2023 Israel-Palestine Armed Conflict

A group of nine Lebanese and Iranian "civilian" "journalists" decided to wander around an Israeli base on the border. Unfortunately, the IDF only killed one and wounded another before the UN managed to extract them

What is it with sand niggers doing the peace sign whenever they are clearly guilty of something. "HEY I'M TOTALLY NOT SPYING DOOD"
 
If by “it” you mean antI-Jewish violence and fights between Arabs and Jews in the land of Israel, that goes back much before 1948. Which basically proves that if Palestinian terrorists didn’t blame their violence on resistance of an occupation, they’d find some other way to justify it.
A few examples from just the 20s and 30s are
1938 Pogrom in Tiberius
1934 Looting of Safed
1934 Hebron Massacre
1929 Riots
1921 Yafo riots, 1921 Jerusalem stabbings
1920 Jerusalem riots
Pure Zionist history-washing. I'm gonna go full history sperg for a minute.

Each riot above followed sustained Zionist provocation, abuse and intimidation of the native population. The British Mandatory Palestine government's Palin Commission concluded this as far back as 1920. They published an extensive report on the Nebi Musa riots (or 1920 Jerusalem riots as you call them) which you can read here in its entirety:


The report's well-written and an easy read. The depth of thought and critical analysis is extinct in modern official communications. If you're serious about learning the history of this conflict, I highly recommend at least glancing the whole thing over. It's chunked into numbered sections for easy reading. Key excerpts:
For the sake of convenience it is usual to speak of the Moslem population as “Arabs”, though the actual Arab element in the blood of the people is probably confined to what is really a landed aristocracy, the vast majority of the population, both Moslem and Christian being of mixed blood and largely consisting of indigenous races which have occupied the country from time immemorial, races which were not in reality extirpated even by the Jews at the remote period of their original conquest. These people constitute a true peasantry rooted to the soil, a fact which it is important to bear in mind in estimating the reality of the opposition to the proposed immigration of the Jews of the Diaspora.
Whatever may be alleged against Turkish rule, one fact stands out quite clearly from the evidence. Up to a very recent date the three sects, Moslem, Christians and Jews lived together in a state of complete amity. The Moslem was no doubt, dominant, but such intolerance as there was, seemed rather to be directed against the Christian than the Jew. The Christian could be occasionally troublesome with his appeals to foreign powers. The Orthodox Jew of Palestine was a humble, inoffensive creature, largely dependent on charity for his livelihood in the city of Jerusalem, elsewhere hardly distinguishable from the rest of the peasant population. No serious at attack on the Jewish population is recorded since the time of Ibrahim Pasha in 1840.
From the very beginning the Extremists among the Zionists both in their writings and speeches adopted one interpretation only of the Balfour Declaration. There was no question of moderate colonisation or a National Home, but a declaration of Palestine as a Jewish State, “as Jewish as England is English” (Mr. Joseph Cohen in a letter to The Times of September 19th, 1919). The loose language of the politicians was seized upon and elaborated into a naked demand for the expulsion of the Arabs.
From another point of view the native of Palestine looks with distrust upon the Jew as a possible ruler. The Orthodox Jew born in the country has never inspired the Arab or Christian with any particular feelings of distrust for, as has been observed before, he has been recognised as an inoffensive creature practically dependent for existence on foreign charity. But they already notice that the latest immigrants from Eastern Europe are men of a very different type imbued with all shades of the political opinions which have plunged Russia into a welter of anarchy, terrorism and misery during the past few years: they have even reason to suspect that the moderate men among the Zionists have to some extent lost their hold upon the machine and that extremists sprung from these new importations have the greatest influence on Zionist councils and they not unnaturally resent and fear the possibility of their country coming under the power of men who they regard as enemies of civilisation and religion. It is interesting to note in this connection that certain of the Orthodox Jews, themselves moderate Zionists, fear the atheistical tendencies of en of this character, such for instance as Dr. Thon, whose public utterances are cited in evidence by Miss Landau the Headmistress of the Evelina Rothschild Girls’ School, herself a strict orthodox Jewess.
Mr. Leon Simon wrote an article in the Zionist Review which, in spite of the apparent moderation of its conclusion was hardly calculated to pacify a panic stricken people. He begins by a reference to the Arab population: “There will be”, he says, “a state of Palestine containing a number of Arab inhabitants, etc.” One might almost imagine he was referring to a handful of gipsy nomads such as infest the waste lands of Alexandria rather than to the great majority of the population of a country. Later he goes on to state: “There are in theory at least three possible policies, any one of which the Zionists might advocate now and might strive to get carried out whenever their influence in the state of Palestine becomes strong enough. These are (1) to remove the Arabs from the country by force if they would not go of their own free will; (2) to leave the Arabs in the country, but to put them in a position inferior to that of the Jews; and (3) to leave the Arabs in the country and invite them to take as much share as they are or may become capable of taking in its [p22] development, making no distinction between Jew and Arab from the point of view of political or economic rights.”

