Trainwreck SSSniperWolf / Lia / Alia Shelesh / Alia Valentine - "Gamer", Camgirl, Future Pornstar

Noxe said:
I like how everyone is like arguing over semantics and completly ignored that she was just shown trying to offer nudes to children if they'd twerk for her.
Click to expand...
There’s a critical mass of coomers and simps ITT. They’re either in denial or they’re masking their coomer/simp nature with political sperging or “he’s a soyboy, I wish she would have shidded and farded on his porch”

I don’t disagree that Jack comes off as an annoying effete pansy but a lot of the sentiment coming from the coomers and simps ITT is what allows e-wahmen to get away with this double standard of “it’s not breaking the rules/law when tittystreamers do it ok sweatiey”.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Mister Loser, Blatant hypocrite, NewnameRealEmail and 68 others
Kicking up a stink makes sense given what happened to the Act Man vs QuantumTV saga.

QTV isn't even a large channel, and is pretty much proven to have at least called up Act Man's family, abused the DMCA system, said TOS stuff off-site, ban evaded, etc.
Youtube decided to let him go because he was dogpiled.

So bringing on the dogpile is the correct solution here, since anything YT does would result in an entertaining outcome. If they do take action, then they'd have to walk back on that line of thinking. If they don't, the takeaway becomes to go the whole hog when doing something that otherwise gets you in trouble and use the ensuing dogpile as a shield form consequences from YT's end.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: The Foxtrot, Cowboy Kim, Johan Schmidt and 4 others
Nate Higgers said:
There’s a critical mass of coomers and simps ITT. They’re either in denial or they’re masking their coomer/simp nature with political sperging or “he’s a soyboy, I wish she would have shidded and farded on his porch”

I don’t disagree that Jack comes off as an annoying effete pansy but a lot of the sentiment coming from the coomers and simps ITT is what allows e-wahmen to get away with this double standard of “it’s not breaking the rules/law when tittystreamers do it ok sweatiey”.
Click to expand...
What makes this even more egregious than a typical e-whore doing this is that she has a literal criminal record for robbery. It is not unreasonable for him to think she might try to physically threaten him or his family.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Cranky Old Broad, Malory Archer, WebLurker and 23 others
xn--mck1c said:
Kicking up a stink makes sense given what happened to the Act Man vs QuantumTV saga.

QTV isn't even a large channel, and is pretty much proven to have at least called up Act Man's family, abused the DMCA system, said TOS stuff off-site, ban evaded, etc.
Youtube decided to let him go because he was dogpiled.

So bringing on the dogpile is the correct solution here, since anything YT does would result in an entertaining outcome. If they do take action, then they'd have to walk back on that line of thinking. If they don't, the takeaway becomes to go the whole hog when doing something that otherwise gets you in trouble and use the ensuing dogpile as a shield form consequences from YT's end.
Click to expand...

As you already said, The Act Man's call to action didn't stick because YouTube ultimately felt uncomfortable allowing a larger channel to pressure them into deplatforming a smaller channel. Even if it ended up only shoving Quantum's channel to absolute obscurity (his channel is the 17th result when explicitly searching his channel name).

The difference this time is Jack's the smaller channel calling out SSSniperwolf, someone with 6 times the number of subscribers and 6 million followers on Instagram who's obviously brigading her audience to get her way.

YouTube will, inevitably, try and sweep all this under the rug if this dumb bitch cooperates, but it's putting eyes on Lia while pressuring YouTube to confront their blatant hypocrisy and favoritism. Unlike with Act Man, I can't imagine this will backfire for Jack regardless.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: The Foxtrot, CEO of Lurkers, Hoplixe and 8 others
She said she doesn't know how to dox but she is a known copyright claimer so she actually does under certain requirements. The system basically let's the one giving you a strike take down your videos until you give them you legal information or something and she could just use that to dox him or anyone making videos about her. I'm sure it's like that on purpose to go after political channels or something too. It takes no hacking skills just fraud which is something she is good at.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Cowboy Kim, Dylan, PlasticOwls and 4 others
SourApples said:
She said she doesn't know how to dox but she is a known copyright claimer so she actually does under certain requirements. The system basically let's the one giving you a strike take down your videos until you give them you legal information or something and she could just use that to dox him or anyone making videos about her. I'm sure it's like that on purpose to go after political channels or something too. It takes no hacking skills just fraud which is something she is good at.
Click to expand...
She’s always been a liar, like all extreme GOTIS cases. Her doing shit like this is a symptom of a greater problem with youtube. She knows that the simps will help her evade any accountability.

anustart76 said:
What makes this even more egregious than a typical e-whore doing this is that she has a literal criminal record for robbery. It is not unreasonable for him to think she might try to physically threaten him or his family.
Click to expand...
If he lived anywhere that wasn’t a blue shithole she’d find out really quickly with the amount of fucking around she does.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Political Sperging
Reactions: Malory Archer, Cowboy Kim, SourApples and 10 others
Nate Higgers said:
There’s a critical mass of coomers and simps ITT. They’re either in denial or they’re masking their coomer/simp nature with political sperging or “he’s a soyboy, I wish she would have shidded and farded on his porch”

I don’t disagree that Jack comes off as an annoying effete pansy but a lot of the sentiment coming from the coomers and simps ITT is what allows e-wahmen to get away with this double standard of “it’s not breaking the rules/law when tittystreamers do it ok sweatiey”.
Click to expand...
In situations where two parties are fighting one another, it is quite commonplace to feel the need to pick one side or the other. And now that 'fencesitting' has become one of the worst things you can be besides a racist, the pressure to plant your flag in someone's camp is more intense than ever. Sometimes the fact is that both sides are being massive turbofaggots, and a lot of folks are more swayed by a pretty face than they'd care to admit.

