I’m sure she wasn’t by the perspective of whatever that godawful flag represents, but in the sense I mean it is fiscal, whereas she was a multi-decade punching bag for champagne socialism in America.
Ayn Rand was a standard bearer for greed and egoism. Her philosophy is fundamentally opposed to western conservatism. She is only superficially aligned because she advocated for the free market.
Ayn Rand was just another subversive Jew advocating for unfettered immigration into the USA.
You don’t know my conception of self-interest. No one has the right to pursue his self-interest by law or by force, which is what you’re suggesting. You want to forbid immigration on the grounds that it lowers your standard of living — which isn’t true, though if it were true, you’d still have no right to close the borders. You’re not entitled to any “self-interest” that injures others, especially when you can’t prove that open immigration affects your self-interest. You can’t claim that anything others may do — for example, simply through competition — is against your self-interest. But above all, aren’t you dropping a personal context? How could I advocate restricting immigration when I wouldn’t be alive today if our borders had been closed?
It’s queer that a woman who’s whole ideology was against charity and aid managed to find it in her heart to advocate for the USA to assist Israel.
“Give all the help possible to Israel.” She stated specifically that “the help Israel needs is technology and military weapons—and they need them desperately. Why should we help Israel?” She explained that at that time, Israel was “fighting not just the Arabs but Soviet Russia, who is sending the Arabs armaments.”
It’s queer that a woman who’s whole ideology was against charity and aid managed to find it in her heart to advocate for the USA to assist Israel.
“Give all the help possible to Israel.” She stated specifically that “the help Israel needs is technology and military weapons—and they need them desperately. Why should we help Israel?” She explained that at that time, Israel was “fighting not just the Arabs but Soviet Russia, who is sending the Arabs armaments.”
Ayn Rand was a standard bearer for greed and egoism. Her philosophy is fundamentally opposed to western conservatism. She is only superficially aligned because she advocated for the free market.
Ayn Rand was just another subversive Jew advocating for unfettered immigration into the USA.
You don’t know my conception of self-interest. No one has the right to pursue his self-interest by law or by force, which is what you’re suggesting. You want to forbid immigration on the grounds that it lowers your standard of living — which isn’t true, though if it were true, you’d still have no right to close the borders. You’re not entitled to any “self-interest” that injures others, especially when you can’t prove that open immigration affects your self-interest. You can’t claim that anything others may do — for example, simply through competition — is against your self-interest. But above all, aren’t you dropping a personal context? How could I advocate restricting immigration when I wouldn’t be alive today if our borders had been closed?
It’s queer that a woman who’s whole ideology was against charity and aid managed to find it in her heart to advocate for the USA to assist Israel.
If you listen to her discussions where she explained her disdain for altruism, it’s because superficial altruism, or the demand that the citizenry engage in it, was the official excuse for the establishment of the Soviet Union.
She points out that there’s always a disguised motive. People don’t give anything for free, and you should know what they expect they’re buying.
You mind telling me where you got your quotes from?
The leader of Hamas has called for global jihad while he sits safely in Doha (in his mansion).
Also he wants you to kill Jews for him and send him your money because he will put it to good use (his kids need new Ferraris).
So expect global terror attacks on Friday 13th which is his recommended date.
Looking forward to all that cultural enrichment tomorrow/after tomorrow.
Some of us will be besides ourselves (literally).
Some things never change.. Pompous elite twats sending others to die and kill for their whims.
Fuck though.. Let's hope he and others like him are ignored.
I don't think he/they quite understand what something like that would mean. The western global non-muslim normies are paying attention, horrified and beginning to notice in general. (from this to the book burning reactions etc) Major or even noticeable violence outside of the ME will be a very bad look... at the very least. And if the violence extends beyond just select targets or to native targets etc. This could end up as a clash of civilization and muslims if they aren't lucky.
On the bright side, it would make efforts to import half the muslim 3rd world all the more insane sounding.
She became the focus cause like always, since time immemorial young retarded men have been whipped into war frenzy fever by the promise of saving the damsel in distress. There are legit children who have died in this they probably didn't have their heads cut off but we don't know their names either. It's plain sensationalism and the people who are into it are really into posting these pics over and over because like I said they are ghouls.
Well I mean it may be sensationalism, but that’s because it’s pretty shocking having a rave ending in executions and rape. It’s shocking enough that you keep having the pro-Palestinians trying to get the topic off of the dead ravers and pretend everyone is fine and ackshualky got medical attention from Hamas.
When did the Arab league have the balls to stand up to Israel and the United States? They never pulled this shit under Trump and Obama. Jimmy Carter was more respected globally than Biden and Kamala Harris.
Its interesting in a macabre way how the explosions of the artillery cause an echo like 3 seconds later. I wonder what the sound is bouncing off of? Looks like most taller buildings are gone.
Some things never change.. Pompous elite twats sending others to die and kill for their whims.
Fuck though.. Let's hope he and others like him are ignored.
I don't think he/they quite understand what something like that would mean. The western global non-muslim normies are paying attention, horrified and beginning to notice in general. (from this to the book burning reactions etc) Major or even noticeable violence outside of the ME will be a very bad look... at the very least. And if the violence extends beyond just select targets or to native targets etc. This could end up as a clash of civilization and muslims if they aren't lucky.
1.8 billion Muslims out of 8.1 billion global population but only a fraction of the Muslim population are "fighters".
Examples from places like China shows that you can in fact stop extremists with some powerful tactics.
And if the violence extends beyond just select targets or to native targets etc. This could end up as a clash of civilization and muslims if they aren't lucky.
There's been rumors online certain paid agitators have entered through the US southern border in the last few weeks. Not paid by Arabs. Paid for by the UN.
Just a rumor. But remember the people in power see you as Real-Time-Strategy units. Not people.