Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[Project Zircon]

Russel Greer is about to give his testimony to the Supreme Court. This is his moment, finally he’ll show that Joshua Connor Moon what’s what and have sex with Taylor Swift.

As his ghoulish visage cracks open to mutter retard noises the ghost of Antonin Scalia appears in the court room.

The court is aghast by this spectral phenomenon. Everyone cowers in fear as the phantom’s voice booms to life.

“Greer!” The ghost cries, its hand pointing like Obama pointed to Mecca after getting the late judge killed.

“Greer, out with it mush mouth! Today junior!”

The terror in the court wanes as the occupants begin to laugh. Greer tries to squeak something weird and probably rapey out.

The ghost of Antonin Scalia begins to mime the stereotypical actions of the mentally handicapped. Greer runs from the courtroom crying. Russel Greer is then convicted of aggravated ugliness and sentenced to exile in the wasteland.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

Russel Greer is about to give his testimony to the Supreme Court. This is his moment, finally he’ll show that Joshua Connor Moon what’s what and have sex with Taylor Swift.

As his ghoulish visage cracks open to mutter retard noises the ghost of Antonin Scalia appears in the court room.

The court is aghast by this spectral phenomenon. Everyone cowers in fear as the phantom’s voice booms to life.

“Greer!” The ghost cries, its hand pointing like Obama pointed to Mecca after getting the late judge killed.

“Greer, out with it mush mouth! Today junior!”

The terror in the court wanes as the occupants begin to laugh. Greer tries to squeak something weird and probably rapey out.

The ghost of Antonin Scalia begins to mime the stereotypical actions of the mentally handicapped. Greer runs from the courtroom crying. Russel Greer is then convicted of aggravated ugliness and sentenced to exile in the wasteland.

Russ’s version:

Russ gives a cool version of his closing argument. The court high-fives him. At that same moment, Keffals turns into Taylor Swift, Liz no-Dong turns into Katy Perry, and Pat Tomlinson turns into…well he doesn’t change, because in Russ World, no man is better, cooler, or more handsome than him.

He, Katy, and Taylor head out the door, keytar slung across his back. He walks up to the mic for his moment in front of the camera, and says “We’re going to have sex now, and Tomlinson is going to get my brothel chain built. Greer out.”

He then drops the mic.

Unfortunately, reality is cruel. He loses, and goes back home to sob into a huge disgusting sugary drink while half heartedly trying to rub one out to a Taylor Swift video.

 

[HTTP Error 404]

Do you mean sua sponte, or by some motion? Indeed, it could sua sponte dismiss the complaint if it "is patently obvious that the plaintiff could not prevail on the facts alleged". See Curley v. Perry, 246 F.3d 1278 (10th Cir. 2001). Dismissal by motion might run into the same issues as in the appeal, though.

Some other motion. They threw it back down to the lower court based on X, but I imagine the motion to dismiss was X Y and Z. Can they just immediately refile a motion to dismiss with Y and Z (and A , B, C other reasons if needed) and have the court dismiss it again?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Some other motion. They threw it back down to the lower court based on X, but I imagine the motion to dismiss was X Y and Z. Can they just immediately refile a motion to dismiss with Y and Z (and A , B, C other reasons if needed) and have the court dismiss it again?

Motion to dismiss faces one big hurdle. All the leniency and inferences will be made in Russ' favor. That is what killed Null's victory in the appeal. The case is about contributory copyright infringement. Motion to dismiss based on that failed (on appeal). Even if there was something to file a motion to dismiss over, it'd face the same issues. 10th circuit found that will all the lenience due, Russ had managed to plead his case well enough to proceed. No motion to dismiss will change that.

 

[Leave_Fargut]

and so the in forma pauperis money-bilking continues. If Null gets to reclaim legal fees from Russ at the end of this, I hope he follows through on the idea of using some content-merchant with a GoPro to do it. The Wall of Shame deterrent for these frivolous litigants needs to happen

 

[Useful_Mistake]

We're on Stanford now:

https://fairuse.stanford.edu/case/greer-v-moon-et-al/

https://archive.ph/etmfk

Law professor at Santa Clara University School of Law wrote about us too (posted the interesting parts. Check the link for full):



Despite shitting on us, the professor claims that the 10th circuit made many mistakes and bent copyright’s legal rules specifically to punish us. Not a bad article, though most of it is court citations

https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2023/10/think-kiwi-farms-is-legally-unassailable-copyright-law-might-disagree-greer-v-moon.htm

https://archive.ph/u9cUU

The golden gem of the article:



Arstechnica made an article too, that was just essentially rewritten stuff from the beforementioned professor:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/10/court-ruling-may-doom-kiwi-farms-but-set-dubious-copyright-precedent/

https://archive.ph/BHT3q

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Arstechnica made an article too, that was just essentially rewritten stuff from the beforementioned professor:

A&H thread for the Arstechnica article. That's for more general discussion about how the ruling affects the Farms.

