UK Waving Palestinian flag may be a criminal offence, Braverman tells police - Home secretary also suggests clampdown on pro-Arab chants in letter that will concern free speech advocates

[Archive]
[Article]
Screenshot 2023-10-11 210240.png
Waving a Palestinian flag or singing a chant advocating freedom for Arabs in the region may be a criminal offence, Suella Braverman has told senior police officers.
In a letter to chief constables in England and Wales, the home secretary urged them to clamp down on any attempts to use flags, songs or swastikas to harass or intimidate members of the Jewish community.
Her words, which follow deadly attacks by Hamas on Israelis and a military response, will deeply concern freedom of speech advocates and members of the Muslim community.
In the letter, Braverman said police should not restrict themselves to potential offences related to the promotion of Hamas, a proscribed organisation.
“It is not just explicit pro-Hamas symbols and chants that are cause for concern. I would encourage police to consider whether chants such as: ‘From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free’ should be understood as an expression of a violent desire to see Israel erased from the world, and whether its use in certain contexts may amount to a racially aggravated section 5 public order offence.
“I would encourage police to give similar consideration to the presence of symbols such as swastikas at anti-Israel demonstrations. Context is crucial. Behaviours that are legitimate in some circumstances, for example the waving of a Palestinian flag, may not be legitimate such as when intended to glorify acts of terrorism.
“Nor is it acceptable to drive through Jewish neighbourhoods, or single out Jewish members of the public, to aggressively chant or wave pro-Palestinian symbols at. Where harassment is identified, I would encourage the police to take swift and appropriate enforcement action.
“I encourage all chief officers to ensure that any protests which could exacerbate community tensions by way of offensive placards, chants, or behaviours that could be construed as incitement or harassment, have a strong police presence to ensure perpetrators are appropriately dealt with, and that communities feel protected,” she wrote. Home Office sources confirmed her words had been approved by government lawyers.
Decisions on arrests are an operational matter for the police, Braverman wrote. “However, I would urge you to ensure your forces use all available powers to prevent disorder and distress to our communities, and that your officers will act if there are any incidents that stray into criminality,” she said.
The human rights barrister Shami Chakrabarti said “[that] the letter had been so readily press-released suggests that the intervention is at best virtue signalling and at worst seeking to compromise operational independence”, adding: “Police chiefs know their powers and duties. Anxious and vulnerable minority communities are not made safer by the politicisation of policing in difficult and dangerous times.”
Braverman’s letter was sent after Rishi Sunak vowed that anyone in the UK supporting Hamas would be “held to account” in the aftermath of the attack on Israel.
The prime minister said the government was ready to support any British citizens in need of help, during a visit in Staffordshire on Tuesday.
A “significant number” of British-Israeli dual nationals have been caught up in the conflict in Israel and Gaza, said the foreign secretary, James Cleverly.
Sunak confirmed his support for Israel, saying he stood in solidarity with the state and its people “in the face of these barbaric acts of terrorism”.
Discussing his visit to a synagogue in north London on Monday night, Sunak said he had been “unequivocal with them that we will make sure that they feel safe at this time”.
He said police had “been given very clear guidance and advice from the government to do everything that they can to keep the community safe”.
Officers will “clamp down on any behaviour that falls foul of the law”, Sunak said.
He added: “I’d just remind everyone that Hamas is a proscribed terrorist organisation. People should not be supporting Hamas and we will make sure that we hold people to account if they are.”
The number of Britons caught up in the violence in Israel and Gaza has yet to be confirmed, with ministers wary that official estimates of casualties and those injured are still being compiled.
Sunak said he understood there were families in the UK “anxious about their loved ones in the region”.
He added: “I want to reassure them we’re doing everything we can, working very closely with the Israeli authorities to establish what is happening on the ground, provide support to people where it’s needed.
“I’d urge anyone there to contact the Foreign Office so that they have their details, follow the advice locally from the Israelis but also from the Foreign Office, and we stand ready to support everyone as best we can.”
Earlier, Cleverly called on supporters of Palestine to stay at home, after protests in London.
The foreign secretary said: “There is no need, there’s no necessity for people to come out. It causes distress. This is a difficult, delicate situation.”
 
