2023 Israel-Palestine Armed Conflict

No, not that model. A Chinook can only carry 55 and that's the largest helicopter from my knowledge.

I believe it's a Sikorsky CH-53 which can handle 50 if configured for troop transport.

Sikorsky_CH-53D_Sea_Stallion_Drawing.svg.png
Profile looks about right.
 
There's absolutely no reason for any transport helicopters to be used by Israel right now except for medevac, and obviously a medevac chopper is not going to be a CH-53 unless there's a huge amount of casualties that need to be moved as quickly as possible, which currently there are not?

Like why would you shove 50 soldiers into a CH-53 when the entirety of southern Israel is basically a military base right now with thousands of ground vehicles available to move soldiers from place to place

I am enjoying these real Pallywood moments though
 

Can a helicopter even carry 50 troops?

Some can. Depends on the model.
That's the tail rotor of a CH-53E Super Stallion or variant thereof. I hated chocking and chaining them on the flight deck especially when one is coming aboard.
 
He's not wrong about the racism thing. He'll always be a nigger. They're delusional if they think that whites however liberal they might act would think otherwise. But that whole decolonize thing...have fun in Africa Jerome. Somebody hasn't told you you're on the wrong continent brother.
 
I am however a bit tired of this very autistic thought process I've noticed develop among a lot of alt-right and anti-establishment types, whereby they think because the US/Western establishment are evil, then every single person and regime that find themselves against it must therefore be based as fuck and a shining example of Aryan honour and virtue.
It's funny and ironic but at this point I really believe that the prototypical online neo nazi political stance is at its core an anti-white ideology, just as much as the opposite modern college student woke-communist style is. It is defined by
  • Viewing white people as weak and effeminate
  • Being fixated by the superior aspects of "based", brown+Russia third-world countries, the more savage and oppressive the better
  • Taking gleeful delight in racially-motivated violence, humiliation and killings against white people because "you brought this on yourself" and "not my problem"
  • Being, on principle, against any action or stance taken by a majority-white country
In every applicable conflict, they side against a white (or more-white) country defending itself, its people and its homeland from being destroyed. Poland and the UK in WWII, Ukraine now. Even Israel now (although that's obvious).

Even their namesake, the thing that make them neo nazis by definition, is based on celebrating a regime that basically wanted to wipe out all but one European culture.
Yep, even Null has done this on MATI, calling Mao Zedong based for culling drug addicts, and people in his chat tell him "but he starved like 30 million people though."

I also pointed out to him, in sarcasm, that every other regime has committed far worse atrocities than the U.S. have. The only one he was willing to acknowledge as being somewhat worse than the U.S. was the Killing Fields of Khmer Rouge, that is how extreme a government has to be before he puts it below the U.S. The Holodomor, the Holocaust, the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, the Gulag, the Stasi and the Armenian Holocaust are somehow better than the modern day U.S.

I'd like to see him host KF in China, seeing as how they're so much better than the U.S. See how long that would last.
Null's politics is very strange. It's obviously based on ethnic and race-based nationalism, but he takes any opportunity to shit on Europeans, especially his country's direct forbears, the English/British, in a way that is seems to go beyond just banter to an actually sensitive subject for him. He's also big on American nationalism, which is fundamentally based on rejecting ties to your heritage and kin, and having civic, rather than ethnic nationalism. People are bound together not by their common ethnicity or culture, but by the state itself.
 
It's funny and ironic but at this point I really believe that the prototypical online neo nazi political stance is at its core an anti-white ideology, just as much as the opposite modern college student woke-communist style is. It is defined by
  • Viewing white people as weak and effeminate
  • Being fixated by the superior aspects of "based", brown+Russia third-world countries, the more savage and oppressive the better
  • Taking gleeful delight in racially-motivated violence, humiliation and killings against white people because "you brought this on yourself" and "not my problem"
  • Being, on principle, against any action or stance taken by a majority-white country
In every applicable conflict, they side against a white (or more-white) country defending itself, its people and its homeland from being destroyed. Poland and the UK in WWII, Ukraine now. Even Israel now (although that's obvious).
Well yeah, that's what happens when a movement gets populated by socially isolated freaks and non-whites who want to larp as Aryans.
 
Back