Cultcow Russell Greer / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

If you were Taylor Swift, whom would you rather date?

  • Russell Greer

    Votes: 117 4.5%

  • Travis Kelce

    Votes: 138 5.3%

  • Null

    Votes: 1,449 55.9%

  • Kanye West

    Votes: 283 10.9%

  • Ariana Grande

    Votes: 607 23.4%
  • Total voters
    2,594
GenociderSyo said:
"Mr. Moon and Kiwi Farms users have been implicated in three suicides, a school shooting in New Mexico, and a clash with New Zealand authorities over information about terrorist attacks at mosques in Christchurch."
Click to expand...
He makes us sound way more badass than we really are.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: SauliNiinisto, Cousin-Larry, Clovis and 11 others
So if we're using the logic of these fucking dolts, then hypothetically, if an avid user of twitter decides to shoot up a school, then that means twitter is responsible for a school shooting.
Even if couch cuck posted a manifesto to here or some shit before, what could Kiwis do to stop it other than contact authorities? Are we just supposed to jump through the fucking screen with lead pipes and glass the fucker? Shits retarded.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Dumb
Reactions: rubytintedchix, Exercise4Reader, YarrBlueballs and 11 others
Pepperonified said:
"Not only refused to remove the materials, he mockingly posted the correspondence to Kiwi Farms."

Is this judge retarded? No, seriously. How does somebody this stupid even get a position like that? I hope this is appealed, and the appeal is as mean and insulting as possible to this retard who thinks "Mockingly posting a correspondence" is in any way relevant in a copyright infringement case.
Click to expand...
They're malicious.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: SpiceyHuman, YarrBlueballs, Eydallur and 4 others
Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
The appellate court here seems to have stretched the legal standard from “caused or materially contributed to or authorized” to “encouraged and therefore materially contributed to” infringement.
Click to expand...
Disagree. Encouraging is part of contributing. The District court held so as well. Speaking of which, so did SCOTUS:
“One infringes contributorily by intentionally inducing or encouraging direct infringement” - Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U.S. 913, 125 S. Ct. 2764 (2005)
Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
2. And I’d also argue that a) it wasn’t “encouragement,” to post the notice and refuse to remove the materials, and b) none of it was any kind of active material contribution to the infringement.
Click to expand...
I agree.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: PollyPissyPants, Star Platinum, I Love Huge Long Chode and 15 others
Useful_Mistake said:
They already made an article about this:
View attachment 5420215View attachment 5420208View attachment 5420209View attachment 5420210View attachment 5420213View attachment 5420214

Sadly archive hits a paywall, so my screenshots will have to suffice

The author falsely accused Null of a federal crime in here, saying that “Moon also illegally posted Greer’s song […] to the forum” something Null did not do. Other than this and giving a brief history of Russ, this pretty much just quotes the court doc and Russ’ lawyer saying that this will make society Great Again.

Edit: Bloomberg just released an article about us too:
View attachment 5420238
Also behind a paywall
Click to expand...
Suddenly this reeks of a well coordinated campaign using the most retarded and easy to control catspaw they could find
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: I Love Huge Long Chode, SpiceyHuman, Exercise4Reader and 12 others
Puff said:
Or someone could actually give me a useful response instead of acting like a nigger. You're in a featured thread. People aren't all going to be up to date on shit.
Click to expand...
Just because the thread is featured doesn't mean that completely brain-dead, lazy faggots like you get a free pass to come shit it up with questions you could easily answer yourself by skimming the OP.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Morgan Copper, PollyPissyPants, Swedishcrepes02 and 24 others
Puff said:
Yeah, that's how you answer a question.
Click to expand...
I literally answered your question right after the insult. Evidently it was served. That is easily observable and discernible even without taking a couple of minutes to scan through the courtlistener docket.
ZipDisk said:
Does this mean Zuck is implicated in every fucking Facebook Live "Hey, let's film ourselves doing crime" video? Because that would be a SPICY ruling.
Click to expand...
It would indeed. I’d be ever so delighted to see which part of this ruling established this broad rule. Surely you can help a brother out?
Merry said:
Suddenly this reeks of a well coordinated campaign using the most retarded and easy to control catspaw they could find
Click to expand...
Burd Turglar said:
I'm honestly starting to wonder about the coordinated MSM attacks on the farms, something smells fishy
Click to expand...
The timing is suspicious.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Dumb
Reactions: PollyPissyPants, I Love Huge Long Chode, Clovis and 13 others
ZipDisk said:
Does this mean Zuck is implicated in every fucking Facebook Live "Hey, let's film ourselves doing crime" video? Because that would be a SPICY ruling.
Click to expand...
You know the answer or you should know. Just type out nigger for a clue. This isn't some cool cloak and dagger mystery. It's just business. Large established and most importantly commercial websites are sterilized to sell shit to retards.

The Kiwifarms isn't and is in competition with them. It will never enjoy the same protection for that very reason. I doubt the case has any legs to stand on but it's going to be another round of meme lawsuits.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: PollyPissyPants, I Love Huge Long Chode, YarrBlueballs and 5 others
MarvinTheParanoidAndroid said:
I don't understand the logic of this ruling, what do the suicides, the New Mexico school shooting or the Christ Church shooting have to do with Russel Greer's copyright claims?

Furthermore, how does showing off Greer's lolsuit emails change whether or not his copyrighted materials are being reposted under fair use? You could make any number of arguments regarding parody, educational purposes or critique.
Click to expand...
it's nonsensical
the first bit has nothing to do with it period and at best they included just to make meanie farms in articles

very narrowly I can comprehend (but not agree with) the logic that nool discussing/laughing at greer mean he was broadly speaking not just "merely ‘permitting’ the infringing material to remain on the website", but that has nothing to do specifically with the case. the ultimate logic is saying they agree that "It is not enough for a defendant to have merely ‘permitted’ the infringing material to remain on the website" but then going "but we don't care, anyway get fukt lol"

1697507550532.png

"we decline the invitation [to correctly read the statute]"
lol
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: I Love Huge Long Chode, Clovis, SpiceyHuman and 6 others
Puff said:
Or someone could actually give me a useful response instead of acting like a nigger. You're in a featured thread. People aren't all going to be up to date on shit.
Click to expand...
Agreed, but I think problem is that this is a decision from an appeals court so logically service must have been effected for both the original claim and the appeal.

So, my guess is people feel that your question really should never have been asked if you had put 2 + 2 together and thus are giving you stick for asking it.

A decision would not be released if service was never effected as service has to be proven/accepted.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: TractorGirl, I Love Huge Long Chode, SpiceyHuman and 5 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back