Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 55 15.6%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.8%

  • Total voters
    353
He is a child raping fraud, simple as. I want to be very clear, I am accusing Nicholas Rakieta of being both a literal child molester that literally rapes children, and a fraud in the legal sense of the word.
Nick is a degenerate, but I don't think I've seen anyone else accuse him of this, other than yourself. If there was any evidence of this, this thread would probably only be talking about that. Despite Nick being a degenerate, I don't think he would be capable of crossing that line.
 
This man looks so GAY holding his glass with his wrist limp, silicone cock ring in place where his wedding ring should be, chiding an uppity nigger for saying he doesn’t practice law. All he practices is his catty lisp into a camera every day
I wouldn't be surprised if his other hand is rubbing his locked up dong cause his wife put a chastity cage on him before leaving with the key
 
I wouldn't be surprised if his other hand is rubbing his locked up dong cause his wife put a chastity cage on him before leaving with the key
That does appear to be one of the main uses of the balldo. With all the alcohol, I don't think Kayla needs to worry about Nick getting hard, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charli Toxic
It seems unconscionable and absurd to me Nick would scream about this for 6-7 hours if he were clued in that the cops hit Riley with a felony stalking charge. Nick would be setting himself up for total embarrassment after he spoke with such confidence about Texas law and how July is a dummy.

But you're absolutely right, Nick is also a lying faggot and a drunken idiot. Common sense is not his forte these days.

My take is that he did this kneejerk to defend Dick and Riley but, as I stated before, he was probably hoping adults wouldn't get involved and nothing legal would come of it.

Well, adults have gotten involved, and something legal has come of it, and now Nick looks even more stupid.

One other possibility is that Nick privated the seven hour stream because somebody clued him in on what action the cops took. I will note, he still hasn't put it back up on Rumble. Now I'm sitting here wondering whether he ever will. He doesn't look any better now. He looks worse.


I do too. But not in bulk. Which i think is what Rekieta does. You can usually buy two of them for like $1.49 at the corner store as a snack.

Example:
View attachment 5398811
Those things got me so sick once. Felt like broken glass in my stomach
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Catgirl Tyranid
Why should anyone here care what the nose thinks about the site/thread?

It's not about what the nose thinks about the site/thread. You're never going to convince Rekieta/random troon/lolcow etc. that the site isn't evil because it doesn't fellate them on demand.

It's really about what the objective observer thinks when they look at the site and how it handles lolcows. If you want the farms to continue to exist, the best chance you have is if an objective observer can look at the way the site handles the documentation of said cows. Does it give them a fair shake? Is it a reasonable and accurate representation of the evidence against them?

There are sites out there where you can post all manner of bullshit and nobody will challenge you for it. Those sites are literal cancer and the people who post there are all utter fucking mongs. Kiwifarms is as good as it is because of the standards it seeks to live up to.
 
Can't wait for his video defending Hamas for trespassing on Israeli property because there wasn't a visible border sign
Very nice of Diddler Dax and Riley to deceive Nick and allow him to make an utter fool of himself. What a pussified chump.

Also: Balldo Man (non-practicing lawyer) 0
Eric July lawyers (who actually practice): 1
 
Last edited:
By the request of @Captain Manning and with the assistance of @The Yellow Dart I present my latest low-effort edit.


View attachment 5400332
Outstanding work. I hope Null plays this on MATI.

Does he seem unusually energetic in that clip? Almost chemically enhanced?
Yes.

Additionally, to me it looked like he was thinking "oh fuck" in that long moment of pause.

If you look at the clip @Spaded Dave put together (see above), it's obvious this wasn't supposed to happen. There wasn't supposed to be a police report. Riley is a gud boi who broke no law. Nick is an expert on the Texas penal code. The cops were supposed to not care. July is a dumb nigger.

TBF, he's probably right that there's no formal judicial charge yet (@AnOminous commented earlier that Texas requires grand jury indictments for all felonies, and hopefully that will happen), but this has already gone father then he was hoping and exposed flaws in his thinking.
 
He looks like I'm looking at him on drugs, I don't know whats going on but I feel like I'm on acid while looking at him. He might be sweating out some sort of drug and alcohol cocktail, he's definitely on something though.
It's his camera. It highlights its pores. I noticed he was looking WAY better shortly after all the Eric July drama so either he literally is fueled by stupid spite or his camera's setting were off for a stream or two. Probably both.
 
Calling Nick a child rapist isn’t funny. The funniest shit is stuff that might be true based upon evidence provided.

I don’t say Nick has AIDS just because it’s funny, but because there is evidence supporting it based upon how Nick has presented himself and how he has overshared his life (“pretending to be gay”, Our Wife coming onto Warski and Ralph, Black Men turning his bussy into a drainage tunnel, “heat allergy”, copious drug use, going to gay/ strip clubs with Dax, loving dick, association with pedophiles, and much more).

Slinging allegations unfounded or not going into schizophrenic detail on why you believe it does nothing but shit up the thread.
 
TBF, he's probably right that there's no formal judicial charge yet (@AnOminous commented earlier that Texas requires grand jury indictments for all felonies, and hopefully that will happen), but this has already gone father then he was hoping and exposed flaws in his thinking.
It's not like you even needed to be a "practicing lawyer" to tell the nonsense he was spouting was complete bullshit.

It was obviously trespassing although with the limited facts we had (because he was duped like a drunken fool by Diddler Dax and Riley), there wasn't evidence of criminal trespassing. Now we know that in fact he had been given explicit notice to leave the property, by the police no less, and ignored them like a dumbfuck midget retard.

And we know that despite using Nick like a cumdumpster gay bar faggot, they didn't even let him in on the actual facts and let him make a buffoon of himself. Some friends you got there Balldo Man.
 
Calling Nick a child rapist isn’t funny. The funniest shit is stuff that might be true based upon evidence provided.

I think it's fine to SPECULATE that Nick might have an affection for young meat -- because of the company he keeps. His long standing friendship with Groomer in Chief, Drexel and his close relationship with Dick Masterson who appears to have a host of open paedophiles in his professional and social circles. At the very least, he seems to have a strong interest in the subject and doesn't appear to be repelled by those who openly profess an attraction to pre and post-pubescent children.

But I think it's important to show your work -- to be clear that all you're doing is speculating, expressing a personal opinion about a possible interest based on the available evidence (which you clearly outline).

Only a retard would randomly go online and insist that somebody literally and definitively sucks little boys dicks without any solid evidence of them doing same. That could get expensive really fuckng quickly.

In short, do what Nick says, not what Nick does.
 
Back