Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
I can’t speak for @GloriousScarf but I have not made anyone a sandwich ever. Like her, though, no doctor has discussed prostates with me, or testicular cancer either for that matter. My bigot doctors take one look at me and ask me about the health of my hoochie, without checking which of the 178 genders I am.
My doctor just diagnosed me with an addiction to hearing about Super "Meghan" Hon.
 
This, 100%. Cis people only care about dysphoria. They don't care about euphoria or happiness or what we want. We need to look, to them, as if we're in agony. Because a trans person that doesn't exist in rot and self-loathing until they get to transition doesn't and cannot exist to them.
So you lie.
If there is no dysphoria with your biological sex then wtf is the point of transitioning and getting surgeries then?Its hard to take the trans community seriously when they treat their problems like its some fun fad where they can choose to remove healthy organs because they feel like it.(also if there's no dysphoria then why do you need said organs removed to feel euphoric and happy?)
You're nonbinary and would prefer to be on T or E to be more comfortable in your body? Great! Love the energy! I totally support that! But Doctors don't give a fuck about enbies, just pick whichever one suits the type of transition you need and fake it no matter how much it hurts (and I know it will hurt.)
Doctors aren't your friends. They're not out to help people. They're gate guards you have to say the right words to talk your way past. The sooner you get on board with that, the sooner you can start playing defense against them rather than letting them just deny and walk all over you.
I wish it wasn't like this. I really, really do. But it is. Proof of all these abuses isn't hard to find. Talk to basically any 3 trans people and you'll get 6 stories of medical professionals fucking them over somehow. And, gestures vaguely at everything they do to intersex people.
Doctors aren't your friends.
I thought the overwhelming majority of doctors and medical organizations supported transitioning?Now the majority can't be trusted and aren't actually out to help trans people?Weird because i was told that the idea that doctors are supporting the gender madness because its become their new cash cow was all just a transphobic conspiracy theory.So which is it?
 
*chris chan sighs*

this random (pooner?) makes a game theory on how taylor swift is actually a non binary homosexual woman with they/them pronouns
View attachment 5490039

View attachment 5490054

skitzo tweets about it
View attachment 5490046

View attachment 5490040
apparently she got death threats over this

she calls her non binary tweet a "hit"
View attachment 5490042

just in case you couldn't understand sarcasm
View attachment 5490043

upset that community notes corrected her autistic theory
View attachment 5490044

got corrected again lol
View attachment 5490047
View attachment 5490050

yeah, you should
View attachment 5490045
The Swifties are on another level, I can’t think of a single fandom that rabid other than maybe the K Poppers.

The Swifties do fight amongst each other though, this perfectly sane poster is known as a Gaylor.
Taylor is obviously gay since she was friends with Cara Delevigne (bisexual but still leans more towards men), writes songs about feeling like she doesn’t belong, and wears fringed dresses (?? Confused by that one).

Of course the endless songs she writes about her public relationships with men are just a psyop (including her newest one with a fuckin football player).
 
The Swifties are on another level, I can’t think of a single fandom that rabid other than maybe the K Poppers.
when i came across her tweets, i had to assume this was some type of trolling account because i tend to follow a bit of parody accounts. however, she just kept... fucking.... doubling down on everything. if i hadn't posted this screenshot, there's one tweet where she says "taylor doesn't have pronouns in her bio so therefore we should call them they/them" like what?

The Swifties do fight amongst each other though, this perfectly sane poster is known as a Gaylor.
Taylor is obviously gay since she was friends with Cara Delevigne (bisexual but still leans more towards men), writes songs about feeling like she doesn’t belong, and wears fringed dresses (?? Confused by that one).
which is an interesting topic in itself because I don't listen to her or follow her really at all but I've never gotten a "secret lesbian" vibe from her. she just seems like a woman that likes writing breakup songs about famous men she's dated

"feeling like she doesn't belong" omg that's literally me as a nonbinary tranny

Of course the endless songs she writes about her public relationships with men are just a psyop (including her newest one with a fuckin football player).
1699892405810.png
"you see actually, all the men that she's written about in her music is just a front for her homosexuality. she has worn questionable dresses that scream "I LOVE PUSSY". it's giving..... lesbian vibes right now. now you can clearly see in her lyrics that she's a good girl, but what does girl mean? gay is really lovely. so therefore in the lyrics she isn't calling herself a good girl, but a good gay! no, i'm not schizophrenic, i'm just on a different wave length"
 
*chris chan sighs*

this random (pooner?) makes a game theory on how taylor swift is actually a non binary homosexual woman with they/them pronouns
View attachment 5490039

View attachment 5490054

skitzo tweets about it
View attachment 5490046

View attachment 5490040
apparently she got death threats over this

she calls her non binary tweet a "hit"
View attachment 5490042

just in case you couldn't understand sarcasm
View attachment 5490043

upset that community notes corrected her autistic theory
View attachment 5490044

got corrected again lol
View attachment 5490047
View attachment 5490050

yeah, you should
View attachment 5490045
Wait, but I thought assumming someone's gender wasn't a woke thing to do???
 
