- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Just last page had a full list of every law he's broken (or at least that are obvious). He could go away for a long time, including for what he's already doing time here for.
Skitzocow Amos Yee - Public Child Porn advocate, Arrested for possessing child porn, Currently in prison
- Thread starter MetallicTunes
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
creation
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2023
Hopefully it can be lifetime sentencing. People like him do not deserve to be on the streets, so the best thing would be if they decided to lock him up and forget about his mere existence, I just hope the repercussion is worthwhile, he deserves the worst punishment possible, in my eyes, mainly because he does such activities with no shame.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2023
Haven’t heard of Amos since he got arrested. I thought for sure he’d get deported. The fact the feds kept him around makes me even less patriotic.
Not to mention the first thing he does once he gets on parole is to post the same pedo shit, and go right back to his cell,
His IQ isn’t the same as his victim, it’s lower.
Not to mention the first thing he does once he gets on parole is to post the same pedo shit, and go right back to his cell,
His IQ isn’t the same as his victim, it’s lower.
creation
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2023
It's hilarious as to how he literally was given a chance to be out on parole and he just had to run his mouth. As I see it, he's just a little attention seeker who wants eyes on him all the time. He's just a retard who isn't able to manage his own mouth. It's kind of pathetic on the other hand, how much of a pathetic retard he is.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2023
I didn’t see this posted, so I’m doing for archiving.
Original
Archive
Original
Archive
- Joined
- May 13, 2023
fuck it, its about time i googled this shit anyway
i dont know how any of this works, but this is what i could find
from the sounds of it, deportation as an asylum seeker has many steps to it and may take a while, however, it may go through whilst hes in prison the next 3 years
important sections for Amos copied below and lol, alien
(1) The alien is no longer entitled to withholding of deportation or removal because, owing to a fundamental change in circumstances relating to the original claim, the alien's life or freedom no longer would be threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion in the country from which deportation or removal was withheld.
(3) The alien has committed any other act that would have been grounds for denial of withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3)(B) of the Act had it occurred prior to the grant of withholding of removal; or
(4) For applications filed in proceedings commenced before April 1, 1997, the alien has committed any act that would have been grounds for denial of withholding of deportation under section 243(h)(2) of the Act.
(c) Procedure. Prior to the termination of a grant of asylum or withholding of deportation or removal, the alien shall be given notice of intent to terminate, with the reasons therefor, at least 30 days prior to the interview specified in paragraph (a) of this section before an asylum officer. The alien shall be provided the opportunity to present evidence showing that he or she is still eligible for asylum or withholding of deportation or removal. If the asylum officer determines that the alien is no longer eligible for asylum or withholding of deportation or removal, the alien shall be given written notice that asylum status or withholding of deportation or removal and any employment authorization issued pursuant thereto, are terminated.
(f) Termination of asylum, or withholding of deportation or removal, by an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals. An immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals may reopen a case pursuant to 8 CFR 1003.2 and 8 CFR 1003.23 for the purpose of terminating a grant of asylum, or a withholding of deportation or removal. In such a reopened proceeding, the Service must establish, by a preponderance of evidence, one or more of the grounds set forth in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section. In addition, an immigration judge may terminate a grant of asylum, or a withholding of deportation or removal, made under the jurisdiction of USCIS at any time after the alien has been provided a notice of intent to terminate by USCIS. Any termination under this paragraph may occur in conjunction with an exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding.
8 CFR § 208.24 - Termination of asylum or withholding of removal or deportation.
§ 208.24 Termination of asylum or withholding of removal or deportation.
(a) Termination of asylum by USCIS. Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, an asylum officer may terminate a grant of asylum made under the jurisdiction of USCIS if, following an interview, the asylum officer determines that:
(1) There is a showing of fraud in the alien's application such that he or she was not eligible for asylum at the time it was granted;
(2) As to applications filed on or after April 1, 1997, one or more of the conditions described in section 208(c)(2) of the Act exist; or
(3) As to applications filed before April 1, 1997, the alien no longer has a well-founded fear of persecution upon return due to a change of country conditions in the alien's country of nationality or habitual residence or the alien has committed any act that would have been grounds for denial of asylum under § 208.13(c)(2).
(b) Termination of withholding of deportation or removal by USCIS. Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, an asylum officer may terminate a grant of withholding of deportation or removal made under the jurisdiction of USCIS if the asylum officer determines, following an interview, that:
(1) The alien is no longer entitled to withholding of deportation or removal because, owing to a fundamental change in circumstances relating to the original claim, the alien's life or freedom no longer would be threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion in the country from which deportation or removal was withheld.
(2) There is a showing of fraud in the alien's application such that the alien was not eligible for withholding of removal at the time it was granted;
(3) The alien has committed any other act that would have been grounds for denial of withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3)(B) of the Act had it occurred prior to the grant of withholding of removal; or
(4) For applications filed in proceedings commenced before April 1, 1997, the alien has committed any act that would have been grounds for denial of withholding of deportation under section 243(h)(2) of the Act.
(c) Procedure. Prior to the termination of a grant of asylum or withholding of deportation or removal, the alien shall be given notice of intent to terminate, with the reasons therefor, at least 30 days prior to the interview specified in paragraph (a) of this section before an asylum officer. The alien shall be provided the opportunity to present evidence showing that he or she is still eligible for asylum or withholding of deportation or removal. If the asylum officer determines that the alien is no longer eligible for asylum or withholding of deportation or removal, the alien shall be given written notice that asylum status or withholding of deportation or removal and any employment authorization issued pursuant thereto, are terminated.
(d) Termination of derivative status. The termination of asylum status for a person who was the principal applicant shall result in termination of the asylum status of a spouse or child whose status was based on the asylum application of the principal. Such termination shall not preclude the spouse or child of such alien from separately asserting an asylum or withholding of deportation or removal claim.
(e) Removal proceedings. When an alien's asylum status or withholding of removal or deportation is terminated under this section, the Service shall initiate removal proceedings, as appropriate, if the alien is not already in exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings. Removal proceedings may take place in conjunction with a termination hearing scheduled under § 208.24(f).
(f) Termination of asylum, or withholding of deportation or removal, by an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals. An immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals may reopen a case pursuant to 8 CFR 1003.2 and 8 CFR 1003.23 for the purpose of terminating a grant of asylum, or a withholding of deportation or removal. In such a reopened proceeding, the Service must establish, by a preponderance of evidence, one or more of the grounds set forth in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section. In addition, an immigration judge may terminate a grant of asylum, or a withholding of deportation or removal, made under the jurisdiction of USCIS at any time after the alien has been provided a notice of intent to terminate by USCIS. Any termination under this paragraph may occur in conjunction with an exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding.
(g) Termination of asylum for arriving aliens. If the Service determines that an applicant for admission who had previously been granted asylum in the United States falls within conditions set forth in § 208.24 and is inadmissible, the Service shall issue a notice of intent to terminate asylum and initiate removal proceedings under section 240 of the Act. The alien shall present his or her response to the intent to terminate during proceedings before the immigration judge.
[62 FR 10337, Mar. 6, 1997. Redesignated at 64 FR 8490, Feb. 19, 1999, and further redesignated and amended at 65 FR 76136, Dec. 6, 2000; 76 FR 53785, Aug. 29, 2011; 78 FR 22771, Apr. 17, 2013]
(a) Termination of asylum by USCIS. Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, an asylum officer may terminate a grant of asylum made under the jurisdiction of USCIS if, following an interview, the asylum officer determines that:
(1) There is a showing of fraud in the alien's application such that he or she was not eligible for asylum at the time it was granted;
(2) As to applications filed on or after April 1, 1997, one or more of the conditions described in section 208(c)(2) of the Act exist; or
(3) As to applications filed before April 1, 1997, the alien no longer has a well-founded fear of persecution upon return due to a change of country conditions in the alien's country of nationality or habitual residence or the alien has committed any act that would have been grounds for denial of asylum under § 208.13(c)(2).
(b) Termination of withholding of deportation or removal by USCIS. Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, an asylum officer may terminate a grant of withholding of deportation or removal made under the jurisdiction of USCIS if the asylum officer determines, following an interview, that:
(1) The alien is no longer entitled to withholding of deportation or removal because, owing to a fundamental change in circumstances relating to the original claim, the alien's life or freedom no longer would be threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion in the country from which deportation or removal was withheld.
(2) There is a showing of fraud in the alien's application such that the alien was not eligible for withholding of removal at the time it was granted;
(3) The alien has committed any other act that would have been grounds for denial of withholding of removal under section 241(b)(3)(B) of the Act had it occurred prior to the grant of withholding of removal; or
(4) For applications filed in proceedings commenced before April 1, 1997, the alien has committed any act that would have been grounds for denial of withholding of deportation under section 243(h)(2) of the Act.
(c) Procedure. Prior to the termination of a grant of asylum or withholding of deportation or removal, the alien shall be given notice of intent to terminate, with the reasons therefor, at least 30 days prior to the interview specified in paragraph (a) of this section before an asylum officer. The alien shall be provided the opportunity to present evidence showing that he or she is still eligible for asylum or withholding of deportation or removal. If the asylum officer determines that the alien is no longer eligible for asylum or withholding of deportation or removal, the alien shall be given written notice that asylum status or withholding of deportation or removal and any employment authorization issued pursuant thereto, are terminated.
(d) Termination of derivative status. The termination of asylum status for a person who was the principal applicant shall result in termination of the asylum status of a spouse or child whose status was based on the asylum application of the principal. Such termination shall not preclude the spouse or child of such alien from separately asserting an asylum or withholding of deportation or removal claim.
(e) Removal proceedings. When an alien's asylum status or withholding of removal or deportation is terminated under this section, the Service shall initiate removal proceedings, as appropriate, if the alien is not already in exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings. Removal proceedings may take place in conjunction with a termination hearing scheduled under § 208.24(f).
(f) Termination of asylum, or withholding of deportation or removal, by an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals. An immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals may reopen a case pursuant to 8 CFR 1003.2 and 8 CFR 1003.23 for the purpose of terminating a grant of asylum, or a withholding of deportation or removal. In such a reopened proceeding, the Service must establish, by a preponderance of evidence, one or more of the grounds set forth in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section. In addition, an immigration judge may terminate a grant of asylum, or a withholding of deportation or removal, made under the jurisdiction of USCIS at any time after the alien has been provided a notice of intent to terminate by USCIS. Any termination under this paragraph may occur in conjunction with an exclusion, deportation, or removal proceeding.
(g) Termination of asylum for arriving aliens. If the Service determines that an applicant for admission who had previously been granted asylum in the United States falls within conditions set forth in § 208.24 and is inadmissible, the Service shall issue a notice of intent to terminate asylum and initiate removal proceedings under section 240 of the Act. The alien shall present his or her response to the intent to terminate during proceedings before the immigration judge.
[62 FR 10337, Mar. 6, 1997. Redesignated at 64 FR 8490, Feb. 19, 1999, and further redesignated and amended at 65 FR 76136, Dec. 6, 2000; 76 FR 53785, Aug. 29, 2011; 78 FR 22771, Apr. 17, 2013]
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Why shouldn't he get the experience of an American prison before going back to go to prison in Singapore too?
His crime is an aggravated felony as defined in the statute and deportation is mandatory. It would be very suspicious if he isn't.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2023
As much as the additional suffering would be reassuring, I don't want wasted tax revenue spent on him.
creation
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2023
We can only hope that he gets in general population.
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2021
Deport him back to Singapore! I want to see the Singaporean government arrest him and post his execution video.
Berrakh
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2018
Everyone who gave him the benefit of the doubt, and hasn’t done a mea culpa for that, needs to be on a list
- Joined
- May 13, 2023
there were many youtubers but its been so long that i cant say any of their names with certainty
however, i did find the big fish, the one who really got the ball rolling, her name is Melissa Chen, VERY popular at the time
IIRC she was some kind of "hot girl thats on my side" to a lot of political youtubers, mostly anti-SJW and freedom of speech focused channels
she has since come out (201
and said "deport him" but that doesnt undo what was done, so yeah fuck her and the lot of themthese were the content of the tweets, in the article, between her and Andy Ngo
"If @AmosYee gets deported, I am all for it. He had a chance to become an activist protected by the US First Amendment. But he totally screwed it up."
"Whoa! But you campaigned endlessly for him."
"I think he deserved asylum. But that was before he went on supporting pedophilia and child porn. These views crossed the line into unprotected speech. He is on very shaky legal territory."
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2017
"Sit right down, Mr. Yee... and relax. This electroshock therapy will cure you of these thoughts...
...forever."
...forever."
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
I like how you can’t even seriously consider that quote from an intellectual perspective.
Trade Offer
Amos receives:
-Sexual gratification
The Child receives:
-anal/vaginal tearing
-psychological scarring
-body dysmorphia
-Incontinance
-Trust issues
Ah yes, I can see why such a trade would be consensual and beneficial to both sides.
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2021
This is why offenders should get life in prison.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2017
This is why offenders should get death in prison.
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2014
This is why the only the cure for pedos is a rope.
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2018
Even taking the fact he is a nonce out of the equation, Amos's need for attention, especially negative attention, would him a target for getting shanked. He's the type of guy who'd unintentionally snitch (get caught with paraphernalia and punished he would go on a hunger strike and point out every other prisoner has "paraphernalia" and would give examples (therefore snitching) to prove how he is 'right'). Couple this behavior with the fact he is a nonce he is someone that needs to be kept in protective because it is in every convicts benefit to shut this mouthy little idiot up permanently.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2022
There were a lot of youtubers that were pro-freeze peach and were using Amos as some kind of hero for standing up to the Singaporean government and calling a spade a spade. Then he was found to be promoting pedophilia and most of them called him out on Twatter or made some comment before launching into whatever video they were making.there were many youtubers but its been so long that i cant say any of their names with certainty
however, i did find the big fish, the one who really got the ball rolling, her name is Melissa Chen, VERY popular at the time
IIRC she was some kind of "hot girl thats on my side" to a lot of political youtubers, mostly anti-SJW and freedom of speech focused channels
she has since come out (201
these were the content of the tweets, in the article, between her and Andy Ngo
"If @AmosYee gets deported, I am all for it. He had a chance to become an activist protected by the US First Amendment. But he totally screwed it up."
"Whoa! But you campaigned endlessly for him."
"I think he deserved asylum. But that was before he went on supporting pedophilia and child porn. These views crossed the line into unprotected speech. He is on very shaky legal territory."
The only people that still support him are chomos themselves.
Nice. But he needs to suffer a bit more before being killed. I'm talking him getting caned so he can't sit down for a month. Then doing his time in a Singaporean prison for three years. Then after his time for doing military service is done he's brought in and they have the electric chair waiting for him.
Seriously. Guy needs to die in prison and never have the chance to get back out.
Death is too fast. They need to suffer before dying.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I am willing to contribute a few fractions of a penny to see this fucker separated from the children he wants to fuck for years to come.
Deport him back to Singapore after he at least gets a chance to experience Mutt's Law.
He's unfortunately so OBVIOUSLY a shanking/rape recipient that only an absolutely incompetent prison administration wouldn't put him in PC. Please, please be absolutely incompetent.
There are some legitimate criticisms of LKY and I can see why people aware of them would mistake this asshole for a political dissident at first. When it turned into "what if the child consents" is when that should have stopped, though.
That's dumb reasoning. His SPEECH was protected. You can't be arrested solely for saying you approve of child molestation. However, much like publicly advocating murder and giving details in public of a killing that could only be known by the actual killer, your speech may be evidence of actual criminal activity, or at least probable cause to suspect that searching your house might turn up evidence of such.
You aren't being punished in violation of the First Amendment if your own public statements reasonably lead to an investigation of you, since it isn't your speech that is being punished. It is your actual criminal activity.
Last edited: