Jackie Singh / Jacqueline Singh / Jacqueline Anne Stokes / Jax / @find_evil / HackingButLegal / @HackingButLegal / piggytomlinson - Cybersecurity "expert," wannabe journoscum, former "hacker"; gunt guards Patrick Tomlinson, currently picking a fight with ONA Forums, GNAA Groupie

Is she visiting some forum we don't know about? She doesn't come here and she made herself a laughing stock on the other forum all the while failing to dox everyone and not only that, she failed hard doing it.
She's so utterly retarded of a street-shitter she seriously still thinks she's good at that shit.
 
Is she visiting some forum we don't know about?

Who knows. While a policy here is to not remove posts removal does happen. Other places might be more aggressive on removing posts. If your 'doxing to upset the trolls' gets removed and the 'trolls' never see this dox, did you really upset 'em?

Oh and Jackie - just because someone offers up a critique on your work or even ask questions about the thought process used to come to your position doesn't make them a troll. Same for pointing out your ties to Weev and the GNAA. Unless by troll you mean "I suffered a narcissistic injury!" and want others to feel bad for you.
 
Last edited:
She's so utterly retarded of a street-shitter she seriously still thinks she's good at that shit.
Pretty sure I can open up the Australian white pages, point to a random name there and claim it's you and still have a higher chance of being right than Jackie has been.
 
Is she visiting some forum we don't know about? She doesn't come here and she made herself a laughing stock on the other forum all the while failing to dox everyone and not only that, she failed hard doing it.
By the strict definition of doxing (to publicly disclose the identity, address, or other personal details of someone, especially as a form of online harassment), she's succeeding. She's publicizing the personal information of someone in the hopes they'll be harassed, #Canceled, or trolled. Where she's failing is finding the specific doxes of the ONA rascals.

And we know she not only comes here, but has an account here. She saw this thread while it was in the PG subforum (which is only possible if you have an account), and she occasionally posts pictures of the thread.
 
Packed house of hungover furries!

IMG_1587.jpeg

I'm glad it was recorded, if she defamed anyone in the talk it will make it easier for their lawyers.
 

She's Indian, how the fuck did she know the showers not working? Did the front desk tell her? Since when did engineers fix them? You call a plumber you stupid street shitter.

No breakfast? Her glucose level might have just dropped under 10 mmol/l for the first time in decades.

Come on now boys. I realise we humble internet autists are a fairly gullible bunch. We are all too willing to believe fantasical tales like Chiris-Chan getting a boyfriend free girl, Reethan Ralph sobering up, or Null being anything other than a obese shut in, but surely even we aren't gullible enough to believe that Snackie either showers or ever skips a meal are we? Surely not!
 
F9xjEaeXkAA4Oan.jpg
I don't know many pajeets, but are they normally ashy looking like a negro ?
Depends. Some pajeets can pull it off, and in India you can buy creams to lighten your skin. Jackie isn't photogenic. At all. No wonder she hides behind filters and an AI generated avatar. She looks like a witch, which is perfect for Halloween.
 
Packed house of hungover furries!

View attachment 5456282

I'm glad it was recorded, if she defamed anyone in the talk it will make it easier for their lawyers.
Hmmm watch a bunch of adults dress up and play make believe on Halloween or dress my kids up so they can play make believe and get candy on Halloween. Hmm such a difficult choice.
I hope it's a video. I want to see what she looks like when she can't hide behind camera filters.
I got you covered
 
How long will it be until Jackie claims she can track this individual by the way their thumb is shaped and the obvious finger prints that can be seen?

There is a difference between what is possible and what the BJ Queen of the GNAA can do.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/ne...om-photos-taken-from-up-to-three-meters-away/ is an example of what is possible.

For Queen BJer she'd need access to a database of fingerprints and that hand would have to be in one of the databases. Legally the BJ Queen would seem to lack authorization to such databases. And those photos would have to be real VS a photoshop job of some sort. I would not put it past the pests to just post totally synthetic photos claiming they are real just to get a rise outta the Queen.

Those of you hoping for a 3rd party video from her keynote might be SOL. Audio recorded on the sly is more likely.
 
Back