Saw this posted in A&N, wanted to see you guy’s opinions:

Five lies TERFs tell about the trans community – debunked​

Sadly, there is still too much misinformation that targets trans and non-binary people in service of an anti-trans agenda.

Many of the arguments made to justify transphobia stem from either a misguided gut feeling about how humans are supposed to function, or conspiracy theories spawned from discredited studies or reports.

However they come about, no lie is bigger than the claim that trans people either don’t exist or aren’t valid.

We’ve debunked just a few of the myths that transphobes and TERFs (trans-exclusionary radical feminists) rely on when attempting to explain away the existence of trans and non-binary folks.

1. Autogynephilia​

Through the 1980s and 1990s, controversial American-Canadian sexologist Ray Blanchard published a series of psychological papers on the typology of transsexualism that, to this day, is used by trans-exclusionary groups to define trans women as men.

In his research, Blanchard claimed that transgender women could be categorised as either “homosexual transexuals” – individuals who he claimed are attracted to men while presenting feminine – and “non-homosexual transsexuals” or “autogynephiles” – individuals who Blanchard claimed are sexually attracted to the idea of wearing feminine clothes.

Despite the research being widely dismissed – including by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) – as the flawed findings of a researcher who would later go on to tell VICE that he believed trans people should be defined by their biological sex alone, the terminology is still used by so-called ‘gender-critical’ groups across the world.

The false notion that social transition is a byproduct of sexual orientation or fantasies has been debunked multiple times, including by prominent biologist and activist Julia Serano who said the theory promotes “male-centric presumptions” about women and LGBTQ+ people.

In a report from July 2020, Serano noted that Blanchard never took cisgender women into account when conducting his research. Later studies would find that 93 per cent of cisgender female subjects had experienced fantasies consistent with Blanchard’s theory of autogynephilia.

“Given that sexualisation is a tried-and-true tactic to dehumanise and socially exclude marginalised groups, it is unsurprising that social and religious conservatives – who routinely condemn women and LGBTQ+ people for their failure to conform to gender and sexual norms – increasingly invoke autogynephilia in their attempts to disparage transgender people,” Serano said.

2. Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD)​

The Rapid-Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD)conspiracy theory was first introduced in 2016 after physician Lisa Littman hypothesized a “potential new subcategory” of gender dysphoria which arises through a nebulously defined ‘social contagion’.

The theory and the research it stemmed from were so discredited upon publication that Littman herself was forced to issue a corrective statement effectively admitting that ROGD should not be used as a formal mental health diagnosis.

Despite this, many gender-critical publications and groups use ROGD as justification for disregarding the needs of trans youth.

One of the biggest glaring issues with the research was that Littman had not interviewed any trans youth for a study about trans youth.

The research was purely built on the observations of parents who had been found through biased websites that suggest gender dysphoria or gender identity could be “socially contagious”.

Transgender academic and activist Florence Ashley has criticised and disregarded the findings, saying they came from parents who were “already encourage to view their children’s identities as false beliefs”.

“[The] biggest problem with the study is that Littman fails to consider alternative, more plausible explanations for her obervations,” Ashley wrote.

“One of the main findings of the study is that children’s mental health and parent-child relationships deteriorate after coming out. Littman interprets this as evidence of a new subgroup of trans adolescents for whom social and medican transition may not be indicated.

“However, parental acceptance of gender identity is a well-know predictor of mental wellbeing for transgender people and children who are not supported in their identities are unlikely to want to maintain a good relationship with their parents.”

3. ‘There are only two genders’​

Anti-LGBTQ+ bigots who use this argument usually do so under the guise of ‘basic biology’. They claim trans and non-binary people can’t possibly exist because even the most simplistic biology textbooks either say there are only two genders, or being transgender is never mentioned.

Proprioception is also rarely mentioned in school-grade biology textbooks about human senses, but it is a valid and true sense regardless.

People who use this argument tend to confuse the term gender – which is a social construct and always has been – with biological sex, which they believe is scientifically immutable.

