Margaret Pless / idlediletante / Stan - Official Kiwi Farms Advertiser and Enthusiast Who Has Proudly Eaten Ass. Now Posting Her Tits to Own the Troons!

[RichardMongler]

Like I said earlier. You’ve done what you wanted to do - you doxed me - now why don’t you just leave me alone? Why are you entering various threads and trying to paint yourself as some courageous hero who bravely doxed me when you and I both know you did it cause you were MATI?
Also, you’re a 0%, as you’re too coward to show your face. I just ran mine through a different analyzer and got a result of 7.8/10.
The analyzer: https://pinkmirror.com/
The photo I used is attached. Feel free to repeat the experiment, but all I’m getting out of this is that AI has a long way to go before we can use it to predict attractiveness, like you are doing, or racial truths, like Agendaposter was doing a few days ago.

AI =\= infallible oracle. Please get that though you thick skull, go analyze your own ugly mug, and then leave me the fuck alone.

You're correct. I don't need AI to tell me this is hot. AI does, indeed, have a long way to go to determine what's hot because clearly you're not:

Yes, content like this is painfully insipid, but she's an attractive young woman with access to social media, so her behavior can hardly be singled out.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

now why don’t you just leave me alone?

Pot, kettle, black.

Heck, the last 3 out of 4 posts on my profile are from you. You just made a new one.

You have what we in the netherlands call "een bord voor je kop". A plate in front of your head. An inability to take a bit of distance and look at your own actions neutrally.

There's a time to care what your attractiveness is, but you really shouldn't care this much when you're a mother.

If you want to know a little secret, the first time I ran your picture through the analyser I used it, it scored a 82%, but that wouldn't be funny, so I ran it through again and adjusted the dials a little until I got this result. I even photoshopped the "or you did not follow the instructions" away from the forehead.

pre-photoshop:

My first attempt, when I didn't manipulate the dials:


What do you know? AI's think you're pretty after all. It's a shame that as you say "AI has a long way to go before we can use it to predict attractiveness".

 

[Stan]

I did no such thing. I simply mocked libs for not knowing what to do with racial categories and for lying endlessly about it.

You were getting cornered by your own appeal to nature fallacy and pulled this out of your ass:

Marge stop this dumb BS for heaven's sake.
First there are no races cause it's a construct; then there are races and blacks are oppressed; then the oppression is akshually, economic; but akshually, medically they need same racial group transplants.
And ooops, turns out radiological AI can tell your race from the skeleton, something that I can only dream of once being able to do accurately enough.
But above all else, remember that people that invented nukes and submarines, went to the moon and made Americans fat and dumb with scientifically approved cheap food are the exact same IQ and capability as the tribes shooting arrows and hunting in the jungle.
Absolutely no difference. Notice anything, and you're a horrible bigot.
What did I say earlier, in this thread and others?
Discussion and compromise, reconciliation etc. MUST start from truth.
No more pie in the sky "in the other life" Jesus will save us/we're all equal religious, conservative or liberal lies. End all this idiocy so we can move forward based on data, measurements and objective reality.
View attachment 5432289
Also, "you can find people with high IQ in any racial group", while a true statement, it's the dumbest non-argument you can make. You know very well what statistics are and what a gaussian distribution looks like.
Imagine if I tried to make the "argument" that there are men that are not violent to women in this thread. @Lurker already penalized me for a very mild pseudo-version of that.

And if you want to follow the thread from there, there’s a second post where you describe a study where AI predicted Africa would fall into Malthusian collapse or something.

here’s a nice AI picture Josh made in Midjourney:

Looks good, right? But if you start looking at it in detail, certain um, issues emerge:



A face only a mother could love

An “airplane” omfg

These aren’t even uncommon errors for Midjourney. The app is notorious for giving people 10 fingers on each hand, supernumerary limbs etc. The problem isn’t even unique to Midjourney. Chat GPT is able to write entire legal briefs based on real-sounding case law that simply never existed. Likewise. I’ve put my face through three different analyzers, including Anton’s, and I’ve got 35%, 78%, and 96%. If I was going to use AI instead of my bathroom scale I would expect similar variance, which means it’s bollocks for this task, at least for now.

