Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

This is what is happening, the current contention is mostly about women posting here and people reporting them. You'd know this if you read any pages beyond where null posts.
Again, IGNORE them. Stop reporting them, that is fucking homosexual. Put them on read. They'll fuck off.
He gets autistic and rants like we're his diary and then leaves and we resume hanging out and doing nothing. It's almost always on behalf of shit that has nothing to do with the regulars here.
His "rants" indicate half this thread is gonna get exiled. Clearly you guys are doing shit. And if you aren't you know who is.
True, except the milk is coming from the mooing cows that follow him around
You wish lol.
 
Because they don't have special rules and privileges extended to them.
You're threadbanned from the russia or ukraine thread if you shit them up with pointless sperging. I'm sure there are other examples. You are actually expected to behave normally and not fill pages with pointless arguing on this website, it's a discussion forum and valued archive. You don't have total freedom, you just have a hell of a lot more than most other sites.
Please don't pull a "why are you gay" on me.
Massive projection bro, that was not my intent at all and I am not joking. Sometimes the curtains are just blue.
It would be funny if it weren't more difficult to moderate already. Look at how much attention just these two threads require.
I don't think trying to explain administrative decisions really equates to moderation. Attention, sure, because he is trying to communicate. You seem to keep refusing to understand. Moderation involves reading reports and actioning them (or throwing them in the trash) and posting "we need to talk about you faggots not knowing how to use thumbnails" on people's profiles. Maybe you feel differently but I don't think an administrator is wasting his time when he tries to communicate his intent to his website. If anything it should be encouraged.
Would be more helpful if you told this to Null, not me.
He doesn't need my advice, or yours for that matter. He has multiple real attorneys to represent his interests in court against the lunatics who hassle him. What you or I think about the law is irrelevant.
Almost as if I haven't suggested the lifting of special privileges off of both threads.
And then what? Just more shitflinging that is "harder to moderate" as trannies keep fucking over the rest of the internet's "woman" only discussions and depressed lost boys get blackpilled on the femoids? lol. Maybe just don't look at the threads if you don't like them and have nothing to contribute.
 
His "rants" indicate half this thread is gonna get exiled. Clearly you guys are doing shit. And if you aren't you know who is
Funny how we must have started "doing shit" right around when his dumbo take on cheese and bread got dunked on and he was called a retard and needed somewhere else to sperg for a bit
 
But alot of you had and got banned.

Dude when I notice his tag a lot it means shit isn't going well. I'm on here a lot if you haven't noticed. I see a lot of how the farms works day to day. I've never seen him pay THIS much attention to one thread. So when I see him in here, it means there is milk to be had.
It means he needs content for MATI, that's all. He literally didn't have to come in here at all. He didn't even have to ban Russian Blonde, everyone was having fun clowning on her sperging.
 
Now that I come to think about it, this all began because a woman came here to bitch about mammographies eventually getting thread banned. It's always women.
And not even all of them, we've got a few that are alright. Everyone is welcome in the Woman-Hate thread, even women, provided they don't shit on the carpet.
 
Again, IGNORE them. Stop reporting them, that is fucking homosexual. Put them on read. They'll fuck off.
Are your null blinders so bad that you can't even read posts that are on the same page as his?
I haven't reported anyone and have stated multiple times in this thread I'm against bans as I can keep scrolling if something upsets me.
 
Funny how we must have started "doing shit" right around when his dumbo take on cheese and bread got dunked on and he was called a retard and needed somewhere else to sperg for a bit
So you mean he stopped paying attention to you for 5 minutes and you guys sperged the fuck out to the point he needed to ban someone? Got it
 
Are your null blinders so bad that you can't even read posts that are on the same page as his?
I'm pretty sure he's just mad that A&H mocks him for his welding sperging. If we're up to shit, surely he can point out specific instances. Otherwise, I hope whomever he's trying to impress notices.
 
Again, IGNORE them. Stop reporting them, that is fucking homosexual. Put them on read. They'll fuck off.

His "rants" indicate half this thread is gonna get exiled. Clearly you guys are doing shit. And if you aren't you know who is.

You wish lol.
Retard, the men posting here are not the ones reporting. In fact, I wonder if some just aren't pissed off women on mission against another. I know how we be.

Without proof, all speculation, but I doubt any of the men posting tonight had shit to do with reporting suspected femoids here.
 
It means he needs content for MATI, that's all. He literally didn't have to come in here at all. He didn't even have to ban Russian Blonde, everyone was having fun clowning on her sperging.
I'm still confused as to who would've reported her unless it's someone that doesn't post here. The reports I know came from regulars were when the emoji spamming was happening and when AR was being annoying, and even the latter is an issue we're divided on.
 
I'm still confused as to who would've reported her unless it's someone that doesn't post here. The one reports I know came from regulars were when the emoji spamming was happening and when AR was being annoying, and even the latter is an issue we're divided on.
My bet is on Dyn. He's a literal gimmick account that posts in both threads. Anyone else who dares to do that gets banned. Probably him who reported me too.
 
I'm still confused as to who would've reported her unless it's someone that doesn't post here. The one reports I know came from regulars were when the emoji spamming was happening and when AR was being annoying, and even the latter is an issue we're divided on.
He made the very odd comment about making it all equal, no men or women in either of these threads, but made the odd decision at least to let @Dyn stay in both and he shits up every thread he is in.
 
You're threadbanned from the russia or ukraine thread if you shit them up with pointless sperging. I'm sure there are other examples. You are actually expected to behave normally and not fill pages with pointless arguing on this website, it's a discussion forum and valued archive. You don't have total freedom, you just have a hell of a lot more than most other sites.
If a post goes against overall rules then yes, it should be moderated as anything else. I am merely against adding extra to protect communities that don't need protection.
Massive projection bro, that was not my intent at all and I am not joking. Sometimes the curtains are just blue.
Trust me, I really don't care about bitter and angry men or women. Only when they start shitting up a website from their protected little shit-nests.
I don't think trying to explain administrative decisions really equates to moderation. Attention, sure, because he is trying to communicate. You seem to keep refusing to understand. Moderation involves reading reports and actioning them (or throwing them in the trash) and posting "we need to talk about you faggots not knowing how to use thumbnails" on people's profiles. Maybe you feel differently but I don't think an administrator is wasting his time when he tries to communicate his intent to his website. If anything it should be encouraged.
It's not about Null peeking his nose this one time, it's about the fuckton of unnecessary bans based on weird thread-specific rules.
He doesn't need my advice, or yours for that matter. He has multiple real attorneys to represent his interests in court against the lunatics who hassle him. What you or I think about the law is irrelevant.
Then you shouldn't have spoken either. Even if it wouldn't result in more legal problems, there are decisions that aren't worth any amount of risk when they bring no measurable benefit.
And then what? Just more shitflinging that is "harder to moderate" as trannies keep fucking over the rest of the internet's "woman" only discussions and depressed lost boys get blackpilled on the femoids? lol. Maybe just don't look at the threads if you don't like them and have nothing to contribute.
If there are no extra thread-specific rules, then there is less of a need to moderate. Most of the bans seem to stem from these specific rules. Also, just because I don't look at a thread it doesn't magically stop it from affecting the overall health of the community.
 
Back