Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 65 17.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 155 40.7%

  • Total voters
    381
Did he though?

There was a guy in this thread that said he was gonna re-watch the Metokur Rekieta show to figure out exactly what was said, but I don't think he got back to us.

I am not sure Metokur said anything beyond the usual spiel of Monty being a crazy litigious person. That's a fair comment. Calling him a child molester is not.

Bottom line is I think Nick took this way beyond anything Metokur said.

Moreover, where did Nick explicitly attribute what he said to Jim? I've predicted he might try to blame Jim, but I dunno if he actually has yet. Is it archived? If not, it absolutely should be.
He did give breakdown.
watched/listened to Jim's stream with Nick where they talked about Montagraph threatening to sue Jim. I believe I have collected every claim Jim made about Monty no matter how joking or petty it was, for completeness. I didn't timestamp them because that was too much. I did however timestamp some parts that I found interesting or funny. I'll also include the stream I used for reference.

Tldr: at no point does Jim ever come close to saying anything Nick could have twisted into the claims he made.
*Edit: I couldn't quote the full post, but there is a breakdown of the statements from Jim and Nick
 
Did he though?

There was a guy in this thread that said he was gonna re-watch the Metokur Rekieta show to figure out exactly what was said, but I don't think he got back to us.

I am not sure Metokur said anything beyond the usual spiel of Monty being a crazy litigious person. That's a fair comment. Calling him a child molester is not.

Bottom line is I think Nick took this way beyond anything Metokur said.

Moreover, where did Nick explicitly attribute what he said to Jim? I've predicted he might try to blame Jim, but I dunno if he actually has yet. Is it archived? If not, it absolutely should be.
The content Jim did on Monty was entirely devoted to talking about Monty's lawsuits and internet slapfights before directly commenting on videos Monty uploaded himself. Nothing Jim talked about comes close to the allegations Nick was proposing.
 
Not just a bowling alley bar, but a bowling alley bar quite literally adjacent to a trailer park. I don't want to get too classist here but the discordance between how Rekieta was dressed for a standup comedy show to this place and what it actually was is a real expectations vs reality thing.
That had to feel patronizing. Cause usually small gig comedians are dressed super casually. It's all for fun! Nick on the other hand looks like he's about to go on set for Kings of Comedy, when really, you're trying to cheer up some folks in the boonies with your bullshitting.

I hope he gets told to do bigger places just get the same treatment Mersh did: no one caring and talking over his shitty jokes.
 
He did give breakdown.
Awesome. I must have missed that. Thread moves fast and IRL work is ramping up.

The content Jim did on Monty was entirely devoted to talking about Monty's lawsuits and internet slapfights before directly commenting on videos Monty uploaded himself. Nothing Jim talked about comes close to the allegations Nick was proposing.
Okay, so my second question is: Has Nick said that Jim told him that Monty was a pedo and child molester? Something archived or clipped.

Because if he did, and I were Jim, I would be fucking pissed. Jim lives in Minnesota too. Look at the state of Nick's case right now.

Plus Jim has always been pretty fair when it comes to accusing people of that crap. I'm having a hard time believing it.
 
Did he though?

There was a guy in this thread that said he was gonna re-watch the Metokur Rekieta show to figure out exactly what was said, but I don't think he got back to us.

I am not sure Metokur said anything beyond the usual spiel of Monty being a crazy litigious person. That's a fair comment. Calling him a child molester is not.

Bottom line is I think Nick took this way beyond anything Metokur said.

Moreover, where did Nick explicitly attribute what he said to Jim? I've predicted he might try to blame Jim, but I dunno if he actually has yet. Is it archived? If not, it absolutely should be.
Jim's whole thing with montagraph wasn't any video or movie or pedoshit, but the fact that Monty is sue-happy with anyone that critizice him, the whole HE TOTALLY FUCKED A LITTLE BOY, is Rekieta's own thing
 
I hope Nick's retarded declarations are what finally forces Jim to appear in public.
I hope Nick's retarded declarations (if Nick indeed made them in reference to anything Jim said about Monty) force Jim to call Nick a faggot.

That's gonna sting really hard.

While he's at at it, he could call Dax a faggot too. Though I would personally consider that an optional side quest
 
I hope Nick's retarded declarations (if Nick indeed made them in reference to anything Jim said about Monty) force Jim to call Nick a faggot.

That's gonna sting really hard.

While he's at at it, he could call Dax a faggot too. Though I would personally consider that an optional side quest
If my thing happens, yours most assuredly would. Hopefully during court where it will be public record forever.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Captain Manning
Doubled down with Branca calling Faran's sister a cunt. (That remains one of the dumbest dramas on LawTube. Faran's sister was a gorgeous new creator with a growing chnnel who did literally nothing to deserve that label. Mission accomplished, though. She folded quickly.)
Hard disagree on that point. Faran's sister wasn't particularly charismatic or watchable. I doubt Andrew had anything to do with her DFEing. She seemed to make her exit at the height of her sister's meltdown.
Okay, so my second question is: Has Nick said that Jim told him that Monty was a pedo and child molester? Something archived or clipped.

Because if he did, and I were Jim, I would be fucking pissed. Jim lives in Minnesota too. Look at the state of Nick's case right now.
That would be heresay.

Relistening to the PPP stream. PPP was right all along.
 
Last edited:
While he's at at it, he could call Dax a faggot too. Though I would personally consider that an optional side quest
Jim has always had a pretty strong inclination to point out when faggots are piling on a target who doesn’t deserve it, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he eventually points out that all the CG pieces of shit are just upset Eric made them look like the lazy niggers they are by simply delivering his comics on time. No one has been able to give a single decent reason for the pile-on and Nick goes along with it because he’s in love with Dax.
 
Do we know where Riley and Mint live?

If they stayed with Rekieta and the 5 kids...

1698002456283.png
 
Awesome. I must have missed that. Thread moves fast and IRL work is ramping up.


Okay, so my second question is: Has Nick said that Jim told him that Monty was a pedo and child molester? Something archived or clipped.

Because if he did, and I were Jim, I would be fucking pissed. Jim lives in Minnesota too. Look at the state of Nick's case right now.

Plus Jim has always been pretty fair when it comes to accusing people of that crap. I'm having a hard time believing it.
Nick didn't say that Jim said any of those things. He said that Jake Morphonios, who was also sued by Monty, said "some" of the things Nick said.
Clip


 
That would be heresay.
It would require verification from Jim, or some other piece of evidence, if Monty wanted to go after Jim, yes.

The issue isn't just that it could aggro Monty back onto Jim. It's also that nobody should want to be depicted as the origin of a bullshit claim if you know you didn't make the claim. Especially THAT claim.

Nick is even bigger scum if he tries to fob this shit off on Jim. Just like he's scum for trying to fob it off on Null and the KF. Like Jim, this site is not the origin of the Nick's claim Monty is a child molester.

There's nothing scummier than trying to blame others for your own fuckups.
 
I've seen Rekieta a couple of times saying shit akin to "why am I getting sued and not Metokur?" or "I just said what Mekotur said" very slimy behavior.
the difference is Jim said those things, but very cleverly always said "allegedly" or "apparently" never being conclusive, and if shown the evidence he just shuts up or says he was wrong, Rekieta's ego made him double, triple and quadruple down like a retard
That is where the irony of all this lies. This Wino is supposed to be a lawyer "law-splaining" to the common folk. Just wants to "help" poor Josh and Eric with his "unsurpassed expertise".
Completely missing any self-awareness of how he landed himself into a lulsuit that a clear non-lawyer was smart enough to avoid.
 
There's nothing scummier than trying to blame others for your own fuckups.
In that old clip someone posted the other day of him talking about his narcolepsy diagnosis, it was already evident Nick was never one for owning his shit. When discussing his tardiness to work, he blamed traffic — as if he didn’t know traffic could be bad and therefore he should leave the house earlier. I’m quite sure it wasn’t a single incident of being four minutes late that caused his boss to hit her limit with him.

Just out of curiosity, is it really legal for a diagnosed narcoleptic to drive a motor vehicle? My understanding is that epileptics can’t, so I’m curious how falling asleep behind the wheel without warning is any safer than having a seizure.
 
So Nick has had a business relationship with Riley for recording his live events since Vegas, but he pretended he could be impartial or objective about Riley showing up at the Rippaverse warehouse
It's almost like July was correct when he said he doesn't feel Nick can be unbias on this matter and that he understands and is fine with that because Nick known the other parties for far longer. Nick could just accept that as a fair assessment, instead of chimping out. Everybody has their biases.
holy shit. so his entire freakout when eric called him dishonest was right on the money. stuff like this convinces me whats left of his audience in locals who still give nick the benefit of the doubt are no different than the ralphamaniacs that worship ralph. its at the point where i have to wonder "what would nick have to do for you to stop believing him?"

also why is everyone talking about jim?
 
It also says that Dick’s low key not very up on himself, despite appearances. He’s not trying to be a king among men, but a king among retards. A normal person would not want Riley on their team.
Dick has assembled his own Idiocracy. It may not be much of a sektur, but he's the king of it.
 
So at what point did he start spiraling down? Was it the wine ass pic? The balldo?
I would say the earliest signs were around 2021. That is when he really started to get lazy with content. Started talking about his boring suburban day for 3 hours straight like a woman. Some of the wild degen stuff was being slowly weaved into the content in a "lol just joking, that would be crazy right" way. The alcoholism really started to appear. Started floating suggestions that he wanted to "change" his content.

The full degen nose dive didn't happen till he got kicked from YT in '22. Didn't learn from Parlor's fall that new alt-tech platforms life spans are just as finicky as YT's terms of service.
Seemed to mistake the massive support he got from Locals and other creators was only because of his reputation as a goofy but loveable, sharp-minded family man. Took the opportunity to make those changes he always floated about.

Locals was supposed to be the spicy after-dark show, the thing is it didn't stay there. Normies who subbed for legal topics or his "red-pilled" takes were put off and da sektur took note.
He has done nothing but harm his own business and relationship with creators with his unhinged double speak. When was the last time FNT adjacent folks had him on again? Even his BBF law-tubers are calling his garbage out.

We haven't seen anything yet, only going to be a milk bukkake when normie commentators like Charlie and Assmongloid get their zoomers to laugh at him too.
I am talking biblical meltdown milk party from Wino Supreme. Strap in boys!
 
Back