Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[LiquidKid]

remember that all the girls that get raped/fucked in redo of the healer are between 9-16 years old

They’re either brutally raped or mind controlled into being a fuck doll, there is no consensual sex in that series

 

[Harm]

- Nick is mad at Twitter. He is shadowbanned and no one got his joke about his Matthew Perry Halloween costume. He thinks talking about CSAM got him banned.

That tweet had over ten thousand impressions when I screenshotted it to post here. If you're "shadowbanned" but your dumb joke can still reach ten thousand people, there's no reason it's not getting likes, retweets, comments, and quote retweets to spread it further. The joke was lame and he explained the joke within the joke.

Nick said that some people (TOTALLY NOT JOSH) identify CSAM as something they do not like, but it has a very specific legal definition.

If you have to play coy lawyer over whether or not something is CP/CSAM then you've lost the plot.

People don't have such an emotional investment in the issue because of the fine legal nuances of the very specific definitions.

Just say it with your chest, Nick. You want to fuck teenagers and jerk off to children within the confines of the law alongside obese pedophiles like Christopher Gesualdi.

The real question is monty a pedo? Or he's a kooky fuck.

Evidence Monty is a pedophile:

- Made a fiction series where an adult plays a young girl who gets killed out of view.
- Allegedly professionally photographed children, unproven. The allegation isn't even that they were nude, just that he photographed children for families.
- Lost a lawsuit on a procedural technicality against someone calling him a pedophile.
- Put eyes in a melon once and pantomimed kissing it.

He's not a pedophile.

 

[Captain Manning]

Nick asks if anyone can prove Chris-chan plugged his mum. The court let him go... He then pivoted into an unironic age of consent discussion. (Not that way) He thinks 18 is a bare minimum floor. Nick said that some people (TOTALLY NOT JOSH) identify CSAM as something they do not like, but it has a very specific legal definition.

This is a really weird thing here. He's bringing up Chris in the context of Null.

Is he suggesting that the accusations against Chris are Null's fault, or something Null is wrong about?

As I understand that situation, Isabella Jenke recorded a phone call with Chris in which he admitted fucking his elderly mom who has dementia. Then the authorities got involved and charged him with a crime. It was dismissed because the authorities farted around too long and didn't bring it to trial quickly enough. AFAIK, Null had nothing to do with any of that outside of hosting the Chris-Chan discussion that the forum has always hosted since before it was even known as Kiwi Farms.

The CSAM hashing shit is dumb enough, but Chris' recent adventure with the criminal justice systems seems irrelevant if he wants to go after Null. It's like he's just flailing his arms around now.

The real question is monty a pedo? Or he's a kooky fuck.

He's a kooky guy, but I don't think he's a pedo or child molester. Remember that Nick has accused him of being both.

He's not even really that interesting of a kooky guy if his thread is anything to go by.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

Evidence Monty is a pedophile:

- Made a fiction series where an adult plays a young girl who gets killed out of view.
- Allegedly professionally photographed children, unproven. The allegation isn't even that they were nude, just that he photographed children for families.
- Lost a lawsuit on a procedural technicality against someone calling him a pedophile.
- Put eyes in a melon once and pantomimed kissing it.

He's not a pedophile.

Rackets fucked.

 

[Geared Chris]

Do we know how much Nick drinks?

On stream, between 6-12 shots but we know from Aaron of SteelToeMorningShow that he enjoys a whisky with breakfast.

Last night was weird. I was going to give him a shout-out for not drinking at all. I didn't see him have a single drink while Turtleboy was on. Then, later, he was suddenly very drunk. He made a deliberate point of holding up the two Monster cans he'd been drinking. Methinks one or both of those cans were spiked. For the last 90 min of the show, he drank normally from his whisky glass.

No, Nick isn't shadowbanned. Nobody cares about what he has to say anymore. He's irrelevant.

I am too lazy to try and quantify it, but I think he's overall getting less engagement across all platforms

Engagement is definitely down on the streams. The chats are utterly checked out and donations are a mere spooky corpse of what they once were.

Happy Halloween, Kiwi!

 

[AnOminous]

These were the ones where Nick said there were people doing line-crossing harassment, and when Null asked, 'Who?' Nick said that what Null meant was, 'Who do you want me to ban?', in his twisted mind

That's because that's what he actually meant but even his pickled coombrain knew that would make him an appalling flaggot. He wanted to get Null to do that but slimily retain his plausible deniability, sort of like with the Elissa Clips thing. He was just hoping Null would pick up on his "social cues" and just do it and take the blame for it while Nick sat there with a halo on his head and a Balldo on his testicles saying he had nothing to do with it.