 

[Atlictoal]

We're on Stanford now:
View attachment 5425187

https://fairuse.stanford.edu/case/greer-v-moon-et-al/

https://archive.ph/etmfk

Law professor at Santa Clara University School of Law wrote about us too (posted the interesting parts. Check the link for full):
View attachment 5425194
View attachment 5425195
View attachment 5425197
Despite shitting on us, the professor claims that the 10th circuit made many mistakes and bent copyright’s legal rules specifically to punish us. Not a bad article, though most of it is court citations

https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2023/10/think-kiwi-farms-is-legally-unassailable-copyright-law-might-disagree-greer-v-moon.htm

https://archive.ph/u9cUU

The golden gem of the article:
View attachment 5425226


Arstechnica made an article too, that was just essentially rewritten stuff from the beforementioned professor:
View attachment 5425204

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/10/court-ruling-may-doom-kiwi-farms-but-set-dubious-copyright-precedent/

https://archive.ph/BHT3q

It's kind of nice to see a clearly smart person defending the site, but goddamnit do I wish the site's defenders would stop being so fucking mealymouthed about it and stop fucking lying. There's a lie in the first paragraphsentence! The rest of the highlights were good to read, though.

 

[Dire Dire Cocks]

All I want is for the mainstream Internet to realize that they have been lied too and deceived about the Farms, and for there to be actual outrage about it.

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

The golden gem of the article

Imagine decades worth of copyright law being upended because some gimpy mouthed retard wants people to forget he's a vexatious sex pest.

 

[JJLiautaud]

Were the book and song ever posted on this fine copyright respecting website in the first place?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Imagine decades worth of copyright law being upended because some gimpy mouthed retard wants people to forget he's a vexatious sex pest.

No, that part is good for us.

Were the book and song ever posted on this fine copyright respecting website in the first place?

The link to it was shared. I’m not sure about the song

 

[Null]

Oy, what a mess.

I've got Mr. Goldman literally oy veying.

 

[macrodegenerate]

I showed my sister Greer for the first time, and her immediate reaction was "why does he look like this?"

 

[The Great Citracett]

Could Russ have finally achieved the fame and attention he's so desperately craved all these years?

Surely nothing undesirable for him could come of even more people learning who he is and just what sort of a person he is...

 

[Dr. Matthew C. Harris]

Could Russ have finally achieved the fame and attention he's so desperately craved all these years?

Surely nothing undesirable for him could come of even more people learning who he is and just what sort of a person he is...

It's 2023, being an unapologetic, narcissistic sex pest is A-OK if you're a spitmunching retard like Greer is. Bonus points if someone convinces Russhole to troon out, then he'd be truly unstoppable, and Taylor Swift would be dragged from her home at Fuckface's behest.

 

[Manul Otocolobus]

I showed my sister Greer for the first time, and her immediate reaction was "why does he look like this?"

Because God clearly hates him.

 

[joebobmurphy]

We're on Stanford now:

I knew we could do it!

 

[WelperHelper99]

Because God clearly hates him.

2 Nephi 5:21:

21 And he had caused the cursing to come upon them, yea, even a sore cursing, because of their iniquity. For behold, they had hardened their hearts against him, that they had become like unto a flint; wherefore, as they were white, and exceedingly fair and delightsome, that they might not be enticing unto my people the Lord God did cause a skin of blackness to come upon them.


I mean, Russ isn't black, but damn, he got a curse of some sort. That's what you get for leaving the Church, bitch.

 

[ellroy]

Because Kiwi Farms creates so many problems for its harassment victims and spurs regulators to call for reactive (over)regulation, I’m sure there is high interest in finding any legal doctrines that could shut it down. This ruling shows how copyright law could be a Kiwi Farms killer–no legal reform required. Yet, we should be careful celebrating copyright’s censorial powers. It might lead to a laudable consequence as applied to Kiwi Farms, but as Prof. Silbey and I have documented, copyright also allows for the widespread scrubbing of socially beneficial content. We definitely don’t want more copyright doctrines that facilitate pernicious removals.

Would of been nice to have something like this in the first paragraph after the defamatory sentence so your readers would see the need in protecting a "harassing" site. I guarantee you a non-zero number did not bother reading on because a bad site is getting punished.

Maybe one of these days people will get it but mealy mouth statements to avoid attracting the ire of the mob isn't going to help the message.