Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Considering your countries main export is rape I'm not that shocked you don't want to answer.
You people have the IQ of a gnat lmao. No wonder you ain't getting pussy or dick.
Screenshot 2023-11-14 170636.png
You have to keep in mind that these are mentally ill Women doing this to themselves
Yeah and the cure is psychiatric interment
 
with all the women who complain about being catcalled and leered at starting in their young teens (and then missing it when they get older), does that actually provide some proof to the incel claim that that teen girls were having sex and starting families historically in europe? the age of consent in plenty of countries there is 13 or 14...
 
I haven't, cause unlike you negroes, I actually love women and have no reason to hate them.
I only wandered here because of KF users being delusional with their biology and reality denial lunacy
I didn't know you were a gypsy and that's a disappointment cause I enjoy your posts.

The djinn I was referencing is Freya, who posted not too long ago here.
 
On pooners:

If we step back from assessing gender dysphoria (or whatever you'd like to call it) as some sort of severe mental flaw (which it is) and instead just analyze it as a thought process that could occur naturally in any reasonable woman as she grows up (which it isn't), I can agree with nool in principle -- girls may be more likely to troon out to avoid being "eye-fucked" when they hit puberty because the majority of women, by nature, are passive creatures. It follows that a woman would never decide to become a pooner on her own, rather a man would have to coercively push her onto that path in some way. It's a mistake to try and hold women to account for the silliest of their own actions when it's patently obvious that they only do something:

a) because a man told them to do it and they feel they should do it;
b) because a man told them not to do it and they feel they should do it anyway;
c) because they feel they should do it in order to please a man;
d) because they feel they should do it in order to displease (or just avoid pleasing) a man.

This isn't to say it like it's a bad thing, it's just the way it is with 99.9999% of women, but it is to say that men are better than women because their action (regardless of moral value) is independent, comes first and then triggers some sort of response action in a woman. This "betterness" is not as much a moral judgment as it is a qualitative one, because men are better than women in the same sense that the first domino, if it were able to topple at will on its own, would be better than the dominos that would topple from the ensuing chain reaction.

I think it's important to keep this in mind when thinking as a father, a son, a husband, a brother or a friend to a woman. Hell, if I ever have a daughter and I knew it was a guarantee that there's a higher probability that her life would be ruined if creeps stared at her I'd want to poke them in the eyes myself but the problem is that individually I would never be able to be with her everywhere she goes everyday as soon as she starts hitting puberty.

Anyway, all this to say that I agree with nool that we need to either put on burqas on all girls that would get stared-at at some point between the ages of 8-12 (this excludes fats and uglies) for their own good so they don't troon out OR that there should be some type of beautiful new law drafted that deals (violently) with the disproportionate amount of creeps staring at teenage girls and making them troon-out. I rest my case.
 
that there should be some type of beautiful new law drafted that deals (violently) with the disproportionate amount of creeps staring at teenage girls and making them troon-out
Why not ban transitioning? How does the below make any sense:
- nature, biology driven behaviors (hornt) are to be controlled
- completely unnatural mutilation and self-harm pseudo-medical tit-butchering interventions should be allowed
 
It's a mistake to try and hold women to account for the silliest of their own actions when it's patently obvious that they only do something:

a) because a man told them to do it and they feel they should do it;
b) because a man told them not to do it and they feel they should do it anyway;
c) because they feel they should do it in order to please a man;
d) because they feel they should do it in order to displease (or just avoid pleasing) a man.

Hasn't it been well proven that women wear makeup to compete with other women? Even though, for guys, it's not really something that matters as much. Point being, women do a lot of thing not in response to men, but to other women. Seems to me the only people who hate women more than men are other women.

Point being, women are far more motivated to spite other women than they are to please men.
 
Anyway, all this to say that I agree with nool that we need to either put on burqas on all girls that would get stared-at at some point between the ages of 8-12 (this excludes fats and uglies) for their own good so they don't troon out OR that there should be some type of beautiful new law drafted that deals (violently) with the disproportionate amount of creeps staring at teenage girls and making them troon-out.
Or, and hear me out on this, we just teach our daughters that trooning out is not an option.
 
Now, talk to someone long enough and they'll tell you just about everything you'd want to know about themselves,
Women definitely do this way more than men, at least in my experience. Women that I have just met and barely know are more than happy to unload all of their personal shit with zero prompting. Genuinely had women I've known for a matter of weeks tell me about their therapy appointments and personal trauma. WTF, I barely know you.

Then they expect you to reciprocate and get really confused when I don't want to talk about my personal life to a stranger I barely know.
 
TBH, female-specific anxieties are a theme that always seem to land with me when expressed through art (no i dont mean performance artists shoving balls of paint up their cooter and queefing it out onto a canvas or a choir of incoherent, tits-out screeching)

I mean stuff like Silent Hill 3's pregnancy motifs, Rule of Rose's childhood cruelty, Carrie's telekinesis being an extension of her changing body.

There's a lot of as-of-yet unexplored subjects that can be sublimated into great works of Gender Terror/Horror, like Null's theory of contemporary women rejecting their own femininity when faced with pubescent sexualization.
 
Back