*Spoiler alert, they went with (1) and (2)

The report concludes:
D.CONCLUSIONS.
69. The following are the considered opinions submitted by the Court:-
  • That the causes of the alienation and exasperation of the feelings of the population of Palestine are:-
    • Disappointment at the non-fulfilment of promises made to them by British propaganda.
    • Inability to reconcile the Allies’ declared policy of self-determination with the Balfour Declaration, giving rise to a sense of betrayal and intense anxiety for their future.
    • Misapprehension of the true meaning of the Balfour Declaration and forgetfulness of the guarantees determined therein, due to the loose rhetoric of politicians and the exaggerated statements and writings of interested persons, chiefly Zionists.
    • Fear of Jewish competition and domination, justified by experience and the apparent control exercised by the Zionists over the Administration.
    • Zionist indiscretion and aggression, since the Balfour Declaration aggravating such fears.
    • Anti-British and anti-Zionist propaganda working on the population already inflamed by the sources of irritation aforesaid.
  • That the Zionist Commission and the official Zionists by their impatience, indiscretion and attempts to force the hands of the Administration, are largely responsible for the present crisis.
Recall that this was written by a government highly sympathetic to Zionists and European Jews in particular, and openly disdainful of Arab barbarity and backwardness. They still found the Zionists principally at fault for this and other unrest in Mandatory Palestine.

As to what sparked the Nebi Musa riots specifically:
According however to testimony given by Fayyad al-Bakri to the Palin Commission, the rioting began when the Hebron banner he was holding while standing in Jaffa Street outside the Crédit Lyonnais Bank, was spat on by a Jew and when the latter was pushed away, Jewish bystanders began throwing stones.

Here's the Balfour Declaration by the way. Pay close attention to the bit about "rights of existing non-Jewish communities":
Balfour_declaration_unmarked.jpg

If all this catches your interest and you want learn more, good! For a comprehensive unbiased history of the founding of modern Israel, check out Darryl Cooper's podcast "Fear and Loathing in the New Jerusalem." He starts with the founding of the Zionist movement and goes from there to 1948. You might recognize Darryl from his recent spots on Jocko Willinck's show linked elsewhere in this thread. The whole thing is 22 hours long but well worth it. You can find the first few episodes YouTube, the rest is on Spotify:

 
Last edited:
'long range' for them means being able to reach riyadh
but israel is way further away, i really doubt they could strike targets there

Yeah, I dont think any of us know. But Iran could have smuggled something in though Im not sure if anything is even coming in from Iran anymore considering all the Saudi and allied patrols.

Someone could probably look up Scud max ranges or what ever.
 
What is it with sand niggers doing the peace sign whenever they are clearly guilty of something. "HEY I'M TOTALLY NOT SPYING DOOD"
i guess they think it makes them look innocent or something, they're gonna have to start shooting every dune coon they spot doing that shit.
 
But Bibi promoted Orban and openly denounced Soros.

https://archive.ph/h2L7D


Idk why people think Jews want non Jews to be cut, it's meant to separate us from the non Jews.

That's definately a step in the right direction, though Orbán is a happy and loyal friend. No Hamas protests in Hungary, he banned them fast.

Though I feel it is too little, too late. Even if Netha-nya-u can hold onto his position for as long as he isn't senile, the rich western parts are the problem.

Hungary can... supply paprika and food to Israel. But it can't do as much as the UK. I just feel like the ship to stop the islamisation of the west failed in the 20th century, and we have derailed way too far to course correct.
Though since he is good friends with Putin and Xi, he maybe able to help negotiations on that front.
Putin's condemning of Israel was a surprise to many.
 
