Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.3%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 25.5%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 62 17.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 142 39.0%

  • Total voters
    364
Balldo, your thread has the same page count as Boogie2988's.
Funny enough both threads had similar trajectories of everyone in the thread saying the subject wasn’t a lolcow, then having a steady trickle of content (Sam & Tolki stuff for Boogie and the alcoholic downward spiral stuff for Nick), then an event that cemented them as a lolcow (both of which involved on stream meltdowns).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Captain Manning
He said it once. Mensa briefly became a joke in the chat. I want to say he's in the 120s? I recall googling the cut off. If I stumble upon it in a recap, I'll keep you posted.
I think it's 132 for Mensa with Stanford-Binet but different for others, and they have their own test. When I was a kid a friend of mine and I took this casually and were pretty impressed with ourselves for easily qualifying, and his drunk-ass dad overheard us, an old vet in his 70s who woke up every morning to a cup of "coffee" that was half whiskey, blasted grackles in his front yard with a shotgun, and continued more or less in the same fashion into the night.

We started reading off some of the questions to him and he just instantly answered every one. We went to ones we didn't get and he instantly got those too, and even explained them. We weren't really keeping score but we'd passed easily and he was way higher IQ than either of us. This drunk-ass old coot was easily a genius in the high 150s and that was in his 70s. He told us Mensa was for faggots.
Funny enough both threads had similar trajectories of everyone in the thread saying the subject wasn’t a lolcow, then having a steady trickle of content (Sam & Tolki stuff for Boogie and the alcoholic downward spiral stuff for Nick), then an event that cemented them as a lolcow (both of which involved on stream meltdowns).
Boogie never really had a grace period for me. I always hated that fence-sitting fat fuck. It wasn't even that he would have a moderate opinion on something, it was that he'd have no opinion whatsoever, take whatever he thought was popular, then chicken out like an absolutely spineless pussy if he got any pushback on it.

I was just always more or less sickened by Boogie, and it slowly ripened into outright hatred.
 
Last edited:
I've had a couple "the lady doth protest too much" moments with her and talk about proprietorial misconduct. It makes me not like her because it seems to me like she was probably involved in some majorly shady shit, or at the very least knows where the bodies are buried on some shit in her old office.
And I understand that. Another criticism I hear is she's too "safe" compared to the irreverence they've come to expect from Rekieta. She's not everybody's cup of tea. She's not really even my cup of tea.

But she's doing things way better than Nick at this point. Live trial coverage is pretty clearly a better path to success compared to the gay shit Nick has been doing.

I'm not a big fan of Branca (for example), but I'd much rather watch him than Nick at this point. Nick has set the bar really fucking low. The self-appointed "Pope of LawTube" is looking more than a little haggard compared to just about all of his lawyer peers. If not all of them. And, if you ask me, Baker is one of the better peers.

Sean, I think, is my favorite though. Blessed Sean.
 
I think it's 132 for Mensa with Stanford-Binet but different for others, and they have their own test. When I was a kid a friend of mine and I took this casually and were pretty impressed with ourselves for easily qualifying, and his drunk-ass dad overheard us, an old vet in his 70s who woke up every morning to a cup of "coffee" that was half whiskey, blasted grackles in his front yard with a shotgun, and continued more or less in the same fashion into the night.

We started reading off some of the questions to him and he just instantly answered every one. We went to ones we didn't get and he instantly got those too, and even explained them. We weren't really keeping score but we'd passed easily and he was way higher IQ than either of us. This drunk-ass old coot was easily a genius in the high 150s and that was in his 70s. He told us Mensa was for faggots.

Boogie never really had a grace period for me. I always hated that fence-sitting fat fuck. It wasn't even that he would have a moderate opinion on something, it was that he'd have no opinion whatsoever, take whatever he thought was popular, then chicken out like an absolutely spineless pussy if he got any pushback on it.

I was just always more or less sickened by Boogie, and it slowly ripened into outright hatred.
Mensa is for people insecure enough to pay for a club to say they are smart. The people who run it got autists like James Watson and other people as the sell.

It’s living proof that intellect, gullibility, education, and sniffing out bullshit are all distinct traits.
 