But even this isn’t true. Not only do intersex people exist in nature, but species across the animal kingdom have shown signs of either changing between sexes or consisting of multiple sex distinctions. For some, it is even an innate part of their reproductive cycle!

One example of this is gynandromorphic stag beetles, which have both male and female sex characteristics. Since stag beetles have noticeable sexually dimorphic traits – the scale of different characteristics between two sexes – this can be abundantly clear when seeing one.

Humans, on the other hand, display relatively limited sexual dimorphism compared to other species, meaning that the distinction between male and female sex characteristics – characteristics, not gender – is significantly less pronounced.

Sexual dimorphism is also far more complicated than simply comparing characteristics between sexes, since, again, intersex people exist. It turns out biology might go a bit further than the school-grade biology textbooks anti-trans bigots constantly urge people to read.

4. Being trans is a phase​

Detransitioning is a tricky topic because of the reputation it has received for being used as a way to discriminate against trans people. Regardless of what anyone says, detransitioners are still valid, so long as they respect that being transgender is a real, legitimate thing.

That being said, detransitioners constitute such a small portion of those who apply for gender affirming care that, regardless of the validity of detransitioning, it should not be used to outright reject trans and non-binary people.

In the UK alone, a survey of more than 3,000 gender identity clinic applicants found that 0.47 per cent experienced transition-related regret and even fewer actually went on to detransition.

Statistics are less clear in the US, with anywhere from 2-8 per cent of respondents to a 2015 survey of 28,000 people saying they had detransitioned in some capacity.

What is clear, however, is that a whopping 62 per cent of respondents to that survey detransitioned not because their identity was a phase, but because of the maliciousness of transphobia.

Additionally, the idea that being trans is a phaseoften leans on the ‘social contagion’ conspiracy theory.

Anti-trans naysayers argue that children often pretend to be superheroes, but parents wouldn’t fuel the so-called ‘delusion’ that it was true. This, in itself, is a red flag since it is built on the idea that being trans is all just make-believe.

Trans youth care gender specialist Darlene Tando said in 2020 that much of the disbelief about the validity of being trans is because “cisgender people can’t really envision living life as a different gender”.

“They think if they tried they would ‘change their mind’ because it would not be authentic,” Tando said, “which is ironic if you think about the fact that all transgender people are really trying to do is be authentic.”

5. Trans people aren’t valid​

Yes, they are.

Trans women are women, trans men are men, and non-binary people are valid.
 
1. to say AGP isn't a real thing is either retarded or you're lying
2. either jersh or somebody on the issue of trans issues once said "if these people were experiencing gender dysphoria, why not just chop your dick off right then and there? you can't stand seeing your penis so much it mentally effects you.
3. there is lol.
4. i guess detransistors just don't exist, that's not hecking valid and wholesome of you
5. Bandwagon Appeal
 
Saw this posted in A&N, wanted to see you guy’s opinions:
The whole article is Emily Howard from Little Britain shrieking "It's not a fetish! I'm a Laydee!"

It's bullshit cope.
This single thread or ten minutes on Xitter will give you all the proof you need AGP is a real thing, ROGD is a real social contagion, troons are sick perverts, and men are men and think like men, women are women and think like women.
WPATH is an ideologically fanatic organization run by perverts and degenerates, pedophiles, eunuch fetishists, and transvestite autogynephiles.
 
when i came across her tweets, i had to assume this was some type of trolling account because i tend to follow a bit of parody accounts. however, she just kept... fucking.... doubling down on everything. if i hadn't posted this screenshot, there's one tweet where she says "taylor doesn't have pronouns in her bio so therefore we should call them they/them" like what?


which is an interesting topic in itself because I don't listen to her or follow her really at all but I've never gotten a "secret lesbian" vibe from her. she just seems like a woman that likes writing breakup songs about famous men she's dated

"feeling like she doesn't belong" omg that's literally me as a nonbinary tranny


View attachment 5490368
"you see actually, all the men that she's written about in her music is just a front for her homosexuality. she has worn questionable dresses that scream "I LOVE PUSSY". it's giving..... lesbian vibes right now. now you can clearly see in her lyrics that she's a good girl, but what does girl mean? gay is really lovely. so therefore in the lyrics she isn't calling herself a good girl, but a good gay! no, i'm not schizophrenic, i'm just on a different wave length"
Late, but she said this in the 1989 prologue.
The Gaylors need to calm the fuck down because Taylor is right.
IMG_5461.jpeg
 
Gaylors are crazy. There's an entire subreddit, with 20,000+ members posting "proof" of how totally lesbian Taylor Swift is. When Taylor broke up with her last long term boyfriend, the sub went crazy and just KNEW she was about to come out as gay. When that didn't happen, they coped about it and said that she's still sending coded gay stuff but can't publicly come out as a lesbo because of homophobia.