You conservatard men all all so alike I wonder if you aren’t part of the Borg collective. You and Lemmingwiser are entirely of a piece: when you thought you could convince me to believe your lukewarm justifications for sexism or Holocaust denial (respectively) you were all roses and courtesy. Once it became obvious that I don’t just give up my beliefs because some man was nice to me for 15 minutes, you both show your hand and chimp out.

I’m disappointed. Not just by the shallow logic holding up your ideology - and in Anton’s case it was very shallow indeed, and yours too I daresay - but because your willingness to be courteous to me is only in service of trying to recruit me.

 

[Dyn]

I don't care if an AI thinks she's ugly or not I want to know about the alleged swatting.

 

[Stan]

I don't care if an AI thinks she's ugly or not I want to know about the alleged swatting.

Back in 2014 I doxed Mike Cernovich’s “legal office”, which turned out to be a 2-bed rented condo in Southern Cali. I did this to prove that Cerno’s status as a “lawyer” was only a half truth: he may have (eventually) passed the bar exam, but did not appear to be working as a lawyer.

Cernovich took that and ran with it with the general gist of his message being “this SJW Margaret Pless is trying to invoke her readers to swat me for releasing police reports about Zoe Quinn’s relationships.”

I never encouraged anyone to call in a SWAT team on Cernovich. The furthest I got to ever hassling Cerno IRL was sending a complaint to the CA Bar about his conduct online.

 

[Dyn]

Back in 2014 I doxed Mike Cernovich’s “legal office”, which turned out to be a 2-bed rented condo in Southern Cali. I did this to prove that Cerno’s status as a “lawyer” was only a half truth: he may have (eventually) passed the bar exam, but did not appear to be working as a lawyer.

Cernovich took that and ran with it with the general gist of his message being “this SJW Margaret Pless is trying to invoke her readers to swat me for releasing police reports about Zoe Quinn’s relationships.”

I never encouraged anyone to call in a SWAT team on Cernovich. The furthest I got to ever hassling Cerno IRL was sending a complaint to the CA Bar about his conduct online.

Oh is that all? Doxing a social media grifter is based and any kiwi who says otherwise is a sad excuse for a kiwi.

 

[Stan]

Oh is that all? Doxing a social media grifter is based and any kiwi who says otherwise is a sad excuse for a kiwi.

Yep, but I'm noticing that when it comes to me, the prevailing norms of what constitutes fair play for Kiwis no longer apply, and these guys will use any argument, no matter how specious, to try and get me to either log off or agree with them.
Case in point:

Your name is now all over the web, you said faggot and other slurs, and you ruined your career.

OMG quelle horreur. That faggot got what was coming to him.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Cernovich took that and ran with it with the general gist of his message being “this SJW Margaret Pless is trying to invoke her readers to swat me for releasing police reports about Zoe Quinn’s relationships.”

What, you don't like it when people lie and stir up their audience? Turnabout is fair play, journo.

 

[Dyn]

What, you don't like it when people lie and stir up their audience? Turnabout is fair play, journo.

Putting aside that all this shit is from ten years ago, she didn't lie about us. It wasn't a positive article, but I don't remember any lies being in it.

 

[Stan]

Putting aside that all this shit is from ten years ago, she didn't lie about us. It wasn't a positive article, but I don't remember any lies being in it.

I could probably point out a few inaccuracies, mostly with regards to the history of Chris-Chan and my confusion between PVCC and CWCki, but I didn't make any deliberate misinterpretations or "spin" it any.

If you want to know a little secret, the first time I ran your picture through the analyser I used it, it scored a 82%, but that wouldn't be funny, so I ran it through again and adjusted the dials a little until I got this result. I even photoshopped the "or you did not follow the instructions" away from the forehead.

pre-photoshop:

Well no wonder I got results so wildly different from yours.

 

[TTD = Total Tarkov Death]

You conservatard men all all so alike

Interestingly enough, I’m not a conservative and I think you’re a fat, unlikeable cow. Care to provide me with your scathing psychoanalysis? I’m bored.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

Cernobitch is a lolcow all on his own but you were just as desperately latching onto Gamergate as he was; you gave Zoe Quinn his deets



so she could vomit them all over the internet while posting (and I'm paraphrasing here) "Wouldn't it be a shame if he got swatted";



in addition to you, Margaret Pless, calling the LAPD from NYC to make a report on Quinn's behalf to report "I'm pretty sure what Cernovich is doing is civil harassment in the state of California; and I feel badly about Quinn being harassed like this on my account."



