Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[AnOminous]

I mean, othrwise? Putting your nuts in a truss thing to force them to say parallel and then shoving all that into your wife and stimulating her to orgasm - that doesn't sound like fun. A ruptured testicle is what it sounds like.

It would be funny if he castrated himself with that thing. It reminds me of the thing they use to castrate pigs.

Rekieta defended Ty a month or so ago by saying Ty feels terrible but was being so kind for being silent and taking all the blame for the Vic case and implied that other people fucked up too, which in my mind could imply multiple groups of people. I 'm interested if he commented any further on last night's show.

I'm honestly not seeing where. I mean I was pretty unimpressed by the quality of filings by all sides (again except Sam Johnson), and multiple people were clearly working on the many lengthy filings, as style and typography would drastically change sometimes even in the same section. The writing was also not terribly inspiring. However, they were all at least workmanlike quality. Really the worst thing about them was a profusion of often duplicative or weirdly formatted exhibits, but better that than leaving something out that turns out important later.

However, these quibbles aside, the briefs would not have killed the case. They stated the arguments clearly enough to be understood even by Chupp.

Not having any of the affidavits admitted into evidence, though, was huge. I don't think it should have been, nor do I think the appeals court should have hung their hat on that, but I'm just some (biased) guy and the panel is three Texas appellate judges.

This only could have happened had Ty, a) chose to file at the very last minute, b) submitted something fundamentally fucked up because of his own notarizations, and c) signed a bad Rule 11 agreement that the appellate panel used as a justification for why a day late re-filing with corrected "sworn declarations" instead of notarized affidavits, which would have been sufficient in the first place, should have excluded them from evidence.

This fatal, triple-barrelled blunder could have been avoided by dotting ts and crossing is before the drop dead deadline, just using sworn declarations in the first place, or using a qualified notary to do remote notarizations, none of which would have been difficult or expensive. So for want of getting a detail that would have been free or a couple hundred bucks to get right, a million dollars and years of everyone's time got flushed down the toilet.

This is the kind of thing that will probably haunt him for the rest of his life. It is the nightmare scenario. It is the kind of thing lawyers wake up in a cold sweat in the middle of the night worried they did.

I'm sure he's sorry about it, but I'm also sure that despite Nick's slithering, it really was this one thing Ty did that sunk the ship.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

Ty is apparently out, and has been for some time. Martinez seems to be Vic's remaining attorney for the purposes of wrapping things up.

Basically Martinez seems to have the unenviable task of trying to limit the financial pain Vic will feel from Ty's fuckup. I wish him luck.

That was my understanding.

Frankly, I'm appalled the fat windbag is still showing his face on Nick's show.

The case was fucked up way beyond the point where "He feels really bad, dood" is a sufficient response.

Any contrition that is not backed by money is not worth anything.

Plus the low superchat figure brought a smile to my face. Utterly shocking nobody wants to hear Ty bloviate anymore.

Yeah, just over $150. Ralph numbers, maybe sub-Ralph numbers actually, not sure. Nobody in his audience cares or maybe even knows who the guy is nor cares about the topics they were discussing. He told people who wanted "serious" law or politics discussion to fuck off.

Why would you say that and then go back to trying to get the people you told to stop giving you money to restart giving you money?

He has made numerous claims to the effect that he has crazy sex with his wife and uses all kinds of contraptions on her. He even claims to travel with a suitcase full of sextoys/bondage equipment. He's also claimed to have used the balldo on her at least twice, I just saw an Elisa clip to that effect in the last couple-three days.

Yes., he even gave it a cute name: the "Field Kit".

He told multiple stories about traveling with the "Field Kit". I believe the story with one of the trips, maybe the Vegas trip was that they bought so much clothes that the contents of the field kit ended up having to get spread out across two different suitcases on the way back or something, but it was almost a year ago now so I may be wrong.

One thing to keep in mind is that if they have enough sex toys to fill a suitcase the balldo is probably the tip of the iceberg and not even the most insane thing in there.

 

[Anticipointment]

He told multiple stories about traveling with the "Field Kit". I believe the story with one of the trips, maybe the Vegas trip was that they bought so much clothes that the contents of the field kit ended up having to get spread out across two different suitcases on the way back or something, but it was almost a year ago now so I may be wrong.

On the way back the TSA had to search the “field kit” suitcase, which included the pope hat.
Nick seemed to get off on both the fact that the bag was searched & by telling the story to his audience.
No embarrassment or shame about it, just gleeful pride & self congratulations.

 

[Wendy Wheelchair]

I haven't watched Nick's rant yet, but there has been some theological discussion on whether anyone actually goes to hell, or if they do, that they are there for eternity. There are some schools of thought in Orthodoxy for example that teach that hell is temporary and not eternal. The idea revolves around God's eternal Justice, vs eternal Mercy. How can you square meeting out righteous justice on those that need punishment vs the infinite mercy of God?

Part of it, too, is that “hell” is merely the absence of God, so spending an entire life rejecting God, why wouldn’t God in a sense give you what you want?

