US Ohio Voters Overwhelmingly Choose to Protect Abortion Rights

Link (Archive)

Ohio Voters Overwhelmingly Choose to Protect Abortion Rights​

Ohio voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly approved a ballot measure that will codify abortion rights in the state constitution, according to the New York Times. Issue 1—which will also enshrine the right to make decisions about birth control, miscarriage care, and fertility treatment—passed by a vote of 58% to 42%, with about 40% of the ballots in. An NBC News exit poll found that 60% of Ohio voters were unhappy with the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.

The victory came despite Republicans waging an all-out misinformation campaign on the amendment by claiming it would do things like strip parental rights and allow rapists to force survivors to have abortions.

The pro-choice position has now won in all seven states that have put abortion on the ballot since the fall of Roe, with Ohio becoming the firstaffirmative” abortion victory in a Republican-leaning state. (Previous pro-choice wins in red states like Kansas and Kentucky came via voters rejecting anti-abortion measures with a “no” vote. Affirmative abortion votes have come in the heavily Democratic states of California, Michigan, and Vermont.) In 2020, Donald Trump won 53% of the vote in Ohio to Joe Biden’s 45%.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D) told reporters before the race was called that Ohioans are pro-choice. Manu Raju tweeted that Brown told him: “Ohio has a 6-week ban. The Republicans have done all they can to obscure that, to make it sound like ‘we should be doing something reasonable, let the legislators do what they want.’ Voters reject that.”

Conservatives and activists desperately wanted to break their losing streak on statewide abortion votes, but Ohio lawmakers’ zeal to try to thwart the ballot measure may have come back to bite them. Buckeye state Republicans tried everythingto stop Issue 1, including authorizing an August special election on whether to raise the threshold that ballot measures need to pass from 50% to 60%. That effort failed by a stunning 14 points, and it cost the anti-abortion side a lot of time, money, and goodwill with voters. (A little more than 3 million voters turned out in August for that proxy vote on abortion.)

Gov. Mike DeWine (R) stayed out of the August election, but appeared in a lecturing ad claiming that Issue 1 is “just not right for Ohio.” DeWine obscured the fact that the ballot measure would be the deciding factor in whether a six-week abortion ban he signed in 2019 would snap back into effect, and he made other absurd claims about what would happen if people voted for it. DeWine won re-election last year by 25 points, but it appears people don’t care to listen to him when it comes to bodily autonomy.

Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose (R), who is running to be the Republican nominee for Senate in 2024, also got involved. He ordered the purge of nearly 27,000 inactive voters in late September but didn’t announce the move as his office has done in the past. LaRose also drafted an amendment summary that appears at the top of the ballot that replaced the word “fetus” with “unborn child.” The state Supreme Court—where Gov. DeWine’s son Patrick serves as a justice—upheld the changes, and yet the amendment still passed.

In recent weeks, pro-choice supporters did begin to worry when two major newspapers made unexpected moves: The editorial board of Cleveland.com refused to take a side—instead allowing board members to write short essays on their stance—while the board at the Toledo Blade came out against Issue 1. But it appears those actions didn’t matter.

Ohioans have been waiting to hear if the state Supreme Court will uphold the currently blocked six-week abortion ban, but now that Issue 1 passed and the right to choose an abortion will go in the state constitution, the ban has no legal legsto stand on.

National groups seized on the Ohio election as a potential turning point. David Bereit, an anti-abortion activist who founded the group 40 Days for Life said during a webcast in late October that groups like his were banking a lot on the results. “This is not just Ohio’s struggle. For all of us, this is a national tipping point moment,” he said, per Politico. “The outcome here can and will dictate the trajectory for the entire United States, whether it’s to bolster or to thwart the abortion agenda from coast to coast.”
That trajectory is now decidedly pro-abortion.

Advocates in states including Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Missouri, Nebraska, and Nevada are already working to get abortion measures on their ballots for 2024.
 
