2023 Israel-Palestine Armed Conflict

So it's all about the babies
I mean pretty much? Most people are generally concerned about getting on with their lives and only really care about national politics. They're not terribly invested in what's happening half a world away, so something like "slitting the throat of babies" is shocking and engages them, and is pretty knee jerk "these are bad people".
All of these are emotional responses. Do you know anyone looking at things in another way?
I am having some more in depth conversations with my partner and some of our friends, but for most people it's just "it's really horrible and I don't want to talk about it" or "I find what people are saying on social media really scary". Admittedly I'm getting this from seeing people in work or in social settings, which is not exactly conducive for a deep dive into the ethics of warfare, but the question was about the most common takes you've noticed.
 
Some related clips
lol, most likely those dumbass Muslim Filipino terrorists. The Philippines may be a shithole, but Gaza is a much, much bigger shithole, so there can only be one reason they're there.
1697232036504.png1697232098235.png
 
when was the former ever an option? They've been kicked out of 109 countries and now actively control the US government via the Israel lobby, but somehow it's possible to live in peace with them?
What are you complaining about then. Peace with kikes is not an option!

Currently kikes are not in a state of peace by any measure

So what's the problem?
 
  • Viewing white people as weak and effeminate
  • Being fixated by the superior aspects of "based", brown+Russia third-world countries, the more savage and oppressive the better
  • Taking gleeful delight in racially-motivated violence, humiliation and killings against white people because "you brought this on yourself" and "not my problem"
  • Being, on principle, against any action or stance taken by a majority-white country
It's because white countries are governed (more or less) by the Rule of Law and some form of small-l liberalism. And since wignats are nearly always losers, they see that Rule of Law as what's constraining them and making them temporarily-embarrassed warrior-kings.

They admire tinpot dictatorships because it's a power fantasy. And like the Antifa hooligans who dream of being Commissars in their imagined Worker's Paradise, they would be lined up against the wall if they ever got the form of government they want.

Liberal democracy is far from perfect, but its flaws are outweighed by things like being able to put food on the table, or flush the toilet, or not get unpersoned for not clapping long enough.
 
yes and poles have a really bad habit of getting cocky with a much bigger and stronger foreign power, getting absolutely steamrolled by them, and then playing the victim afterwards. The fact that they are retarded snow mexicans is why they keep repeating this pattern of behavior until getting their shit kicked in.
Any possibility an admin can move this retard to mass debates?
 
if only it actually happened and wasn't just more atrocity propaganda like the 6 gorillion beheaded babies.
Super optimistic Dear Leader: Please use this thread to discuss a happening in Israel, and don’t shit it up with unrelated /pol sperging.

This tard: THE NAZIS DID NOTHING WRONG.
 
Hamas shot down an Israeli helicopter on Saturday near Be'eri It was carrying 50 soldiers Source: Palestinian Journalist Suhayb Musalima, quoting Israeli Channel ⁠12.


Fake and gay. How the fuck are you going to shove 50 soldiers in a UH-60 Blackhawk? Even a CH-53 Sea Stallion can only fit, like, 25.
That tail is definitely from a CH-53 Sea Stallion and they can carry "up to 38 fully-equipped troops" according to Sikorsky. Israelis aren't big people so maybe they could cram 50 Jews in a helicopter.
 
Back