Your reiteration was factually wrong, and I corrected you. He did not "coast[] on the pity card", the appellate court merely disagreed about how liberally Pro se complaints should be constructed/disagreed with one of the district court's factual determinations.
what does any of that have to do with russell greer?
Woman Judge Moment.
Kind of but not really. They'd just be idiots whining on the internet.. If the media, Internet companies, politicians, Governments and Judges didn't carry water for them. Those are the REAL issues he faces, not a bunch of retards whining on the Internet.
I don’t get this at all. “in a Google Drive on Kiwi Farms” means the content is not actually hosted here, so why wouldn’t he issue the DMCA with Google instead? It all seems so retarded.
goes to show that if the judge is part of the (((tribe))) she’ll take an opportunity to encourage degeneracy, and even the smallest dig against the successful white woman taylor swift
We get blamed for things that we weren't even involved in solely because we make fun of trannies. And Google has the Fuck You money to make it go away; Null doesn't.
Nothing, but that's ultimately going to be a question for the District court to answer, and it hasn't yet. It was completely irrelevant to the appeal, but it is part of the "record," because Russ put it in the lawsuit.
Neither Null nor Shitlips can actually get meaningful payout from each other, no matter who wins. Shitlips wants to take down the Farms because it is somewhere people can talk about him without him controlling the narrative. Null, meanwhile, wants attorney's fees to punish Russ for being a vexatious litigant.
There’s what a person wants and then what a court will entertain+enforce. This is just a battle in the war sure. But in this specific instance if there isn’t a settlement and it’s ruled not fair use (which it absolutely should be based on criticism alone, but who knows with the rot in society now), it’s gonna be one of those legal “math” things of “he would have sold two of them so ok Null you owe $50”
Not a lawsperg, but 17 U.S.C. § 504(c)(2) specifies that the court could award up to $150,000 for each count of willful infringement. Greer is specifically seeking the statutory damages, so the question is how likely is he to succeed and how likely is it that Null would be ordered to pay the maximum statutory damages?
Being retarded is the right of all Americans. It is perhaps our only true God-given right. We can be retarded in our financial, educational, medical, and judicial systems. Truly a beautiful country.
Because his beef with us ultimately isn't about copyright. It's about stopping us from mocking him. If it was just a copyright thing this would've been over long ago.
Thank you for this wonderful and unique contribution. I mean, it's not like this has been posted multiple times per page or anything and you could just literally fucking read the answer.
He was in person. The hearing was in person.
I literally answered that a few pages back. Put in at least tinniest bit of effort.
You don't have to deal with the original infringement, no.
It can't. The district court pointed it out. Null never contested it, because it would have been a waste of money; Russ would have just refiled and named Null's LLC.