Everyone here is a lolcow but it was hilarious to see you groveling as you tried to worm your way into Zoe Quinn's circle of grifters as a journo whose only writing credentials were your Wordpress blog.

now why don’t you just leave me alone?

BTW providing even more personal info when autists online fuck with you is the worst choice you can make.
Your name is now all over the web, you said faggot and other slurs, and you ruined your career. And for what? Total number of online incel chuds owned?
ZERO

Take the advice @AgendaPoster gave you.

 

[m1ddl3m4rch]

Putting aside that all this shit is from ten years ago, she didn't lie about us. It wasn't a positive article, but I don't remember any lies being in it.

That may be so, but in the hands of a journo half truths are whole lies. Marge has been pretty economical with the truth and I'm not inclined to give her the benefit of the doubt here. Especially since she's fond of saying the narrative is right about the farms, we really are that bad and so on.

 

[Dyn]

you gave Zoe Quinn his deets so she could vomit them all over the internet while posting (and I'm paraphrasing here) "Wouldn't it be a shame if he got swatted";

Who cares? If we doxed him we'd have proudly put it in his OP.

I could probably point out a few inaccuracies, mostly with regards to the history of Chris-Chan and my confusion between PVCC and CWCki, but I didn't make any deliberate misinterpretations or "spin" it any.

Yeah the kind of stuff you got wrong was clearly not done intentionally to smear us, otherwise you would have picked much more damning things be wrong about. Looking back after all the 'three transpeople murdered' hysteria it's actually one of the nicest articles we've ever had written about us.

That may be so, but in the hands of a journo half truths are whole lies.

To be very clear, I do not think she misrepresented us with halftruths,either. She wrote a negative article on us because she had a negative opinion of us. It cast us in an ungenerous light, but not an unfair one.

 

[AgendaPoster]

You conservatard men all all so alike

I am NOT conservative
I also don't accept that only Dyn is allowed to shitpost
I want to compliment beautiful women too

 

[Stan]

I am NOT conservative
I also don't accept that only Dyn is allowed to shitpost
I want to compliment beautiful women too

That's a rad song tho

Marge has been pretty economical with the truth and I'm not inclined to give her the benefit of the doubt here.

When have you ever?

Especially since she's fond of saying the narrative is right about the farms, we really are that bad and so on.

Well, considering the community spams me with insults like "cuntface", "sow", "dumb cunt", "die journo" and continually baits me with comments about my baby dying of cot death, (as you do, faggot,) it's very difficult to give such a community positive press coverage.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

Well, considering the community spams me with insults like "cuntface", "sow", "dumb cunt", "die journo" and continually baits me with comments about my baby dying of cot death, (as you do, faggot,) it's very difficult to give such a community positive press coverage.

I like how you always reverse the chronology of events. You make it sound like you wrote the article after people were making dumb comments about your baby.

 

[Perun]

I like how you always reverse the chronology of events. You make it sound like you wrote the article after people were making dumb comments about your baby.

can you post the chatlogs of you flirting with margaret, I'm convinced this was a lovers spat, and if you do i will totally deny the holocaust

 

[Flaming_Barghast]

Dude I was being serious with you and you are leaning hard into nebulous comments and biological essentialism.
You did not really think I was going to agree with you that men rule over women in a natural hierarchy because they’re slightly physically stronger than women, did you??

"Slightly"
A healthy man punching you in the head could kill any woman, but not another man.
I don't agree that they rule everything, but to deny literal biological facts is retarded. Men have twice the lung size, twice the density of muscle (which both result in a stronger frame) and tower over a regular sized woman. No we are not equal biologically.

 

[stupid frog]

Also, you’re a 0%, as you’re too coward to show your face. I just ran mine through a different analyzer and got a result of 7.8/10.
The analyzer: https://pinkmirror.com/
The photo I used is attached. Feel free to repeat the experiment, but all I’m getting out of this is that AI has a long way to go before we can use it to predict attractiveness, like you are doing, or racial truths, like Agendaposter was doing a few days ago.

Shit like this is why everyone is bullying you, GIRL STOP