Just remember lads, no matter how pretty she is, no matter how much of a perfect waifu she may appear to be from her carefully curated online presence, some poor guy out there is getting sick of her having period sharts in bed all night and leaving her dirty ass underwear all over the bathroom floor. And the worst part is that even that mental picture isn't enough to dissuade some of you.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cowboy Kim, Nate Higgers, Noxe and 6 others
Chuck McGill said:
Just remember lads, no matter how pretty she is, no matter how much of a perfect waifu she may appear to be from her carefully curated online presence, some poor guy out there is getting sick of her having period sharts in bed all night and leaving her dirty ass underwear all over the bathroom floor. And the worst part is that even that mental picture isn't enough to dissuade some of you.
Click to expand...
Did she have a husband divorce her, or am I thinking of someone else?

More than any of that, what's really off-putting is just listening to her talk. I mean if you go watch any of her TikTok content thieving videos the way she talks is obnoxious.
 
  • Late
Reactions: Burning Fanatic
Regardless of how soy people perceive Jack to be and believe this to be fruitless, his crusade against her is kind of working. Surely there is work he’s doing that he isn’t monetizing on videos imo but even if lia isn’t kick off partner or given really any consequence worth it to anyone’s standards, more and more people are vocalizing about it and it’s a start. She’s a cluster b mess embroiled in shit with her personal life and channel already, then toss in her ire with Jack, now a collective are starting to criticize her loudly, she’s gonna thot out and snap. Hopefully very publicly cus that’s worth watching
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Agree
Reactions: Malory Archer, Cowboy Kim, anustart76 and 7 others
Okay, place your bets; if she gets banned from YouTube, will she start doing porn?

Nate Higgers said:
There’s a critical mass of coomers and simps ITT. They’re either in denial or they’re masking their coomer/simp nature with political sperging or “he’s a soyboy, I wish she would have shidded and farded on his porch”
Click to expand...

That's the main thing I've noticed about this chick, she can avoid criticism because she's conventionally attractive and its fucking annoying to know that.
 
Last edited:
  • Islamic Content
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Cowboy Kim, 56 others, Nate Higgers and 1 other person
HarrietTubmansTittyFuckSu said:
Regardless of how soy people perceive Jack to be and believe this to be fruitless, his crusade against her is kind of working.
Click to expand...
When the walls of Soyjacksfilmstinople fell Muslim aggressors seeking vengeance for the crusades poured into the defenseless city. Historians agree that on that day Jacksfilms could be heard looking like this and sounding like this:
Durka durka mohammed jihad.png
"Noooo! I am not laughing yet I am still losing! How can this beeee?!"​
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Dumb
Reactions: Cowboy Kim, Kulmeister, Nguyen Van Phuoc and 8 others
SourApples said:
She said she doesn't know how to dox
Click to expand...

Bollocks.

All doxxing is is finding out someone’s personal details, basically their address and telephone number, and posting it online somewhere publicly accessible.

If she doesn’t know how to do that, she doesn’t know how to use the internet.

Maybe she means she doesn’t know where to find out such details, but most people can be found with Google and a bit of effort.

I find a lot of things that the young millennials and zoomer generations think to be mildly bizarre at best and outright foolish at worst.

Like when they seem to think that doxxing is a serious crime. I am not saying it doesn’t have the potential for leading to serious crimes, but ultimately if some crazy people want to cause someone harm, they will find a way.

They really do seem to believe that there is an honor system on social media and not following it is a massive crime.

My generation (Late X) went into the internet knowing that making personal details easy to find was silly.
We knew not to trust random strangers, in real life and on the internet.

If you choose to forgo your anonymity on the internet, it will be abused. So if you want to be a YouTuber, showing your face, sooner or later someone will leak your details. You need to be ready.
It’s not nice to leak someone’s details, but it’s not completely private information. Your neighbors know where you live without your express permission, so it’s not a crime for randoms to know your address.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Malory Archer, Lord Xenu, The Foxtrot and 10 others
All I know is that when I see this cunts face either adblock isn't working or I'm on a dummy account, referring to youtube. She's youtube's darling, probably has more money than she knows what to do with. If she tanks her career now she can live the rest of her life comfy already....if she isn't a retard.

Heavy on the if, because then again she wouldn't be harassing this guy like this in this way in the first place. I've never seen a second of her vids, the thumbnails kill enough woefully dwindling braincells as it is.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Cranky Old Broad and Orange Piccolo
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back