed in the interview that it is common in French to refer to the living in the past tense, which French speakers in Null's chat immediately called out as false. He was saying this in English during the interview. so we don't need any translation, just a French speaker who knows whether or not this is a thing. He has referred to her in past tense probably a dozen times in the past week in various interviews and comments. While his accent is thick, his English is decent, and I doubt this was some "lost in translation" moment.
It's pretty much the same as English. Depending on the context, you could talk about her in the past tense, but it could also come across as weird.
 
After watching all of JF's various interviews so far, especially his interview from yesterday on Dick Masterson, I am 100% convinced he murdered Elora.

JF's appearance on Masterson proved he is a liar and a manipulator, and is almost certainly a sociopath.

Let's review just a few of the things he said:

- JF unironically compared himself to OJ Simpson
- He spoke fondly of the show Dexter and how to get away with murder
- He laughed about Elora's disappearence and spoke of "good murders" and how to fake an electronic alibi.
- It was clear he's taunting the police and the public, and thinks he will never get caught.

---

I want to focus on one specific provable lie...

JF went off on a tangent complaining about fathers that are overprotective of their daughters.

He related a story saying he was dating a "high IQ woman" in the U.S. (not Mama JF / Elora), who was attending college, and that her father sent a security officer to illegally kidnap the woman from JF's house. JF claimed he and this woman were engaged.

JF spoke about how the father improperly went to court and got custody of his "fiance" and said it was illegal and that the woman wanted to stay with JF.

---

All of this is lies and is contradicted by the court documents, shown below.

- The woman had a mental age of a "10 or 11 year old child" according to the court. (Not "high IQ" like JF claims)
- The court said JF committed a crime for taking advantage of a disabled person and for moving the woman across state lines.
- The court noted the woman was "scared" of JF
- The court found that JF was married during this incident, and thus could not be engaged.
- The court found JF lured this disabled woman out of her house and took her to another state for sex.
- The court found JF did not have her interests in mind
- The court noted JF was "aggressive towards women" and "unstable"


Court Case Screenshots (highlighted):
(PDF attached below.)

Note: "Relator" is JF, and "Ward" is the young woman. "Guardian Ad Litem" is a person appointed by the court.

Screenshot_20231009-133730~3.png

Screenshot_20231009-133901~2.png

Screenshot_20231009-133953~3.png

Comments: This court case proves what JF said on Masterson was a lie.

Additionally, this incident makes at least three (?) low IQ or disabled women that JF has taken advantage of and then later lied about it. It's clear this guy is a total sociopath who needs women he can take advantage of and abuse with impunity. He thinks he is too smart to get caught.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
It's funny how the weirdos who prattle on about "phsyiognomy and phenotypes" and the importance of their genetics being passed on are oftentimes the LAST people who should be passing on their genes. (see JF, Ralph, Frederick Brennan, etc.)

It's also a misunderstanding of the idea if inheritance in an evolutionary context. Having phenotypes that are "fit" can only be understood in a population over time. There isn't an inherently "better" phenotype, only one that is more likely, in the context of a population in an environment, to spread over time, which
doesn't even account for modern technology, philosophy, and moralism (which is really the source of his fetish, not science). Even if you're trying to integrate evolution with some sort of technological environment ("smart people are better in a technological environment"), technology can and WILL change, and really it seems the only viable future is "an incredible amount of variety in population to account for the incredible variety of needs and roles in the population."

In practice, his supposed intelligence is just as likely to be a desirable trait as his lack of empathy is to be not desirable. All these fucking lone wolf ubermenschen chads forget that humans are an entirely social creature. We work in teams. We raise our young for a very long time, even in earlier times before the idea of an adult was put at ~18, and they're essentially useless (unless directed.. You know, more social animal stuff). until, what, 12?

Real leaders ("alphas" lol) are leading. They're not online grifters celebrating bitcoin. Elon Musk is the strange nexus between the two.
 
He’s said that “ALL women are crack whores at heart” (in the same video where he wishes it was the 1920s where you could just commit disobedient women to insane asylums.)
What? But in his crucible interview, he specifically said that being "mentally ill" isn't a thing, and that removing someone's fundamental human right to freedom is "imperialistic" action by psychiatrists. How does that jive with commiting your unruly wife to an insane asylum?

This guy is fucking retarded, can't keep his supposed principles straight for two minutes, and thinks he's waaaaay smarter than he is. I can't wait until it all comes crashing down around him.
 
Sorry, I don't have time to look it up right now, but he definitely claimed in the interview that it is common in French to refer to the living in the past tense, which French speakers in Null's chat immediately called out as false. He was saying this in English during the interview. so we don't need any translation, just a French speaker who knows whether or not this is a thing. He has referred to her in past tense probably a dozen times in the past week in various interviews and comments. While his accent is thick, his English is decent, and I doubt this was some "lost in translation" moment.
It’s not a thing any more than it is in English. In fact the example he uses to show how it’s different- “my mother was a secretary” meaning she was in the past, not that she’s dead, works the exact same way in English.

It’s a bit minor to focus on compared to his repeated totally careless statements about her being dead or alive. It’s ofc fun to bring up, creepy to consider, and a classic bit in detective fiction, but it doesn’t mean much when he’s nonchalantly saying she may as well be dead. (And alive or dead, she would want you to buy his book!)
 
