Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not exactly modern, but I'd also add that as soon as women got suffrage, they immediately made alcohol--and fun--illegal while tricking men into fighting World War I. Thus creating organized crime.Depends on "modern." Here are 3 strong contenders I can think of:
- Allowing the Marxists in the 70s to flee into Academia rather than rip that shit out by the roots after they bombed Congress et all.
- Cheap Cotton.
- Not listening to literally every other country who allowed them in and deciding "surely it's not them, the 108 other countries before us are just mean."
tbf I can think of at least a couple of times Captain Harlock has basically done just thatTrump should have just ignored how all his enemies had a dozen traps laid to and instead charged head first into the bait because the sheer righteousness of his actions would magically cause all of it to not work
It literally works with Trump because his opposition has been 3 ring circus since 2015.tbf I can think of at least a couple of times Captain Harlock has basically done just that
And then he would...?If Trump ordered the NG to restore order to a US city and they didn't, he'd know within hours.
Fire them and have them court-martialed for insubordination?And then he would...?
Maybe lost in the spergfight above but still want to respond. I largely agree with the two paragraphs prior to this but on this one, I never said he'd demand concessions, I said Ukraine would lose support publicly. Trump is far more likely to simply say the war is not our problem, offer to mediate any thing between the two, then just drop funding and go full neutrality.Trump is critical of the war, certainly. His instinct is that the US should not be entangled in foreign wars, which I am sure a lot of people here agree with. However, I think his solution will not be to force territorial concessions from Zelensky. Instead, I suspect he will use the war for domestic advantage, by making continued material aid contingent on getting his wall finished, establishing tighter immigration rules, and dealing with other internal issues. His argument will be one that has been echoed here: if the US is protecting Ukraine's borders, why is she not protecting her own? Alternatively, he may choose to resolve the war by re-establishing the threat of personal consequences for Putin or his senior staff, but I think that's less likely.
It literally works with Trump because his opposition has been 3 ring circus since 2015.
When the people opposing you are defending hamas because you oppose them, the "traps" they set are "power-ups".
What's both stupid and aggravating is that framing the whole shitshow as "not our problem" will be painted like he's the next gigahitler, once again.Maybe lost in the spergfight above but still want to respond. I largely agree with the two paragraphs prior to this but on this one, I never said he'd demand concessions, I said Ukraine would lose support publicly. Trump is far more likely to simply say the war is not our problem, offer to mediate any thing between the two, then just drop funding and go full neutrality.
We gave them money and equipment, they have not succeeded, we have larger issues at home, so why should we support either side? Their prior good relations mean nothing when it's fundiementally not our problem.
This is so pathetic, less viewers than a 3-view vtuber and they won't enable live chat:
View attachment 5473565
I knew the guy was a psychopath when he did what he did in florida.This is so pathetic, less viewers than a 3-view vtuber and they won't enable live chat:
View attachment 5473565
Sure but the point is that everyone thought Trump was going to win because of the riots in 2020 and they did nothing to help him in 2020.
Fire them and have them court-martialed for insubordination?
(and if staff refused to do that, he'd fire them, too, and on and on until the enlisted ranks were promoted and became NCO's, and they fucking loved him)
I had libs contact me, afraid because of Trumps Gestapo arresting black block rioters out of Scary Unmarked Minivans. They thought that the rioters were genuine good guys and they placed the rosy frame of abolitionists and integrationists right over the top of them. Like you say, they're insane. Completely and totally starved of true information.I suspect the average democrat and swing voter didn't really know about the riots. If you told them about CHAZ/CHOP they'd have no idea what you are talking about and think you're talking some looney fake news things. The bubbles people are in to detach them from reality are insane.
Today I learned the president is not the commander in chief of the US armed forces.The President can't fire the National Guard or have anyone court-martialed.
You're a retard who thinks the commander in chief does not command the US military.The President can't generally fire anyone in the Federal government except the uppermost ranks. You have no idea how the US government works.
Even on rumble and their funny numbers he didn't break 5k. Didn't click to see if he had chat while it was activeThis is so pathetic, less viewers than a 3-view vtuber and they won't enable live chat:
View attachment 5473565
How the fuck did Mel Brooks miss this joke?Don’t you mean the Death Star of David?
They literally disobeyed and nothing happened. De facto he doesnt. Hawaiian judge will make it de jure.Today I learned the president is not the commander in chief of the US armed forces.
You are officially retarded.
You're a retard who thinks the commander in chief does not command the US military.
Where exactly do you think the concept of "federalizing the guard" comes from?
It comes from article 2 authority of POTUS