Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[ScooterL]

how tall is greer?

About 5'2".

 

[Alabaster Disaster]

About 5'2".

Fuck yes make this happen I love midget wrestling.

 

[Edict of Expulsion]

Harman looks damn dapper in that suit. He is not fat and the alternate reality woman version of me would have post-marital sex with him



Maybe Harman can make a Christmas miracle happen and do whatever AG law magic is needed to actually get Greer some prison time for once.

 

[Probably An Autist]

if he has prior cases for sneed then we may be onto a winner here boys

 

[AnOminous]

if he has prior cases for sneed then we may be onto a winner here boys

Cope v. Seethe. Cope v. Dilate. Cope v. SNEED!

 

[mindlessobserver]

Cope v. Seethe. Cope v. Dilate. Cope v. SNEED!

Joshes lawyers better get the word "Sneed" written into precedent that lawyers will be forced to cite because of this bullshit.

As in the case of Greer v. Moon, the court held that the simple application of the term "Sneed" to refer to derogatory comments about a referenced work was transformative in nature....

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Stewart B. Harman and Matthew Hardin joined Null on the district case. Harman is seemingly there to sponsor Hardin

Hardin was approved

 

[not william stenchever]

Fuck yes make this happen I love midget wrestling.

It would be a miracle if Ralph uses what he learned about facial rearrangement on the streets of portugo to fix Greer's fucked up facial expression.

 

[Tetragrammaton]

Yeah he was going to offer that job to Ethan Ralph which would be such a hilarious choice. It would be the only time in my life I would root for Ralph.

just imagine ralph showing up demanding you give him the money or else he is gonna start taking your stuff. i feel like it would be like those tv shows about tow truck drivers and repo companies in the middle of some nowhere town. just with more rage pig moments

 

[Useful_Mistake]

New article came out praising the 10th circuit decision, saying it "Contributes Clarity" to US copyright law.

https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7aae4a28-d187-4a21-9ab8-bdbf910b1165

https://archive.ph/Vua7M

Wouldn't recommend reading it. The title is the most original part of the article, the rest is just slightly reworded summary of the Judge's order.

 

[teriyakiburns]

New article came out praising the 10th circuit decision, saying it "Contributes Clarity" to US copyright law.
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=7aae4a28-d187-4a21-9ab8-bdbf910b1165

Better headline: "Lawyers praise decision that will lead to more people hiring lawyers"

 

[Null]

Greer's counsel wanted extra time and I didn't oppose it. I'm a nice guy.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Greer's counsel wanted extra time and I didn't oppose it. I'm a nice guy.

Doc for those curious. He wants time until the 17th

 

[BULLY HUNTER_78]

They're kind of getting along now too. Handing Ralph the authority to go and take a bunch of shit out of someone's house would be hilarious. Imagine Ralph with any modicum of actual power, lol.

The best part is Ralph could probably squeeze this in during a Vegas trip. I hope Null wins hard enough this time to get lawyers fees and Greer is petty enough that gunt gets to show up at his door to repo his stuff.

While Ralph will probably lose a 1 on 1 fight with Greer, he certainly excels at illiciting the assistance of law enforcement (which should be in attendance to ensure the peaceful transition of possessions.)

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Russ’ request was granted. His next deadline is this friday

 

[jerkstore]

Russ’ request was granted. His next deadline is this friday
View attachment 5491351

in your opinion, why do you think they have requested more time? just because this is what they do, or something else?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

in your opinion, why do you think they have requested more time? just because this is what they do, or something else?

I mean, they did lay out their reasons. I have no reason to disbelieve it, though I am unsure how helpful extra four days would be.

 

[jerkstore]

I mean, they did lay out their reasons. I have no reason to disbelieve it, though I am unsure how helpful extra four days would be.

out of curiosity, i looked up their motion for extra time on pacer. not gonna lie, “we were busy with other stuff” (that we might feel is of more import than this case) is kinda how it reads to me. also, is it normal to bold and underline exactly how “unopposed” a motion is by the other party? both in the title and text of the document?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

i looked up their motion for extra time on pacer

You could have saved yourself those cents and just clicked on the doc I attached in response to Null.

is it normal to bold and underline exactly how “unopposed” a motion is by the other party?

Well, you don't want the court to miss that part. In all their other motions for extension they did the same or similar.

“we were busy with other stuff” (that we might feel is of more import than this case) is kinda how it reads to me

"We're busy and there's time sensitive thing tomorrow" is not really unreasonable (for the district level at the very least). Personally, I think (especially given all their prior extensions) that this shouldn't fly on the appellate level, but there's not exactly any problems for Null and the Court, so who cares.

 

[Kosher Salt]

in your opinion, why do you think they have requested more time? just because this is what they do, or something else?

I think the real question is how many more extensions they're going to need, and what excuses they'll come up with for those. Maybe one of them is going to come down with a bad case of the chicken pox.

You could have saved yourself those cents and just clicked on the doc I attached in response to Null.

I went to PACER anyway because the CourtListener archive didn't have the updated docket or document yet (it should now). I never have more than $30 in PACER fees in one quarter, so it's all waived and I've never had to pay for it.