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I haven't watched Nick's rant yet, but there has been some theological discussion on whether anyone actually goes to hell, or if they do, that they are there for eternity. There are some schools of thought in Orthodoxy for example that teach that hell is temporary and not eternal. The idea revolves around God's eternal Justice, vs eternal Mercy. How can you square meeting out righteous justice on those that need punishment vs the infinite mercy of God?

Nick's take on it is nothing so nuanced as that.

I am not out to start a religious argument with anyone in the thread (despite being deeply devout myself), but the fact that a VAST majority of the nonsense he spouts is antithetical to a similar majority of people who claim the title of 'Christian' puts the lie to his own claims.

I am more than happy to have a religious discussion with anyone, but in this thread I try to keep it about Nick and limit my own autism. The above is the most logically expedient way to show his inconsistency in a way that religious and non-religious people alike can appreciate without attending religious services or needing deep Biblical knowledge. Although, I do wish that people would be interested enough to attend...

Could have sworn it was recently in this thread that he has exorbitant payments on the mustang and navigator still?

I am 99% sure those are his insurance payments he is talking about. It was in the same bitch fit where he said he pays 18k USD for health insurance for his family.

 

[elb]

Do we know if they actually use those toys/do that stuff? Like, has he said that they do somewhere?

They have a sex toy suitcase, starts around 6:32. This clip was probably my first “some of this feels like tmi” moment. I’m pretty sure the suitcase travels with them regularly, he still references it occasionally

Edit: apparently I was late to the party, oops

 

[Balldo's Gate]

They have a sex toy suitcase, starts around 6:32. [..] I’m pretty sure the suitcase travels with them regularly, he still references it occasionally

Upon reflection I think there must be at least two specific stories about traveling with the sex toy field kit suitcase.

This one is older and I don't remember watching it; it seemingly was from before he gave it the name "field kit", since he calls it a "sexy suitcase".

I think there was another occasion on the Vegas trip where they bought so many clothes including the selection of aging rock star jackets that they had to mix the field kit across multiple suitcases to get everything to fit. Then he ended up forgetting that there was a sex toy in a different suitcase and that resulted in embarrassment. But maybe I'm misremembering.

This clip was probably my first “some of this feels like tmi” moment.

Based on the date of the clip that makes sense. It came out of nowhere in the summer of last year.

31197417,RekietaLaw,true,"@croMinion11 I gfought off 2 butches the other night, was hilarious",8813,false,0,2023-11-10 02:04:20 -0600 CST
31197417,RekietaLaw,true,"@croMinion11 Lady R is small and Cute, butch women are big and aggressive",8830,false,0,2023-11-10 02:04:57 -0600 CST

He didn't elaborate in last nights chat. He of course had to push a totally legit story of how women were fighting over him but he had no interest. Also he totally only loves Gollum.

I don't understand how he realizes how weird it is that allegedly every time he goes out somewhere, in each occasion with his wife, that he is set upon by women and has to reject them all.

This has long gone past the point of becoming a trope of the show. The first time I think it happened was the gay bar birthday trip. But it seemingly comes up every time he goes to any type of bar or club. Im confused why he doesn't realize that people will find this odd.

 

[TheRaptorJesus]

I accidentally tuned in the other day and I don't remember his camera being so blurry. Was it always that bad or am I just retarded.

 

[Not Who You Think]

I haven't watched Nick's rant yet, but there has been some theological discussion on whether anyone actually goes to hell, or if they do, that they are there for eternity. There are some schools of thought in Orthodoxy for example that teach that hell is temporary and not eternal. The idea revolves around God's eternal Justice, vs eternal Mercy. How can you square meeting out righteous justice on those that need punishment vs the infinite mercy of God?

Trying to keep this short (wish me luck).

People are often so preoccupied with human agency that they overlook the agency of the Lord. This leads to pitting the Lord's attributes against one another rather than discerning that the Lord has a will of His own that directs these attributes according to His own desires. Those who fail to account for what the Lord wants and give priority to their own interests (like Nick seems to be doing) tend to run into problems as they struggle to simplify the God of the universe.

People have historically been more comfortable with a god represented/bound by certain reducible attributes expressed via a pantheon (a god of death, a goddess of love) rather than a single omnipotent God of all creation with a will of His own who expresses a variety of attributes and is lacking in nothing. This makes Him impossible to control/predict/barter with, which is what some people are looking for in a deity (and why their relationship with their god tends to be so transactional).

The answer lies in accounting for the Lord's own agency and discerning what He wants (even if it is at odds with what we want) and not reducing Him to a dominant attribute. Hope this helps.

 

[not william stenchever]

I’m going to need to see some evidence that Nick doesn’t join in when he leaves his wife at home to visit Elijah in Texas.

"No, Nick. You can't be the top just because you crammed your balls into a silicone cage. I'm a faggot not a furry. If you want to fuck me in the ass you better be able to get it up you fucking queer. Now assume the position."

 

[Swole McPole]

I believe you but I've also seen far too many modern women online talking about how sex work is real work and they should be respected for being a whore cause 'they gotta get that money'. Very, very few of them are actually proud of being a whore even in the moment but they cope and sneed a lot about how they totally are.

