Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 15.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 5 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 97 24.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 157 40.3%

  • Total voters
    390
But if he did lie about everything like he claims he did? Then oh yeah the man didn't actually do it and just drives as a narcoleptic at risk of passing out on the road any day now.
I don't even believe his narcolepsy bullshit at this point. He's never once passed out on stream or displayed anything resembling narcolepsy.

The only lepsy he has is drunkolepsy.
 
How’s Vito the Pedo’s campaign going again Nick?
"I don't. WANT TO . Support the. Pedophile. But I. HAVE TO. Support the. Pedophile. Because that FUCKING LOSER AUTIST SPERG FATASS VIRGIN NEET CHILD PORNOGRAPHY-COLLECTING JOSH MOON. NULL. Knows EVERYTHING about the law, apparently. And that's fiiiiiiiiiiine. I love Josh. Josh, I know you're watching me. I love you buddy. Why don't you show your law degree, Josh? Let's see it! I love you, buddy. You're such a fucking retard. I love you buddy. You're like that retarded loner the entire school loves."
Retard. .jpg
 
Long day at Twitter-X Nick, start the show with a bottle of scotch you madlad. You've earned it!
He's been gone for almost a week. He shouldn't waste time talking about Trump. He hates talking about Trump. He should "own the farms" and talk about how wrong we are. Maybe call out individual members. Then he should talk about how Eric July's lates campaign wasn't successful, somehow. Bringing on Dax and Camelot would be a good idea too. Talk about how he watched the bulls bang Kayla while he sat in a corner, limp dicked with his balldo on.
 
He's been gone for almost a week. He shouldn't waste time talking about Trump. He hates talking about Trump. He should "own the farms" and talk about how wrong we are.
He should definitely own us by saying the specific things we're wrong about. I mean that would never lead to even more proof of it coming out. I mean it's not like he's a scared pussy who knows we have the dox to prove everything we say, is it?
 
He should definitely own us by saying the specific things we're wrong about. I mean that would never lead to even more proof of it coming out. I mean it's not like he's a scared pussy who knows we have the dox to prove everything we say, is it?
He should go back to page 950 of the thread and refute each and every post that is wrong and not stop until he gets all the way to the end of the thread. No matter how many days it takes. It would be epic ownage of the farms. We would NEVER recover from that. I'm sure he has enough coke and other drugs to keep going.

And if Kayla tries to stop him, he should just beat her. You know he wants to. Forcing him to have all those dam kids that wrecked her body. Making him waste his precious time with that home school nonsense. Slam that selfish cunt's head right through the wall Nicky. Imagine how good it would feel to BASH HER FUCKING BRAINS OUT. You know he want to.

Don't get me started on those DAM KIDS. Every read The Shining Nicky? It's about time you've made those kids TAKE THEIR MEDICINE!
 
Last edited:
He should go back to page 950 of the thread and refute each and every post that is wrong and not stop until he gets all the way to the end of the thread.
He might try that. But he wouldn't have much to say afterwards. Except that we were right, like we always are.
 
It was both the Keffals and the Schneider complaints, all resolved together
I think that must be true mainly because thats consistent with what I believe to be their usual practice with respect to complaints, namely that when a new complaint comes in they keep existing ones open and only dismiss them at the point where they're ready to dismiss all of them. Nick's ability to explain things concisely has atrophied to such an extent that he couldn't clearly state what had happened in 4 minutes of video.

If I had to speculate, I'd guess they were sniffing around the Schneider complaint for most of this year and the other complaints stayed along for the ride. I vaguely recall Nick saying something about how they had asked him for a follow up as to when exactly he obtained representation in the case, so that would seem to suggest they were actively probing it.

Didn't he read out precisely what the ethics office sent him with the complaints last year? I get that that was what got him in to trouble for one of the sets of complaints, but he could read out just what the office sent him without any reference to the complainants.
 
If I had to speculate, I'd guess they were sniffing around the Schneider complaint for most of this year and the other complaints stayed along for the ride. I vaguely recall Nick saying something about how they had asked him for a follow up as to when exactly he obtained representation in the case, so that would seem to suggest they were actively probing it.
Frankly Schneider's complaint was pretty bogus and more reflects his (justified) hatred toward Balldo Man than any merit. Still, that you're mad at an adverse party in litigation does not mean you have a valid bar complaint, and Schneider didn't. Seriously don't waste time on gay bullshit like that.
 
Frankly Schneider's complaint was pretty bogus and more reflects his (justified) hatred toward Balldo Man than any merit. Still, that you're mad at an adverse party in litigation does not mean you have a valid bar complaint, and Schneider didn't. Seriously don't waste time on gay bullshit like that.
I kind of wonder whether what they were interested in was less the specifics of what he said to insult Schneider and more about sorting out the very weird situation surrounding whether he was represented or not at various times.
 
I kind of wonder whether what they were interested in was less the specifics of what he said to insult Schneider and more about sorting out the very weird situation surrounding whether he was represented or not at various times.
Unless you're a client and the lawyer stole your money, just don't waste the time of the bar association with bullshit like this.
 
Back