'long range' for them means being able to reach riyadh
but israel is way further away, i really doubt they could strike targets there
They can hit eilat. They just revealed the Toufan missile which is a rebranded iranian Ghadr-110 missile. It has a range of 1800-2000 kilometers which can hit Israel.


The claim is bold:
🇮🇷🇾🇪 Qods-4 cruise-missile improved its range to 2000km

From ~1400km Qods-1 to 1650km Paveh and now Qods-4

Two new weapons after the Shahed-136, shown today: Both reach 🇮🇱 Tel Aviv from 🇾🇪 Sanaa
- Qods-4
- Ghadr-F/Tufan
- Shahed-136
 
Seriously what's with internet weirdos and foreskin? Not Jewish, still have foreskin, but the fixation on penises is pretty gay.
I have a theory that foreskin removal correlates to high cases of abuse as shown in silent hill 4 ( its a pretty depressing game about a ex-jew who has ptsd )
 
The al-Tanf garrison in southeastern Syria is located at a sensitive juncture often used by Iranian-backed militants to ferry weapons to Hezbollah.
Imagine growing up in Appalachia, joining the Army to escape your dying coal town, training for years to be a badass motherfucker, then getting sent to buttfuck-nowhere Syria (sovereign country against whom we have not declared war) just to die for Israel in the desert. Horrific.
 
Last edited:
Iran smuggled somewhere like 50k rockets to hezbollah in Lebanon, they are experienced smugglers. Probably used ships or planes.

To get to the Houthi's you need to either go through hostile territory (Saudi/Yemeni) or get through the Gulf of Aden that has both coalition ships patrolling against pirates and Saudi - coalition ships patrolling against any smuggling to the Houthis and checking all ships.
How would you even use planes? Isn't the Sanaa airport bombed?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Wendy Wheelchair
To get to the Houthi's you need to either go through hostile territory (Saudi/Yemeni) or get through the Gulf of Aden that has both coalition ships patrolling against pirates and Saudi - coalition ships patrolling against any smuggling to the Houthis and checking all ships.
How would you even use planes? Isn't the Sanaa airport bombed?
No idea but the missiles are there somehow
 
But Bibi promoted Orban and openly denounced Soros.

https://archive.ph/h2L7D


Idk why people think Jews want non Jews to be cut, it's meant to separate us from the non Jews.
Maybe they're missing out on the various delicious recipes that can be cooked with foreskin? Just kidding, it's just another retarded lie in the vein of "Jews kill gentiles to bake their unleavened bread for Passover with HUMAN BLOOD"
I can translate it for you: schizophrenia + being terminally online
But Hulkster, WHAT ABOUT MUH FORESKIN!?

I just love how everyone's suddenly an expert on the Middle East now that it's trending on X and TikTok, and on the non-Kiwi internet at large. I might make a couple of jokes about the situation but I'm more reserved in my serious takes on stuff like this.
I have a theory that foreskin removal correlates to high cases of abuse as shown in silent hill 4 ( its a pretty depressing game about a ex-jew who has ptsd )
Well there is a large amount of sexual abuse in churches and stuff so it's no surprise. Doesn't excuse the leftards openly trying to push sexual content into public schools, but some say that's okay because religion isn't involved.
 
Also these retarded leftists also don't realize that you can be both victim and aggressor at the same time. It's hilarious how all the non-Muslims are often some shade of "socialist" and I unfortunately have some of these types in my family. I actually got into it with someone and they cried about "muh ypipo" which makes zero sense.

I just know that I'm right because I actually read books and am aware of the many nuanced issues that can't be covered in a god-damned ten second TikTok video.

As an ex-leftist myself I'm appalled at what has become of the ideology I left.
Yeah, TikTok is really the ultimate cesspool of unnuanced takes. My favorite example is @rathbonemakesmusic. The perhaps most unnuanced "thinker" I've ever heard that isn't a Muslim. They take a very simplified oppressor = bad, anything oppressed does = good all while dunking on some epic strawmen arguments.



I just want less hours, free healthcare and fairer wages. This "leftist" shit is getting us nowhere closer.
 
The "decolonization" narrative the fringe left is pushing is such a creepy mask off moment. Their hatred of whites is so extreme they will openly support massacres of white people (I know I know Jews aren't white but lefties think they are) as an act of freeing and decolonizing brown people. Fucking sociopaths.
 
Back