Yes, I've seen those women. And to be fair, I've known a few who tried that line on in real life as well.

But I've never known one go home and boast to her father.
"Guess what, dad? I made $1,000 selling my snatch today. And I only had to fuck five men to do it."

That said, around two thirds of the sex workers I knew grew up in the care of the local authority. It's almost as though not having a father around damages people in some way, isn't it?

 

[Neetorino]

With regards to the "sexy suitcase" I have a strong memory of Nick saying one of their parents saw the vast collection in the suitcase after some trip. (The in-laws maybe?) It's entirely possible that the start of the breakdown between Nick and Our Wife's parents started with them learning how much of a degenerate he'd turned their daughter into.
Edit: I am currently at work or I'd go clip hunting myself.

 

[retard strength II]

Of all the sex toy nastiness and general TMI and religious blasphemy and legal failures Nick has going on in this thread lately, the concept of paying a company to ship you random fucking clothes that you may or may not like that may or may not fit, that his whole family is supposedly subscribed to, is the dumbest to me right now. Like, what the fuck? Is this a monthly or quarterly thing or what?

 

[AnOminous]

On the way back the TSA had to search the “field kit” suitcase, which included the pope hat.
Nick seemed to get off on both the fact that the bag was searched & by telling the story to his audience.
No embarrassment or shame about it, just gleeful pride & self congratulations.

He probably gets off on sickening people, like troons do.

 

[Swole McPole]

They pay to attend a boat load of activities. Dance, multiple instrument per child, debate, all thr driving, a nanny/driver, the 2k USD snack drawer, they use StitchFix for clothes for everyone.

That lazy do-nothing skank of a wife is so exhausted by being railed by big black cock all night that's she can't even be bothered to choose her own kids clothes?

What a fucking slapper. I wonder if they all look like little versions of Nick in his cheap suits and his nasty belt?

 

[elb]

I have a strong memory of Nick saying one of their parents saw the vast collection in the suitcase after some trip

He told a story about his dad walking in on them playing an adult card game (he gets to the point around 3:30ish). I don’t recall anyone finding the suitcase though

 

[AnOminous]

This makes Him impossible to control/predict/barter with, which is what some people are looking for in a deity (and why their relationship with their god tends to be so transactional).

IMO the worst of these are so-called "prosperity Christians" who seem to think the purpose of God is literally to give them money. I could see a different Nick (one that was actually a Christian) going in that direction.

 

[Doctor John B. Zyklon]

I accidentally tuned in the other day and I don't remember his camera being so blurry. Was it always that bad or am I just retarded.

It's his "new" (years ago at this point) camera. It was always dog shit. He claims it's 4k or some nonsense, but the feed is 360 or 480p. He claims that it's just so clear that people think it looks worse, and that there is a boca.

I don't know if the feed is low res, or it's a low bitrate, or what, but it's not set up correctly. He knows best of course.

 

[Vect]

I haven't watched Nick's rant yet, but there has been some theological discussion on whether anyone actually goes to hell, or if they do, that they are there for eternity. There are some schools of thought in Orthodoxy for example that teach that hell is temporary and not eternal. The idea revolves around God's eternal Justice, vs eternal Mercy. How can you square meeting out righteous justice on those that need punishment vs the infinite mercy of God?

Well, it's the classic Aquinas Paradox. God, as understood in most interpretations of Western theology, is an absolute force, and is very hard to reconcile with the concepts of objective evil and human agency, which is why people often quibble about the standards for salvation. That said, there is a case for Purgatory, a transient state that allows for purification, as opposed to damnation which is everlasting - as in, sin is punished, but there is a hard line somewhere between 'merely' doing penance and being irredeemable.

I think what Nick is trying to say about objective morality is that in the real world, where right and wrong is always muddied by context and nuance, which is after all what law deals with, adhering to an objective and thus absolute standard of morality is impractical. His comparison about sex work seems to be that objective moralists will claim that punishing or inhibiting it is for their own spiritual good, while at the same time caring nothing for their lives in a practical sense. Basically he seems to have in mind the hypocritical fundies that have been the usual poster child for the evils of organized religion for the past two decades.

Everything after that, however, sounds like he's trying to offer a technicality based defense of his own soul to St. Peter while in front of the Pearly Gates. "Where is it written specifically that I had to try to live an honest and moral life? Is it not written here, in your own (allegedly) First Epistle, Mr. Peter..."

It's pretty clear that Nick is classic example of a besserwisser, a very distinct kind of person that (in this case emboldened by lady liquor) pontificates authoritatively and radically on various subjects based on an extremely broad range of half remembered anecdotes and scraps of information. He's a nicer version of the guy sitting alone at the end of the bar at 10 in the evening watching Fox News on the mounted TV and telling you uninvited about how you can spot the alien lizard people.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Some relevant clips from Nick's Sidescroller Interview:


Nick addressed the claim he has changed:

Nick addressed the untrue stories about him: