Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
For those that don't remember, Dame Pesos is a Dick Masterson orbiter. He was a Chilean edgelord who has now either gone tranny or started sucking tranny cock.
And before that, he was a Ralph orbiter.

Back then, Dame became semi-popular for two things:

1. Saying "Mundane Matt is a faaaaaagot. Jajajajajajajaja" in a thick Chilean accent. Which stopped being funny years ago.
2. A 2016 edit of the Young Turks melting down over Trump getting elected that got over 8 million views on Youtube. That video is still kinda funny, but it too happened forever ago.

Other than that, he's gone the way of pretty much all of Ralph's orbiters (Gator, Flamenco, etc.): Irrelevancy, or worse.

Dick surrounds himself with pond scum. I think Sean is the only one I kinda have some respect for, and that's mainly because I don't know much about him.

It's Texas. Before an indictment by a grand jury, you cannot be charged with a felony.
That's a good point. Most of us that are American probably live in states that allow direct indictments for felonies.

I just don't think the excuse of "it's just a police incident report" means that Riley is in the clear. They put more effort into it than they would have if they felt this was a complete nothingburger. If enough time passes, and nothing happens, I might reassess that though.
 
Lucky for Riley, Nick should be able to direct to him a good Texas Lawyer to help with this recent legal predicament.

TexasLawyer.png
 
Nick has such acute daddy issues that he’s now responding in defiance to tweets that aren’t even directed toward him.

IMG_7409.jpeg
IMG_7410.jpeg

This nigger will never grow up. Worse, he’s proud of his maturity regression. Pretty fucked up that a father of five is so invested in being a whiny brat on the internet.
 
Or Nick was intentionally kept in the dark so that he'd run interference for them and idiots would believe whatever came out of lawyer man's mouth.
ask yourself what is more likely:
the masterminds of dick masterson vito and riley kept nick in the dark in order to deceive him. they did this despite the fact nick has not only parroted everything they have said so far but even ran defense for them at every possible turn while claiming to be impartial.
or
nick was too lazy to actually look into the issue and just ran with what they said. and since he is dishonest the truth doesnt matter to him. because for him all that mattered was how to agree with dick.
i dont know about you but one of those seems closer to the expected work ethic and character of a non-practicing lawyer.

edit: i dont think i made the point well enough. dick and company dont have to mislead nick because he is on their side. no deception is necessary. nick will run defense for whatever position masterson takes regardless of how abhorrent. and in terms of being embarrassed by being wrong nick will just pretend those who point this out as him being misrepresented.
 
Last edited:
since he is dishonest the truth doesnt matter to him. because for him all that mattered was how to agree with dick.
Nick seems to be trying to walk a delicate line whereby he pretends to be a principled and independent thinker while (TOTALLY coincidentally, guys!) finding a way to shit on whoever Dax has declared jihad on most recently — while also pretending to “love” everyone he’s shitting on.

In other words, Nick Rekieta is a bitch-made sissy. I’m sure Kayla’s not the only one who’s seen him in his ‘mangerie’.
 
he is dishonest the truth doesnt matter to him. because for him all that mattered was how to agree with dick.
It's this. He doesn't care at all about being genuine or arguing the law in good faith. Without exaggeration, the only time he beings up his """knowledge""" about law or his """credentials""" is when he's trying to appeal to his own authority and use it as a cudgel.

I'm not exaggerating at all, by the way. Look at every one of his legal takes. If we exclude the gimmes like Melinda Scott and Russell Greer, every single one of his hot legal takes has literally just been him spouting his opinion off as if it were infallible fact, ignoring actual legal theory. Rittenhouse and Depp were the only times where his opinion just coincidentally lined up with the facts, and even then, he got literally everything wrong except for the outcome.

He is a child raping fraud, simple as. I want to be very clear, I am accusing Nicholas Rakieta of being both a literal child molester that literally rapes children, and a fraud in the legal sense of the word.
 
It's this. He doesn't care at all about being genuine or arguing the law in good faith. Without exaggeration, the only time he beings up his """knowledge""" about law or his """credentials""" is when he's trying to appeal to his own authority and use it as a cudgel.

I'm not exaggerating at all, by the way. Look at every one of his legal takes. If we exclude the gimmes like Melinda Scott and Russell Greer, every single one of his hot legal takes has literally just been him spouting his opinion off as if it were infallible fact, ignoring actual legal theory. Rittenhouse and Depp were the only times where his opinion just coincidentally lined up with the facts, and even then, he got literally everything wrong except for the outcome.

He is a child raping fraud, simple as. I want to be very clear, I am accusing Nicholas Rakieta of being both a literal child molester that literally rapes children, and a fraud in the legal sense of the word.
Just like in Kim Potter's case where Nick said that they should have argued that she was justified in shooting the guy, instead of arguing that she accidentally grabbed her gun when she intended to use the tazer. I still think that Potter's lawyers had seen that considering how fast he got an interview with them after the case.
 
Can't wait for his video defending Hamas for trespassing on Israeli property because there wasn't a border sign written in Arabic.
Damn. All this time we focused on him defending Juju, but it turns out his ultimate goal is to bring down JewJew.

Edit: Phonefagging.
 
Last edited:
Again, I reiterate that Nicholas Rakieta, the Internet (non-practicing) lawyer that lives in Minnesota, is a pedophile that actively raped children, including his own, and he needs to be shot.
He is a child raping fraud, simple as. I want to be very clear, I am accusing Nicholas Rakieta of being both a literal child molester that literally rapes children, and a fraud in the legal sense of the word.
What? Idk if you are trying to make some sort of Montegraph reference/joke but you're just giving him ammunition to claim that this site is full of retards making shit up about him when it's mostly real criticism. Stop being retarded.
 
It's this. He doesn't care at all about being genuine or arguing the law in good faith. Without exaggeration, the only time he beings up his """knowledge""" about law or his """credentials""" is when he's trying to appeal to his own authority and use it as a cudgel.

I'm not exaggerating at all, by the way. Look at every one of his legal takes. If we exclude the gimmes like Melinda Scott and Russell Greer, every single one of his hot legal takes has literally just been him spouting his opinion off as if it were infallible fact, ignoring actual legal theory. Rittenhouse and Depp were the only times where his opinion just coincidentally lined up with the facts, and even then, he got literally everything wrong except for the outcome.

He is a child raping fraud, simple as. I want to be very clear, I am accusing Nicholas Rakieta of being both a literal child molester that literally rapes children, and a fraud in the legal sense of the word.
Nick thinks he's a lawyer and is mid-brain rot. There is still room in this story for him to try to sue the internet. Just because he's a freeze peach guy now doesn't mean he'll be held by his own fleeting self standards 6 months from now. Don't make trouble for the grand-janny.
 
Nick thinks he's a lawyer and is mid-brain rot. There is still room in this story for him to try to sue the internet. Just because he's a freeze peach guy now doesn't mean he'll be held by his own fleeting self standards 6 months from now. Don't make trouble for the grand-janny.

If Nick ever strikes Elissa we will know he's flipped his freeze peach stance. He's already hinted that he would since he's said he was gonna do those private videos for Locals.
 
Back