What a sleazy slimeball.

I feel like you almost need something like that running a forum that people don't like, look at soyjack party and 8 chan thats all you need to do to shut down a forum is to spam enough of that shit to break a nigga. It seems like thats the go to for shutting things down.

It says a lot about the kind of people opposed to such sites that they always seem to have a huge collection of that shit.

 

[Oliver Onions]

I'd be more infuriated by this, but for the fact Null has been through this many times before and seems largely desensitized to it. It's disgusting, but I don't think any of it is gonna hurt Null. Nick isn't the first person to make pedo accusations against Null when they get mad at him.

I agree, I think what annoys me with Nick in particular is the way he's doing it while trying to pretend he's not by never explicitly naming Null. I don't know if he thinks this is funny (I certainly hope he doesn't think he's being clever) but it just comes across as r/atheism levels of smug and thinking he's smarter than he is; all the while feigning humility with the whole 'I always regard myself as the dumbest person in the room' schtick.

It's all gross and weirdly manipulative and I really hope he doesn't do this shit to our wife and his kids, too.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

New Elissa clips:

Sean brainstorms alternative names for Nick's guarding of Dick:

Drunken relationship talk - didn't even bother listening, but is this what his amazing idea for the future of his show was supposed to be?

 

[AnOminous]

Drunken relationship talk - didn't even bother listening, but is this what his amazing idea for the future of his show was supposed to be?

Made it about a minute into this smoothbrained take before diving when I felt my IQ dropping just from listening to it.

 

[Catboy Ranch Dressing]

New Elissa clips:

Drunken relationship talk - didn't even bother listening, but is this what his amazing idea for the future of his show was supposed to be?

Seems like he's trying to become an Andrew Tate manosphere grifter. Generic "women love it when they're complimented for being smart, guys like it when they're complimented on their appearance" shit. Whisky glass hovering around his nose for almost the entire clip, too.

 

[Harm]

Drunken relationship talk - didn't even bother listening, but is this what his amazing idea for the future of his show was supposed to be?

I'm going to take note of everything he says that sounds absolutely crazy:

• Men are visual creatures and their attention goes to visual cues, whereas women have cues in "intellectual achievement and provision areas." Whatever the fuck that means.
• Men don't value compliments about their capabilities because they already know they're capable.
• Women, if you want to attract a man, DON'T tell him he accomplished a great thing. Compliment his physical appearance instead; "God, those pants fit your ass very well!"
• Women are tired of compliments on their appearance because they get so many compliments on their appearance.
• Men don't care if you lie when you compliment their appearance.
• Only the top 10% of humanity is attractive and you should "lie to the bottom 90% because that's all you can do."
• Gives an example of a woman who compliments a man's shoulders, so he gives her his banking information. "That's how I think!"
• "We'll lie to you and you'll lie to us, and then we'll all be happy!" Happiness is when you live a lie, apparently.
• Gives the example of telling someone they're funny even though you can tell it's not funny because they didn't laugh at their own joke.
• Proceeds to tell an unfunny joke about how women tell long stories. Makes sure to audibly chuckle at his own joke.
• The one thing men want is "Helen Keller with giant tits and a big ass!"
• Backtracks it all once he realizes this rant could be used to paint him as a liar. Now it's all a joke. Not even a second later, he's explaining that it's real advice again.
• Devolves into lowest common denominator racism about blacks.

That was such a great segment, Nick! This valuable advice from your completely healthy marriage will benefit everyone!

 

[Captain Manning]

Sean brainstorms alternative names for Nick's guarding of Dick:

Surely I am not the only person thinking there's gonna come a point when Nick is gonna lose his shit at Sean, and it's gonna be glorious? Nick's not helped here by the fact that Warski and PPP keep playing Elissa's clips of Sean on the KC.

BTW, I really like "JuJu ranching," but I think that's more of what the Farms is doing. It sounds more like milking than guarding.

Also, random commenter quoted for truth:

 

[Potatoherder]

Nick really likes to flirt with the redpill community but for some reason won't go full into it. Kayla probably plays a part in that because she's the poster-child of women they say to avoid: mentally ill with tattoos. He'd get torn apart for 'do as i say not as i do.'