I'm not a big fan of Branca (for example), but I'd much rather watch him than Nick at this point. Nick has set the bar really fucking low. The self-appointed "Pope of LawTube" is looking more than a little haggard compared to just about all of his lawyer peers. If not all of them. And, if you ask me, Baker is one of the better peers.
I think the opposite end from Rekieta is someone like Leonard French. Rekieta is a generalist who shoots from the hip and this was okay when he actually had contents in the head on his shoulders other than booze. And he could be funny, something hard to find in the law sphere. French by comparison is a specialist in one of the most arcane fields of practice, and probably the best at explaining it to a lay audience (and even other lawyers), but IP law is dry as death. Unless you specifically nerd out on the subject there is really no way to make it fun and sexy.

Start talking about multi-part balancing tests for fair use and most people's eyes glaze over instantly. It's really rare to find anything resembling humor in the field (although the Alex Mauer thing gave him a rare opportunity to be hilarious).

Nick was good as infotainment. You got to hear what was filed today in whatever case interested you and probably a sensible chuckle or two at the same time. But someone like French is someone I'd listen to not for entertainment so much as to learn shit about the field, even though I already know a good amount about it. He has a genuine depth of knowledge of the subject, puts in his homework, and more or less expects you to be able to keep up with him. You can be pretty sure when he says something, whether or not he's 100% right, it's at least based on sources he cites so you can make up your own mind.
 
Yeah I thought it was pretty fitting considering Nick's rapidly deteriorating mental state. If someone could synthesize Rekietas voice to generate stuff like this it would be hilarious.
The Esquire is good, but the ai already exists. Here's a new one!

Mensa is for people insecure enough to pay for a club to say they are smart
Ty Beard is in Mensa. Nuf said.

tip I've been told but have never actually done personally is that Hong Kong has a lot of Savile Row-tier tailors for a fraction of the price, and you can get something like ten no-name suits for the price of one in London. I have no idea how true this is.
It was true 15 years ago, but I'm not sure if things have changed in the interim. I can almost guarantee prices have gone up.
 
But she's doing things way better than Nick at this point. Live trial coverage is pretty clearly a better path to success compared to the gay shit Nick has been doing.
I don't know if it's working out for her. Of course she will be getting ad money but those aren't good numbers.
firefox_3yirzV2rog.png
On the other hand there is Law and Lumber which seems like Nick but advertiser friendly.
firefox_j9S7XlYPb6.png

I think recaps are the way forward on anything except Rittenhouse level trials. That would solve all the issue of the dead time. It also allows for better control of superchats.
 
He told us Mensa was for faggots.
Yeah this is absolutely true. My mother was a keeping-up-with-the-johnsons type wine mom and when I was around 10 had me tested and made me go to all of these faggy mensa events just so she could tell everyone how big brain'd her kid was or whatever.

Without exaggeration, the events are about the gayest things someone could participate in short of a gay gangbang. They're a bunch of unfulfilled fags huffing their own farts and jerking each other off about how awesome and smart and cool they are.
 
He could have had a strong "true crime" audience. Even if said audience consisted predominantly of daytime TV wine moms.

Instead, he went mask-off, stopped the trial coverage, and now puts out garbage content. Look at the state of his fanbase now. Even the wine moms don't seem to care, and some of them have even become critics themselves.
The daytime is the key part. I think many would have stayed even if he didn't do trials had he not decided to continue this 11pm-3am nonsense. The only reason that worked with the weeb wars audience is they were weebs and had no life.
I don't know if I agree with you that the daytime slot was key, though it was certainly half of it. I don't think he would have been as successful without the fact there were trials going. His success came down to, in large part, to the fact you could either watch him, or watch some shitty bias MSM coverage that painted Heard as a victim, and Rittenhouse as a murderer. Moreover, I think he realized (correctly) that assembling a panel to review the day's footage at night time wouldn't have worked as well because it's a subject where you need to strike while the iron is white hot. The audience that watched him was the audience that wanted up-to-the-minute coverage. That means doing it live. If he didn't do it, the true crime wine moms would have gone elsewhere and skipped him entirely.

I think this is one of these things where he wants the world to revolve around him, and he honestly felt that his personality played a big role in his success. That if he did something else, people would keep flocking to him no matter what he did. He's overestimating his own abilities, and underestimating the interest people had in the subject matter he used to cover. Maddox is interesting. Weebwars is interesting (some people on the Farms found it lame, but the numbers don't lie). Amber Heard and Rittenhouse were very interesting. Balldos, cooming, and Dick's ridiculous obsession with Eric July, not so much. The numbers aren't lying there either.
The views are literally between 3x and 10x of any regular show. I assume the Superchat revenue is also exponential. Even Megan Fox who seldom gets 100 people in her lives, is regularly getting 800 people watching the Maya case with her.

The morning audience he had was full of bored housewives who binge the Serial podcast and worry that their neighbour has all the classic signs of psychopathy, so they need a Xanax. I think there was an audience there.

Regardless of the wine mom audience or not, Nick does not seem to be aiming to attract ANY specific audience at present. He had the late-night weebs and third-shift nerds through WW, and he picked up some politically disaffected right of Marx people as well along with MAGA extremists. These mingled with the True Crime audience in a chaotic frenzy during Depp, then he failed to deliver daytime content for the wine moms and told the rest of the audience who still had a healthy sense of shame to piss off.

Who is he trying to woo with degenerate shows in the wee hours of the morning in the US, the early to mid morning in Europe, and the afternoon in Asia and Austraiia?]

Ditto. I recently stumbled on Nick's daughters' 3+ hour dance recital from last spring. I won't publish links bc they're minors and names are listed.

I found this in one of the pictures. It looks like a shemale with those shoulders:

1699221759417.png
 
Yeah this is absolutely true. My mother was a keeping-up-with-the-johnsons type wine mom and when I was around 10 had me tested and made me go to all of these faggy mensa events just so she could tell everyone how big brain'd her kid was or whatever.

Without exaggeration, the events are about the gayest things someone could participate in short of a gay gangbang. They're a bunch of unfulfilled fags huffing their own farts and jerking each other off about how awesome and smart and cool they are.
Sounds like Nick fits right in

I found this in one of the pictures. It looks like a shemale with those shoulders:
Manlier than her father
 
That seems to be the prevailing thought.
Considering he had just handily beaten me in a battle of wits while drunk off his ass and half-senile, I took it as words of wisdom.
Without exaggeration, the events are about the gayest things someone could participate in short of a gay gangbang. They're a bunch of unfulfilled fags huffing their own farts and jerking each other off about how awesome and smart and cool they are.
Seriously dodged a bullet there. Was considering it. Being laughed at by a crazy old coot literally too smart for Mensa for even contemplating it was a huge favor.
 
Last edited:
I think recaps are the way forward on anything except Rittenhouse level trials. That would solve all the issue of the dead time. It also allows for better control of superchats.
You may want to check out RecoveryAddict on YT wrt the Maya case - a case which has quickly built up a huge audience due to the horrors involved. He's not a lawyer.

He's the only notable streamer doing live coverage of Maya and somehow has access to all the sidebars due to a Zoom link (journalism? but L&C doesn't report this stuff) and relays the sidebar conversations to the audience. He's regularly getting 30K views for Maya. His other streams barely break 5K.

Megan tends to start 3ish hours late in order to skip the boring bits. Rob does evening coverage.
 
The Esquire is good, but the ai already exists. Here's a new one!
Yes! Bernie! I don't know why I keep forgetting his name. I should probably just sub to him.

If anybody else wants to sub, he'll roll over to 100.

1699221969361.png


Anyways, if he reads this thread, or is a Kiwi, I think the Francis E. Dec parody that @Drew Pickles 69 wrote would make excellent fodder for the AI. It would probably work best if he yelled the entire thing.


I don't know if it's working out for her. Of course she will be getting ad money but those aren't good numbers.
View attachment 5470316
On the other hand there is Law and Lumber which seems like Nick but advertiser friendly.
View attachment 5470320

I think recaps are the way forward on anything except Rittenhouse level trials. That would solve all the issue of the dead time. It also allows for better control of superchats.
Well, she's actually doing much better than many of Sean's trial livestreams. I also don't know what her superchat revenue looks like. Nick's is pretty bad.

I agree with you though that not every trial is gonna bring in big numbers though.

I'm just saying that, right now, I can foresee a future where Byte's actually pulls ahead of Rekieta in most metrics. It's gonna probably take a while though. Like I pointed out, her short-form content is doing pretty good, whereas Nick has all but abandoned short-form content. Unless you count the Locals "exclusive" hot tub streams.
 
Back