Makes the noggin go joggin ain't it
I looked at who was rating those posts and many of who were rating it positively had around 100 posts or less, saw some with zero posts too.

I could only name like 2 higher profile Kiwis that I've seen before retardedly rating a pro Patriot Act post positively.
 
I looked at who was rating those posts and many of who were rating it positively had around 100 posts or less, saw some with zero posts too.

I've seen a metric fuck-ton of that type of shit lately (like pre-this shit kicking off)... got called crazy and told to shut up when I brought it up though.

Things that I knew kiwis a year or two back would have laughed out of the room is getting overwhelming positive response by low-post counts / newfags.

(That and the newfags with insanely high reaction scores)

Glad I'm not the only one who noticed.
 
I've seen a metric fuck-ton of that type of shit lately (like pre-this shit kicking off)... got called crazy and told to shut up when I brought it up though.

Glad I'm not the only one who noticed.
I hate how hard it is to have any real discussion there because of its extremely anal rules enforced by Josh just because he is schizo about /pol/tards crapping up the thread
 
I suspect that this will likely only really target retarded western liberal whites who wave that flag in "solidarity" like Jeremy "Our friends in Hamas and Hezbollah" Corbyn.

I also suspect this may cause a uptick in Trucks of Peace which will suspiciously always be followed up by massive campaigns of national unity under love and tolerance targeting evil right wingers using it for racist speech.
 
I hate how hard it is to have any real discussion there because of its extremely anal rules enforced by Josh just because he is schizo about /pol/tards crapping up the thread

Funny thing is it seems like a lot of the /pol/ tards are actually from Israel and dried up over the weekend once shit started supposedly.

1697049417339.png


Then this popped up monday

1697049490023.png


Funny I've noticed a bunch of supposed nazi's claiming "we need to support Israel cause the mudslimes are worse" over the past few days.

Something isn't adding up there.
 
Last edited:
Ignoring all of the retarded israel/palestine takes in this thread, I'm torn on this.

On one hand TMD. On the other hand, freedom of speech

We did let hook-hand abu hamza call for the death of all English during one of his many speeches in London and we defended it because free speech meant more than the deranged ramblings of fat paki.
If we ban waving flags now, we really have become weak faggots.
 
Ignoring all of the retarded israel/palestine takes in this thread, I'm torn on this.

On one hand TMD. On the other hand, freedom of speech

We did let hook-hand abu hamza call for the death of all English during one of his many speeches in London and we defended it because free speech meant more than the deranged ramblings of fat paki.
If we ban waving flags now, we really have become weak faggots.
UK and Europe do not have freedom of speech.
The only discussion should be where to draw borders and arguments for why that specific thing should be banned, but not others
 
UK and Europe do not have freedom of speech.
The only discussion should be where to draw borders and arguments for why that specific thing should be banned, but not others
You're right in a way that nowhere has true free speech, we had civilised speech; no screaming fire in a building or "bomb" in a train station.

State sponsored speech I can't get behind, because my principles won't allow it. I grew up in a heavily muslim infested area and saw the destruction they brought to a once, posh, suburban white town. I wouldn't bat an eyelid if they were all fired into the sun.

However, banning flags, regardless of the flag, makes a mockery of what those with principles have fought against for the past few years. I won't ban the english or confederate flag, So i can't advocate for the banning of a paki flag.
 
If such a law is passed, it'll only be enforced on weedy white lefty student types flying the flag outside their student union building in "solidarity", the police are too cowardly to risk the wrath of upsetting Muslims holding mass demonstrations. Same reason why whites here get jailed for "hate speech" for dropping bacon outside a mosque while Ahmed and friends cruise the streets of London shouting about raping and murdering Jews with zero consequences, we have a two-tier justice system here.
 
Suella Braverman, now there is a name as British as Van Gogh is Dutch.

Enoch Powell was of course right about rivers of blood. But as I have stated countless times before, Britain really ought to have gone with Halifax due bf the War Cabinet Crisis and sue for peace. But then agsiny British elites should have been better stewards if their society and not let International Jewry work itself into the ruling class. Two words: Balfour Declaration.
 
Last edited:
Back