Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 101 25.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 72 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 162 40.2%

  • Total voters
    403
“Presenting Nick Reikita, practicing lawyer.”
IMG_2222.jpeg
“Sorry, non-practicing lawyer.”
IMG_2223.jpeg
 
Huh? Null's not sitting on an empire. It's a small forum that much of the Western planet wants to take down. Josh needs every possible supporter.
The problem is any support from the Balldo will always be hollow and require concessions that Null isn't willing to make and rightfully so.
 
the price to pay for balldo's help is to berate and humiliate null. based on rekieta's behavior. if i were in null's position, i wouldn't do it. not worth it.
Nick's a fuckin' mess - no one here would disagree.

Nor would most people disagree that Kiwi is ALWAYS in a precarious state. Call it the deep state or whatever but give it time.

Rumble is already censoring - Fuentes.

Null calls it out on almost every MATI stream. The days are numbered before "globalists" shut this place down.... plenty of mundane sites are being taken down due to the Israeli/Palestinian "war".

What do Null and Rekieta STRATEGICALLY agree on? Plenty.
 
What do Null and Rekieta STRATEGICALLY agree on? Plenty.
Do they or did Balldo make a lot of claims that he instantly dropped when they became inconvenient to him?

Remember, Balldo has chosen to side with Flaggots who laugh publicly about getting people banned for "threats" and then cry publicly when they're hoisted on their own petard.
 
His kitchen counter is cluttered but not as messy as I previously thought it was. However, his workstation area where he streams looks very messy though.

View attachment 5422203
Clearer view of kitchen counter before Nick stepped into frame. Taken from elissa clips - ISOM v ISOM: “Every Single Part of This Controversy & Lawsuit is Eric’s Fault”

View attachment 5422245
Zillow pic of gun vault.

View attachment 5422262
Workstation area setup. Originally posted by @Cynthia Behave here

View attachment 5422266
Workstation area setup zoomed out. Originally posted by @Cynthia Behave here
Holy bottles batman!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Tangerine Dreams
Do they or did Balldo make a lot of claims that he instantly dropped when they became inconvenient to him?

Remember, Balldo has chosen to side with Flaggots who laugh publicly about getting people banned for "threats" and then cry publicly when they're hoisted on their own petard.

Nick banned people bc he was being a child. Null's also banned people and deleted comments for issues worthy of debate, if we're being free speech purists.

My point is broader: Political, legal, or financial deals are made on larger issues.

It's about how you win.

Edit: Added "deleted".
 
He needs help where he can find it.
Nick brings NOTHING of value.

Null should kiss the Balldo in exchange for what exactly? A smug smile and three fiddy?

Name me one thing Nick can do that somebody else can't do, and probably do better.

To clarify, (was listening to Nicks stream last night when he was talking about the Greer v. KF lawsuit,) & Balldo didn’t say he’d set up a fundraiser, he said he’d share one that was already set up, only if Null made up with him. He’d go so far as to repost a link. Amazing, ain’t it. Balldo truly cares about freedom of speech.
Contrast this to somebody like Ken White (Popehat) who put out a call for help for Asterios Kokkinos when he was sued by Maddox. The same Asterios that Dick didn't lift a finger to help and later treated like shit. White did this despite the fact he's a grumpy old fart and thinks everybody involved is a "Morlock."


Say what you want about White, but he did the decent thing, in a court case that has broader implications, while not expecting quid-pro-quo.
 
What do Null and Rekieta STRATEGICALLY agree on? Plenty.
He needs to reach the level of a functional alcoholic first. Naltrextone is very helpful here. All it does it make you not want to drink because you don't care any more. I highly, highly recommend it. I have no idea why this drug is so suppressed because it absolutely works wonders, way more than 309832 years at AA will do for you.
 
Nick brings NOTHING of value.
Depends on what cards Josh has, right? He seemed pretty desperate when the site was down. He was literally calling on a viewership of 2, 000 to help.

Name me one thing Nick can do that somebody else can't do, and probably do better.
An alliance. On a free Internet. Can someone else do it better? Probably but...

DOES Josh have a real team? CAN he pay them? He's, what, barely in his 30s living in exile?
____

All I'm saying is that we make uncomfortable agreements when called for.
 
the price to pay for balldo's help is to berate and humiliate null. based on rekieta's behavior. if i were in null's position, i wouldn't do it. not worth it.
Nick brings NOTHING of value.

I don't want to put words in Josh's mouth, but I could've sworn that he brought this up on MATI when their bromance first started to fray.

That Nick's contributions to KF were very superficial even during the good times.