What? But in his crucible interview, he specifically said that being "mentally ill" isn't a thing, and that removing someone's fundamental human right to freedom is "imperialistic" action by psychiatrists. How does that jive with commiting your unruly wife to an insane asylum?

This guy is fucking retarded, can't keep his supposed principles straight for two minutes, and thinks he's waaaaay smarter than he is. I can't wait until it all comes crashing down around him.
I think he squares it by saying that women in essence have no rights because they can't be trusted with decisions. He literally wants them to be treated as property.

In lolbert terms he probably terms it as marriage being a contract where you voluntarily give away your rights as opposed to the big mean state doing it.
 
I think he squares it by saying that women in essence have no rights because they can't be trusted with decisions. He literally wants them to be treated as property.

In lolbert terms he probably terms it as marriage being a contract where you voluntarily give away your rights as opposed to the big mean state doing it.
Nah, I just listened to that crucible interview, in response to a question about MamaJF being mentally ill he specifically says she has the right to be free, the right for the state not to know where she is, the right not to carry a cell phone or a form of government ID. Not things you would say if you thought women shouldn't have rights at all. He's inconsistent.
 
"No, you eeejit dri wall ees perfecly eezee to do yourself"

If the RCMP get in there and start spraying everything with Luminol I doubt a few days of cleaning by JF is going to make a difference - and I would love to see him explain away the blood flecks from Mama JF on the ceiling that are the result of him throwing the hammer back ready for another strike.
Just look at his public behavior. Someone this arrogant has completely overlooked something incredibly obvious. Maybe he thought of the castoff blood from whatever blunt instrument he used or the splatter that ended up inside an electrical fixture. But there's something he didn't think of or doesn't think the cops are smart enough to notice.
 
This raises another question: how did he dispose of the bloody drywall? I did some work at a landfill once and one of the things we were told to look out for was a guy getting there really early to throw away a blood-stained mattress.
He could have smashed it up into pieces small enough to fit into contractor bags. Also, every rural community has illegal dumpsites; he could have disposed of it in one of those, rather than the nearest landfill. And there may not have been that much to dispose of.

He was so confident that he was going to get away with disposing of Élora, he boasted about cleaning, repairing, and "sanitizing" his house just three days after allegedly dropping her off at the gas station (you know, the one that had cameras that would film the drop-off so he couldn't be accused of murdering her). So I expect that same arrogance and overconfidence to have shaped the way he handled covering his tracks and cleaning up.
 
*Researching other serial killers. This is a pretty common theme among killers. Joel Rifkin for example, killed 20 hookers and dumped their bodies at the dump in NY. One of the things he said in an interview was that he had read up behorehand about the likes of Ted Bundy and Jeffry Dahmer.
But yet he's too dumb a retard to know the most obvious thing all "successful" serial killers do, which is DO NOT KILL PEOPLE YOU KNOW.
Fucking mongoloid, no wonder he goes for the <90 IQ girls.
This dumb fuck is the mental retard equivalent of the fat chick who always goes out with an even fatter chick so as to look less fat. He only looks intelligent compared to even dumber retards.
 
He is NOT innocent. He IS guilty of reckless endangerment and gross negligence at absolute minimum, best case scenario. I don't know what you midwit smoothbrains don't understand about this. You cannot just abandon a mentally ill person at a fucking gas station for 4 months and not say anything. It is VERY illegal. There is no amount of muh redpill copium that changes this. Anything else is just denial.

It's Canada. Common law is universal and whether you're married or not makes no difference when you have kids together. It's Canada. It doesn't matter if you signed papers to be someone's legal guardian, if you take on a guardianship role, you are a legal guardian. JFG IS HER LEGAL GUARDIAN. Oh what? She's not mentally ill? She goes on backpacking adventures in the jungle searching for gold with her ex boyfriend. She thinks No White Guilty is a ghost that stalked and tried to murder her for three fucking years. She fucks and couch surfs anyone that will give her a roof over her head. She abandons her young children to go hitchhiking through the country. If you think she's mentally fit, you're even more fucking retarded than she is.
You’re probably right.
If she is certifiably mentally impaired he has a legal responsibility over her as her spouse, even just a common law marriage. Shrugging off mental illness as a ‘rejected premise’ is not a legal excuse for this.
If he knew she had plans for her survival trip thing he would be fine- if she planned to meet with some people on the 20th and didn’t make it or whatever, that’s tough but not criminal/criminally negligent. However he outright stated he knew she did not (was not capable of) making plans.
He also knew she did not have equipment for an actual survival camping trip, having only a small backpack, no tent, maybe some spare clothes. I can’t speak to whether the climate there would necessitate a tent, but in terms of food at least she sounds completely unprepared. Even if it was “just two weeks” (two weeks of camping takes a shitload of food and water, never mind clothes and supplies) like he said it was before he knew she did not have adequate resources.
He also stated they had planned to keep in contact (how she would do this innawoods I have no clue) but *she* changed plans and ghosted. He never followed up to her or anyone else, by his claims to respect privacy.

I’m fascinated to know her legal mental status. I’m pretty sure everything I said is correct and represents his own words, yet even if he super mega murdered her and hid the body, just the above would constitute felony neglect of a dependent (in the US)
Which may be objectively the funniest outcome- plan a clean murder, only to bloviate so hard about your fake story you fuck up and go to jail anyway
 
Back