 

[Edilg]

What is Nick even implying here?

https://youtu.be/wLuRmbNkMwA?si=KzzmxEQw65zWVi4Z

That Josh shouldn't have cut ties with Chris?
(I'll fix formatting when I'm at home)

 

[Doctor John B. Zyklon]

The government wants to fuck you and will lie. Just like women lie to men. Women know when to look at a guy's dick just like a girl named Megan did to Nick in high school. She told him later that it was manipulative but she knew men like it. Women lie. Just like the government lies.

Men, same thing. You lie. You simply want to fuck her but you tell her that her stories are interesting when they're boring and annoying so you just lie. That's what the government does! SO, EVERYONE, FIX YOUR RELATIONSHIPS BY LYING!

Cleary the words of a man who one should take relationship advice from.

 

[huckbeine]

What is Nick even implying here?

https://youtu.be/wLuRmbNkMwA?si=KzzmxEQw65zWVi4Z

That Josh shouldn't have cut ties with Chris?
(I'll fix formatting when I'm at home)

he is not a real lawyer so he can't figure out why the case got dismissed because he can't read court documents, so he is asking his audience why the case got dismissed

 

[Captain Manning]

What is Nick even implying here?

https://youtu.be/wLuRmbNkMwA?si=KzzmxEQw65zWVi4Z

That Josh shouldn't have cut ties with Chris?
(I'll fix formatting when I'm at home)

I'll embed it for you.

As I said earlier, I think he's just flailing at Null ineffectively by saying "See! Chris wasn't brought to trial! Josh was wrong again!"

What he doesn't mention is that the authorities apparently thought he was guilty too, or they wouldn't have had him arrested. There's nothing I've read that would suggest they don't still think he's guilty. Instead he's saying "The state's not convinced it happened," which seems to be speculation on his part. My understanding is they just didn't move their ass fast enough on the charges and the dismissal was NOT made at the request of the state. Chris has a Constitutional right to a speedy trial, and it seems like he was denied that.

TL;DR: Nick is basically spewing bullshit again. He's trying to take a shot at Null on what seems to amount to incompetence on the part of the Commonwealth prosecutor.

Also, it's really weird to see him, or anybody really, defending Chris-Chan.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

New Elissa clips:

Sean brainstorms alternative names for Nick's guarding of Dick:

Drunken relationship talk - didn't even bother listening, but is this what his amazing idea for the future of his show was supposed to be?

This is terrible fucking advice. I couldn't give a shit if I look good or not, I'm a man. Tell me that my home brewed blackberry wine tastes good and that you'd like me to make more. That is my favorite compliment I've received from my wife in recent memory and why I'm going to brew a 3 gallon batch of blackberry wine next because she liked it even though it's more expensive and I'm content with basic sugar wine.

Edit: I didn't even touch on the batshit insanity that lying to your spouse is a good idea! What a drunken retard. I bet he lies to his wife about how much vodka he's spiking his energy drinks with because it "makes her feel better."

 

[AnOminous]

• Men don't value compliments about their capabilities because they already know they're capable.

By that definition he isn't even a man since he is so desperate for compliments he starts crying like a little bitch when he doesn't get them.

What he doesn't mention is that the authorities apparently thought he was guilty too, or they wouldn't have had him arrested. There's nothing I've read that would suggest they don't still think he's guilty. Instead he's saying "The state's not convinced it happened," which seems to be speculation on his part.

He's an idiot. He got an autism deferral which means that his CRIME was connected to his autism. Without essentially admitting he did that, there would be nothing to defer.

In any criminal case, except a violation of § 18.2-31, an act of violence as defined in § 19.2-297.1, or any crime for which a deferred disposition is provided for by statute, upon a plea of guilty, or after a plea of not guilty, and the facts found by the court would justify a finding of guilt, the court may, if the defendant has been diagnosed by a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist with (i) an autism spectrum disorder as defined in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association or (ii) an intellectual disability as defined in § 37.2-100 and the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that the criminal conduct was caused by or had a direct and substantial relationship to the person's disorder or disability, without entering a judgment of guilt and with the consent of the accused, after giving due consideration to the position of the attorney for the Commonwealth and the views of the victim, defer further proceedings and place the accused on probation subject to terms and conditions set by the court.

He needs to quit babbling about shit he doesn't know anything about.

He wouldn't have qualified for such a deferral without such a finding.

Without "criminal conduct" there is no way the "criminal conduct was caused by or had a direct and substantial relationship to the person's disorder or disability."

 

[ColinQuinnsStent]

Also, it's really weird to see him, or anybody really, defending Chris-Chan.

Translation: Nick wants to interview Chris.