The occasional stream with Josh to discuss KF's plight.

But no direct financial contributions. No fundraising. No legal services. No legal referrals. No rallying his other Lawtube and other contacts to get the real truth out about KF and its enemies and libelers.

Within the last month or so, Josh did mention during a MATI episode that he was grateful that Nick provided some sort of generic advice that ended up paying off with great dividends. But he also made it clear that he felt in no way that anything was owed to Nick or that he was in his debt for the success.
 
Nick's a fuckin' mess - no one here would disagree.

Nor would most people disagree that Kiwi is ALWAYS in a precarious state.
If KF if in a precarious state, why would Null go to someone who you admit is a fuckup? If you're in a bad spot, the LAST person you should be going to is someone who's such a bumbling incompetent that it's readily apparent from a mile away. You said Null needs all the help he can get. That may be true, but if someone's a fuckup, they aren't going to provide help. They're going to make things worse by fumbling whatever you ask them to do.

If I'm hurt and need a doctor, I'm not going to the guy who's well-known for botching simple procedures and accidentally killing his patients, because even though I need help, trying to get it from someone I KNOW is a walking catastrophe is asking for trouble.
 
Fucking around with BingAI yielded this.

View attachment 5425214
Too much hair, immersion ruined.
Depends on what cards Josh has, right? He seemed pretty desperate when the site was down. He was literally calling on a viewership of 2, 000 to help.


An alliance. On a free Internet. Can someone else do it better? Probably but...

DOES Josh have a real team? CAN he pay them? He's, what, barely in his 30s living in exile?
____

All I'm saying is that we make uncomfortable agreements when called for.
I get where you're coming from, but the juice ain't worth the squeeze. There's other Internet lawyers Null can team up with for PR purposes that wouldn't require him to compromise his principles in doing so. Whatever tangential benefit there could be to making nice with Rackets in the short term in order to signal boost to that degenerate's rapidly plummeting viewership would be counter-acted by the fact he would never stop eating shit for being associated to team Juju, especially after his complete disavowal of them.

Doing such a thing could even possibly become the beginning of Null's own lolcow arc.
 
What do Null and Rekieta STRATEGICALLY agree on? Plenty.
You are assuming facts not in evidence. Besides being a degenerate drug user, we have no idea what Nick really supports. Everything he has said and done in the past was predicated on extracting as much money from subscribers as possible.

Nick is also unreliable about maintaining promises and will change his moral convictions in a second if it will get him more super chats.
 
what does long term Jim fans think on what Jim would 'side' on? I know little of Jim but my initial thought that he'd make fun of all involved but I think any normal human that isn't sperging on technicalities can see who are the assholes here...
I am not a long term Jim fan, but I feel it's easy to say Jim wouldn't support this dumb shit. Like why are you stirring the shitpot? Leave these idiots to their devices and if they get themselves into gay legal shit then give your two cents, otherwise, don't. Nick also by extension broke the "don't shit on your fans" rule that he got onto Baked for by mocking Kiwis because he decided to make his private life public. If he didn't want people reading so hard into what he does then maybe don't make it so open for everyone to see and mock.
Within the last month or so, Josh did mention during a MATI episode that he was grateful that Nick provided some sort of generic advice that ended up paying off with great dividends. But he also made it clear that he felt in no way that anything was owed to Nick or that he was in his debt for the success.
I get Null's thinking in it, your end goal should be to just... you know, help? It's fucking sad that the world seems to run on quid pro quo and not just even a percentage of altruism.
 
DOES Josh have a real team? CAN he pay them? He's, what, barely in his 30s living in exile?
Ask him.

He said on yesterday's MATI he's fine. Until and unless he says otherwise, I see no reason not to take him at his word. This forum has survived 10 years. Over that period of time I think Null has become quite keen at judging the seriousness of threats.

All I'm saying is that we make uncomfortable agreements when called for.
Within reason.

I think the agreement Nick would want would be the death of the forum. If it involves getting Null to start suppressing and disallowing shit on Nick and Dick's behalf (which is what Nick's been fishing for from Null) that would be the very definition of a Faustian bargain,.
 
Last edited:
If KF if in a precarious state, why would Null go to someone who you admit is a fuckup?

With genuine respect, I suspect you've never done deals across a table from people with whom you know socially the people they've had affairs with, and the fact that their kid has gone to rehab, and that the parents over-drink.

You realize this is almost the norm, right? And we're discussing how to keep Kiwi alive?

Thankfully, I think Null is so cynical by now, he knows that.
 
Back