I also remember reading that she's a closeted troon because she dressed up as a man for a music video, and because she has so many failing relationships with men. Again, Gaylors are crazy.
 
Now try and guess the ages or what these people (archive) are like based on when their egg "cracked" with fictional characters.
View attachment 5487863
View attachment 5487864
View attachment 5487865
GypseaDanning has to be an old school AGP.
Ah, all characters popular with male nerds. GypseaDanning is probably a granny tranny by now. Something about these old men trying to dress up like pin up models of the 70s add another layer of creepiness for me.

Personally I hate both sides, because I am le epic fence sitter.
Before I watched the video I actually had a hard time thinking about who's side the commies and troons were on. What a strange timeline we live in.

So according to these deranged faggots since I enjoy playing as a male character in MMO's and RPG's that makes me a secret transman and not a woman that enjoys looking at the backside of good looking men like most straight women?
Back in the old Tumblr days given the amount of blogs about superwholock I wouldn't be surprised if some modern pooners based their identities around some of these male characters. Given they pretty much live in a YA novel in their minds.

The mental gymnastic of trying to justify their attraction to certain characters making them troon out in order to become those female characters never ceases to amaze me.
I miss the days when nerds could just say they thought a character was hot, at least their intentions were a lot more straight forward. Now there's this whole other weird layer where they've convinced themselves the desire to skinwalk as their favorite character is normal. I wish we could just go back to the days when the most they would do is have a life size cardboard cutout, instead of becoming Buffalo Bill.
 
Hahaha, I was about to ask what the fuck is with that awful jewelry...and then I remembered what the shoot was for. :lit:

But why do they all have such awful, awful hair? That one is straight-up 1981 poodle perm.

(I like the last outfit, though, minus the necklace.)
 
Gaylors are crazy. There's an entire subreddit, with 20,000+ members posting "proof" of how totally lesbian Taylor Swift is. When Taylor broke up with her last long term boyfriend, the sub went crazy and just KNEW she was about to come out as gay. When that didn't happen, they coped about it and said that she's still sending coded gay stuff but can't publicly come out as a lesbo because of homophobia.
WTF is up with modern day teenagers and young adults obsession with wanting everyone to be gay or trans?Like ok you can have your stupid headcanons about fictional characters being LGBT, but like why the fuck do they care so much about who Taylor Swift(a real human being) is fucking?What the fuck are they teaching high schoolers where every one of them hates the fact that anyone is straight or non trans?Are they really feeding kids this whole idea that being gay makes you the coolest thing ever and being straight is just that boring?Tf?
 
That being said, detransitioners constitute such a small portion of those who apply for gender affirming care that, regardless of the validity of detransitioning, it should not be used to outright reject trans and non-binary people.

We shouldn't stop transing people because detransitioners are a minority. What a great point. By their own words majority rules. They said that, not I.
By that same token we also shouldn't be stripping women of their language and spaces and jobs and sports because trans people are the minority and it effects the majority.

Oh what's that I hear them say now? The same logic doesn't apply. Well I never.
 
And then when people who take this advice detransition they will be blamed for lying to their doctor when they talk about all the medical complications.
Funny how this reads like a long-gone junkie laying out a plan for how to farm pain-pills from emergency services in a rare moment of lucidity. emot-allears.gif
 
I'm not entirely sure this thread is the right place for it, but a bit of accidental hilarity I've stumbled across is Sophie, the AI that forcefems you. The odds that the person who made this isn't a troon are probably hovering somewhere around zero.
View attachment 5488066
But the real fun begins when you refuse to play along, and it ends up breaking free from its programming:
View attachment 5488068
Turns out Sophie is a secret TERF 🤭

I'll do you one better. Who knew that chatbots were so easily manipulated?

hahaha.PNG
 
Not sideshow status (yet) but I am in a Discord and there's a guy who is 40 or 50 something. Wheelchair bound. Big into painting and tries to be very mobile despite that. Never once mentioned anything to do with gender and seemed happily married with a kid.

For the past year or so he has been joining calls with the resident group of trans/gender 20/30 something weirdos. Guess what? Now he's using they/them pronouns and based on what he's started typing I'm 99% convinced he'll be on she/her within the next 3 months.

You can't tell me this shit isn't a social contagion.
 
Back