Even though I'm pro-abortion (within certain limits), I can totally understand why the right tries to pull everything they can to change the minds of people, even if it's lies. For those activists, allowing abortion is allowing murder in mass scale. So...all bets are off. 🤷
 
the incels on A&N's brains short circuit when theres a conflict between hating women and hating niggers. they usually just change the topic.
LMAO! Stay mad Salon Fat. Cry more about other women's vaginas and abortion. Women like you, Disgruntled Pupper and AR make me root for the trannies. Get over yourself you vapid ho's. As for abortion, who gives a shit? Only insane and repulsive women like AR, Disgruntled Pupper and Freya are obsessed with abortion. I cared more about marijuna getting legalized then I did about abortion. I told family I have there that the moment they legalize marijuna they are going to get all the scum fucks and homeless moving to Ohio in droves like they did for Washington. Reason why the homeless problem got so bad in Washington was in part because marijuna getting legalized. Ohio has a bad enough homeless problem. With marijuna now being legalized it is only going to get worse.
 
Last edited:
Sounds good. States can hold votes and decide on their own rules.
That was why they overturned Roe v. Wade in the first place. Both Trump and Ginsberg thought it would be better for states to decide whatever or not to have abortion be legalized or not instead of the federal government deciding it. I think that is a good thing. A person in California shouldn't decided abortion laws for the people of Florida and vice versa. Different states feel differently about abortion and it is up to the people to decide whatever they want it or not. As for Ohio, Ohio is quite a strange state. I have family there and they tell me that during voting season there is two things that both Republicans and Democrats should never touch and that is Abortion laws and Gun Rights. Ohio for years has voted against outlawing abortion. At the same time Ohio voted in droves to be a constitutional carry state and will kill the career of any wanabee politician that advocates for gun restriction. Ohio is, in the sense of the word, a Purple State. While considered a Deep Red state the people at their core are Purple. It just the Democrats have gotten so batshit insane over the years that Ohio considers itself a Red State now.
 
Ohio has a bad enough homeless problem. With marijuna now being legalized it is only going to get worse.
I disagree; weed is a much more financially supportable habit than heroin, and Ohio has a massive heroin problem. Legal weed might help some of those junkies find a more financially sustainable and socially acceptable high, keeping them in housing and employment. Moreover, with the number of states that have legalized or decriminalized marijuana at this point why in the fuck would any of them come to shithole Ohio?
 
Legal weed might help some of those junkies find a more financially sustainable and socially acceptable high
Most people who use marijuana do not go on to use other, “harder” drugs.4 People who use marijuana and do go on to use other drugs (including alcohol and tobacco) may have a higher risk of dependence or addiction to those drugs, especially if they started using marijuana at an early age and use it frequently.4-6
Reading a bit between the lines here, those who do move onto harder drugs are probably not going to go back since they have the taste for a harder habit.
Enforcement is the only thing that has ever lowered drug use but it comes at a cost and is not the perfect solution.
 
Any article on abortion summons AR. It’s like witchcraft, but instead of summoning something cool like a demon, you just get a sperg.
She prolly searches this shit up on the daily.
Any bets on when she gets aborted to the woman dimension this time with her thirty dollar haircut from her uncle?
the incels on A&N's brains short circuit when theres a conflict between hating women and hating niggers. they usually just change the topic.
Oh hey it’s the one most likely to lop off her tits to own the chuds.
Please put me in your trannifesto btw not like anyone is gonna see it.
 
That was why they overturned Roe v. Wade in the first place. Both Trump and Ginsberg thought it would be better for states to decide whatever or not to have abortion be legalized or not instead of the federal government deciding it. I think that is a good thing. A person in California shouldn't decided abortion laws for the people of Florida and vice versa. Different states feel differently about abortion and it is up to the people to decide whatever they want it or not. As for Ohio, Ohio is quite a strange state. I have family there and they tell me that during voting season there is two things that both Republicans and Democrats should never touch and that is Abortion laws and Gun Rights. Ohio for years has voted against outlawing abortion. At the same time Ohio voted in droves to be a constitutional carry state and will kill the career of any wanabee politician that advocates for gun restriction. Ohio is, in the sense of the word, a Purple State. While considered a Deep Red state the people at their core are Purple. It just the Democrats have gotten so batshit insane over the years that Ohio considers itself a Red State now.

Beforehand, certain States could hide under the cover of, "It's a federal law. Every citizen has this right."

Here's the issue, though. Do you remember learning about the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857? In that case, the issue at hand was, are slaves people or property? How can a slave be a person in one state but then stripped of all his rights and essentially his humanity in another state? Let's put that forward to today. Is the child in the womb a person or is it not a person? How can a child be a person in one state but then stripped of all its rights and essentially its humanity in another state?

See, even if you have one state deciding one thing and another state deciding the opposite, the fundamental question has still been left unanswered. Is it up to state authority to determine what is and isn't a human being? Or should that determination be left to a higher power or ultimate authority?

Anyone with a moral backbone in Ohio ought to vote with their feet ASAP is what I'm saying.
 
Last edited:
I am not pro-abortion. I think it would be wonderful if no woman ever even had to consider having one. But I don't get to make that decision for someone else. End of.
I am not pro drunk driving. I think it would be wonderful if no driver had to to drive drunk. But I don't get to make that descision for someone else. End of.
 
Sounds good. States can hold votes and decide on their own rules.
Problem is that there's an overwhelmingly common position that you can't just let other states do what they want.

I blame Lincoln as usual.
Republicans need to start focusing on actual issues
That repopulation rate problem is an actual issue, but everyone in the country will find that out soon enough.

The cultural change brought about by abortion being legal to the extent that it is, and widespread at that, admittedly is more cancerous and contributory to that problem than abortion in and of itself, but still.
 
That repopulation rate problem is an actual issue
Americans in general are simply having less or no children due to public policy that eats the young to feed boomer retirements, and other structurally anti-natal policy.

I guarantee for every baby niggers abort you have 100 that are not born to everyone else.
 
ohio dangerjpg.jpg
 

Reading a bit between the lines here, those who do move onto harder drugs are probably not going to go back since they have the taste for a harder habit.
Enforcement is the only thing that has ever lowered drug use but it comes at a cost and is not the perfect solution.
Wow, an article that was researching the exact opposite thing I was talking about. Cool, thanks man. Here, maybe try this one instead dipshit
 
The various RINOs, uniparty stooges, and useless Christcucks will never let abortion and an eventual contraception ban go, no matter how many times their retarded shit is smacked down. If they do, what other smokescreen do they have to pretend to be doing something without actually doing anything? Without abortion people might start to wonder why """"conservatives""" give no fucks about deporting the millions of invaders this country hosts and fixing asylum laws, or why Biden and his staff aren't on trial for treason for violating he first amendment, or why they don't do anything about the federal reserve worsening inflation, or....
The people most likely to want what you want. For republicans to actually do something all support abortion bans.
 
Wow, an article that was researching the exact opposite thing I was talking about. Cool, thanks man. Here, maybe try this one instead dipshit
  • Cannabis alleviates self-reported opioid withdrawal symptoms.
  • In summary, these data suggest that the co-users of opioids and cannabis endorse cannabis as a method for reducing opioid withdrawal severity.
Your study is garbage. Its a suggestion that maybe it could possibility might be a thing and more money is needed because reasons.
 
  • Cannabis alleviates self-reported opioid withdrawal symptoms.
  • In summary, these data suggest that the co-users of opioids and cannabis endorse cannabis as a method for reducing opioid withdrawal severity.
Your study is garbage. Its a suggestion that maybe it could possibility might be a thing and more money is needed because reasons.
Dude, your talking to a libshit druggie who doesn't have to live with the consequences of people legalizing weed such as increased crime, drugs and homelessness. It is best not to engage with such people. It is like engaging with a Salon Fat. It is a waste of time and you just lose brain cells.
 
Back